Pharyngeal mechanosensory neurons control food swallow in Drosophila melanogaster

  1. Jierui Qin
  2. Tingting Yang
  3. Kexin Li
  4. Ting Liu
  5. Wei Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of Life Sciences, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Tsinghua University, China
  2. Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Science, China
4 figures, 5 videos, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Mechanoreceptor genes are essential for swallow control of Drosophila.

(A) Swallow patterns of liquid food. Filling and emptying process constitutes a cycle. (B–D) Swallowing behavior of Tmc, nompC, and piezo mutant flies. Pump frequency represents the swallowing speed, ingestion rate indicates the efficiency of food intake, while volume per pump shows how much a fly ingests with one pump. N=8–15 in each group. (E) Double mutans of Tmc and nompC show more severe dysphagia. n=9–13 in each group. In all analyses, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons was used, and statistical differences were represented as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001. Data were represented as means ± SEM.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Mutation of mechanoreceptors leads to a lower pump frequency caused by longer emptying time.

(A–B) Filling time and emptying of the cibarium in flies of different genotypes. n=6–14. (C) Ratio of filling time dividing emptying time indicates the proportion of two processes in one cycle. n=6–14. (D) Tmc and piezo double mutation showed a similar phenotype with single mutation for either gene in swallowing behavior. n=9–24. (E–H) Proportion of time with incomplete emptying during swallowing when flies were fed with methylcellulose solution. n=4–11. Data were represented as means. In all analyses, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons except nonparametric test in (D) was used, and statistical differences were represented as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001. Data were represented as means ± SEM.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Mechanosensory neurons and mechanoreceptors are essential to swallow.

(A) Blocking synaptic transduction of Tmc positive neurons leads to a lower pump frequency, and the flies display difficulty in cibarium emptying (emptying time>0.3 s). n=9–27 in each group. (B–C) Inhibiting Tmc-GAL4 and nompC-QF double-labeled neurons by Kir2.1 results in a lower pump frequency and intake volume per minute. n=7–12 in each group. (D) Arbitrary intensity of cibarium when flies of different genotype swallow. The ordinate value was graphed using the opposite value of the original arbitrary intensity in the cibarium, so the declining line represents emptying process (the same for Figure 3B). (E) Pump frequency after knocking down the expression level of the mechanoreceptor genes. n=6–23 in each group. (F) Projection pattern of md-C neurons in the brain and cibarium. About two pairs of multi-dendritic neurons are situated along the pharynx. Genotype: Tmc-GAL4; UAS-FRT-mCherry/nompC-QF; QUAS-FLP. Scale bar=50 μm. (G) Somata of md-C neurons situated in the cibarium but not in the cibarium. Genotype: XUAS-RedStinger; Tmc-GAL4, UAS-FRT-GAL80-STOP-FRT/ +; nompC-QF, QUAS-FLP/+. Scale bar=50 μm. In all analyses, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons was used, and statistical differences were represented as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001. Data were represented as means ± SEM.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Expression pattern of (A) Tmc, (B) nompC, (C) piezo, (D) Tmc & piezo, and (E) nompC & piezo in the brain and cibarium.

Scale bar=50 μm.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Activation of md-C neurons led to dysphagia.

(A) Optogenetic activation of md-C neurons with CsChrimson during food intake could induce accelerated swallowing, incomplete filling (the expansion range of cibarium decreased to about half the maximum), and difficulty in filling. Distinct states driven by CsChrimson light stimulation of md-C neurons were displayed, with the proportions of flies exhibiting each state. n=26. (B) Arbitrary intensity of fly cibarium when md-C neurons were stimulated as (A) or not optogenetically stimulated (no ATR). (C) Swallowing behavior of flies with or without md-C neurons stimulated. n=11–13 in each group. Pump frequency was calculated only when fly consistently pumped at a normal range (observed dye boundary in the cibarium is wider than 90% width of mouthpart). ATR, all trans retinal. In all analyses, two-tailed unpaired t-tests were used, and statistical differences were represented as follows: **p<0.01 and ****p<0.0001. Data were represented as means ± SEM.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
md-C neurons, but not md-L neurons, are essential for sensorimotor control of swallow rhythm.

