Hunger- and thirst-sensing neurons modulate a neuroendocrine network to coordinate sugar and water ingestion

  1. Amanda J González Segarra  Is a corresponding author
  2. Gina Pontes
  3. Nicholas Jourjine
  4. Alexander Del Toro
  5. Kristin Scott  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
6 figures, 1 table and 5 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) relay information to the pars intercerebralis.

(A) Temporal consumption assay screen for water ingestion using RNAi targeting different neurotransmitter pathways. UAS-RNAi+ or - ISN-Gal4. RNAi against: nSynaptobrevin (nSyb), tryptophan hydroxylase (TRH), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), tyrosine beta-hydroxylase (TBH), histamine decarboxylase (HDC), vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT), glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (GAD1), dopa decarboxylase (DDC), Drosophila vesicular glutamate transporter (DVGlut), short neuropeptide F (sNPF), vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT), tyrosine decarboxylase 2 (TDC2), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 1 (dILP1), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 2 (dILP2), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 3 (dILP3), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 4 (dILP4), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 5 (dILP5), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 6 (dILP6), Drosophila insulin-like peptide 7 (dILP7). Represented are the mean, and the 10–90 percentile; data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons against the RNAi control; p-values were adjusted using false discovery rate. n=8–39 animals/genotype except nSyb positive control (70–72). (B) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water using RNAi targeting dILP3 or amontillado in ISNs. Sucrose assay: Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests against ISN control and respective RNAi control. Water assay: ANOVA, Šídák’s multiple comparison test to ISN control and respective RNAi control. n=48–52 animals/genotype. (C) ISNs reconstruction from full adult fly brain (FAFB) volume. (D) Light microscopy image of ISN-Gal4 registered to JFRC2010. (E) ISN postsynaptic neurons based on synapse predictions using FAFB volume (Zheng et al., 2018) and connectome annotation versioning engine (CAVE, Buhmann et al., 2021; Ida et al., 2012). Left: 10 postsynaptic neurons, right: postsynaptic neurons bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT), Cowboy, Handshake, and DSOG1. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN) postsynaptic partners labeled by trans-Tango and EM.

(A) Expression of trans-Tango ligand in the ISNs (green) and postsynaptic partners (PSPs) (magenta). nc82 staining in blue. (B) Distribution of synaptic output from the ISNs divided by cell class or brain region. Total of 4050 synapses from the ISNs and 104 postsynaptic partners. FLAa2 (46 neurons) receive 26.77% of all ISN output, Handshake (4 neurons) 17.9%, Cowboy (2 neurons) 11.4%, neurons located in the subesophageal zone (SEZ) (14 neurons) 9.04%, DSOG1 (4 neurons) 8.18%, neurons with neurites in the subesophageal zone and superior medial protocerebrum (SEZ and SMP) (11 neurons) 7.91%, bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) (1 neuron) 7.46%, ascending neurons (ANs) (10 neurons) 4.41%, descending neurons (DNs) (8 neurons) 3.07%, and ISNs (4 neurons) 0.5%. Only postsynaptic partners with five or more synapses were considered for this analysis. Reconstruction of FLAa2 neurons (C), Handshake neurons (D), Cowboy neurons (E), neurons innervating the SEZ (F), DSOG1 neurons (G), neurons innervating the SEZ and SMP (H), BiT (I), ascending neurons (J), descending neurons (K).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements
Interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) inhibit bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT), which oppositely regulates sugar and water ingestion.

(A) BiT neuron reconstruction from full adult fly brain (FAFB) dataset. (B) Light microscopy image of BiT split-Gal4. (C) Experimental setup for in vivo voltage imaging. We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in the ISNs and optogenetically stimulated them with 660 nm LED. We expressed the voltage sensor ArcLight in BiT and imaged it with a two-photon microscope. (D) ArcLight response of BiT soma to 2 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs or (E) 30 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired Wilcoxon and paired t-test (Stim 2, p=0.07). n=7 flies. (F) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of BiT with Chrimson. Ingestion time of females exposed to light normalized to dark controls of indicated genotype. Sucrose: Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Water: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparison test. n=44–54 animals/genotype. (G) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water using RNAi targeting nSyb in BiT. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n=45–57 animals/genotype. (H) Neural model for BiT coordination of sucrose and water intake. Dashed lines indicate inactive synapses. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) genetic control functional imaging.

