Differential ripple propagation along the hippocampal longitudinal axis

  1. Roberto de Filippo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Dietmar Schmitz  Is a corresponding author
  1. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Hippocampal ripples are highly synchronous neural events critical for memory consolidation and retrieval. A minority of strong ripples has been shown to be of particular importance in situations of increased memory demands. The propagation dynamics of strong ripples inside the hippocampal formation are, however, still opaque. We analyzed ripple propagation within the hippocampal formation in a large open access dataset comprising 267 Neuropixel recordings in 49 awake, head-fixed mice. Surprisingly, strong ripples (top 10% in ripple strength) propagate differentially depending on their generation point along the hippocampal longitudinal axis. The septal hippocampal pole is able to generate longer ripples that engage more neurons and elicit spiking activity for an extended time even at considerable distances. Accordingly, a substantial portion of the variance in strong ripple duration (R² = 0.463) is explained by the ripple generation location on the longitudinal axis, in agreement with a possible distinctive role of the hippocampal septal pole in conditions of high memory demand. Moreover, we observed that the location of the ripple generation has a significant impact on the spiking rate modulation of different hippocampal subfields, even before the onset of the ripple. This finding suggests that ripple generation location plays a crucial role in shaping the neural activity across the hippocampus.

Data availability

All the code used to process the dataset is available at https://github.com/RobertoDF/De-Filippo-et-al-2022, pre-computed data structures can be downloaded at 10.6084/m9.figshare.20209913. All figures and text can be reproduced using code present in this repository, each number present in the text is directly linked to a python data structure. The original dataset is provided by the Allen Institute and available at https://allensdk.readthedocs.io/en/latest/visual_coding_neuropixels.html.

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Siegle JH
    2. Jia X
    3. Durand S
    4. et al
    (2021) Visual Coding - Neuropixels
    https://knowledge.brain-map.org/data/4YYLRZZGK82FQ85NIH8/summary.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roberto de Filippo

    Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    roberto.de-filippo@charite.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4085-9114
  2. Dietmar Schmitz

    Neuroscience Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    dschmitz-office@charite.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2741-5241

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (184695641 - SFB 958)

  • Dietmar Schmitz

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (327654276 - SFB 1315)

  • Dietmar Schmitz

European Research Council (810580)

  • Roberto de Filippo

NeuroCure Exzellenzcluster (Exc-2049-390688087)

  • Dietmar Schmitz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Liset M de la Prida, Instituto Cajal, Spain

Version history

  1. Received: December 9, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: December 22, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 12, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 13, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 24, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, de Filippo & Schmitz

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,196
    views
  • 190
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Roberto de Filippo
  2. Dietmar Schmitz
(2023)
Differential ripple propagation along the hippocampal longitudinal axis
eLife 12:e85488.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85488

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85488

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.