Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is a cardinal feature of skeletal muscle atrophy. ROS refers to a collection of radical molecules whose cellular signals are vast, and it is unclear which downstream consequences of ROS are responsible for the loss of muscle mass and strength. Here we show that lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) are increased with age and disuse, and the accumulation of LOOH by deletion of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) is sufficient to augment muscle atrophy. LOOH promoted atrophy in a lysosomal-dependent, proteasomal-independent manner. In young and old mice, genetic and pharmacologic neutralization of LOOH or their secondary reactive lipid aldehydes robustly prevented muscle atrophy and weakness, indicating that LOOH-derived carbonyl stress mediates age- and disuse-induced muscle dysfunction. Our findings provide novel insights for the role of LOOH in sarcopenia including a therapeutic implication by pharmacologic suppression.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hiroaki Eshima

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Justin L Shahtout

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson

    Sciex, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    MacKenzie J Pearson, is affiliated with Sciex. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Patrick J Ferrara

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alexis W Lyons

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. John Alan Maschek

    Metabolomics Core Research Facility, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Alek D Peterlin

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2837-7446
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Jordan M Johnson

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Anahy Salcedo

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Edwin R Miranda

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ethan J Anderson

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sihem Boudina

    Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, College of Health,, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Qitao Ran

    Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. James E Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Micah J Drummond

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Katsuhiko Funai

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    kfunai@utah.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3802-4756

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK107397)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (HL149870)

  • Sihem Boudina

National Institutes of Health (HL139451)

  • Ziad S Mahmassani

National Institutes of Health (DK130555)

  • Alek D Peterlin

National Institutes of Health (AG073493)

  • Jonathan J Petrocelli

American Heart Association (915674)

  • Piyarat Siripoksup

American Heart Association (18PRE33960491)

  • Anthony RP Verkerke

American Heart Association (19PRE34380991)

  • Jordan M Johnson

Larry H. & Gail Miller Family Foundation (Predoctoral fellowship)

  • Patrick J Ferrara

Uehara Memorial Foundation (Postdoctoral fellowship)

  • Hiroaki Eshima

National Institutes of Health (DK127979)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (GM144613)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG074535)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG063077)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG050781)

  • Micah J Drummond

National Institutes of Health (HL122863)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG057006)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG064078)

  • Qitao Ran

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20-07007) of the University of Utah.

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from subjects. All procedures were approved by institutional IRB at the University of Utah and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Title 45, US Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, "Protection of Human Subjects."

Copyright

© 2023, Eshima et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,206
    views
  • 389
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hiroaki Eshima
  2. Justin L Shahtout
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani
  6. Patrick J Ferrara
  7. Alexis W Lyons
  8. John Alan Maschek
  9. Alek D Peterlin
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke
  11. Jordan M Johnson
  12. Anahy Salcedo
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli
  14. Edwin R Miranda
  15. Ethan J Anderson
  16. Sihem Boudina
  17. Qitao Ran
  18. James E Cox
  19. Micah J Drummond
  20. Katsuhiko Funai
(2023)
Lipid hydroperoxides promote sarcopenia through carbonyl stress
eLife 12:e85289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Surya Bansi Singh, Shatruhan Singh Rajput ... Deepa Subramanyam
    Research Article

    Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington's disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration-associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Evgenia Leikina, Jarred M Whitlock ... Leonid Chernomordik
    Research Article

    The bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts plays a critical role in the life-long remodeling of our bones that is perturbed in many bone loss diseases. Multinucleated osteoclasts are formed by the fusion of precursor cells, and larger cells – generated by an increased number of cell fusion events – have higher resorptive activity. We find that osteoclast fusion and bone resorption are promoted by reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling and by an unconventional low molecular weight species of La protein, located at the osteoclast surface. Here, we develop the hypothesis that La’s unique regulatory role in osteoclast multinucleation and function is controlled by an ROS switch in La trafficking. Using antibodies that recognize reduced or oxidized species of La, we find that differentiating osteoclasts enrich an oxidized species of La at the cell surface, which is distinct from the reduced La species conventionally localized within cell nuclei. ROS signaling triggers the shift from reduced to oxidized La species, its dephosphorylation and delivery to the surface of osteoclasts, where La promotes multinucleation and resorptive activity. Moreover, intracellular ROS signaling in differentiating osteoclasts oxidizes critical cysteine residues in the C-terminal half of La, producing this unconventional La species that promotes osteoclast fusion. Our findings suggest that redox signaling induces changes in the location and function of La and may represent a promising target for novel skeletal therapies.