Genetic controls: we expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson without the interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN)-LexA driver and exposed the brains to 660 nm LED. We expressed the voltage sensor ArcLight in BiT and imaged it with a two-photon microscope. (A) ArcLight response of BiT soma to 2 s LED exposure or (B) 30 s LED exposure. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired Wilcoxon or paired t-test. n=7 flies.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) optogenetic activation ingestion phenotype.

Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of BiT with Chrimson. Represented are the mean, and the 10–90 percentile. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons against the no laser control. n=44–54 animals/genotype. ***p<0.001.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements
Bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) postsynaptic neurons include neuroendocrine cells.

(A) Distribution of synaptic output from BiT divided by cell class or brain region. Total of 1742 synapses from BiT and 93 postsynaptic partners. Insulin producing cells (IPCs) (18 neurons) receive 25.37% of all BiT output, Lgr3/FLAa3 (12 neurons) 15.56%, superior medial protocerebrum (SMP) and superior lateral protocerebrum (SLP) (20 neurons) 15.5%, CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) (4 neurons) 13.09%, SMP and subesophageal zone (SEZ) (19 neurons) 11.65%, Antler (2 neurons) 5.97%, visual projections (4 neurons) 3.85%, fan shaped body (4 neurons) 3.33%, Gallinule (5 neurons) 3.21%, SEZ (5 neurons) 2.47%. Only postsynaptic partners with five or more synapses were considered for this analysis. Reconstruction of IPCs (B), Lgr3/FLAa3 neurons (C), neurons innervating the SMP and SLP (D), CCHa2R-RA neurons (E), neurons innervating the SMP and SEZ (F), Antler neurons (G), visual projection neurons (H), neurons innervating the fan shaped body (I), Gallinule neurons (J), and neurons innervating the SEZ (K).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Insulin producing cell (IPC) response to bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) stimulation.

(A and B): We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in BiT and optogenetically stimulated it with 660nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the IPCs and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (A) Calcium response of IPC somas to 2 s optogenetic activation of BiT or (B) 30 s optogenetic activation of BiT. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired Wilcoxon test or paired t-test. n=9 flies. (C and D) Genetic controls: we expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson without the BiT-split Gal4 driver and exposed the brains to 660 nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the IPCs and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (C) Calcium response of IPC somas to 2 s LED exposure or (D) 30 s LED exposure. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired t-test. n=9–10 flies. (E) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of IPCs with Chrimson. Ingestion time of females exposed to light normalized to dark controls of indicated genotype. One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparison test. n=43–49 animals/genotype. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Insulin producing cell (IPC) optogenetic activation ingestion phenotype.

Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of IPCs with Chrimson.Represented are the mean, and the 10–90 percentile. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons against the no laser control. n=43–49 animals/genotype. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) neurons regulate water but not sugar ingestion and are likely inhibited by bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT).

(A) CCHa2R-RA neurons reconstruction from full adult fly brain (FAFB) dataset. (B) Light microscopy image of CCHa2R-RA-Gal4. (C) Experimental setup for in vivo calcium imaging. We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in the interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) and optogenetically stimulated them with 660 nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the CCHa2R-RA neurons and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (D) Calcium responses of CCHa2R-RA neurites in subesophageal zone (SEZ) to 2 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs or (E) 30 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired t-test and paired Wilcoxon test. n=10 flies. (F) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of CCHa2R-RA neurons with Chrimson. Ingestion time of females exposed to light normalized to dark controls of indicated genotype. Sucrose: Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Water: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparison test. n=42–47 animals/genotype. (G) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water using RNAi targeting nSynaptobrevin (nSyb) in CCHa2R-RA neurons. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n=45–54 animals/genotype. (H) Neural model for CCHa2R-RA regulation of water intake. Dashed lines indicate inactive synapses. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) genetic controls functional imaging and response to bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) optogenetic stimulation.

