Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia integrate into mouse retina and recapitulate features of endogenous microglia

  1. Wenxin Ma
  2. Lian Zhao
  3. Biying Xu
  4. Robert N Fariss
  5. T Michael Redmond
  6. Jizhong Zou
  7. Wai T Wong  Is a corresponding author
  8. Wei Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Retinal Neurophysiology Section, National Eye Institute, United States
  2. Genetic Engineering Core, National Eye Institute, United States
  3. Immunoregulation Section, National Eye Institute, United States
  4. Biological Imaging Core, National Eye Institute, United States
  5. Molecular Mechanisms Section, National Eye Institute, United States
  6. iPSC Core, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, United States
  7. Tiresias Bio, United States
10 figures, 1 table and 8 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Differentiation and characterization of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia.

(A) Human iPSCs were cultured in a 6-well plate. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B) Embryoid body formation was enabled in AggreWell800 plate at day 8 in culture medium mTeSR1 plus BMP4, VEGF, and SCF. Scale bar = 200 µm. (C) Image of a myeloid precursor cluster following 1 month culture of embryoid bodies in TheraPEAK X-vivo-15 Serum-free Hematopoietic Cell Medium with added M-CSF and IL3. Scale bar = 50 µm. (D) Image of microglial cells in maturation culture for 2 weeks with Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/F12 plus non-essential amino acids, glutamine, IL34, CSF1, TGFb2, and CX3CL1. Scale bar = 50 µm. (E) Immunohistochemical staining for Iba1 and human CD34, CX3CR1, P2RY12, CD11b, and CD68. Scale bar = 100 µm. (F) Cell counts and colocalization analysis of (F) CD34- and Iba1-positive cells and (G) positivity for myeloid cell markers CX3CR1, CD11b, activation marker CD68, and microglia marker P2RY12 in differentiated microglia.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Immunocytochemistry staining with human SPI1 and TREM2.

(A) Confocal images showed SPI1 and TREM2 staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) SPI1- and TREM2-positive cells are 99.7% and 99.4%, respectively, in entire DAPI+ cell counts.

Figure 2 with 4 supplements
Profiling of genes differentially expression between differentiated microglial cells vs. myeloid progenitor cells (MPCs) using bulk RNAseq analysis.

(A) Volcano plot showing representative genes that were either upregulated (red) or downregulated (green) in differentiated microglia vs. MPCs. (B) Heat map showing increased expression of microglia-enriched genes in differentiated microglia (Supplementary file 1). (C) Histogram comparing the expression levels of microglia-enriched genes in terms of Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM). *p < 0.05. (D) Histogram comparing expression levels of myeloid cell lineage genes in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived MPC and microglia cells using FPKM. *p < 0.05. (E) Graphic signaling pathway analysis with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) highlighting IL6 and IL1B as signaling hubs in differential gene expression patterns (Supplementary file 1) in differentiated microglia vs. MPCs.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Analysis results of the canonical pathway of complete differentiated human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia vs. myeloid progenitor cells with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) with the enriched microglia genes (Supplementary file 1).
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Hierarchical cluster analysis on microglia-enriched genes among human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglial cells (hiPSC-MG) and human adult brain microglia cells (AMG), fetal brain microglia cells (FMG), inflammatory monocytes (IM), monocytes (M).

The human microglia gene panel combined our mouse microglia-enriched genes and human microglia-enriched genes (Abud et al., 2017; Muffat et al., 2016; Douvaras et al., 2017; Böttcher et al., 2019; van der Poel et al., 2019). The total microglia-enriched gene list contains 203 genes (Supplementary file 2), which used to be extracted from the gene profile of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-MG and downloaded human adult microglia (AMG), fetal microglia (FMG), inflammatory monocyte (IM) and monocytes (M) (GSE 178846, Abud et al., 2017). 188 genes (Supplementary file 2) were obtained from both gene lists. All the gene counts were normalized with four human cells housekeeping genes C1orf43, RAB7A, REEP5, and VCP (Eisenberg and Levanon, 2013). The hierarchical cluster was analyzed by JMP (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC). Results showed that hiPSC-MG is more comparable with AMG and FMG.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3
Correlation analysis between the expression levels of microglia-enriched genes in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia cells (hiPSC-MG) vs. those in other myeloid cells.

