The Impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening and treatment in older adults: the multiethnic cohort study
- University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States
- University of California, San Francisco, United States
- University of Southern California, United States
Abstract
Background: The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the health and day-to-day life of individuals, especially the elderly and people with certain pre-existing medical conditions, including cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate how COVID-19 impacted access to cancer screenings and treatment, by studying the participants in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study.
Methods: The MEC has been following over 215,000 residents of Hawai'i and Los Angeles for the development of cancer and other chronic diseases since 1993-1996. It includes men and women of five racial and ethnic groups: African American, Japanese American, Latino, Native Hawaiian, and White. In 2020, surviving participants were sent an invitation to complete an online survey on the impact of COVID-19 on their daily life activities, including adherence to cancer screening and treatment. Approximately 7,000 MEC participants responded. A cross-sectional analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between the postponement of regular health care visits and cancer screening procedures or treatment with race and ethnicity, age, education, and comorbidity.
Results: Women with more education, women with lung disease, COPD, or asthma, and women and men diagnosed with cancer in the past 5 years were more likely to postpone any cancer screening test/procedure due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Groups less likely to postpone cancer screening included older women compared to younger women and Japanese American men and women compared to White men and women.
Conclusions: This study revealed specific associations of race/ethnicity, age, education level, and comorbidities with the cancer-related screening and healthcare of MEC participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased monitoring of patients in high-risk groups for cancer and other diseases is of the utmost importance as the chance of undiagnosed cases or poor prognosis is increased as a result of delayed screening and treatment.
Funding: This research was partially supported by the Omidyar 'Ohana Foundation and grant U01 CA164973 from the National Cancer Institute.
Data availability
The Multiethnic Cohort welcomes applications from researchers to maximize the utility of the MEC data and/or specimens for prevention and etiological research on cancer and other chronic diseases. For access, a research application is required. To request access to the MEC resource for data analyses or ancillary studies, and to submit an application, please visit https://www.uhcancercenter.org/for-researchers/mec-data-sharing for further instructions. You will need to request an account in the system if you do not already have one. Proposals for access to MEC data or biospecimen are reviewed quarterly by the MEC Research Committee (MECRC) and must be submitted by the following deadlines: December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1. All applications are reviewed by the MECRC following a standard procedure. The Statistical Analysis System (SAS), version 9.4 codes used for this study are available upon request. If you have questions please contact Gail Ichida at gichida@cc.hawaii.edu.
Article and author information
Author details
Christopher A Haiman
Funding
Hawaii Community Foundation (Omidyar 'Ohana Fund,20DA-101546)
- Loic Le Marchand
National Cancer Institute (U01 CA164973)
- Lynne R Wilkens
- Christopher A Haiman
- Loic Le Marchand
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Eduardo L Franco, McGill University, Canada
Ethics
Human subjects: All participants provided informed consent before filling out the survey. The study was approved by the IRBs of the University of Hawaii (CHS 9575) and the University of Southern California (HS-17-00714).
Version history
- Received: January 31, 2023
- Preprint posted: February 23, 2023 (view preprint)
- Accepted: June 12, 2023
- Accepted Manuscript published: June 27, 2023 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: November 13, 2023 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2023, Mak et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 564
- views
-
- 91
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
The Impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening and treatment in older adults: the multiethnic cohort study
eLife 12:e86562.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86562
Further reading
-
- Epidemiology and Global Health
We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or nonrandomized research. Additionally, we offer advice to help investigators, editors, reviewers, and readers make more informed decisions about conducting and interpreting research where the influence of covariates may be at issue. We primarily address misperceptions in the context of statistical management of the covariates through various forms of modeling, although we also emphasize design and model or variable selection. Other approaches to addressing the effects of covariates, including matching, have logical extensions from what we discuss here but are not dwelled upon heavily. The misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes we discuss include accurate representation of covariates, effects of measurement error, overreliance on covariate categorization, underestimation of power loss when controlling for covariates, misinterpretation of significance in statistical models, and misconceptions about confounding variables, selecting on a collider, and p value interpretations in covariate-inclusive analyses. This condensed overview serves to correct common errors and improve research quality in general and in nutrition research specifically.
-
- Ecology
- Epidemiology and Global Health
Zoonotic disease dynamics in wildlife hosts are rarely quantified at macroecological scales due to the lack of systematic surveys. Non-human primates (NHPs) host Plasmodium knowlesi, a zoonotic malaria of public health concern and the main barrier to malaria elimination in Southeast Asia. Understanding of regional P. knowlesi infection dynamics in wildlife is limited. Here, we systematically assemble reports of NHP P. knowlesi and investigate geographic determinants of prevalence in reservoir species. Meta-analysis of 6322 NHPs from 148 sites reveals that prevalence is heterogeneous across Southeast Asia, with low overall prevalence and high estimates for Malaysian Borneo. We find that regions exhibiting higher prevalence in NHPs overlap with human infection hotspots. In wildlife and humans, parasite transmission is linked to land conversion and fragmentation. By assembling remote sensing data and fitting statistical models to prevalence at multiple spatial scales, we identify novel relationships between P. knowlesi in NHPs and forest fragmentation. This suggests that higher prevalence may be contingent on habitat complexity, which would begin to explain observed geographic variation in parasite burden. These findings address critical gaps in understanding regional P. knowlesi epidemiology and indicate that prevalence in simian reservoirs may be a key spatial driver of human spillover risk.
