The negative adipogenesis regulator Dlk1 is transcriptionally regulated by Ifrd1 (TIS7) and translationally by its orthologue Ifrd2 (SKMc15)

  1. Ilja Vietor  Is a corresponding author
  2. Domagoj Cikes
  3. Kati Piironen
  4. Theodora Vasakou
  5. David Heimdörfer
  6. Ronald Gstir
  7. Matthias David Erlacher
  8. Ivan Tancevski
  9. Philipp Eller
  10. Egon Demetz
  11. Michael W Hess
  12. Volker Kuhn
  13. Gerald Degenhart
  14. Jan Rozman
  15. Martin Klingenspor
  16. Martin Hrabe de Angelis
  17. Taras Valovka
  18. Lukas A Huber
  1. Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
  2. Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Austria
  3. University of Helsinki, Finland
  4. ADSI - Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Austria
  5. Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
  6. Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

Delta-like homolog 1 (Dlk1), an inhibitor of adipogenesis, controls the cell fate of adipocyte progenitors. Experimental data presented here identify two independent regulatory mechanisms, transcriptional and translational, by which Ifrd1 (TIS7) and its orthologue Ifrd2 (SKMc15) regulate Dlk1 levels. Mice deficient in both Ifrd1 and Ifrd2 (dKO) had severely reduced adipose tissue and were resistant to high fat diet-induced obesity. Wnt signaling, a negative regulator of adipocyte differentiation was significantly up regulated in dKO mice. Elevated levels of the Wnt/β-catenin target protein Dlk1 inhibited the expression of adipogenesis regulators Pparg and Cebpa, and fatty acid transporter Cd36. Although both, Ifrd1 and Ifrd2, contributed to this phenotype, they utilized two different mechanisms. Ifrd1 acted by controlling Wnt signaling and thereby transcriptional regulation of Dlk1. On the other hand, distinctive experimental evidence showed that Ifrd2 acts as a general translational inhibitor significantly affecting Dlk1 protein levels. Novel mechanisms of Dlk1 regulation in adipocyte differentiation involving Ifrd1 and Ifrd2 are based on experimental data presented here.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ilja Vietor

    Institute of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    ilja.vietor@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1391-6793
  2. Domagoj Cikes

    Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Wien, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0350-5672
  3. Kati Piironen

    Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Theodora Vasakou

    Institute of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Heimdörfer

    Division of Genomics and RNomics, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ronald Gstir

    ADSI - Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matthias David Erlacher

    Division of Genomics and RNomics, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ivan Tancevski

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Philipp Eller

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Egon Demetz

    Department of Internal Medicine II, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Michael W Hess

    Division of Histology and Embryology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Volker Kuhn

    Department Trauma Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gerald Degenhart

    Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9961-1084
  14. Jan Rozman

    Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8035-8904
  15. Martin Klingenspor

    Chair of Molecular Nutritional Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4502-6664
  16. Martin Hrabe de Angelis

    Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7898-2353
  17. Taras Valovka

    Institute of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Lukas A Huber

    Institute of Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1116-2120

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P18531-B12)

  • Ilja Vietor

Austrian Science Fund (P22350-B12)

  • Ilja Vietor

Helmholtz Zentrum München (01KX1012)

  • Martin Hrabe de Angelis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed in accordance with Austrian legislation BGB1 Nr. 501/1988 i.d.F. 162/2005).

Copyright

© 2023, Vietor et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 918
    views
  • 117
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ilja Vietor
  2. Domagoj Cikes
  3. Kati Piironen
  4. Theodora Vasakou
  5. David Heimdörfer
  6. Ronald Gstir
  7. Matthias David Erlacher
  8. Ivan Tancevski
  9. Philipp Eller
  10. Egon Demetz
  11. Michael W Hess
  12. Volker Kuhn
  13. Gerald Degenhart
  14. Jan Rozman
  15. Martin Klingenspor
  16. Martin Hrabe de Angelis
  17. Taras Valovka
  18. Lukas A Huber
(2023)
The negative adipogenesis regulator Dlk1 is transcriptionally regulated by Ifrd1 (TIS7) and translationally by its orthologue Ifrd2 (SKMc15)
eLife 12:e88350.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88350

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88350

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Weihua Wang, Junqiao Xing ... Zhangfeng Hu
    Research Article

    Existence of cilia in the last eukaryotic common ancestor raises a fundamental question in biology: how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved? One conceptual answer to this question is by an ancient transcription factor regulating ciliary gene expression in both uni- and multicellular organisms, but examples of such transcription factors in eukaryotes are lacking. Previously, we showed that an ancient transcription factor X chromosome-associated protein 5 (Xap5) is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Here, we show that Xap5 and Xap5-like (Xap5l) are two conserved pairs of antagonistic transcription regulators that control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis. Male mice lacking either Xap5 or Xap5l display infertility, as a result of meiotic prophase arrest and sperm flagella malformation, respectively. Mechanistically, Xap5 positively regulates the ciliary gene expression by activating the key regulators including Foxj1 and Rfx families during the early stage of spermatogenesis. In contrast, Xap5l negatively regulates the expression of ciliary genes via repressing these ciliary transcription factors during the spermiogenesis stage. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms by which temporal and spatial transcription regulators are coordinated to control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.