The correlation analysis of 188 human microglia-enriched genes (Supplementary file 2) among human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia cells (hiPSC-MG), human adult brain microglia (AMG) cells (A), fetal brain microglia (FMG) cells (B), inflammatory monocytes (IM) (C), and monocytes (M) (D) (GSE 178846, Abud et al., 2017), respectively. The images and the analysis results (Prism, GraphPad) showed that expression levels of microglia-enriched genes in hiPSC-MG are more correlated between those in FMG (r = 0.7358, p < 0.0001) and AMG (r = 0.7057, p < 0.0001).

Figure 2—figure supplement 4
Correlation analysis between the expression levels of genes in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia cells (hiPSC-MG) vs. human donor brain microglia by sex.

Correlation comparison of entire gene profiles between male (A)/female (B) human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglial cells and male (A)/female (B) human brain microglia cells (GSE 111972, van der Poel et al., 2019; Supplementary file 3), respectively. The results showed they are significantly correlative (r = 0.8055 (M), r = 0.8326 (F), p < 0.0001).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Inflammation responses of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglial cells following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation.

(A) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) showed different gene expression (fold change >twofold, p < 0.05) between LPS-treated and control hiPSC-derived microglial cells, demonstrating activation of core pathways involving IL6, IL1A, IL1B, and IFNG. (B) Assessment of mRNA expression of selected genes for inflammatory cytokines using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR; Oligonucleotide primers are provided in Supplementary 4) demonstrated increased expression following LPS (0.1 µg/ml) stimulation for 6 hr (3-6 replicates). These changes corresponded to increases in the protein expression levels of inflammatory cytokines following 24 hr of LPS stimulation as measured with a Multiplex kit (Millipore) in cell lysate (C) and conditioned media (D). The data in (C) and (D) are presented as means ± SEM (3-6 replicates). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Inflammatory cytokines were produced synthetically by IFNG and LPS in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglial cells.

hiPSC-derived microglial cells were cultured in 6-well plates for 14 days, 20 ng/ml of human IFNG and 0.5 µg/ml of LPS were added to the wells, respectively, or 20 ng/ml of human IFNG and 0.5 µg/ml of LPS were added to the wells together. After 6 hr of incubation, the cells were washed and harvested into a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube for RNA isolation with a NucleoSpin RNA/Protein Mini kit (Macherey-Nagel, #740933.50). The cDNA was synthesized with PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, #6110A). Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a SYBR green RT-PCR kit (Affymetrix), using the Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, and then 60°C for 45 s. Threshold cycle (CT) values were calculated and expressed as fold-induction determined using the comparative CT (2ΔΔCT) method. Ribosomal protein S13 (RPS13) and GAPDH were used as internal controls. Oligonucleotide primers are provided in Supplementary 4, the samples have 3 replicates. .

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia demonstrate robust phagocytosis.

Human iPSC-derived microglia were incubated for 1 hr in pHrodo Red E. coli bioparticles (A), pHrodo Red zymosan bioparticles (B), DiI-labeled bovine photoreceptor outer segments (POSs) (C) and labeled with anti-human P2RY12 antibody (green) and DAPI. Scale bar = 40 µm. (D) A high-magnification view of a POS-containing intracellular vesicle within a labeled microglial cell is shown. Scale bar = 40 µm. (E) An overlay of panels in (D) with side views. Scale bar = 40µm.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Floating myeloid progenitor cells were cultured in a 2-well slide chamber overnight, and then the DiI-labeled bovine photoreceptor outer segments were added to the chamber and incubated for 1 hr.

The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min and stained with IBA1 and hP2RY12, respectively. The DiI-labeled bovine photoreceptor outer segments can only be engulfed by IBA1- or P2RY12-positive microglia cells. Scale bar = 16 µm.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
The morphology of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia cells under 1 hr zymosan treatment with different concentrations.

After 1 hr of treatment with zymosan, 5 µg/ml concentration did not change the microglia cell morphology, but over 20 µg/ml concentration changed the microglia morphology to an ameboid round shape.

Figure 5 with 6 supplements
Xenotransplanted human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglial cells into recipient mouse retina in vivo demonstrate recapitulation of endogenous distribution, cellular morphology, and stable integration for up to 4 months.

