Sex-specific splicing occurs genome-wide during early Drosophila embryogenesis

Abstract

Sex-specific splicing is an essential process that regulates sex determination and drives sexual dimorphism. Yet, how early in development widespread sex-specific transcript diversity occurs was unknown because it had yet to be studied at the genome-wide level. We use the powerful Drosophila model to show that widespread sex-specific transcript diversity occurs early in development, concurrent with zygotic genome activation. We also present a new pipeline called time2splice to quantify changes in alternative splicing over time. Furthermore, we determine that one of the consequences of losing an essential maternally-deposited pioneer factor called CLAMP (Chromatin linked adapter for MSL proteins) is altered sex-specific splicing of genes involved in diverse biological processes that drive development. Overall, we show that sex-specific differences in transcript diversity exist even at the earliest stages of development.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes #GSE220455 and #GSE220439All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2-figure Supplement 3, Figure 5, and Figure 6Source data used to generate all the figures, graphs, and Venn diagrams are provided in Supplementary Data Tables S1-S7

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mukulika Ray

    Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology and Biochemistry Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9064-818X
  2. Ashley Mae Conard

    Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jennifer Urban

    Biology Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6621-8358
  4. Pranav Mahableshwarkar

    Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joseph Aguilera

    Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology and Biochemistry Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Annie Huang

    Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology and Biochemistry Department, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Smriti Vaidyanathan

    Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Erica Larschan

    Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, United States
    For correspondence
    erica_larschan@brown.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2484-4921

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM126994)

  • Mukulika Ray
  • Erica Larschan

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Ashley Mae Conard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Luisa Cochella, Johns Hopkins University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 19, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 17, 2023
  3. Accepted: July 11, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 3, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Ray et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,091
    Page views
  • 163
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mukulika Ray
  2. Ashley Mae Conard
  3. Jennifer Urban
  4. Pranav Mahableshwarkar
  5. Joseph Aguilera
  6. Annie Huang
  7. Smriti Vaidyanathan
  8. Erica Larschan
(2023)
Sex-specific splicing occurs genome-wide during early Drosophila embryogenesis
eLife 12:e87865.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87865

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Ernesto Ciabatti, Ana González-Rueda ... Marco Tripodi
    Tools and Resources Updated

    Transsynaptic viral vectors provide means to gain genetic access to neurons based on synaptic connectivity and are essential tools for the dissection of neural circuit function. Among them, the retrograde monosynaptic ΔG-Rabies has been widely used in neuroscience research. A recently developed engineered version of the ΔG-Rabies, the non-toxic self-inactivating (SiR) virus, allows the long term genetic manipulation of neural circuits. However, the high mutational rate of the rabies virus poses a risk that mutations targeting the key genetic regulatory element in the SiR genome could emerge and revert it to a canonical ΔG-Rabies. Such revertant mutations have recently been identified in a SiR batch. To address the origin, incidence and relevance of these mutations, we investigated the genomic stability of SiR in vitro and in vivo. We found that “revertant” mutations are rare and accumulate only when SiR is extensively amplified in vitro, particularly in suboptimal production cell lines that have insufficient levels of TEV protease activity. Moreover, we confirmed that SiR-CRE, unlike canonical ΔG-Rab-CRE or revertant-SiR-CRE, is non-toxic and that revertant mutations do not emerge in vivo during long-term experiments.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Hooman Allayee, Charles R Farber ... Aldons J Lusis
    Review Article

    Quantitative traits are often complex because of the contribution of many loci, with further complexity added by environmental factors. In medical research, systems genetics is a powerful approach for the study of complex traits, as it integrates intermediate phenotypes, such as RNA, protein, and metabolite levels, to understand molecular and physiological phenotypes linking discrete DNA sequence variation to complex clinical and physiological traits. The primary purpose of this review is to describe some of the resources and tools of systems genetics in humans and rodent models, so that researchers in many areas of biology and medicine can make use of the data.