Understanding genetic variants in context

  1. Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong  Is a corresponding author
  2. Stanley Fields
  3. Frederick Roth
  4. Lea M Starita
  5. Cole Trapnell
  6. Judit Villen
  7. Douglas M Fowler  Is a corresponding author
  8. Christine Queitsch  Is a corresponding author
  1. Herbold Computational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, United States
  2. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, United States
  3. Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, United States
  4. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, United States
  5. Donnelly Centre and Departments of Molecular Genetics and Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada
  6. Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Canada
  7. Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  8. Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, United States
3 figures

Figures

Only a small number of coding variants have annotations that can guide diagnosis and treatment.

As exome and whole-genome sequencing becomes commonplace in the clinic, the number of variants of uncertain significance is likely to increase.

Multiplex assays of variant effect (MAVEs) in context.

(A) MAVEs in cell lines can assay many variants for simple phenotypes like cell growth. Models like organoids and mice allow for measuring complex multicellular phenotypes like proportions of cell types but are currently limited to assaying only a few variants at a time. (B) Gene–gene interactions are examined in different models at different levels of phenotype complexity. Gene–gene interactions suggested for prioritization include compound heterozygotes, combinations of common and rare variants in a given locus in cis and trans, and experiments testing variants on different genetic backgrounds. (C) Gene–environment interactions are examined at different levels of phenotype complexity. Three broad categories are suggested to model the complexity of environmental context in the laboratory: abiotic stress, challenges to immunity, and metabolism.

Environmental context is key to trait interpretation.

(A) Adapted from Figure 1 of Ebrahim et al., 2010, age-, factory-, and occupation-adjusted percent prevalence (95% CI) of diabetes by type of migrant and sex, Indian migration study 2005–2007. Diabetes is prevalent in urban residents and residents who migrated to urban areas and resided there for more than 10 years. (B) Gene–environment interactions will affect an organismal trait at the level of genes, cells, tissues, and whole organisms. Extending the Mostafavi et al., 2022 model to incorporate environmental context captures more relevant biology, and hence facilitates variant effect interpretation. As shown, a variant (red allele) affects a gene’s function within a particular cellular context. Cells affected by the red allele function exist within the context of the organism, here a light-gray mouse as compared to a dark-gray mouse that does not carry the red allele. Mice with or without the red allele are exposed to environmental factors, symbolized by the cheese as a dietary factor challenging metabolism. Note that one of the mice carrying the red variant is not exposed to this environmental challenge (light gray, clipped ear). In the example shown, environmental context determines the trait value (obesity, big light-gray mouse) for mice carrying the red variant.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong
  2. Stanley Fields
  3. Frederick Roth
  4. Lea M Starita
  5. Cole Trapnell
  6. Judit Villen
  7. Douglas M Fowler
  8. Christine Queitsch
(2024)
Understanding genetic variants in context
eLife 13:e88231.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88231