(A) The schematic diagram shows the timeline for transplantation experiments. Two-month-old adult transgenic Rag2−/−;IL2rg−/−;hCSF1+/+ mice were fed a PLX-5622-containing diet for 10 days before switching to standard chow. Two days following the resumption of standard chow, human iPSC-derived microglial cells expressing either tdTomato or EGFP were xenotransplanted into the subretinal space via subretinal injection (5000 cells in 1 µl injection volume). Retinas were harvested for analysis 120 and 240 days following transplantation. (B, C) The retinas isolated from post-transplantation were analyzed in flat-mounted tissue with confocal imaging. Transplanted human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia were visualized through their expression of tdtomato (TdT) (B) or EGFP (C), while endogenous mouse microglia were visualized using immunostaining for mouse Tmem119 (mTmem119). Imaging analysis was performed in separate layers of the retina, including the ganglion cell layer (GL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and outer plexiform layer (OPL). Scale bar = 100 µm. (D) The retinal section showed human iPSC-derived microglial cells integrated into whole retinal layers (top panel) and positively stained with human P2RY12 and TMEM119 microglia signature markers. Scale bar = 100 µm. The microglia cell number in GL, IPL, and OPL of host mouse retina were counted: mouse microglial cells (Iba1+, tdT−) and grafted human microglial cells (Iba1+, tdT+) were shown in (E), (F), and (G), respectively. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, 3-6 biological replicates were performed. (H) and (I) showed tdT (H) or EGFP (I) labeled human iPSC-derived microglial cells in the IPL and OPL of the flat-mount retina with human CD11b staining. These results demonstrated that the infiltration of grafted hiPSC-derived microglial cells integrated into the mouse retina is general in nature and not cell line specific. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglial cells in the mouse retina do not affect local retinal cells.

Entire section images showed GFAP, GS, RBPMS, and Iba1 staining for astrocytes, Müller cells, ganglion cells, and microglia cells in the retina after 4 months of xenotransplantation. Scale bar = 300 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia cells in the mouse retina do not affect local retinal cells.

The high-magnification images showed GFAP, GS, RBPMS, and Iba1 staining for astrocytes, Müller cells, ganglion cells, and microglia cells in the retina after 4 months of transplantation. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia cells in the mouse retina do not affect local retinal cells.

Entire section images showed arrestin, calbindin, and PKCα staining for cone photoreceptors, horizontal and some amacrine cells, and bipolar cells in the retina after 4 months of xenotransplantation. Scale bar = 300 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 4
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia cells in the mouse retina do not affect local retinal cells.

The partial section of high-magnification images showed arrestin, calbindin, and PKCα staining for cone photoreceptors, horizontal and some amacrine cells, and bipolar cells in the retina after 4 months of xenotransplantation. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 5
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia cells in the mouse retina do not take over local retinal microglia cells.

The section images showed Red Fluorescence Protein (RFP) and mouse CD11b staining to determine the tdT+ human microglia cells and local mouse microglia cells in the retina after 4 months of xenotransplantation. The results showed that the tdT+ human microglia cells colocalized with RFP staining (Far red) but not mouse CD11b (green) staining. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 6
Homeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglia cells in the mouse retina do not take over local retinal microglia cells.

The hight magnification images showed RFP and mouse CD11b staining in the retina after 4 months of xenotransplantation. The results showed that the tdT+ human cells colocalized with RFP staining (Far red) but not mouse CD11b (green) staining. The triangle marker indicated that the local mouse microglia cells were only stained with mouse CD11b but not colocalized with tdT+ human microglia cells. Scale bar = 50 µm.

Figure 6 with 2 supplements
Migration and proliferation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia in the mouse retina after sodium iodate (NaIO3)-induced retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell injury.

(A) The schematic diagram shows the experiment’s procedure. After 8 months post-transplantation of hiPSC-derived microglia, recipient animals were administered NaIO3 (30 mg/kg body weight, intraperitoneal injection) to induce RPE injury. Retinas were harvested at 3 and 7 days after NaIO3 administration and microglia numbers in the retina and subretinal space will be monitored in retina and RPE-choroid flat mounts. (B) RPE-choroid flat mounts demonstrate an increase of hiPSC-derived microglia (tdTomato+ and P2RY12+) in the subretinal space in response to RPE injury. A subset of subretinal microglia labeled for Ki67 indicates active proliferation. Scale bar = 60 µm. (C) and (D) showed the number of P2RY12+ and tdtomato+ human microglial cells in inner plexiform layer (IPL) (C) and outer plexiform layer (OPL) (D) decreased; some of them showed Ki67+ staining, Scale bar = 60 µm. The cell count results showed in (F) and (G). (E) The retinal flat mount showed the number of P2RY12+ and tdtomato+ human microglial cells in IPL and OPL that were repopulated, and the cells stopped dividing with loss of the Ki67 staining at 7 days after NaIO3 injection. The cell numbers are shown in (F) and (G) (3 biological replicates). Scale bar = 60 µm, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001, **** P,0.0001.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
The images of hP2RY12 staining on the retina after 8 months of xenotransplantation.

