Different coexistence patterns between apex carnivores and mesocarnivores based on temporal, spatial, and dietary niche partitioning analysis in Qilian Mountain National Park, China
Figures

The relationship between carnivore species occupancy probability and covariates by the optimal models (∆AIC≤2).
The solid line represents the fitted polynomial regression and the gray area represents 95% confidence intervals.

Daily activity patterns of carnivore species.
Shades of lavender indicate temporal areas of overlap. The p-values are derived from Wald tests. A p-value less than 0.05 indicates that the parameter significantly contributes to the model.

The food web of carnivore species (SL – snow leopard, EL – Eurasian lynx, PC – Pallas’s cat, RF – red fox, TF – Tibetan fox).
The heights of the left bars represent the frequency of occurrence of the taxonomic order of prey species, the middle bars represent the number of samples for each carnivore, and the heights of the right bars represent the frequency of occurrence of prey species in scats. The colors of prey match the taxonomic orders. The connecting line widths represent the prey frequency of occurrence in the diet of each carnivore species.

The number of scats belonging to each host species among 480 scats samples.

The frequency of occurrence (FOO) percentage of each prey order by carnivore.
‘Livestock’ consists of all domestic animals observed as prey combined.
Tables
Summary of occupancy rate and detection probability of different species for the optimal models (ΔAIC≤2).
Species | Models | Number of parameters | AIC | ΔAIC | AIC Wt | ψ | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wolf | Psi (rix+ndvi+prey); P (ele+prey) | 7 | 282.14 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.180 | 0.153 |
Psi (rix+ndvi+prey); P (ele+hdis) | 7 | 282.45 | 0.302 | 0.066 | 0.183 | 0.145 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+prey); P (ele) | 6 | 283.67 | 1.525 | 0.036 | 0.217 | 0.111 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+prey); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 8 | 284.10 | 1.959 | 0.029 | 0.179 | 0.154 | |
Psi (ele+rix+ndvi+prey); P (ele+prey) | 8 | 284.12 | 1.972 | 0.029 | 0.168 | 0.165 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+disrd+prey); P (ele+prey) | 8 | 284.14 | 2.000 | 0.028 | 0.178 | 0.156 | |
Model average | 0.184 | 0.147 | |||||
Snow leopard | Psi (disrd+ndvi); P (hdis+prey) | 6 | 970.69 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0.436 | 0.419 |
Psi (ele+disrd); P (hdis+prey) | 6 | 970.81 | 0.113 | 0.033 | 0.435 | 0.421 | |
Psi (.); P (hdis+prey) | 4 | 970.99 | 0.292 | 0.030 | 0.437 | 0.420 | |
Psi (disrd+ndvi); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 7 | 971.12 | 0.429 | 0.028 | 0.440 | 0.413 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+ndvi); P (hdis+prey) | 7 | 971.13 | 0.439 | 0.028 | 0.433 | 0.420 | |
Psi (.); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 5 | 971.21 | 0.511 | 0.027 | 0.442 | 0.413 | |
Psi (disrd); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 6 | 971.22 | 0.525 | 0.027 | 0.444 | 0.410 | |
Psi (disrd); P (hdis+prey) | 5 | 971.52 | 0.825 | 0.023 | 0.437 | 0.420 | |
Psi (ele); P (hdis+prey) | 5 | 971.62 | 0.928 | 0.022 | 0.435 | 0.421 | |
Psi (ndvi); P (hdis+prey) | 5 | 971.64 | 0.947 | 0.022 | 0.437 | 0.420 | |
Psi (ele+disrd); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 7 | 971.92 | 1.222 | 0.019 | 0.436 | 0.416 | |
Psi (ndvi); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 6 | 972.42 | 1.726 | 0.015 | 0.440 | 0.414 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+ndvi); P (ele+hdis+prey) | 8 | 972.45 | 1.757 | 0.014 | 0.435 | 0.416 | |
Psi (disrd+ndvi+rix); P (hdis+prey) | 7 | 972.67 | 1.974 | 0.013 | 0.436 | 0.419 | |
