High-throughput mapping of single-neuron projection and molecular features by retrograde barcoded labeling

Abstract

Deciphering patterns of connectivity between neurons in the brain is a critical step toward understanding brain function. Imaging-based neuroanatomical tracing identifies area-to-area or sparse neuron-to-neuron connectivity patterns, but with limited throughput. Barcode-based connectomics maps large numbers of single-neuron projections, but remains a challenge for jointly analyzing single-cell transcriptomics. Here, we established a rAAV2-retro barcode-based multiplexed tracing method that simultaneously characterizes the projectome and transcriptome at the single neuron level. We uncovered dedicated and collateral projection patterns of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) neurons to five downstream targets and found that projection-defined vmPFC neurons are molecularly heterogeneous. We identified transcriptional signatures of projection-specific vmPFC neurons, and verified Pou3f1 as a marker gene enriched in neurons projecting to the lateral hypothalamus, denoting a distinct subset with collateral projections to both dorsomedial striatum and lateral hypothalamus. In summary, we have developed a new multiplexed technique whose paired connectome and gene expression data can help reveal organizational principles that form neural circuits and process information.

Data availability

Raw gene expression, barcode count matrices and metadata were available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE210174). The computational code used in the study is available at GitHub (https://github.com/MichaelPeibo/MERGE-seq-analysis). The data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper can be downloaded at https://figshare.com/projects/High-throughput_mapping_of_single-neuron_projection_and_molecular_features_by_retrograde_barcoded_labeling/150207. All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials and source data files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peibo Xu

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    michaelxupb@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jian Peng

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tingli Yuan

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6676-8790
  4. Zhaoqin Chen

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hui He

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ziyan Wu

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ting Li

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiaodong Li

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2459-8778
  9. Luyue Wang

    CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Le Gao

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jun Yan

    Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shangjai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Wu Wei

    CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Chengyu T Li

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    tonylicy@lglab.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Zhen-Ge Luo

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    luozhg@shanghaitech.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-0542
  15. Yuejun Chen

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    yuejunchen@ion.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4625-2604

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0108000)

  • Yuejun Chen

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170806)

  • Yuejun Chen

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32130035)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Thousand Young Talents Program of China

  • Yuejun Chen

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021ZD0202500)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted according to a protocol approved by the IACUC at the Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technol- ogy of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). (reference number for approval: NA-034-2022).

Copyright

© 2024, Xu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,515
    views
  • 398
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peibo Xu
  2. Jian Peng
  3. Tingli Yuan
  4. Zhaoqin Chen
  5. Hui He
  6. Ziyan Wu
  7. Ting Li
  8. Xiaodong Li
  9. Luyue Wang
  10. Le Gao
  11. Jun Yan
  12. Wu Wei
  13. Chengyu T Li
  14. Zhen-Ge Luo
  15. Yuejun Chen
(2024)
High-throughput mapping of single-neuron projection and molecular features by retrograde barcoded labeling
eLife 13:e85419.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85419

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85419

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.

    1. Neuroscience
    Markus R Tünte, Stefanie Hoehl ... Ezgi Kayhan
    Research Advance

    Several recent theoretical accounts have posited that interoception, the perception of internal bodily signals, plays a vital role in early human development. Yet, empirical evidence of cardiac interoceptive sensitivity in infants to date has been mixed. Furthermore, existing evidence does not go beyond the perception of cardiac signals and focuses only on the age of 5–7 mo, limiting the generalizability of the results. Here, we used a modified version of the cardiac interoceptive sensitivity paradigm introduced by Maister et al., 2017 in 3-, 9-, and 18-mo-old infants using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Going beyond, we introduce a novel experimental paradigm, namely the iBREATH, to investigate respiratory interoceptive sensitivity in infants. Overall, for cardiac interoceptive sensitivity (total n=135) we find rather stable evidence across ages with infants on average preferring stimuli presented synchronously to their heartbeat. For respiratory interoceptive sensitivity (total n=120) our results show a similar pattern in the first year of life, but not at 18 mo. We did not observe a strong relationship between cardiac and respiratory interoceptive sensitivity at 3 and 9 mo but found some evidence for a relationship at 18 mo. We validated our results using specification curve- and mega-analytic approaches. By examining early cardiac and respiratory interoceptive processing, we provide evidence that infants are sensitive to their interoceptive signals.