(A) In the brain, the projecting pattern of Tmc-GAL4 & nompC-QF>>GFP exhibited no significant changes post labellum ablation. Following the ablation of the labellum for 36 hr, the GFP signals of md-L in the mouth were scarcely observable when GFP expression was driven by Tmc-GAL4 & nompC-QF. (B) Flies expressing ReaChR in md-C neurons display dysphagia when stimulated by light. n=18. (C) Flies with labellum ablated for 36 hr still showed response to light stimulation of md-C, indicating that md-L neurons are not necessary for controlling swallow rhythm. n=11.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Interaction between motor neurons (MNs) and md-C neurons revealed working pattern of swallow.

(A) md-C neurons labeled by GFP antibody (green) and muscles labeled by phalloidin (magenta) showed that they are in close proximity around cibarium. Genotype: Tmc-GAL4/UAS-FRT-mCD8-GFP; nompC-QF/QUAS-FLP. Scale bar=50 μm. (B–C) GRASP (GFP reconstitution across synaptic partners) signals between md-C neurons and MNs could be observed in the subesophageal zone (SEZ) area. Genotype: Tmc-GAL4, UAS-FRT-GAL80-STOP-FRT/UAS-nSyb-spGFP1-10, lexAop-CD4-spGFP11; nompC-QF, QUAS-FLP/MN-LexA. Scale bar=50 μm. (D–F and G–I) Activation of Tmc+ neurons via P2X2 increased MN activity. Fluorescence changes (ΔF/F0) of GCaMP6s in MNs indicate calcium level changes. Water or ATP solution was added when it came to 30 s after record begins, as black arrow indicates. n=4–10, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons was used, error bars indicate mean ± SEM. Scale bar=50 μm. (J) Significant signal changes could be detected of the md-C neurons’ termini at fly’s SEZ area after feeding fly with 0.1 M sucrose solution when GCaMP6m is expressed in md-C neurons. Scale bar=50 μm. (K) are traces of fluorescence changes. n=4–6, *p<0.05, two-tailed unpaired t-test was used, error bars indicate mean ± SEM. (L) Working model for md-C-MN-CPG controlling swallow of Drosophila. CPG, central pattern generators.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Regulation of md-C neurons requires the inhibitory inter-neurons.

(A) Knocking down the expression of GABAA-R in md-C neurons caused a lower pump frequency. n=16–25, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons was used in (B) and (C) while nonparametric test was used in (A), and statistical differences were represented as follows: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, and ****p<0.0001. Data were represented as means ± SEM.

Videos

Video 1
Feeding behavior of wild-type flies and mechanoreceptor mutant flies.
Video 2
Tmc1 and piezoKO flies displayed incomplete emptying when fed with 1% methylcellulose (MC) water.
Video 3
Flies with md-C neurons inhibited displayed difficulty in cibarium emptying.
Video 4
Optogenetic activation of md-C neurons caused accelerated swallowing, incomplete cibarium filling, and difficulty in filling.
Video 5
Optogenetic activation of md-C neurons could still trigger dysphagia in flies without labellum.