The images showed the tdtomato+ human microglia cells colocalized with hP2RY12 staining in GL, inner plexiform layer (IPL), and outer plexiform layer (OPL) in the mouse retina. Scale bar = 300 µm.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2
The images of hTMEM119 staining on the retina after 8 months of xenotransplantation.

The images showed the tdtomato+ human microglia cells colocalized with hTMEM119 staining in GL, inner plexiform layer (IPL), and outer plexiform layer (OPL) in the mouse retina. Scale bar = 300 µm.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Dyshomeostatic human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived microglial cells in the mouse retina phagocytose dead photoreceptor cells/debris after retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell injury.

(A) Dyshomeostatic human microglial cells (tdtomato+) accumulated in the photoreceptor cell layer after 3 days of sodium iodate (NaIO3)-induced RPE cell injury compared with no NaIO3 administration. The photoreceptor cells stained with cone arrestin (green) and autofluorescence showed in magenta. Scale bar = 60 µm. (B) High-magnificent images and the side view showed human microglial cells (red) co-labeled with photoreceptor cells arrestin staining (green) after 3 days of NaIO3 injury. The yellow arrowhead showed the colocalized tdT+ human microglia cell and arrestin+ cone photoreceptor cell. Scale bar = 40 µm. (C) The number of tdtomato+ human microglial cells in the photoreceptor layer. (D) The mean gray autofluorescence value in each human microglia cell. ****p < 0.0001.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
The inflammation, phagocytosis, adhesion and migration, neurotrophic factors, and microglia signature gene expression in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived microglia cells of grafted retinas.

The gene coding sequences were compared between humans and mice, a human-specific sequence was chose to make the oligos (Supplementary file 5), and ran a quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) on 8-month hiPSC-derived microglia cells grafted retinas with/without sodium iodate (NaIO3)-treated retinas. The results revealed that hiPSC-derived microglia cells expressed more inflammatory factors and phagocytosis genes and promoted cell migration but decreased microglia cell signature genes and neurotrophic factors in NaIO3-treated retina (3 biological replicates in each group).

The heat map of 42 candidate genes from 34 loci associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) expressed in retinal microglia cells.

The microglia gene expression data are from microarray data previously published (Ma et al., 2013). The candidate genes came from the published paper (den Hollander et al., 2022). The gene list is in Supplementary file 6.

The heat map of 209 genes associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (Fritsche et al., 2016) expressed in retinal microglia cells.

The microglia gene expression data are from microarray data previously published (Ma et al., 2013). The gene list is in Supplementary file 7.