(A and B): Genetic controls: we expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson without the interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN)-LexA driver and exposed the brains to 660nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the CCHa2R-RA neurons and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (A) Calcium response of CCHa2R-RA subesophageal zone (SEZ) neurites to 2 s LED exposure or (B) 30 s LED exposure. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, with individual traces in gray, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired Wilcoxon test and paired t-test. n=7 flies. (C and D) We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in BiT and optogenetically stimulated it with 660 nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the CCHa2R-RA neurons and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (C) Calcium response of CCHa2R-RA somas to 2 s optogenetic stimulation of BiT or (D) 30 s optogenetic stimulation of BiT. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired t-test. n=5 flies.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) optogenetic activation ingestion phenotype.

Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of CCHa2R-RA neurons with Chrimson. Represented are the mean, and the 10–90 percentile. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons against the no laser control. n=42–47 animals/genotype. ***p<0.001.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons are downstream of the interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) and oppositely regulate sugar and water ingestion.

(A) CCAP neurons reconstruction from full adult fly brain (FAFB) dataset. (B) Light microscopy image of CCAP-Gal4. (C) Experimental setup for in vivo calcium imaging. We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in the ISNs and optogenetically stimulated them with 660 nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the CCAP neurons and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (D) Calcium response of CCAP neurites to 2 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs or (E) 30 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired t-test. n=10 flies. (F) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of CCAP neurons with Chrimson. Ingestion time of females exposed to light normalized to dark controls of indicated genotype. Sucrose: Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test, Water: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák multiple comparison test. n=42–48 animals/genotype. (G) Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water using RNAi targeting nSynaptobrevin (nSyb) in CCAP neurons. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n=45–54 animals/genotype. (H) Neural model for CCAP coordination of sugar and water intake. Dashed lines indicate inactive synapses. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) responds to interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN) activation using another CCAP-Gal4 driver.

We expressed the light-sensitive ion channel Chrimson in the ISNs and optogenetically stimulated them with 660 nm LED. We expressed the calcium sensor GCaMP in the CCAP neurons and imaged them with a two-photon microscope. (A) Calcium response of CCAP neurites to 2 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs or (B) 30 s optogenetic stimulation of the ISNs. Left: Scatter plot shows mean ± SEM of all flies imaged, gray bars represent LED stimulation. Right: Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity before stim (off) and during stim (on), each dot represents one fly. Paired t-test. n=8 flies. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) optogenetic activation ingestion phenotype.

Temporal consumption assay for 1 M sucrose or water during acute optogenetic activation of CCAP neurons with Chrimson. Represented are the mean, and the 10–90 percentile. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons against the no laser control. n=42–48 animals/genotype. ***p<0.001.

Interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISN) regulation of sugar and water ingestion model.

