(A) Assignment of old (red) and new (blue) poles and daughters. The starting cell is white because it was randomly picked to start the experiment and its polarity was unknown. Because the division …
The fluorescence and length values were normalized (n = 89 pairs). Color designation is as in Figure 1A for old (red) and new (blue) poles and daughters. Error bars show standard error of the mean …
Because ratios are a form of normalization, their values were derived from non-normalized data. Asterisks in figures indicate levels of significance from comparison between ratios of new (blue bar) …
The measurements were made from the same cells in Figure 2C. All density and elongation values were normalized for this analysis. Means, variances, and other parameters extracted from these data are …
Because the old and new daughter values were jointly normalized, they were not independent and their combination into a single plot could not be assessed by statistical models assuming independence. …
Ratios correspond to density in the new pole half divided by density in the old pole half (Figure 1C) of the mothers. Regression slopes were significantly greater than zero for old (slope = 0.0177, …
Total (VT), stochastic (VE), and deterministic (D2/4) components of variances estimated from Figure 3 (see ‘Materials and methods’). The deterministic proportion of total variance VT was h2 = (D2/4)/…
(A) Ribosomal density | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vr | D | D2/4 | h2 | ||||
Old mothers | 0.00634 | 0.101 *** | 0.00253 | 0.399 | |||
New mothers | 0.00347 | 0.0184 * | 0.00008 | 0.024 | |||
(B) Elongation rates | |||||||
Vr | D | D2/4 | h2 | ||||
Old mothers | 0.00913 | 0.0821 *** | 0.00168 | 0.185 | |||
New mothers | 0.00581 | 0.0533 *** | 0.00071 | 0.122 | |||
(C) VE estimates | |||||||
Old mothers | New mothers | p-value1 | |||||
Elongation rates | 0.00744 | 0.0051 | 0.0073** | ||||
Ribosome density | 0.00381 | 0.00338 | 0.40 n.s. | ||||
p-value2 | 0.000001*** | 0.0041** | |||||