Heterosynaptic plasticity of the visuo-auditory projection requires cholecystokinin released from entorhinal cortex afferents

  1. Wenjian Sun
  2. Haohao Wu
  3. Yujie Peng
  4. Xuejiao Zheng
  5. Jing Li
  6. Dingxuan Zeng
  7. Peng Tang
  8. Ming Zhao
  9. Hemin Feng
  10. Hao Li
  11. Ye Liang
  12. Junfeng Su
  13. Xi Chen  Is a corresponding author
  14. Tomas Hökfelt  Is a corresponding author
  15. Jufang He  Is a corresponding author
  1. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. Karolinska Institute, Sweden
  3. City University of Hong Kong, China

Abstract

The entorhinal cortex is involved in establishing enduring visuo-auditory associative memory in the neocortex. Here we explored the mechanisms underlying this synaptic plasticity related to projections from the visual and entorhinal cortices to the auditory cortex in mice, using optogenetics of dual pathways. High-frequency laser stimulation (HFS laser) of the visuo-auditory projection did not induce long-term potentiation (LTP). However, after pairing with sound stimulus, the visuo-auditory inputs were potentiated following either infusion of cholecystokinin (CCK) or HFS laser of the entorhino-auditory CCK-expressing projection. Combining retrograde tracing and RNAscope in situ hybridization, we show that Cck expression is higher in entorhinal cortex neurons projecting to the auditory cortex than in those originating from the visual cortex. In the presence of CCK, potentiation in the neocortex occurred when the presynaptic input arrived 200 ms before postsynaptic firing, even after just five trials of pairing. Behaviorally, inactivation of the CCK+ projection from the entorhinal cortex to the auditory cortex blocked the formation of visuo-auditory associative memory. Our results indicate that neocortical visuo-auditory association is formed through heterosynaptic plasticity, which depends on release of CCK in the neocortex mostly from entorhinal afferents.

Data availability

Source Data files have been provided for figures 1 to 6 and supplementary figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wenjian Sun

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1584-8242
  2. Haohao Wu

    Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yujie Peng

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Xuejiao Zheng

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing Li

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8075-0650
  6. Dingxuan Zeng

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Peng Tang

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ming Zhao

    Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hemin Feng

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hao Li

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ye Liang

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Junfeng Su

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xi Chen

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    For correspondence
    xi.chen@cityu.edu.hk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2144-6584
  14. Tomas Hökfelt

    Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    Tomas.Hokfelt@ki.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jufang He

    Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    For correspondence
    jufanghe@cityu.edu.hk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4288-5957

Funding

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (General Research Fund,11103220M)

  • Jufang He

The Swedish Research Council (220-01688)

  • Tomas Hökfelt

Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B030340001)

  • Wenjian Sun

Wong Chun Hong Endowed Chair Professorship

  • Jufang He

Charlie Lee Charitable Foundation

  • Jufang He

Fong Shu Fook Tong Foundation

  • Jufang He

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (General Research Fund,11101521M)

  • Jufang He

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Collaborative Research Fund,C1043-21GF)

  • Jufang He

Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (Innovation and Technology Fund,MRP/053/18X)

  • Jufang He

Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission (Innovation and Technology Fund,GHP_075_19GD)

  • Jufang He

Hong Kong health bureau (Health and Medical Research Fund,06172456)

  • Xi Chen

Hong Kong health bureau (Health and Medical Research Fund,09203656)

  • Jufang He

The Swedish Research Council (2018-0273)

  • Tomas Hökfelt

The Arvid Carlsson Foundation

  • Tomas Hökfelt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Subjects Ethics Sub-Committees of City University of Hong Kong (Reference number of animal ethics review: A-59 and A-0467).

Copyright

© 2024, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 710
    views
  • 126
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wenjian Sun
  2. Haohao Wu
  3. Yujie Peng
  4. Xuejiao Zheng
  5. Jing Li
  6. Dingxuan Zeng
  7. Peng Tang
  8. Ming Zhao
  9. Hemin Feng
  10. Hao Li
  11. Ye Liang
  12. Junfeng Su
  13. Xi Chen
  14. Tomas Hökfelt
  15. Jufang He
(2024)
Heterosynaptic plasticity of the visuo-auditory projection requires cholecystokinin released from entorhinal cortex afferents
eLife 13:e83356.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83356

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83356

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Matthew R Kleinman, David J Foster
    Research Article

    Sequenced reactivations of hippocampal neurons called replays, concomitant with sharp-wave ripples in the local field potential, are critical for the consolidation of episodic memory, but whether replays depend on the brain’s reward or novelty signals is unknown. Here, we combined chemogenetic silencing of dopamine neurons in ventral tegmental area (VTA) and simultaneous electrophysiological recordings in dorsal hippocampal CA1, in freely behaving male rats experiencing changes to reward magnitude and environmental novelty. Surprisingly, VTA silencing did not prevent ripple increases where reward was increased, but caused dramatic, aberrant ripple increases where reward was unchanged. These increases were associated with increased reverse-ordered replays. On familiar tracks this effect disappeared, and ripples tracked reward prediction error (RPE), indicating that non-VTA reward signals were sufficient to direct replay. Our results reveal a novel dependence of hippocampal replay on dopamine, and a role for a VTA-independent RPE signal that is reliable only in familiar environments.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian ... Haiyan Wu
    Research Article

    Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.