(A) Performance index (PI) (mean ± SD) during the acquisition of the six original PAs (OPAs) (S1–2, 4–8, 10–17) and NPAs (S19) of the control (n=8), hM4Di-CNO (n=15), and rescue (hM4Di-CNO+L-lactate) (n=7) groups. From S6 onward, hM4Di-CNO group consistently showed lower PI compared to control. However, concurrent L-lactate administration into the ACC (rescue group) can rescue this impairment. (B) PI (mean ± SD) of hM4Di-CNO group (n=8) from S21 onward showing gradual increase in PI when CNO was withdrawn. (C, D, and E) Non-rewarded PTs (PT1, PT2, and PT3 conducted on S3, S9, and S18, respectively) to test memory retrieval of OPAs for the control, hM4Di-CNO, and rescue groups. The percentage of digging time at the cued location relative to that at the non-cued locations are shown (mean ± SD). In both PT2 and PT3, the control group spent significantly more time digging the cued sand well above the chance level, indicating that the rats learned OPAs and could retrieve it. Contrasting to this, hM4Di-CNO group did not spend more time digging the cued sand well above the chance level irrespective of CNO administration before the PTs. The rescue group showed results similar to the hM4Di-CNO group if CNO is given without L-lactate. On the other hand, they showed results similar to the control group if L-lactate is concurrently given with CNO, indicating that this group learned OPAs and could retrieve it. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, one-sample t-test comparing the proportion of digging time at the cued sand well with the chance level of 16.67%. Non-rewarded PT4 (S20) which was conducted after replacing two OPAs with two NPAs (NPAs 7 and 8) in S19 for the control, hM4Di-CNO, and rescue groups. Results show that the control group spent significantly more time digging the new cued sand well above the chance level indicating that the rats learned the NPAs from S19 and could retrieve it in this PT. Contrasting to this, hM4Di-CNO group did not spend more time digging the new cued sand well above the chance level irrespective of CNO administration before the PT. The rescue group showed results similar to the hM4Di-CNO group if CNO is given without L-lactate. On the other hand, they showed results similar to the control group if L-lactate is concurrently given with CNO indicating that this group learned NPAs from S19 and could retrieve it. ***p<0.001, one-sample t-test comparing the proportion of digging time at the new cued sand well with the chance level of 16.67%. (G, H, and I) Non-rewarded PTs (PT5, PT6, and PT7 conducted on S23, S27, and S33, respectively) to test memory retrieval of OPAs for the hM4Di-CNO group. In both PT6 and PT7, the rats spent significantly more time digging the cued sand well above the chance level if the tests are done without CNO, indicating that the rats learned the OPAs and could retrieve it. However, CNO prevented memory retrieval during these PTs. ***p<0.001, one-sample t-test comparing the proportion of digging time at the cued sand well with the chance level of 16.67%. Non-rewarded PT4 (S35) which was conducted after replacing two OPAs with two NPAs (NPAs 9 and 10) in S34 for the hM4Di-CNO group. Results show that the rats spent significantly more time digging the new cued sand well above the chance level if CNO was not given before the PT, indicating that the rats learned the NPAs from S34 and could retrieve it in this PT. However, if CNO is given before the PT, the retrieval is impaired. ***p<0.001, one-sample t-test comparing the proportion of digging time at the new cued sand well with the chance level of 16.67%. (K and L) Latency (in seconds) before commencing digging at the correct well. Data shown as mean ± SD. (M, N, and O) Continuation study (S21–34) with the rescue group (n=5). The PI (mean ± SD) is shown in (M). PT5 and PT6 (conducted at S23 and S28, respectively) are shown in (N). PT7, which was conducted twice, is shown in (O). In S21, PI was 75.3 ± 4.5% for the six OPAs without CNO or L-lactate. For S22–28, two OPAs were replaced with two NPAs (NPAs 9 and 10). In S22, which was conducted with CNO only, PI dropped to 63.3 ± 5.6%. PT5 (N) confirms that the rats did not learn the NPAs 9 and 10 from S21. In S24–26, which were conducted with CNO only, PI remained similarly low (69.3 ± 4.9%, 66 ± 7.7%, and 66 ± 5.7%, respectively), indicating that the rats were not learning the NPAs 9 and 10 despite multiple sessions. In S27, which was conducted with CNO+L-lactate, PI raised to 74 ± 5.7%, suggesting that they have learned the NPAs in this session. This was confirmed by PT6 (N) which showed that they spent significantly more time in digging the new cued sand well above the chance level. In S29–34, the six OPAs were restored. Studies in these sessions showed that PI drops from ∼77% to ∼64% even for the OPAs if L-lactate is not given concurrently with CNO. Furthermore, PT7 (S34) (O) shows that CNO administration before PT impairs memory retrieval of existing associative schema which can be rescued by administering L-lactate concurrently. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, one-sample t-test comparing the proportion of digging time at the cued sand well with the chance level of 16.67%.