Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is a cardinal feature of skeletal muscle atrophy. ROS refers to a collection of radical molecules whose cellular signals are vast, and it is unclear which downstream consequences of ROS are responsible for the loss of muscle mass and strength. Here we show that lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) are increased with age and disuse, and the accumulation of LOOH by deletion of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) is sufficient to augment muscle atrophy. LOOH promoted atrophy in a lysosomal-dependent, proteasomal-independent manner. In young and old mice, genetic and pharmacologic neutralization of LOOH or their secondary reactive lipid aldehydes robustly prevented muscle atrophy and weakness, indicating that LOOH-derived carbonyl stress mediates age- and disuse-induced muscle dysfunction. Our findings provide novel insights for the role of LOOH in sarcopenia including a therapeutic implication by pharmacologic suppression.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hiroaki Eshima

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Justin L Shahtout

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson

    Sciex, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    MacKenzie J Pearson, is affiliated with Sciex. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Patrick J Ferrara

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alexis W Lyons

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. John Alan Maschek

    Metabolomics Core Research Facility, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Alek D Peterlin

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2837-7446
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Jordan M Johnson

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Anahy Salcedo

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Edwin R Miranda

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ethan J Anderson

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sihem Boudina

    Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, College of Health,, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Qitao Ran

    Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. James E Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Micah J Drummond

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Katsuhiko Funai

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    kfunai@utah.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3802-4756

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK107397)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (HL149870)

  • Sihem Boudina

National Institutes of Health (HL139451)

  • Ziad S Mahmassani

National Institutes of Health (DK130555)

  • Alek D Peterlin

National Institutes of Health (AG073493)

  • Jonathan J Petrocelli

American Heart Association (915674)

  • Piyarat Siripoksup

American Heart Association (18PRE33960491)

  • Anthony RP Verkerke

American Heart Association (19PRE34380991)

  • Jordan M Johnson

Larry H. & Gail Miller Family Foundation (Predoctoral fellowship)

  • Patrick J Ferrara

Uehara Memorial Foundation (Postdoctoral fellowship)

  • Hiroaki Eshima

National Institutes of Health (DK127979)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (GM144613)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG074535)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG063077)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG050781)

  • Micah J Drummond

National Institutes of Health (HL122863)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG057006)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG064078)

  • Qitao Ran

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christopher Cardozo, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20-07007) of the University of Utah.

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from subjects. All procedures were approved by institutional IRB at the University of Utah and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Title 45, US Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, "Protection of Human Subjects."

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 20, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 1, 2022
  3. Accepted: March 22, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 5, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Eshima et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,864
    views
  • 340
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hiroaki Eshima
  2. Justin L Shahtout
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani
  6. Patrick J Ferrara
  7. Alexis W Lyons
  8. John Alan Maschek
  9. Alek D Peterlin
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke
  11. Jordan M Johnson
  12. Anahy Salcedo
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli
  14. Edwin R Miranda
  15. Ethan J Anderson
  16. Sihem Boudina
  17. Qitao Ran
  18. James E Cox
  19. Micah J Drummond
  20. Katsuhiko Funai
(2023)
Lipid hydroperoxides promote sarcopenia through carbonyl stress
eLife 12:e85289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mathieu C Husser, Nhat P Pham ... Alisa Piekny
    Tools and Resources

    Endogenous tags have become invaluable tools to visualize and study native proteins in live cells. However, generating human cell lines carrying endogenous tags is difficult due to the low efficiency of homology-directed repair. Recently, an engineered split mNeonGreen protein was used to generate a large-scale endogenous tag library in HEK293 cells. Using split mNeonGreen for large-scale endogenous tagging in human iPSCs would open the door to studying protein function in healthy cells and across differentiated cell types. We engineered an iPS cell line to express the large fragment of the split mNeonGreen protein (mNG21-10) and showed that it enables fast and efficient endogenous tagging of proteins with the short fragment (mNG211). We also demonstrate that neural network-based image restoration enables live imaging studies of highly dynamic cellular processes such as cytokinesis in iPSCs. This work represents the first step towards a genome-wide endogenous tag library in human stem cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.