(A) Particle distribution at various timesteps of a simulation with a step-like lower-diffusivity region. (B) Particle distribution at various timesteps for a simulation with a diffusivity gradient. …
(A) Agent-based modeling of particle dynamics was used in this study. Choosing the diffusivity at the start point of a particle hop is in line with the Itô interpretation. (B) Numerical solutions …
(A) Progress of a simulation comprising particles possessing weak interactions ( is the interaction strength; see Methods), initialized with a uniform concentration of particles. (B) Progress of a …
(A) Progress of a simulation comprising particles possessing weak interactions (), initialized with a uniform concentration of particles; no diffusivity gradient used here. (B) Progress of a …
(A) mean squared displacement (MSD) versus time for homogeneous diffusion of 10,000 particles in a 5 mm × 5 mm simulation region. (B) Same as (A) for homogeneous diffusion in a more tightly bounded …
(A) Analysis of simulation trajectories via in silico microrheology. (B) Increasing diffusiophoretic extent due to variation of the zone diffusivity in a chamber comprising a low-diffusive end. (C) …
(A) Simulated fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) t1/2 as a function of granule:bulk diffusivity ratio (, ). (B) Simulated FRAP as a function of granule radius (, ). (C) …
(A) The in silico implementation of FRAP was used in this study. (B) Methodology for determining mean dwell time of particles in low-diffusive granules, from a set of simulation trajectories. (C) …
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Active noise/memory effects/other sources of nonequilibrium behaviors | Nonequilibrium in case of Itô and Stratonovich, equilibrium in case of isothermal | Consistent with equilibrium; thermal noise dominates |
Diffusive lensing occurs | Diffusive lensing is seen in the Itô and Stratonovich cases (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B) | Diffusive lensing does not occur |