Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is a cardinal feature of skeletal muscle atrophy. ROS refers to a collection of radical molecules whose cellular signals are vast, and it is unclear which downstream consequences of ROS are responsible for the loss of muscle mass and strength. Here we show that lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) are increased with age and disuse, and the accumulation of LOOH by deletion of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) is sufficient to augment muscle atrophy. LOOH promoted atrophy in a lysosomal-dependent, proteasomal-independent manner. In young and old mice, genetic and pharmacologic neutralization of LOOH or their secondary reactive lipid aldehydes robustly prevented muscle atrophy and weakness, indicating that LOOH-derived carbonyl stress mediates age- and disuse-induced muscle dysfunction. Our findings provide novel insights for the role of LOOH in sarcopenia including a therapeutic implication by pharmacologic suppression.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hiroaki Eshima

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Justin L Shahtout

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson

    Sciex, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    MacKenzie J Pearson, is affiliated with Sciex. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Patrick J Ferrara

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alexis W Lyons

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. John Alan Maschek

    Metabolomics Core Research Facility, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Alek D Peterlin

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2837-7446
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Jordan M Johnson

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Anahy Salcedo

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Edwin R Miranda

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ethan J Anderson

    Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sihem Boudina

    Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, College of Health,, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Qitao Ran

    Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. James E Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Micah J Drummond

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Katsuhiko Funai

    Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    kfunai@utah.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3802-4756

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK107397)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (HL149870)

  • Sihem Boudina

National Institutes of Health (HL139451)

  • Ziad S Mahmassani

National Institutes of Health (DK130555)

  • Alek D Peterlin

National Institutes of Health (AG073493)

  • Jonathan J Petrocelli

American Heart Association (915674)

  • Piyarat Siripoksup

American Heart Association (18PRE33960491)

  • Anthony RP Verkerke

American Heart Association (19PRE34380991)

  • Jordan M Johnson

Larry H. & Gail Miller Family Foundation (Predoctoral fellowship)

  • Patrick J Ferrara

Uehara Memorial Foundation (Postdoctoral fellowship)

  • Hiroaki Eshima

National Institutes of Health (DK127979)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (GM144613)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG074535)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG063077)

  • Katsuhiko Funai

National Institutes of Health (AG050781)

  • Micah J Drummond

National Institutes of Health (HL122863)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG057006)

  • Ethan J Anderson

National Institutes of Health (AG064078)

  • Qitao Ran

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christopher Cardozo, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20-07007) of the University of Utah.

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from subjects. All procedures were approved by institutional IRB at the University of Utah and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Title 45, US Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, "Protection of Human Subjects."

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 20, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 1, 2022
  3. Accepted: March 22, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 5, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Eshima et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,056
    views
  • 363
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hiroaki Eshima
  2. Justin L Shahtout
  3. Piyarat Siripoksup
  4. MacKenzie J Pearson
  5. Ziad S Mahmassani
  6. Patrick J Ferrara
  7. Alexis W Lyons
  8. John Alan Maschek
  9. Alek D Peterlin
  10. Anthony RP Verkerke
  11. Jordan M Johnson
  12. Anahy Salcedo
  13. Jonathan J Petrocelli
  14. Edwin R Miranda
  15. Ethan J Anderson
  16. Sihem Boudina
  17. Qitao Ran
  18. James E Cox
  19. Micah J Drummond
  20. Katsuhiko Funai
(2023)
Lipid hydroperoxides promote sarcopenia through carbonyl stress
eLife 12:e85289.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85289

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Toshiharu Ichinose, Shu Kondo ... Hiromu Tanimoto
    Research Article

    Multicellular organisms are composed of specialized cell types with distinct proteomes. While recent advances in single-cell transcriptome analyses have revealed differential expression of mRNAs, cellular diversity in translational profiles remains underinvestigated. By performing RNA-seq and Ribo-seq in genetically defined cells in the Drosophila brain, we here revealed substantial post-transcriptional regulations that augment the cell-type distinctions at the level of protein expression. Specifically, we found that translational efficiency of proteins fundamental to neuronal functions, such as ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors, was maintained low in glia, leading to their preferential translation in neurons. Notably, distribution of ribosome footprints on these mRNAs exhibited a remarkable bias toward the 5′ leaders in glia. Using transgenic reporter strains, we provide evidence that the small upstream open-reading frames in the 5’ leader confer selective translational suppression in glia. Overall, these findings underscore the profound impact of translational regulation in shaping the proteomics for cell-type distinction and provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms driving cell-type diversity.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.