Conditional deletion of neurexins dysregulates neurotransmission from dopamine neurons

  1. Charles Ducrot
  2. Gregory de Carvalho
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud
  4. Constantin VL Delmas
  5. Priyabrata Halder
  6. Nicolas Giguère
  7. Consiglia Pacelli
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque
  10. Martin Parent
  11. LuLu Y Chen  Is a corresponding author
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université de Montréal, Canada
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
  3. University of Foggia, Italy
  4. Université Laval, Canada

Abstract

Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are key regulators of basal ganglia functions. The axonal domain of these neurons is highly complex, with a large subset of non-synaptic release sites and a smaller subset of synaptic terminals from which in addition to DA, glutamate or GABA are also released. The molecular mechanisms regulating the connectivity of DA neurons and their neurochemical identity are unknown. An emerging literature suggests that neuroligins, trans-synaptic cell adhesion molecules, regulate both DA connectivity and neurotransmission. However, the contribution of their major interaction partners, neurexins (Nrxns) is unexplored. Here we tested the hypothesis that Nrxns regulate DA neuron neurotransmission. Mice with conditional deletion of all Nrxns in DA neurons (DAT::Nrxns KO) exhibited normal basic motor functions. However, they showed an impaired locomotor response to the psychostimulant amphetamine. In line with an alteration in DA neurotransmission, decreased levels of the membrane DA transporter (DAT) and increased levels of the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) were detected in the striatum of DAT::Nrxns KO mice, along with reduced activity-dependent DA release. Strikingly, electrophysiological recordings revealed an increase of GABA co-release from DA neuron axons in the striatum of these mice. Together, these findings suggest that Nrxns act as regulators of the functional connectivity of DA neurons.

Data availability

All primary data are provided in the source data files accompanying the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charles Ducrot

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Gregory de Carvalho

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9179-7697
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Constantin VL Delmas

    Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Priyabrata Halder

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nicolas Giguère

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Consiglia Pacelli

    Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4915-5823
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin Parent

    Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. LuLu Y Chen

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    chenly@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8873-3481
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    louis-eric.trudeau@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4684-1377

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP106556)

  • Louis-Eric Trudeau

University of California Irvine, School of Medicine (GF15247)

  • LuLu Y Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving animals and their care were conducted in accordance with the Guide to care and use of Experimental Animals of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The experimental protocols (#21-113) were approved by the animal ethics committees of the Université de Montréal (CDEA).

Copyright

© 2023, Ducrot et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,125
    views
  • 242
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charles Ducrot
  2. Gregory de Carvalho
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud
  4. Constantin VL Delmas
  5. Priyabrata Halder
  6. Nicolas Giguère
  7. Consiglia Pacelli
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque
  10. Martin Parent
  11. LuLu Y Chen
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau
(2023)
Conditional deletion of neurexins dysregulates neurotransmission from dopamine neurons
eLife 12:e87902.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87902

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87902

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Proloy Das, Mingjian He, Patrick L Purdon
    Tools and Resources

    Modern neurophysiological recordings are performed using multichannel sensor arrays that are able to record activity in an increasingly high number of channels numbering in the 100s to 1000s. Often, underlying lower-dimensional patterns of activity are responsible for the observed dynamics, but these representations are difficult to reliably identify using existing methods that attempt to summarize multivariate relationships in a post hoc manner from univariate analyses or using current blind source separation methods. While such methods can reveal appealing patterns of activity, determining the number of components to include, assessing their statistical significance, and interpreting them requires extensive manual intervention and subjective judgment in practice. These difficulties with component selection and interpretation occur in large part because these methods lack a generative model for the underlying spatio-temporal dynamics. Here, we describe a novel component analysis method anchored by a generative model where each source is described by a bio-physically inspired state-space representation. The parameters governing this representation readily capture the oscillatory temporal dynamics of the components, so we refer to it as oscillation component analysis. These parameters – the oscillatory properties, the component mixing weights at the sensors, and the number of oscillations – all are inferred in a data-driven fashion within a Bayesian framework employing an instance of the expectation maximization algorithm. We analyze high-dimensional electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography recordings from human studies to illustrate the potential utility of this method for neuroscience data.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sihan Yang, Anastasia Kiyonaga
    Insight

    A neural signature of serial dependence has been found, which mirrors the attractive bias of visual information seen in behavioral experiments.