Id2 GABAergic interneurons comprise a neglected fourth major group of cortical inhibitory cells

  1. Robert Machold
  2. Shlomo Dellal
  3. Manuel Valero
  4. Hector Zurita
  5. Illya Kruglikov
  6. John Hongyu Meng
  7. Jessica L Hanson
  8. Yoshiko Hashikawa
  9. Benjamin Schuman
  10. György Buzsáki
  11. Bernardo Rudy  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Spain
  3. University of Colorado Boulder, United States

Abstract

Cortical GABAergic interneurons (INs) represent a diverse population of mainly locally projecting cells that provide specialized forms of inhibition to pyramidal neurons and other INs. Most recent work on INs has focused on subtypes distinguished by expression of Parvalbumin (PV), Somatostatin (SST), or Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP). However, a fourth group that includes neurogliaform cells (NGFCs) has been less well characterized due to a lack of genetic tools. Here, we show that these INs can be accessed experimentally using intersectional genetics with the gene Id2. We find that outside of layer 1 (L1), the majority of Id2 INs are NGFCs that express high levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and exhibit a late-spiking firing pattern, with extensive local connectivity. While much sparser, non-NGFC Id2 INs had more variable properties, with most cells corresponding to a diverse group of INs that strongly expresses the neuropeptide CCK. In vivo, using silicon probe recordings, we observed several distinguishing aspects of NGFC activity, including a strong rebound in activity immediately following the cortical down state during NREM sleep. Our study provides insights into IN diversity and NGFC distribution and properties, and outlines an intersectional genetics approach for further study of this underappreciated group of INs.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, 4, Table 1, Figure 1 - figure supplement 1 and Figure 1 - figure supplement 2.

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Yao et al.
    (2021) Whole Cortex and Hippocampus - 10x genomics (2020) with 10x-Smart-Seq Taxonomy
    https://portal.brain-map.org/atlases-and-data/rnaseq/mouse-whole-cortex-and-hippocampus-10x.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Robert Machold

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6261-496X
  2. Shlomo Dellal

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Manuel Valero

    Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hector Zurita

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Illya Kruglikov

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. John Hongyu Meng

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jessica L Hanson

    Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yoshiko Hashikawa

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Benjamin Schuman

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. György Buzsáki

    Neuroscience Institute, Langone Medical Center, Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3100-4800
  11. Bernardo Rudy

    Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    Bernardo.Rudy@nyulangone.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1367-7136

Funding

National Institutes of Health (P01NS074972)

  • Bernardo Rudy

National Institutes of Health (R01NS110079)

  • Bernardo Rudy

National Institutes of Health (U19NS107616)

  • György Buzsáki

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental animals were handled with care to minimize suffering in accordance with institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols approved by the Division of Comparative Medicine at the NYU Langone Medical Center for Dr. Bernardo Rudy's lab (#IA15-01465 and #IA15-01473).

Copyright

© 2023, Machold et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,500
    views
  • 247
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Robert Machold
  2. Shlomo Dellal
  3. Manuel Valero
  4. Hector Zurita
  5. Illya Kruglikov
  6. John Hongyu Meng
  7. Jessica L Hanson
  8. Yoshiko Hashikawa
  9. Benjamin Schuman
  10. György Buzsáki
  11. Bernardo Rudy
(2023)
Id2 GABAergic interneurons comprise a neglected fourth major group of cortical inhibitory cells
eLife 12:e85893.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85893

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85893

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nicolas Langer, Maurice Weber ... Ce Zhang
    Tools and Resources

    Memory deficits are a hallmark of many different neurological and psychiatric conditions. The Rey–Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) is the state-of-the-art assessment tool for neuropsychologists across the globe to assess the degree of non-verbal visual memory deterioration. To obtain a score, a trained clinician inspects a patient’s ROCF drawing and quantifies deviations from the original figure. This manual procedure is time-consuming, slow and scores vary depending on the clinician’s experience, motivation, and tiredness. Here, we leverage novel deep learning architectures to automatize the rating of memory deficits. For this, we collected more than 20k hand-drawn ROCF drawings from patients with various neurological and psychiatric disorders as well as healthy participants. Unbiased ground truth ROCF scores were obtained from crowdsourced human intelligence. This dataset was used to train and evaluate a multihead convolutional neural network. The model performs highly unbiased as it yielded predictions very close to the ground truth and the error was similarly distributed around zero. The neural network outperforms both online raters and clinicians. The scoring system can reliably identify and accurately score individual figure elements in previously unseen ROCF drawings, which facilitates explainability of the AI-scoring system. To ensure generalizability and clinical utility, the model performance was successfully replicated in a large independent prospective validation study that was pre-registered prior to data collection. Our AI-powered scoring system provides healthcare institutions worldwide with a digital tool to assess objectively, reliably, and time-efficiently the performance in the ROCF test from hand-drawn images.