Model average | 0.437 | 0.417 | |||||
Eurasian lynx | Psi (ndvi); P (hdis) | 4 | 371.32 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.163 | 0.321 |
Psi (rix+ndvi); P (hdis) | 5 | 371.40 | 0.076 | 0.024 | 0.161 | 0.322 | |
Psi (ndvi); P (hdis+prey) | 5 | 371.64 | 0.325 | 0.021 | 0.170 | 0.296 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi); P (hdis+prey) | 6 | 371.86 | 0.539 | 0.019 | 0.167 | 0.300 | |
Psi (ndvi+hdis); P (prey) | 5 | 371.94 | 0.623 | 0.019 | 0.163 | 0.315 | |
Psi (ndvi+disrd); P (hdis) | 5 | 372.02 | 0.702 | 0.018 | 0.163 | 0.321 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+hdis); P (prey) | 6 | 372.23 | 0.907 | 0.016 | 0.161 | 0.318 | |
Psi (ndvi+hdis); P (.) | 4 | 372.24 | 0.916 | 0.016 | 0.156 | 0.343 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+hdis); P (.) | 5 | 372.36 | 1.044 | 0.015 | 0.154 | 0.345 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+disrd); P (hdis) | 6 | 372.39 | 1.072 | 0.015 | 0.161 | 0.321 | |
Psi (ndvi+disrd); P (hdis+prey) | 6 | 372.64 | 1.318 | 0.013 | 0.168 | 0.300 | |
Psi (ndvi+prey); P (hdis) | 5 | 372.67 | 1.352 | 0.013 | 0.163 | 0.320 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+prey); P (hdis) | 6 | 372.99 | 1.672 | 0.011 | 0.160 | 0.323 | |
Psi (ndvi+disrd+hdis); P (.) | 5 | 373.06 | 1.744 | 0.011 | 0.156 | 0.344 | |
Psi (ndvi+hdis); P (hdis) | 5 | 373.09 | 1.775 | 0.010 | 0.156 | 0.325 | |
Psi (ndvi+disrd+hdis); P (prey) | 6 | 373.11 | 1.792 | 0.010 | 0.162 | 0.319 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+disrd); P (hdis+prey) | 7 | 373.12 | 1.796 | 0.010 | 0.165 | 0.303 | |
Psi (rix+ndvi+hdis); P (hdis) | 6 | 373.23 | 1.913 | 0.010 | 0.154 | 0.326 | |
Psi (ele+ndvi); P (hdis) | 5 | 373.32 | 1.999 | 0.009 | 0.164 | 0.319 | |
Model average | 0.161 | 0.320 | |||||
Red fox | Psi (disrd+hdis+prey); P (.) | 5 | 894.44 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.369 | 0.391 |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey); P (ele) | 6 | 894.59 | 0.152 | 0.037 | 0.370 | 0.387 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+ndvi+prey); P (.) | 6 | 895.30 | 0.864 | 0.026 | 0.370 | 0.391 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+ndvi+prey); P (ele) | 7 | 895.37 | 0.934 | 0.025 | 0.370 | 0.387 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey+rix); P (.) | 6 | 895.99 | 1.544 | 0.018 | 0.369 | 0.392 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey+rix); P (ele) | 7 | 896.16 | 1.717 | 0.017 | 0.370 | 0.388 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey); P (prey) | 6 | 896.29 | 1.850 | 0.016 | 0.368 | 0.388 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey); P (hdis) | 6 | 896.37 | 1.932 | 0.015 | 0.368 | 0.394 | |
Model average | 0.369 | 0.390 | |||||
Tibetan fox | Psi (ele+disrd+prey+rix); P (ele+prey) | 8 | 326.43 | 0.000 | 0.066 | 0.147 | 0.236 |
Psi (disrd+prey+rix); P (ele+prey+hdis) | 8 | 327.14 | 0.714 | 0.046 | 0.277 | 0.135 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+hdis+prey+rix); P (ele+prey) | 9 | 327.20 | 0.775 | 0.045 | 0.151 | 0.230 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+rix); P (ele+prey) | 7 | 327.29 | 0.866 | 0.043 | 0.158 | 0.219 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+prey+rix); P (ele+prey+hdis) | 9 | 327.53 | 1.100 | 0.038 | 0.153 | 0.222 | |
Psi (ele+disrd+prey); P (ele+prey) | 7 | 327.69 | 1.263 | 0.035 | 0.149 | 0.234 | |
Psi (disrd+hdis+prey+rix); P (ele+prey) | 8 | 328.01 | 1.585 | 0.030 | 0.260 | 0.142 | |
Psi (ele+disrd); P (ele+prey) | 6 | 328.42 | 1.986 | 0.024 | 0.159 | 0.219 | |
Model average | 0.182 | 0.205 |
-
disrd – distance to roads, ele – elevation, ndvi – normalized difference vegetation index, rix – roughness index, hdis – human disturbance.
