Carnivores play key roles in maintaining ecosystem structure and function, as well as ecological processes (Ripple et al., 2014). Apex carnivores are often classically specialized hunters occupying top trophic positions that work to suppress the number of herbivores and mesocarnivores through predation, competition, and trophic cascades (Ripple et al., 2014; Newsome et al., 2017; Ritchie and Johnson, 2009). Understanding how sympatric carnivore species coexist in natural ecosystems is a central focus in community ecology and biodiversity conservation (Chu et al., 2017). Human activities and climate change are causing large-scale habitat loss and fragmentation, posing significant challenges to carnivore interspecies relationships (Li et al., 2021; Manlick and Pauli, 2020; Ripple et al., 2014). Such relationships are becoming increasingly intricate, leading to greater research efforts aimed at determining the strategies that facilitate coexistence despite intense competition (Kuijper et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2017).

The competitive exclusion principle dictates that species with similar ecological requirements are unable to successfully coexist (Hardin, 1960; Gause, 1934). Thus, carnivores within a guild occupy different ecological niches based on a combination of three niche dimensions, i.e., spatial, temporal, and trophic (Schoener, 1974). Spatially, carnivore species within the same geographical area exhibit distinct distributions that minimize overlap in resource use and competition. For example, carnivores can partition habitats based on habitat feature preferences and availability of prey (de Satgé et al., 2017; Garrote and Pérez de Ayala, 2019; Goldyn et al., 2003; Strampelli et al., 2023). Temporally, differences in seasonal or daily activity patterns among sympatric carnivores can reduce competitive interactions and facilitate coexistence. For example, carnivores can exhibit temporal segregation in their foraging behaviors, such as diurnal versus nocturnal activity, to avoid direct competition (Finnegan et al., 2021; Nasanbat et al., 2021; Searle et al., 2021). Trophically, carnivore species can diversify their diets to exploit different prey species or sizes, thereby reducing competition for food resources. For example, carnivores can exhibit dietary specialization to optimize their foraging efficiency and minimize competitive pressures (Steinmetz et al., 2021). Currently, research on the niche partitioning of sympatric carnivores primarily focuses on one or two dimensions, with little attention paid to all three (Alexander et al., 2016; Karanth et al., 2017; Li et al., 2022a; Santos et al., 2019; Shao et al., 2021; Strampelli et al., 2023; Tsunoda et al., 2020; Vilella et al., 2020). This limitation restricts the multi-scale understanding of coexistence mechanisms among carnivores.

In recent years, camera trapping and DNA metabarcoding technology has been widely used in wildlife monitoring and research. Camera trapping enables the monitoring of elusive species in remote areas (Boitani, 2016; Palencia et al., 2022), and has become a helpful tool for accumulating large amounts of time-recorded data that can provide detailed information surrounding animal behavior and activity patterns, which is widely used to investigate species-interspecies relationships (Frey et al., 2017). For example, Li et al., 2019, used camera trap data to conclude that temporal segregation is a key mechanism for promoting the coexistence of tigers (Panthera tigris) and leopards (Panthera pardus). DNA metabarcoding provides a noninvasive molecular tool that is more accurate than traditional dietary analysis methods, such as microhistology (Deiner et al., 2017; Newmaster et al., 2013). DNA metabarcoding technology has been applied to many studies and has offered profound insight into the ecology, conservation, and biological monitoring of rare and endangered species (Deagle et al., 2019; Kartzinel et al., 2015). For example, Shao et al., 2021, found that dietary niche partitioning promoted the coexistence of species in the mountains of southwestern China based on DNA metabarcoding. The combination of camera trapping and DNA metabarcoding can result in robust data for exploring the mechanisms of coexistence surrounding carnivore guilds.

The Qilian Mountains constitute a biodiversity hotspot with one of the richest carnivore assemblages in the world (Di Minin et al., 2016). To understand the competition and coexistence among different carnivore species in this area, we explored the habitat use, activity patterns, and prey item composition of sympatric carnivore species comprised of apex carnivores and mesocarnivores across Qilian Mountain National Park using camera trap data and DNA metabarcoding data. Based on theories surrounding resource partitioning and niche differentiation, as well as studies on interactions and coexistence among carnivorous species (Haswell et al., 2018; Linnell and Strand, 2000), we hypothesized that differentiation along one or more niche axes is beneficial for the coexistence of the carnivorous guild in the Qilian Mountains. We expected that spatial niche differentiation promotes the coexistence of large carnivores in the Qilian Mountain region, as they are more likely than small carnivores to spatially avoid interspecific competition (Davis et al., 2018). Mesocarnivores may coexist either spatially or temporally due to increased interspecific competition for similar prey (Di Bitetti et al., 2010; Donadio and Buskirk, 2006). Dietary niche differentiation may be a significant factor for promoting coexistence between large and mesocarnivore species due to differences in body size (Gómez-Ortiz et al., 2015; Lanszki et al., 2019).