Tables

Appendix 1—key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Tmc-Gal4Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:66557
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)QUAS-FLPBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:30127
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-FRT-GAL80-STOP-FRTBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:38880
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-FRT-STOP-Kir2.1-FRTBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:67686
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS(FRT.mCherry)ReaChRBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:53743
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-TNTBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:28997
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)LexAop-GCaMP6sBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:64413
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Tmc1Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:66556
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)w[]; P{w[+Mc] = UAS-nSyb-spGFP1-10}2, P{w[+Mc] = lexAop-CD4-spGFP11}2/CyOBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:64314
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-RedStingerBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:8547
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Piezo-GAL4Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterBDSC:59266
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-Piezo-RNAiVienna Drosophila RNAi CenterVDRC:105132
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-FRT-STOP-FRT-GCaMP6motherFrom Laboratory of Chuan Zhou, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)nompC-QFYang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Yuh Nung Jan, UCSF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)nompC1/CyOYang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Yuh Nung Jan, UCSF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)nompCf00914/CyOYang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Yuh Nung Jan, UCSF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)piezoKOZhang et al., 2013From Laboratory of Yuh Nung Jan, UCSF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-nompC-RNAi; UAS-Dicer2Yang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Yuh Nung Jan, UCSF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-rdl-RNAiYang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Xin Liang, THU
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-P2X2Yang et al., 2021From Laboratory of Yufeng Pan, School of Life Science and Technology, Southeast University
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS(FRT.stop)CsChrimson-mVenusWu et al., 2019aFrom Laboratory of Yufeng Pan, School of Life Science and Technology, Southeast University
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)MN12-GAL4Manzo et al., 2012From Laboratory of Kristin Scott, UCB
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)MN11-GAL4Manzo et al., 2012From Laboratory of Kristin Scott, UCB
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)MN12-LexAThis paperHacked from MN12-GAL4
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)MN11-LexAThis paperHacked from MN11-GAL4
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Tmc-GAL4, UAS(FRT.stop)CsChrimson-mVenus/CyOThis paperRecombined from BDSC:66557 and UAS(FRT.stop)CsChrimson-mVenus
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)nompC-QF, QUAS-Flp/TM6BThis paperRecombined from BDSC:30127 and nompC-QF
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Tmc-GAL4, UAS-FRT-GAL80-STOP-FRT/CyOThis paperRecombined from BDSC:66557&38880
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Piezo-GAL4ADThis paperHacked from BDSC:59266
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Tmc-GAL4DBDThis paperHacked from BDSC:66557
Antibodyanti-Rabbit Alexa 488(Goat polyclonal)InvitrogenCat#A11008; RRID: AB_1431651:200
Antibodyanti-Rabbit Alexa 555(Goat polyclonal)InvitrogenCat#A21428; RRID: AB_25358491:200
Antibodyanti-Mouse Alexa 488(Goat polyclonal)InvitrogenCat#A11001; RRID: AB_25340691:200
Antibodyanti-Mouse Alexa 647(Goat polyclonal)InvitrogenCat#A21235; RRID: AB_25358041:200
Antibodyanti-Brp(Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat# nc82; RRID: AB_23148661:500
Antibodyanti-GFP(Rabbit polyclonal)InvitrogenCat#A11122; RRID: AB_2215691:500
Antibodyanti-RFP(Rabbit polyclonal)RocklandCat#600-401-379S; RRID: AB_111828071:500
Antibodyanti-GFP(Mouse monoclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat# G6539; RRID: AB_2599411:200
Chemical compound, drug4% PFADingguo BiotechCat#AR-0211;CAS:30525-89-4
Chemical compound, drugBrilliant BlueShi-touCat#GB 7655.1
Chemical compound, drugMethylcelluloseSigma-AldrichM7140-100G
Chemical compound, drugAll trans retinalSigma-AldrichR2500-500MG
Chemical compound, drugPhalloidinAAT bioquestCat#23127
Chemical compound, drugAdenosine-5aladdinLot#I2118087
Software, algorithmImageJ and FijiNIH; Schindelin et al., 2012https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ http://fiji.sc/
Software, algorithmGraphPad Prism 8GraphPad Softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
Software, algorithmAdobe IllustratorAdobe Systemshttps://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jierui Qin
  2. Tingting Yang
  3. Kexin Li
  4. Ting Liu
  5. Wei Zhang
(2024)
Pharyngeal mechanosensory neurons control food swallow in Drosophila melanogaster
eLife 12:RP88614.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88614.3