Author response image 1

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)C;129S4-Rag2tm1.1Flv Csf1tm1(CSF1)Flv Il2rgtm1.1Flv/JPubMed:21791433MGI:J:177073RRID:IMSR_JAX:017708
Genetic reagent (Homo sapiens)KYOUDXR0109BATCCACS-1023Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)
Genetic reagent (Homo sapiens)NCRM6NHLBINCRM6 (female) iPSC lineFrom CD34+ cells, Episomal vectors
Genetic reagent (Homo sapiens)MS19-ES-HNHLBIMS19-ES-H (female) iPSC lineFrom PBMS cells, Cytotune Sendai Virus kit
Genetic reagent (Homo sapiens)NCRM5-AAVS1-CAG-EGFPNHLBINCRM5-AAVS1-CAG-EGFP (clone 5)From CD34+ cells, NCRM5 (male) reporter iPSC line with CAG-EGFP targeted mono-allelically at AAVS1 safe harbor
Genetic reagent (Homo sapiens)ND2-AAVS1-iCAG-tdTomatoNHLBIND2-AAVS1-iCAG-tdTomato (clone 1)From fibroblast cells, ND2 (male) reporter iPSC line with insulated CAG-tdTomato targeted mono-allelically at AAVS1 safe harbor
Antibodyanti-Iba1 (rabbit polyclonal)WakoCat. #: 019-19741, RRID:AB_839504IHC (1:500)
Antibodyanti-human TMEM119 (rabbit polyclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat. #: HPA051870, RRID:AB_2681645IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-human CD68 (mouse monoclonal)R&DCat. #: MAB20401IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-human CD45 (mouse monoclonal)R&DCat. #: FAB1430RIHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-human CD11b (mouse monoclonal)R&DCat. #: FAB1699RIHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-human CX3CR1 (rat monoclonal)InvitrogenCat. #: 61-6099-42IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-human HLA (mouse monoclonal)InvitrogenCat. #: 11-9983-42IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-mouse CD11b (rat monoclonal)Bio-RadCat. #: MCA711GIHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-GFAP (rat monoclonal)InvitrogenCat. #: 13-0300, RRID:AB_2532994IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-mouse TMEM119 (guinea pig polyclonal)Synaptic systemsCat. #: 400 004, RRID:AB_2832239IHC (1:500)
Antibodyanti-CD68 (rat monoclonal)Bio-RadCat. #: MCA1957, RRID:AB_322219IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-CD34 (rat monoclonal)eBioscienceCat. #: 14-0341IHC (1:30)
Antibodyanti-PU.1 (rabbit monoclonal)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: MA5-15064IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-Trem2 (rabbit monoclonal)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 702886IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD45 (rat monoclonal)Bio-RadCat. #: MCA1388, RRID:AB_321729IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti glutamine synthetase (mouse monoclonal)MilliporeCat. #: MAB302, RRID:AB_2110656IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-RBPMS (guinea Pig polyclonal Ab)PhosphosolutionsCat. #: 1832-RBPMSIHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-cone arrestin (rabbit polyclonal)MilliporeCat. #: AB15282, RRID:AB_1163387IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-calbindin (rabbit polyclonal)SwantCat. #: CB-38aIHC (1:5000)
Antibodyanti-PKCa (rabbit polyclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat. #: P4334, RRID:AB_477345IHC (1:200)
Antibodyanti-RFP (rabbit polyclonal)RockLandCat. #: 600-401-379-RTUIHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-Ki67-660 (rat monoclonal)eBioscienceCat. #: 50-5698-82, RRID:AB_2574235IHC (1:50)
Antibodyanti-P2RY12 (rabbit polyclonal)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: PA5-77671, RRID:AB_2736305IHC (1:100)
Antibodyanti-P2RY12 (rabbit polyclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat. #: HPA014518, RRID:AB_2669027IHC (1:100)
AntibodyGoat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenCat. #: A27034, RRID:AB_2536097IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 568InvitrogenCat. #: A11011, RRID:AB_143157IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenCat. #: A32733, RRID:AB_2633282IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenCat. #: A28175, RRID:AB_2536161IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 568InvitrogenCat. #: A-11004, RRID:AB_141371IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenCat. #: A-21235, RRID:AB_141693IHC (1:200)
AntibodyDonkey anti-Rat IgG Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenCat. #: A-21208, RRID:AB_141709IHC (1:200)
AntibodyDonkey anti-Rat IgG Alexa Fluor 594InvitrogenCat. #: A-21209, RRID:AB_2535795IHC (1:200)
AntibodyDonkey anti-Rat IgG Alexa Fluor 650InvitrogenCat. #: SA5-10029, RRID:AB_2556609IHC (1:200)
AntibodyRat monoclonal anti CD11b, Alexa Fluor 488eBioscienceCat. #: 53-0112-82, RRID:AB_469901IHC (1:50)
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman M-CSFInvitrogenCat. #: PHC9501
Peptide, recombinant proteinHuman IL3R&DCat. #: 203-IL-100
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman IL-34PeprotechCat. #: 200–34
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman CX3CL1PeprotechCat. #: 300–31
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman TGFb1R&DCat. #: 7666-MB-005
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman TGFb2R&DCat. #: 7346-B2-005
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman BMP-4GIBCOCat. #: PHC9534
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman SCFMiltenyi BiotecCat. #: 130096692
Peptide, recombinant proteinhuman VEGFGIBCOCat. #: PHC9394
