Functionally refined encoding of threat memory by distinct populations of basal forebrain cholinergic projection neurons

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  2. Mala R Ananth
  3. Ronald Kim
  4. Richard B Crouse
  5. Li Jiang
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández
  7. Chongbo Zhong
  8. Christian Arty
  9. Shaohua Wang
  10. Alice Jone
  11. Niraj S Desai
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Marina R Picciotto
  14. Lorna W Role  Is a corresponding author
  15. David A Talmage  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, United States
  2. Yale University, United States
  3. Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, United States
  4. LinkedIn, United States
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States
  6. Steris, United States
  7. Peking University, China

Abstract

Neurons of the basal forebrain nucleus basalis and posterior substantia innominata (NBM/SIp) comprise the major source of cholinergic input to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using a genetically-encoded acetylcholine (ACh) sensor in mice, we demonstrate that BLA-projecting cholinergic neurons can 'learn' the association between a naïve tone and a foot shock (training) and release ACh in the BLA in response to the conditioned tone 24h later (recall). In the NBM/SIp cholinergic neurons express the immediate early gene, Fos following both training and memory recall. Cholinergic neurons that express Fos following memory recall display increased intrinsic excitability. Chemogenetic silencing of these learning-activated cholinergic neurons prevents expression of the defensive behavior to the tone. In contrast, we show that NBM/SIp cholinergic neurons are not activated by an innately threatening stimulus (predator odor). Instead, VP/SIa cholinergic neurons are activated and contribute to defensive behaviors in response to predator odor, an innately threatening stimulus. Taken together, we find that distinct populations of cholinergic neurons are recruited to signal distinct aversive stimuli, demonstrating functionally refined organization of specific types of memory within the cholinergic basal forebrain of mice.

Data availability

Source data for the fiber photometry experiments presented in Figure 1 and supplements are provided as individual source data files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9893-3025
  2. Mala R Ananth

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ronald Kim

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Richard B Crouse

    Office of New Haven Affairs, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9509-9263
  5. Li Jiang

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández

    Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chongbo Zhong

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian Arty

    LinkedIn, Sunnyvale, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shaohua Wang

    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Alice Jone

    Regulatory Affairs Division, Steris, Mentor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Niraj S Desai

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yulong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marina R Picciotto

    Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4404-1280
  14. Lorna W Role

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    Lorna.Role@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5851-212X
  15. David A Talmage

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    david.talmage@NIH.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4627-3007

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1ZIANS009424)

  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1ZIANS009416,1ZIANS009422)

  • Lorna W Role

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS22061)

  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Mental Health (U01-MH109104)

  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Mental Health (MH077681)

  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA14241,DA037566)

  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS007224)

  • Richard B Crouse

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees (ACUC) of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke (NINDS) (Protocol #1531), SUNY Research Foundation at Stony Brook University (Protocol #1618), and Yale University (Protocol #2019-07895).

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,407
    views
  • 199
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  2. Mala R Ananth
  3. Ronald Kim
  4. Richard B Crouse
  5. Li Jiang
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández
  7. Chongbo Zhong
  8. Christian Arty
  9. Shaohua Wang
  10. Alice Jone
  11. Niraj S Desai
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Marina R Picciotto
  14. Lorna W Role
  15. David A Talmage
(2024)
Functionally refined encoding of threat memory by distinct populations of basal forebrain cholinergic projection neurons
eLife 13:e86581.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86581

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86581

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhujun Shao, Mengya Zhang, Qing Yu
    Research Article

    When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gáspár Oláh, Rajmund Lákovics ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.