Our study addresses, for the first time, the coexistence patterns of carnivore species present in Qilian Mountain National Park across multiple dimensions of niche partitioning. This work substantially contributes to current understanding of carnivore guilds and offers helpful information for biodiversity conservation at a regional scale. Moreover, our study provides important insights into the potential mechanisms of niche partitioning among sympatric carnivores, particularly intra- and interspecific relations between apex carnivores and mesocarnivores. Specifically, we found that the overall trend of spatial overlap across carnivores is relatively low, that apex carnivores overlap in time and diet, that mesocarnivores showed a high degree of dietary overlap, and that there was substantial similarity in diel activity patterns between apex carnivores and mesocarnivores. These results indicate that carnivores with similar ecological traits foster co-occurrence by adjusting their daily activity patterns and using differing food resources to minimize competitive interactions.

We found dietary and temporal overlap among apex carnivores, showing that spatial partitioning is responsible for their successful coexistence in this area, consistent with our hypothesis. Wolf and snow leopard had the highest dietary overlap and prey similarity between apex carnivore pairs in this study, showing that the avoidance of space and time plays an important role in their coexistence. Recent evidence proves that habitat preference facilitates the coexistence of wolf and snow leopard (Shrotriya et al., 2022). Their hunting strategies may be impacted by their habitat selection. Solitary snow leopards are more suitable for hiding in habitats with features that favor ambush predators, while wolves hunt in packs (Shrotriya et al., 2022). It is clear that wild ungulates (e.g. blue sheep) constituted the primary proportion of wolf and snow leopard diet, followed by small mammals such as plateau pika, Himalayan marmot (Marmota himalayana), and woolly hare (Lepus oiostolus). In addition, livestock consumption also contributed to the high degree of overlap in their diets (Wang et al., 2014). This supports the optimal foraging theory, in which large predators preferentially select food resources that provide maximum benefit (Brown et al., 1999), but also showed that greater competition for resources is likely to occur between wolf and snow leopard due to their use of the same prey species in this area. This may be especially true in times of habitat stress when resources are poor.

Snow leopard and Eurasian lynx had the highest temporal overlap between apex carnivore pairs in our case, showing that spatial and dietary partitioning facilitate their coexistence. Eurasian lynx is considered an opportunistic predator, and its prey varies among different regions with its primary dietary resource being ungulates and small mammals. For example, Eurasian lynx showed a strong preference for brown hare Lepus europaeus in Turkey, edible dormice Glis glis in Slovenia and Croatia, and chamois Rupicapra rupicapra or roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Switzerland (Mengüllüoğlu et al., 2018; Krofel et al., 2011; Molinari-Jobin et al., 2007). Varied prey selection may be related to sex, age, population density, and season (Mengüllüoğlu et al., 2018; Odden et al., 2006). Our results show that woolly hare make up the majority of the Eurasian lynx diet, followed by blue sheep. Woolly hare is mainly distributed in shrubland, meadow, desert, and wetland, while blue sheep tend to choose highly sheltered areas, close to bare rocks and cliffs as habitat. Therefore, prey preferences among snow leopard and Eurasian lynx also contribute to spatial avoidance.

Mesocarnivores had substantial overlap in diet, underscoring food resources as a primary competitive factor that necessitates spatial and temporal partitioning for successful coexistence. This finding aligns with previous research indicating that mesocarnivores use temporal and spatial segregation to reduce competition and the probability of antagonistic interspecific encounters (Ferreiro-Arias et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022a). Differences in habitat preference may lead to spatial niche partitioning among mesocarnivores (Wang et al., 2022). In addition, species can adjust temporal periods of behavior to respond to environmental change, competition, and predation risk (Gallo et al., 2022; Finnegan et al., 2021; van der Vinne et al., 2019). Pallas’s cat hunts during crepuscular and diurnal periods and inhabits meadow habitat with greater prey abundance (Anile et al., 2021; Greco et al., 2022; Ross et al., 2019). In contrast, red fox is primarily nocturnal and occupies diverse habitats depending on prey abundance (Goldyn et al., 2003; Pandolfi et al., 1997; Reshamwala et al., 2022). Tibetan fox is a diurnal hunter of the Tibetan plateau, preferring shrub meadow, meadow steppe, and alpine meadow steppe (Gong and Hu, 2003). It is worth noting the substantial overlap in diet between Pallas’s cat and Tibetan fox. The dietary overlap between the two was extremely high, with a Pianka’s value close to 1. Dietary analyses showed that pika contributed to more than 85% of their collective diets, with 90% of Pallas’s cat diet being pika. Pika may be an optimal prey item in the area because of size and year-round activity (Ross, 2009). Previous studies have shown that the Pallas’s cat and Tibetan fox are specialist predators of pikas (Harris et al., 2014; Ross, 2009). However, specialization on pika is facultative in that Pallas’s cat and Tibetan fox can select other prey items when pika availability is low (Harris et al., 2014; Ross, 2009). This was observed in our study, even though dietary diversity was low.