Hunger signals activate the ISN while thirst signals inhibit the ISNs. ISNs use Drosophila insulin-like peptide 3 (dILP3) as a neurotransmitter and require amontillado (amon) for neuropeptide processing. ISN activity inhibits bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT), which in turn inhibits CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) neurons. Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons are downstream of the ISNs, connected via Cowboy, VESAa1, BiT2, and CCHa2R-RA neurons. BiT activity inhibits sugar ingestion and promotes water ingestion. CCAP activity promotes sugar ingestion and inhibits water ingestion. CCHa2R-RA activity inhibits water ingestion.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-nSynaptobrevin RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 31983
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dcr2Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 24650
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-Trh RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25842
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-ChAT RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25856
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-Tbh RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 27667
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-Hdc RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 26000
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-VMAT RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 31257
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-GAD1 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 28079
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-DDC RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 27030
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-DVGlut RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 27538
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-sNPF RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25867
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-VGAT RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 41958
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-TDC2 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25871
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP1 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 32861
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP2 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBSC 32475
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP3 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBSC 31492
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP4 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 33682
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP5 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 31378
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP6 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 33684
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-dILP7 RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 32862
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-amon RNAiBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 29009
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
ISN-Gal4 (VT011155-Gal4)FlyLight, Janelia Research CampusFly Light ID 54404
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
ISN-LexA (GMR34G02-LexA)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 54138
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-myrGFP.QUAS-mtdTomato-3xHA; trans-TangoBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 77124
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
VT002073-Gal4.ADBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 71871
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
VT040568-Gal4.DBDBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 72902
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-csChrimson.mVenusBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 55134
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
LexAop-ChrimsonR.mCherryGift from Jayaraman Lab
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-ArcLightBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 51056
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
Empty splitBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 79603
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
ppk28-Gal4Cameron et al., 2010.BDSC 93020
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
Gr5a-Gal4Chyb et al., 2003.BDSC 57592, 57591
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
CCha2R-RA-Gal4Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 84603
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
LexAop-CsChrimson.tdTomato (III)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 82183
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
UAS-GCaMP6s (III)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 42749
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
20XUAS-GCaMP7bBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 79029
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
CCAP-Gal4 (II)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25685
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
CCAP-Gal4 (III)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 25686
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
CCHa2R (RA)-LexABloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC 84363
Genetic reagent
(D. melanogaster)
dILP2-LexALi and Gong, 2015.
AntibodyAnti-Brp (nc82)
(Mouse monoclonal)
DSHB, University of Iowa, USADSHB Cat# nc82, RRID:AB_23148661:40
AntibodyAnti-GFP
(Chicken polyclonal)
InvitrogenThermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A10262, RRID:AB_25340231:1000
AntibodyAnti-dsRed
(Rabbit polyclonal)
Takara, Living ColorsTakara Bio Cat# 632496, RRID:AB_100134831:1000
AntibodyAnti-mouse AF647
(Goat polyclonal)
InvitrogenThermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-21236, RRID:AB_25358051:500
AntibodyAnti-chicken AF488
(Goat polyclonal)
Life TechnologiesThermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11039, RRID:AB_25340961:1000
AntibodyAnti-rabbit AF568
(Goat polyclonal)
InvitrogenThermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11036, RRID:AB_105635661:1000
Chemical compoundAll trans-RetinalMilliporeSigmaCat# R2500
Software, algorithmFijihttps://fiji.sc/RRID: SCR_002285
Software, algorithmNAVisCopyright 2018, Philipp Schlegel
Software, algorithmCATMAIDSaalfeld et al., 2009; https://catmaid.org
Software, algorithmFlywireFlywire; https://flywire.ai/RRID:SCR_019205
Software, algorithmGraphPad PrismGraphPad Software; https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithmPythonPython Software Foundation; https://www.python.org/downloads/
Software, algorithmAdobe IllustratorAdobe Software; https://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html
Software, algorithmCAVE (connectome annotation versioning engine)https://github.com/seung-lab/CAVEclient/blob/master/FlyWireSynapseTutorial.ipynb; seung-lab, 2021; Buhmann et al., 2021; Eckstein et al., 2020; Heinrich et al., 2018
Software, algorithmR Project for Statistical ComputingDessau and Pipper, 2008RRID:SCR_001905

Additional files

MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88143/elife-88143-mdarchecklist1-v1.pdf
Supplementary file 1

Interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN) postsynaptic partners.

Number of synapses from the four ISNs onto different cell types, including the Flywire tracing contributions of different laboratories.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88143/elife-88143-supp1-v1.docx
Supplementary file 2

Bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) postsynaptic neurons.

Number of synapses from BiT onto different cell types, including the Flywire tracing contributions of different laboratories.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88143/elife-88143-supp2-v1.docx
Supplementary file 3

Synapses from interoceptive subesophageal zone neuron (ISN) postsynaptic partners onto crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons.

Number of synapses from ISN postsynaptic partners onto CCAP neurons, including the Flywire tracing contributions of different laboratories.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88143/elife-88143-supp3-v1.docx
Supplementary file 4

Fly genotypes used. Fly genotypes used throughout the study, as shown in different figure panels.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88143/elife-88143-supp4-v1.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amanda J González Segarra
  2. Gina Pontes
  3. Nicholas Jourjine
  4. Alexander Del Toro
  5. Kristin Scott
(2023)
Hunger- and thirst-sensing neurons modulate a neuroendocrine network to coordinate sugar and water ingestion
eLife 12:RP88143.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88143.3