Chemical compoundPLX5622PlexxikonPLX5622 was provided by Plexxikon Inc and formulated in AIN-76A standard chow by Research Diets Inc1200 mg/kg in chow
Chemical compoundNaIO3Sigma-AldrichCat. #: S4007
Chemical compoundBSASigma-AldrichCat. #: A2153
Chemical compoundFBSThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: A3160702
Chemical compoundKetamineAnasedCat. #: NDC13985-584-10
Chemical compoundXylazineAnasedCat. #: NDC59399-110-20
Chemical compoundTopical tropicamideAlconCat. # 215340
Chemical compoundPhenylephrineAlconCat. l# 215664
Chemical compound0.5% Proparacaine HCLSandozCat. #: 101571
Chemical compoundSurcroseSigma-AldrichCat. #: S7903-5KG
Chemical compoundOCTThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 23-730-571
Chemical compoundFluorescein AK-FLUORAkornCat. #: 17478-253-10
Chemical compoundTamoxifenSigma-AldrichCat. #: T5648-5G
Chemical compoundHBSSSigma-AldrichCat. #: H8264-1L
Chemical compoundL-(+)-Cysteine hydrochloride monohydrateFisherCat. #: C562-25
Chemical compoundPapain, lyophilizedWorthington BiochemicalCat. #: LS003119
Chemical compoundDNAse IWorthington BiochemicalCat. #: LS006333
Chemical compoundSuperoxide dismutaseWorthington BiochemicalCat. #: LS003540
Chemical compoundCatalaseSigma-AldrichCat. #: C1345-1G
Chemical compound(+)-α-Tocopherol acetateSigma-AldrichCat. #: T-1157-1G
Chemical compoundGentamicin solutionSigma-AldrichCat. #: G1397-10ml
Chemical compoundD-(+)-GlucoseSigma-AldrichCat. #: G7021-100g
Chemical compoundAntipain dihydrochlorideRocheCat. #: 11004646001
Chemical compoundHEPESInvitrogenCat. #: 15630080
Chemical compoundEDTAKD medicalCat. #: RGC-3130
Chemical compoundRNAlater solutionAmbionCat. #: AM7021
Chemical compoundTriton X-100Sigma-AldrichCat. #: X100100ml
Chemical compoundTween 20Sigma-AldrichCat. #: P1379-100ml
Chemical compoundParaformadehydeFisher ScientificCat. #: 50-259-97
Chemical compoundDonkey serumSigma-AldrichCat. #: D9663-10ml
Chemical compoundGoat serumSigma-AldrichCat. #: G9023-10ml
Commercial assay or kitBloking ReagentSigma-AldrichCat. #: 11096176001
Commercial assay or kitIn Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR redSigma-AldrichCat. #: 12156792910
Commercial assay or kitIb4 Alexa Fluor 568InvitrogenCat. #: I21412IHC (1:200)
Commercial assay or kitIb4 Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenCat. #: I32450IHC (1:200)
Commercial assay or kitDAPISigma-AldrichCat. #: D9542IHC (1:200)
Commercial assay or kitMounting medium without DAPIVectorCat. #: H-1000
Commercial assay or kitMounting medium with DAPIVectorCat. #: H-1200
Commercial assay or kitRNeasy Mini KitQIAGENCat. #: 74104
Commercial assay or kitRnase free Dnase setQIAGENCat. #: 79254
Commercial assay or kitFirst strand cDNA synthesisTakaraCat. #: 6110A
Commercial assay or kitMessageBooster cDNA synthesis kitEpicentreCat. #: MB060110
Commercial assay or kitFast SYBR Green Master MixThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 4385617
Commercial assay or kitLiDirect Lightening genotyping kitLifeSciCat. #: M0015
Commercial assay or kiteBioscience Flow Cytometry Staining BufferThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 00-4222-57
Commercial assay or kitX-VIVO-15 mediumLonzaCat. #: BEBP02-061Q
Commercial assay or kitDMEM:F12 mediumThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 11330057
Commercial assay or kitmTeSR1Stemcell technologiesCat. #: 85850
Commercial assay or kitN2 supplementThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 17502048
Commercial assay or kitNon-essential Amino Acids (NEAA)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 11140050
Commercial assay or kitGlutaMax SupplementThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 35050061
Commercial assay or kitGeltrexThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: A1413301
Commercial assay or kitTrypLE ExpressThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 12605010
Commercial assay or kitRho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632abcamCat. #: ab143784
Commercial assay or kitmFreSRStemcell technologiesCat. # 05854
Commercial assay or kitStem Cell Dissociation ReagentATCCCat, #: ACS-3010
Commercial assay or kitStem Cell Freezing MediaATCCCat. #: ACS-3020
Commercial assay or kitPenicillin-StreptomycinThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 15140122
Commercial assay or kitpHrodo Red E. coli BioParticlesThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: P35361
Commercial assay or kitpHrodo Red Zymosan BioparticlesThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: P35364
Commercial assay or kitBovine rod outer segmentInvision BioresourcesCat. #: 98740
Commercial assay or kitVybrant DiI Cell-Labeling SolutionThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: V22885
Commercial assay or kitLipopolysaccharides (LPS)Sigma-AldrichCat. #: L2630
Commercial assay or kitRIPA lysis bufferSigma-AldrichCat. #: R0278
Commercial assay or kitproteinase inhibitor mixtureCalbiochemCat. #: 539132
Commercial assay or kitPierce BCA Protein Assay KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat. #: 23227
Commercial assay or kitMilliplex bead assay kitMilliporeCat. #: MCYTOMAG-70K
Commercial assay or kitAggreWellsTM800Stemcell technologiesCat. #: 34825
SoftwareImageJImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/)RRID:SCR_003070
SoftwareGraphPad Prism7GraphPad Prism (https://graphpad.com)RRID:SCR_015807Version 7
SoftwareIPAQIAGENRRID:SCR_008653
SoftwareJMPJMPRRID:SCR_014242Version 12

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Microglia-enriched gene list.

The gene list of 71 microglia-enriched genes was extracted from bulk RNAseq of microglial cells vs. myeloid progenitor cells (MPCs). The total microglia-enriched gene list combined from the research conducted by Barres BA Lab (Bennett et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016) and from our RNA sequencing data of mouse retinal microglia (Ma et al., 2013), identifying a total of 130 genes predominantly expressed in microglia.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp1-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 2

188 hMG gene comparisons vs. GSE178846.

The human microglia gene panel combined our mouse microglia-enriched genes and human microglia-enriched genes (Abud et al., 2017; Muffat et al., 2016; Douvaras et al., 2017; Böttcher et al., 2019; van der Poel et al., 2019). The total microglia-enriched gene list contains 203 genes, which used to be extracted from the gene profile of hiPSC-MG and downloaded human adult microglia (AMG), fetal microglia (FMG), inflammatory monocyte (IM) and monocytes (M) (GSE 178846, Abud et al., 2017). 188 genes were obtained from both gene lists. All the gene counts were normalized with four human cells housekeeping genes C1orf43, RAB7A, REEP5, and VCP (Eisenberg and Levanon, 2013).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp2-v1.xls
Supplementary file 3

The gene list of comparison vs. GSE111972.

The total gene list of both male and female hiPSC-derived microglial cells and human brain microglia cells (GSE 111972, van der Poel et al., 2019).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp3-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 4

The oligos for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

The oligos were used for qRT-PCR in cultured hiPSC-derived cells.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp4-v1.docx
Supplementary file 5

Human-specific oligos for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

The oligos were used for qRT-PCR in mouse retinas with integrated hiPSC-derived microglial cells.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp5-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 6

42 genes associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

42 candidate genes from 34 loci associated with AMD expressed in retinal microglia cells. The microglia gene expression data are from microarray data previously published (Ma et al., 2013). The candidate genes came from the published paper (den Hollander et al., 2022).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp6-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 7

209 genes associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The 209 microglia-enriched genes were extracted from the genes associated with AMD (Fritsche et al., 2016). The microglia gene expression data are from microarray data previously published (Ma et al., 2013).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-supp7-v1.xlsx
MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/90695/elife-90695-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wenxin Ma
  2. Lian Zhao
  3. Biying Xu
  4. Robert N Fariss
  5. T Michael Redmond
  6. Jizhong Zou
  7. Wai T Wong
  8. Wei Li
(2024)
Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia integrate into mouse retina and recapitulate features of endogenous microglia
eLife 12:RP90695.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90695.3