Apex carnivores and mesocarnivores exhibited considerable overlap in time overall, showing that spatial and dietary partitioning may play a large role in facilitating their coexistence. As confirmed by previous research, kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) successfully coexisted with dominant carnivores by a combination of spatial avoidance and use of alternative resources (Lonsinger et al., 2017). Differences in body mass may play a crucial role in minimizing dietary overlap, effectively reducing interspecific competition between apex and mesocarnivores. Of exception in our study, however, was wolf and red fox, who exhibited more dietary overlap, showing that temporal and spatial avoidance may promote their coexistence. As canid generalist-opportunist species, the wolf and red fox consumed similar prey, albeit the red fox may have obtained livestock and ungulate species via scavenging or by preying on very young individuals (Hacker et al., 2022). In addition, the wolf and red fox had different peak activity times, suggesting temporal segregation as a potentially strong driver of coexistence. Our occupancy model also revealed that mesocarnivores prefer habitats that coincide with human disturbance, possibly contributing to spatial niche differentiation with other apex carnivore species like the wolf. Our findings echo other recent research which supports the idea that red foxes can coexist with wolves by exploiting a broader ecological niche (Shrotriya et al., 2022).

Our study highlights the effectiveness of combining camera trapping with DNA metabarcoding for detecting and identifying both cryptic and rare species within a sympatric carnivore guild. This integrated approach allowed us to capture a more comprehensive view of species presence and interactions compared to traditional visual surveys, whereas it is important to acknowledge the challenges associated with this technique, including the high costs of equipment and the need for specialized training and computational resources to manage and analyze the large volumes of sequence data. Despite these challenges, the benefits of this combined method in improving biodiversity assessments and understanding species coexistence outweigh the drawbacks. However, several restrictions remain for this research. The first limitation involves differences in samples sizes. Although the scat samples of Tibetan fox were relatively low, the accuracy of DNA metabarcoding in informing species presence in diet ensures that data are informative and thus still important for species conservation management decisions (Hacker et al., 2022). Second, the methodology of foraging (e.g. predation or scavenging) and the condition of the prey item (e.g. age or size) cannot be identified in dietary studies (Hacker et al., 2022). Pika is a prime component of diet among mesocarnivores, especially in the diet of the Pallas’s cat and the Tibetan fox. We surmise that the simultaneous dependence on pika led to partial overlap in spatial and activity patterns, resulting in increased potential competitive interactions. Due to the lack of spatial and temporal analysis of Pallas’s cat in our study, further monitoring is needed to develop a comprehensive conservation plan. Despite these limitations, our study provides a foundation from which future studies interested in niche partitioning among carnivores along spatial, temporal, and dietary dimensions can be modeled.

In summary, our study has shown that the coexistence of carnivore species in the landscapes of Qilian Mountain National Park can be facilitated along three niche axes, with spatial segregation being the most pronounced of the three. Apex carnivore species tended to overlap temporally or trophically, mesocarnivore species had high dietary overlap with each other, and apex carnivore and mesocarnivore species displayed similarity in temporal use. Pika, blue sheep, and livestock were found to make up a large proportion of carnivore diet. Resource competition between wolf and snow leopard and the interspecific competition between Pallas’s cat and Tibetan fox were strong in this area. Based on the findings presented above, we recommend targeted efforts for enhanced protection and management in several key areas. First, greater efforts are needed to protect habitat, including the establishment of habitat corridors and optimizing grassland fence layouts to safeguard migration routes. Second, resource competition should be carefully monitored between snow leopards and wolves, as well as between Pallas’s cat and Tibetan foxes. More attention is needed for pika at our study site considering the role they play in the conservation of Pallas’s cat and Tibetan fox populations. Previous poisoning campaigns targeting pikas were initiated out of concern for grassland degradation (Smith and Foggin, 1999). Recent research underscores the importance of pika population health and habitat for the distribution of Pallas’s cats (Greenspan and Giordano, 2021). It’s crucial to note that poisoning campaigns targeting small mammals may be incredibly dangerous for mesocarnivores feeding on them due to secondary poisoning, necessitating caution in such conservation strategies. Further, vigilance regarding the preponderance of smaller prey in predator diets is vital, as this may indicate severe loss of larger prey, which will increase the risk of interference competition (Steinmetz et al., 2021). Third, efforts should focus on restoring vulnerable wild prey populations, strengthening grazing area management, and supporting livelihoods of herders to mitigate livestock predation and consequent human-wildlife conflicts. Regular patrols of protected areas and core habitats are essential, along with educational outreach to conservation staff and herders. Our study corroborates and complements the findings of prior studies on these species and their coexistence mechanisms, offering insights crucial for wildlife conservation in the region.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Alexander JS
   2. Shi K
   3. Tallents LA
   4. Riordan P

   (2016) On the high trail: examining determinants of site use by the Endangered snow leopard Panthera uncia in Qilianshan, China

   Oryx 50:231–238.

   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315001027

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Anile S
   2. Augugliaro C
   3. Munkhtsog B
   4. Dartora F
   5. Vendramin A
   6. Bombieri G
   7. Nielsen CK

   (2021) Density and activity patterns of Pallas’s cats, Otocolobus manul, in central Mongolia

   Wildlife Research 48:264.

   https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20061

   • Google Scholar
3. Book

   1. Boitani L

   (2016)

   Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research

   Pelagic Publishing Ltd.

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Brown JS
   2. Laundre JW
   3. Gurung M

   (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions

   Journal of Mammalogy 80:385–399.

   https://doi.org/10.2307/1383287

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Chen X
   2. Tian T
   3. Pan H
   4. Jin Y
   5. Zhang X
   6. Xiang Y
   7. Yang B
   8. Zhang L

   (2024) Coexistence mechanisms of small carnivores in a near-pristine area within the mountains of Southwest China

   Global Ecology and Conservation 49:e02777.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02777

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Chu C
   2. Wang Y
   3. Liu Y
   4. Jiang L
   5. He F

   (2017) Advances in species coexistence theory

   Biodiversity Science 25:345–354.

   https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2017034

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Davis CL
   2. Rich LN
   3. Farris ZJ
   4. Kelly MJ
   5. Di Bitetti MS
   6. Blanco YD
   7. Albanesi S
   8. Farhadinia MS
   9. Gholikhani N
   10. Hamel S
   11. Harmsen BJ
   12. Wultsch C
   13. Kane MD
   14. Martins Q
   15. Murphy AJ
   16. Steenweg R
   17. Sunarto S
   18. Taktehrani A
   19. Thapa K
   20. Tucker JM
   21. Whittington J
   22. Widodo FA
   23. Yoccoz NG
   24. Miller DAW

   (2018) Ecological correlates of the spatial co-occurrence of sympatric mammalian carnivores worldwide

   Ecology Letters 21:1401–1412.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13124

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Deagle BE
   2. Thomas AC
   3. McInnes JC
   4. Clarke LJ
   5. Vesterinen EJ
   6. Clare EL
   7. Kartzinel TR
   8. Eveson JP

   (2019) Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

   Molecular Ecology 28:391–406.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14734

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Deiner K
   2. Bik HM
   3. Mächler E
   4. Seymour M
   5. Lacoursière-Roussel A
   6. Altermatt F
   7. Creer S
   8. Bista I
   9. Lodge DM
   10. de Vere N
   11. Pfrender ME
   12. Bernatchez L

   (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities

   Molecular Ecology 26:5872–5895.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. de Satgé J
    2. Teichman K
    3. Cristescu B

    (2017) Competition and coexistence in a small carnivore guild

    Oecologia 184:873–884.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3916-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Di Bitetti MS
    2. De Angelo CD
    3. Di Blanco YE
    4. Paviolo A

    (2010) Niche partitioning and species coexistence in a Neotropical felid assemblage

    Acta Oecologica 36:403–412.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2010.04.001

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Di Minin E
    2. Slotow R
    3. Hunter LTB
    4. Montesino Pouzols F
    5. Toivonen T
    6. Verburg PH
    7. Leader-Williams N
    8. Petracca L
    9. Moilanen A

    (2016) Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change

    Scientific Reports 6:23814.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23814

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Donadio E
    2. Buskirk SW

    (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora

    The American Naturalist 167:524–536.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/501033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Dormann CF

    (2011)

    How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks

    Network Biology 1:1–20.

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Ferreiro-Arias I
    2. Isla J
    3. Jordano P
    4. Benítez-López A

    (2021) Fine-scale coexistence between Mediterranean mesocarnivores is mediated by spatial, temporal, and trophic resource partitioning

    Ecology and Evolution 11:15520–15533.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8077

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Finnegan SP
    2. Gantchoff MG
    3. Hill JE
    4. Silveira L
    5. Tôrres NM
    6. Jácomo AT
    7. Uzal A

    (2021) “When the felid’s away, the mesocarnivores play”: seasonal temporal segregation in a neotropical carnivore guild

    Mammalian Biology 101:631–638.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00110-9

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Fiske I
    2. Chandler R

    (2011) unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance

    Journal of Statistical Software 43:1–23.

    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v043.i10

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Frey S
    2. Fisher JT
    3. Burton AC
    4. Volpe JP

    (2017) Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities

    Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 3:123–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.60

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Gallo T
    2. Fidino M
    3. Gerber B
    4. Ahlers AA
    5. Angstmann JL
    6. Amaya M
    7. Concilio AL
    8. Drake D
    9. Gay D
    10. Lehrer EW
    11. Murray MH
    12. Ryan TJ
    13. St Clair CC
    14. Salsbury CM
    15. Sander HA
    16. Stankowich T
    17. Williamson J
    18. Belaire JA
    19. Simon K
    20. Magle SB

    (2022) Mammals adjust diel activity across gradients of urbanization

    eLife 11:e74756.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74756

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Garrote G
    2. Pérez de Ayala R

    (2019) Spatial segregation between Iberian lynx and other carnivores

    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 1:347–354.

    https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2019.42.0347

    • Google Scholar
21. Book

    1. Gause GF

    (1934)

    The Struggle for Existence

    Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Goldyn B
    2. Hromada M
    3. Surmacki A
    4. Tryjanowski P

    (2003) Habitat use and diet of the red foxVulpes vulpes in an agricultural landscape in Poland

    Zeitschrift Für Jagdwissenschaft 49:191–200.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189737

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gómez-Ortiz Y
    2. Monroy-Vilchis O
    3. Mendoza-Martínez GD

    (2015) Feeding interactions in an assemblage of terrestrial carnivores in central Mexico

    Zoological Studies 54:e16.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-014-0102-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Gong M
    2. Hu J

    (2003)

    The summer microhabitat selection of Tibetan Fox in the Northwest Plateau of Sichuan

    Acta Theriologica Sinica 23:266–269.

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Gorczynski D
    2. Hsieh C
    3. Ahumada J
    4. Akampurira E
    5. Andrianarisoa MH
    6. Espinosa S
    7. Johnson S
    8. Kayijamahe C
    9. Lima MGM
    10. Mugerwa B
    11. Rovero F
    12. Salvador J
    13. Santos F
    14. Sheil D
    15. Uzabaho E
    16. Beaudrot L

    (2022) Human density modulates spatial associations among tropical forest terrestrial mammal species

    Global Change Biology 28:7205–7216.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16434

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Greco I
    2. Oberosler V
    3. Monti IE
    4. Augugliaro C
    5. Barashkova A
    6. Rovero F

    (2022) Spatio‐temporal occurrence and sensitivity to livestock husbandry of Pallas’s cat in the Mongolian Altai

    The Journal of Wildlife Management 86:e22150.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22150

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Greenspan E
    2. Giordano AJ

    (2021) A rangewide distribution model for the Pallas’s cat ( Otocolobus manul ): identifying potential new survey regions for an understudied small cat

    Mammalia 85:574–587.

    https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2020-0094

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Hacker CE
    2. Jevit M
    3. Hussain S
    4. Muhammad G
    5. Munkhtsog B
    6. Munkhtsog B
    7. Zhang Y
    8. Li D
    9. Liu Y
    10. Farrington JD
    11. Balbakova F
    12. Alamanov A
    13. Kurmanaliev O
    14. Buyanaa C
    15. Bayandonoi G
    16. Ochirjav M
    17. Liang X
    18. Bian X
    19. Weckworth B
    20. Jackson R
    21. Janecka JE

    (2021) Regional comparison of snow leopard (Panthera uncia) Diet using DNA metabarcoding

    Biodiversity and Conservation 30:797–817.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02118-6

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Hacker CE
    2. Cong W
    3. Xue Y
    4. Li J
    5. Zhang Y
    6. Wu L
    7. Ji Y
    8. Dai Y
    9. Li Y
    10. Jin L
    11. Li D
    12. Zhang J
    13. Janecka JE
    14. Zhang Y

    (2022) Dietary diversity and niche partitioning of carnivores across the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau of China using DNA metabarcoding

    Journal of Mammalogy 103:1005–1018.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyac044

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Hardin G

    (1960) The competitive exclusion principle

    Science 131:1292–1297.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3409.1292

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Harris RB
    2. Jiake Z
    3. Yinqiu J
    4. Kai Z
    5. Chunyan Y
    6. Yu DW

    (2014) Evidence that the Tibetan fox is an obligate predator of the plateau pika: conservation implications

    Journal of Mammalogy 95:1207–1221.

    https://doi.org/10.1644/14-MAMM-A-021

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Haswell PM
    2. Jones KA
    3. Kusak J
    4. Hayward MW

    (2018) Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators

    Oecologia 187:573–583.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Janečka JE
    2. Jackson R
    3. Yuquang Z
    4. Diqiang L
    5. Munkhtsog B
    6. Buckley‐Beason V
    7. Murphy WJ

    (2008) Population monitoring of snow leopards using noninvasive collection of scat samples: A pilot study

    Animal Conservation 11:401–411.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00195.x

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Karanth KU
    2. Srivathsa A
    3. Vasudev D
    4. Puri M
    5. Parameshwaran R
    6. Kumar NS

    (2017) Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 284:20161860.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1860

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Kartzinel TR
    2. Chen PA
    3. Coverdale TC
    4. Erickson DL
    5. Kress WJ
    6. Kuzmina ML
    7. Rubenstein DI
    8. Wang W
    9. Pringle RM

    (2015) DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores

    PNAS 112:8019–8024.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503283112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kays R
    2. Arbogast BS
    3. Baker‐Whatton M
    4. Beirne C
    5. Boone HM
    6. Bowler M
    7. Burneo SF
    8. Cove MV
    9. Ding P
    10. Espinosa S
    11. Gonçalves ALS
    12. Hansen CP
    13. Jansen PA
    14. Kolowski JM
    15. Knowles TW
    16. Lima MGM
    17. Millspaugh J
    18. McShea WJ
    19. Pacifici K
    20. Parsons AW
    21. Pease BS
    22. Rovero F
    23. Santos F
    24. Schuttler SG
    25. Sheil D
    26. Si X
    27. Snider M
    28. Spironello WR

    (2020) An empirical evaluation of camera trap study design: How many, how long and when?

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11:700–713.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13370

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Krofel M
    2. Huber D
    3. Kos I

    (2011) Diet of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in the northern Dinaric Mountains (Slovenia and Croatia)

    Acta Theriologica 56:315–322.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-011-0032-2

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kuijper DPJ
    2. Sahlén E
    3. Elmhagen B
    4. Chamaillé-Jammes S
    5. Sand H
    6. Lone K
    7. Cromsigt JPGM

    (2016) Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 283:20161625.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1625

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Lanszki J
    2. Heltai M
    3. Kövér G
    4. Zalewski A

    (2019) Non-linear relationship between body size of terrestrial carnivores and their trophic niche breadth and overlap

    Basic and Applied Ecology 38:36–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2019.06.004

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Li S
    2. Mcshea WJ
    3. Wang D
    4. Shao L
    5. Shi X

    (2010) The use of infrared‐triggered cameras for surveying phasianids in Sichuan Province, China

    Ibis 152:299–309.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00989.x

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Li Z
    2. Wang T
    3. Smith JLD
    4. Feng R
    5. Feng L
    6. Mou P
    7. Ge J

    (2019) Coexistence of two sympatric flagship carnivores in the human-dominated forest landscapes of Northeast Asia

    Landscape Ecology 34:291–305.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0759-0

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Li Jia
    2. Xue Y
    3. Hacker CE
    4. Zhang Y
    5. Li Y
    6. Cong W
    7. Jin L
    8. Li G
    9. Wu B
    10. Li D
    11. Zhang Y

    (2021) Projected impacts of climate change on snow leopard habitat in Qinghai Province, China

    Ecology and Evolution 11:17202–17218.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8358

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Li J
    2. Li D
    3. Hacker C
    4. Dong W
    5. Wu B
    6. Xue Y

    (2022a) Spatial co-occurrence and temporal activity patterns of sympatric mesocarnivores guild in Qinling Mountains

    Global Ecology and Conservation 36:e02129.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02129

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Li J
    2. Xue Y
    3. Liao M
    4. Dong W
    5. Wu B
    6. Li D

    (2022b) Temporal and spatial activity patterns of sympatric wild ungulates in qinling mountains, China

    Animals 12:1666.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131666

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Linnell JDC
    2. Strand O

    (2000) Interference interactions, co‐existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores

    Diversity and Distributions 6:169–176.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00069.x

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Lonsinger RC
    2. Gese EM
    3. Bailey LL
    4. Waits LP

    (2017) The roles of habitat and intraguild predation by coyotes on the spatial dynamics of kit foxes

    Ecosphere 8:e01749.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1749

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Ma D
    2. Sun Z
    3. Hu D
    4. An B
    5. Chen L
    6. Zhang D
    7. Dong K
    8. Zhang L

    (2021) Camera-trapping survey of the mammal diversity in the qilian mountains national nature reserve, gansu province

    ACTA Theriologica Sinica 41:90–98.

    https://doi.org/10.16829/j.slxb.150418

    • Google Scholar
48. Book

    1. MacKenzie DI

    (2018)

    Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence

    Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier.

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Manlick PJ
    2. Pauli JN

    (2020) Human disturbance increases trophic niche overlap in terrestrial carnivore communities

    PNAS 117:26842–26848.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012774117

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Mengüllüoğlu D
    2. Ambarlı H
    3. Berger A
    4. Hofer H

    (2018) Foraging ecology of Eurasian lynx populations in southwest Asia: Conservation implications for a diet specialist

    Ecology and Evolution 8:9451–9463.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4439

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Molinari-Jobin A
    2. Zimmermann F
    3. Ryser A
    4. Breitenmoser-Würsten C
    5. Capt S
    6. Breitenmoser U
    7. Molinari P
    8. Haller H
    9. Eyholzer R

    (2007) Variation in diet, prey selectivity and home-range size of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in Switzerland

    Wildlife Biology 13:393–405.