-
Table 1—source data 1
Data captured by camera traps on carnivore species.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90559/elife-90559-table1-data1-v1.xlsx
Covariates influencing carnivore occupancy rate and detection probability based on the optimal models (ΔAIC≤2).
Species | Model component | Covariates | Estimate (β) | SE | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wolf | Occupancy | Intercept | –2.031 | 0.497 | 4.083 | <0.001*** |
ndvi | –0.843 | 0.287 | 2.935 | 0.003** | ||
prey | 1.318 | 0.534 | 2.470 | 0.014* | ||
rix | –1.166 | 0.570 | 2.046 | 0.041* | ||
Detection | Intercept | –1.920 | 0.457 | 4.198 | <0.001*** | |
ele | 0.618 | 0.266 | 2.320 | 0.020* | ||
Snow leopard | Occupancy | Intercept | –0.256 | 0.143 | 1.783 | 0.075 |
disrd | –0.163 | 0.172 | 0.953 | 0.341 | ||
ndvi | –0.095 | 0.145 | 0.653 | 0.514 | ||
Detection | Intercept | –0.451 | 0.124 | 3.628 | <0.001*** | |
hdis | –1.830 | 0.520 | 3.519 | <0.001*** | ||
ele | 0.661 | 0.247 | 2.678 | 0.007** | ||
Eurasian lynx | Occupancy | Intercept | –1.879 | 0.316 | 5.941 | <0.001*** |
ndvi | –0.583 | 0.201 | 2.899 | 0.004** | ||
Detection | Intercept | –0.999 | 0.375 | 2.665 | 0.008** | |
hdis | –1.785 | 1.690 | 1.056 | 0.291 | ||
Red fox | Occupancy | Intercept | –0.441 | 0.177 | 2.488 | 0.013* |
disrd | 0.331 | 0.178 | 1.866 | 0.062 | ||
hdis | 1.333 | 0.611 | 2.184 | 0.029* | ||
prey | 0.665 | 0.319 | 2.083 | 0.037* | ||
Detection | Intercept | –0.451 | 0.121 | 3.729 | <0.001*** | |
ele | 0.057 | 0.093 | 0.606 | 0.545 | ||
Tibetan fox | Occupancy | Intercept | –2.087 | 0.643 | 3.247 | <0.001*** |
disrd | 0.955 | 0.321 | 2.973 | 0.003** | ||
ele | 0.768 | 0.547 | 1.403 | 0.161 | ||
Detection | Intercept | –1.679 | 0.685 | 2.453 | 0.014* | |
ele | 0.882 | 0.417 | 2.112 | 0.035* | ||
prey | 0.369 | 0.167 | 2.216 | 0.027* |
-
The different superscript letters represent significance, ***p<0.001, **0.001<p<0.01, *0.01<p<0.05.
Spatial overlap (Sørensen’s index), diel activity overlap (Δ), and dietary overlap (Pianka’s index), as well as confidence intervals for carnivore species.
Sørensen’s index | Δ | Pianka’s index | |
---|---|---|---|
Wolf – Snow leopard | 0.277 | 0.676 (0.562–0.756) | 0.892 (0.804–0.982) |
Wolf – Eurasian lynx | 0.272 | 0.661 (0.541–0.759) | 0.585 (0.141–0.881) |
Snow leopard – Eurasian lynx | 0.305 | 0.900 (0.854–0.992) | 0.458 (0.160–0.886) |
Wolf – Pallas’s cat | – | – | 0.658 (0.053–0.950) |
Wolf – Red fox | 0.365 | 0.497 (0.359–0.563) | 0.811 (0.497–0.962) |
Wolf – Tibetan fox | 0.350 | 0.855 (0.777–0.937) | 0.689 (0.456–0.967) |
Snow leopard – Pallas’s cat | – | – | 0.354 (0.092–0.827) |
Snow leopard – Red fox | 0.477 | 0.814 (0.756–0.863) | 0.586 (0.568–0.941) |
Snow leopard – Tibetan fox | 0.292 | 0.711 (0.629–0.744) | 0.390 (0.299–0.905) |
Eurasian lynx – Pallas’s cat | – | – | 0.376 (0–0.921) |
Eurasian lynx – Red fox | 0.205 | 0.800 (0.728–0.878) | 0.536 (0.442–0.910) |
Eurasian lynx – Tibetan fox | 0.198 | 0.695 (0.601–0.756) | 0.385 (0.078–0.919) |
Pallas’s cat – Red fox | – | – | 0.945 (0.369–0.988) |
Pallas’s cat – Tibetan fox | – | – | 0.997 (0–1) |
Red fox – Tibetan fox | 0.349 | 0.576 (0.467–0.580) | 0.949 (0.279–0.988) |
Additional files
-
Supplementary file 1
Dietary composition, diversity, as well as similarity among six carnivore species.
(a) The frequency of occurrence (FOO) of prey found in carnivore diet. (b) Dietary diversity indices for each carnivore species. (c) Jaccard distance for prey items in diets using binary presence-absence data.
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90559/elife-90559-supp1-v1.docx
-
MDAR checklist
- https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90559/elife-90559-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx