Cell type-specific connectome predicts distributed working memory activity in the mouse brain

  1. Xingyu Ding
  2. Sean Froudist-Walsh
  3. Jorge Jaramillo
  4. Junjie Jiang
  5. Xiao-Jing Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  3. University of Göttingen, Germany
  4. Xi'an Jiaotong University, China

Abstract

Recent advances in connectome and neurophysiology make it possible to probe whole-brain mechanisms of cognition and behavior. We developed a large-scale model of the mouse multiregional brain for a cardinal cognitive function called working memory, the brain's ability to internally hold and process information without sensory input. The model is built on mesoscopic connectome data for inter-areal cortical connections and endowed with a macroscopic gradient of measured parvalbumin-expressing interneuron density. We found that working memory coding is distributed yet exhibits modularity; the spatial pattern of mnemonic representation is determined by long-range cell type-specific targeting and density of cell classes. Cell type-specific graph measures predict the activity patterns and a core subnetwork for memory maintenance. The model shows numerous self-sustained internal states (each engaging a distinct subset of areas). This work provides a framework to interpret large-scale recordings of brain activity during cognition, while highlighting the need for cell type-specific connectomics.

Data availability

The current manuscript is predominantly a computational study. Consequently, no new data was generated. However, the modeling code that underpins our findings has been made publicly available on GitHub, accessible via https://github.com/XY-DIng/mouse_dist_wm

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xingyu Ding

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sean Froudist-Walsh

    Bristol Computational Neuroscience Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jorge Jaramillo

    Campus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Junjie Jiang

    Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2930-7770
  5. Xiao-Jing Wang

    Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    xjwang@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3124-8474

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01MH062349)

  • Xiao-Jing Wang

Office of Naval Research (N00014)

  • Xiao-Jing Wang

National Science Foundation (NeuroNex grant,2015276)

  • Xiao-Jing Wang

Simons Foundation (543057SPI)

  • Xiao-Jing Wang

National Institutes of Health (U19NS123714)

  • Xiao-Jing Wang

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X013243/1)

  • Sean Froudist-Walsh

University of Bristol (Neuroscience of Mental Health Award)

  • Sean Froudist-Walsh

National Institutes of Health (U19NS123714)

  • Jorge Jaramillo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Carlos D Brody, Princeton University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 5, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 8, 2022
  3. Accepted: December 14, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 4, 2024 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 24, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2024, Ding et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,698
    views
  • 332
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xingyu Ding
  2. Sean Froudist-Walsh
  3. Jorge Jaramillo
  4. Junjie Jiang
  5. Xiao-Jing Wang
(2024)
Cell type-specific connectome predicts distributed working memory activity in the mouse brain
eLife 13:e85442.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85442

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85442

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kenta Abe, Yuki Kambe ... Tatsuo Sato
    Research Article

    Midbrain dopamine neurons impact neural processing in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) through mesocortical projections. However, the signals conveyed by dopamine projections to the PFC remain unclear, particularly at the single-axon level. Here, we investigated dopaminergic axonal activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) during reward and aversive processing. By optimizing microprism-mediated two-photon calcium imaging of dopamine axon terminals, we found diverse activity in dopamine axons responsive to both reward and aversive stimuli. Some axons exhibited a preference for reward, while others favored aversive stimuli, and there was a strong bias for the latter at the population level. Long-term longitudinal imaging revealed that the preference was maintained in reward- and aversive-preferring axons throughout classical conditioning in which rewarding and aversive stimuli were paired with preceding auditory cues. However, as mice learned to discriminate reward or aversive cues, a cue activity preference gradually developed only in aversive-preferring axons. We inferred the trial-by-trial cue discrimination based on machine learning using anticipatory licking or facial expressions, and found that successful discrimination was accompanied by sharper selectivity for the aversive cue in aversive-preferring axons. Our findings indicate that a group of mesocortical dopamine axons encodes aversive-related signals, which are modulated by both classical conditioning across days and trial-by-trial discrimination within a day.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    Working memory enables us to bridge past sensory information to upcoming future behaviour. Accordingly, by its very nature, working memory is concerned with two components: the past and the future. Yet, in conventional laboratory tasks, these two components are often conflated, such as when sensory information in working memory is encoded and tested at the same location. We developed a task in which we dissociated the past (encoded location) and future (to-be-tested location) attributes of visual contents in working memory. This enabled us to independently track the utilisation of past and future memory attributes through gaze, as observed during mnemonic selection. Our results reveal the joint consideration of past and future locations. This was prevalent even at the single-trial level of individual saccades that were jointly biased to the past and future. This uncovers the rich nature of working memory representations, whereby both past and future memory attributes are retained and can be accessed together when memory contents become relevant for behaviour.