    https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[393:VIDPSA]2.0.CO;2

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Moreno-Sosa AM
    2. Yacelga M
    3. Craighead KA
    4. Kramer-Schadt S
    5. Abrams JF

    (2022) Can prey occupancy act as A surrogate for mesopredator occupancy? A case study of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)

    Mammalian Biology 102:163–175.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-022-00232-8

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Nasanbat B
    2. Ceacero F
    3. Ravchig S

    (2021) A small neighborhood well-organized: seasonal and daily activity patterns of the community of large and mid-sized mammals around waterholes in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia

    Frontiers in Zoology 18:25.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-021-00412-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Newmaster SG
    2. Thompson ID
    3. Steeves RAD
    4. Rodgers AR
    5. Fazekas AJ
    6. Maloles JR
    7. McMullin RT
    8. Fryxell JM

    (2013) Examination of two new technologies to assess the diet of woodland caribou: video recorders attached to collars and DNA barcoding

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research 43:897–900.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0108

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Newsome TM
    2. Greenville AC
    3. Ćirović D
    4. Dickman CR
    5. Johnson CN
    6. Krofel M
    7. Letnic M
    8. Ripple WJ
    9. Ritchie EG
    10. Stoyanov S
    11. Wirsing AJ

    (2017) Top predators constrain mesopredator distributions

    Nature Communications 8:15469.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15469

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Odden J
    2. Linnell JDC
    3. Andersen R

    (2006) Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density

    European Journal of Wildlife Research 52:237–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-006-0052-4

    • Google Scholar
57. Software

    1. Oksanen J
    2. Blanchet FG
    3. Friendly M
    4. Kindt R
    5. Legendre P
    6. McGlinn D
    7. Minchin PR
    8. O’Hara RB
    9. Simpson GL
    10. Solymos P
    11. Stevens MHH
    12. Szoecs E
    13. Wagner H

    (2019) Vegan: community ecology package, version 2.2-0

    R Package.

    http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan
58. 1. Palencia P
    2. Vicente J
    3. Soriguer RC
    4. Acevedo P

    (2022) Towards a best‐practices guide for camera trapping: assessing differences among camera trap models and settings under field conditions

    Journal of Zoology 316:197–208.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12945

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Pandolfi M
    2. Forconi P
    3. Montecchiari L

    (1997) Spatial behaviour of the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) in a rural area of central Italy

    Italian Journal of Zoology 64:351–358.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009709356222

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Reshamwala HS
    2. Raina P
    3. Hussain Z
    4. Khan S
    5. Dirzo R
    6. Habib B

    (2022) On the move: spatial ecology and habitat use of red fox in the Trans-Himalayan cold desert

    PeerJ 10:e13967.

    https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13967

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Riaz T
    2. Shehzad W
    3. Viari A
    4. Pompanon F
    5. Taberlet P
    6. Coissac E

    (2011) ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis

    Nucleic Acids Research 39:e145.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr732

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Ridout MS
    2. Linkie M

    (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data

    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14:322–337.

    https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.08038

    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Ripple WJ
    2. Estes JA
    3. Beschta RL
    4. Wilmers CC
    5. Ritchie EG
    6. Hebblewhite M
    7. Berger J
    8. Elmhagen B
    9. Letnic M
    10. Nelson MP
    11. Schmitz OJ
    12. Smith DW
    13. Wallach AD
    14. Wirsing AJ

    (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores

    Science 343:1241484.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241484

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Ritchie EG
    2. Johnson CN

    (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation

    Ecology Letters 12:982–998.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. Thesis

    1. Ross S

    (2009)

    Providing an ecological basis for the conservation of the Pallas’s cat (Otocolobus manul) PhD thesis

    University of Bristol.

    • Google Scholar
66. Book

    1. Ross S
    2. Barashkova A
    3. Kirilyuk V
    4. Naidenko S

    (2019)

    The Behaviour and Ecology of the Manul

    Cat Specialist Group.

    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Rowcliffe JM
    2. Kays R
    3. Kranstauber B
    4. Carbone C
    5. Jansen PA

    (2014) Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:1170–1179.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12278

    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Santos F
    2. Carbone C
    3. Wearn OR
    4. Rowcliffe JM
    5. Espinosa S
    6. Lima MGM
    7. Ahumada JA
    8. Gonçalves ALS
    9. Trevelin LC
    10. Alvarez-Loayza P
    11. Spironello WR
    12. Jansen PA
    13. Juen L
    14. Peres CA

    (2019) Prey availability and temporal partitioning modulate felid coexistence in Neotropical forests

    PLOS ONE 14:e0213671.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213671

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Schoener TW

    (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities

    Science 185:27–39.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4145.27

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Searle CE
    2. Smit JB
    3. Cusack JJ
    4. Strampelli P
    5. Grau A
    6. Mkuburo L
    7. Macdonald DW
    8. Loveridge AJ
    9. Dickman AJ

    (2021) Temporal partitioning and spatiotemporal avoidance among large carnivores in a human-impacted African landscape

    PLOS ONE 16:e0256876.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256876

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. Book

    1. Shannon CE
    2. Weaver W

    (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Philosophical Review.

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3067010

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Shao X
    2. Lu Q
    3. Xiong M
    4. Bu H
    5. Shi X
    6. Wang D
    7. Zhao J
    8. Li S
    9. Yao M

    (2021) Prey partitioning and livestock consumption in the world’s richest large carnivore assemblage

    Current Biology 31:4887–4897.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Shrotriya S
    2. Reshamwala HS
    3. Lyngdoh S
    4. Jhala YV
    5. Habib B

    (2022) Feeding patterns of three widespread carnivores—the wolf, snow leopard, and red fox—in the trans-himalayan landscape of India

    Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10:815996.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.815996

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Smith A
    2. Foggin M

    (1999) The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau

    Animal Conservation 2:235–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943099000566

    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Smith JA
    2. Suraci JP
    3. Clinchy M
    4. Crawford A
    5. Roberts D
    6. Zanette LY
    7. Wilmers CC

    (2017) Fear of the human “super predator” reduces feeding time in large carnivores

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 284:20170433.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0433

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. Book

    1. Sorensen TJ

    (1948)

    A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species Content and Its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on Danish Commons

    Royal Academy press.

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Steinmetz R
    2. Seuaturien N
    3. Intanajitjuy P
    4. Inrueang P
    5. Prempree K

    (2021) The effects of prey depletion on dietary niches of sympatric apex predators in Southeast Asia

    Integrative Zoology 16:19–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12461

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Strampelli P
    2. Henschel P
    3. Searle CE
    4. Macdonald DW
    5. Dickman AJ

    (2023) Spatial co-occurrence patterns of sympatric large carnivores in a multi-use African system

    PLOS ONE 18:e0280420.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280420

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Torretta E
    2. Riboldi L
    3. Costa E
    4. Delfoco C
    5. Frignani E
    6. Meriggi A

    (2021) Niche partitioning between sympatric wild canids: the case of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) and the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in north-eastern Italy

    BMC Ecology and Evolution 21:129.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01860-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Tsunoda H
    2. Newman C
    3. Peeva S
    4. Raichev E
    5. Buesching CD
    6. Kaneko Y

    (2020) Spatio-temporal partitioning facilitates mesocarnivore sympatry in the Stara Planina Mountains, Bulgaria

    Zoology 141:125801.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2020.125801

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. van der Vinne V
    2. Tachinardi P
    3. Riede SJ
    4. Akkerman J
    5. Scheepe J
    6. Daan S
    7. Hut RA

    (2019) Maximising survival by shifting the daily timing of activity

    Ecology Letters 22:2097–2102.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13404

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Vilella M
    2. Ferrandiz-Rovira M
    3. Sayol F

    (2020) Coexistence of predators in time: Effects of season and prey availability on species activity within a Mediterranean carnivore guild

    Ecology and Evolution 10:11408–11422.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6778

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Wang J
    2. Laguardia A
    3. Damerell PJ
    4. Riordan P
    5. Shi K

    (2014) Dietary overlap of snow leopard and other carnivores in the Pamirs of Northwestern China

    Chinese Science Bulletin 59:3162–3168.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0370-y

    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Wang D
    2. Sai Q
    3. Wang Z
    4. Zhao H
    5. Lian X

    (2022) Spatiotemporal overlap among sympatric Pallas’s cat (Otocolobus manul), Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata) and red fox (V. vulpes) in the source region of the Yangtze River

    Biodiv Sci 30:21365.

    https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2021365

    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Xue Y
    2. Li J
    3. Hu Y
    4. Ma L
    5. Qian W
    6. Yan P
    7. Yang M
    8. Chen D
    9. Wu B
    10. Li D

    (2019) Camera-trapping survey of the mammals and birds in the Qilian Mountain National Park (Qinghai area)

    China. ACTA Theriologica Sinica 39:466–475.

    https://doi.org/10.16829/j.slxb.150307

    • Google Scholar
86. Software

    1. Zhang J

    (2016) Spaa: species association analysis, version 0.2.2

    GitHub.

    https://github.com/helixcn/spaa
87. Book

    1. Zheng J

    (2011)

    The Study of Qinghai Nature Reserve

    Qinghai People’s Publishing House.

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Wei Cong

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0005-6071-9564

2. Jia Li

   Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Charlotte Hacker

   Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Ye Li

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Yu Zhang

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Funding acquisition, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Lixiao Jin

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Yi Zhang

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Diqiang Li

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. Yadong Xue

   Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

   Contribution

   Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   xueyadong334@163.com

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

10. Yuguang Zhang

    Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing, China

    Contribution

    Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

    For correspondence

    yugzhang@sina.com.cn

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9801-8556

• 528

  views

• 83

  downloads

• 0

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.