Homeostatic Control of Deep Sleep and Molecular Correlates of Sleep Pressure in Drosophila

  1. Budhaditya Chowdhury
  2. Lakshman Abhilash
  3. Antonio Ortega
  4. Sha Liu
  5. Orie T Shafer  Is a corresponding author
  1. City University of New York, United States
  2. VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Belgium

Abstract

Homeostatic control of sleep is typically addressed through mechanical stimulation-induced forced wakefulness and the measurement of subsequent increases in sleep. A major confound attends this approach: biological responses to deprivation may reflect a direct response to the mechanical insult rather than to the loss of sleep. Similar confounds accompany all forms of sleep deprivation and represent a major challenge to the field. Here we describe a new paradigm for sleep deprivation in Drosophila that fully accounts for sleep-independent effects. Our results reveal that deep sleep states are the primary target of homeostatic control and establish the presence of multi-cycle sleep rebound following deprivation. Furthermore, we establish that specific deprivation of deep sleep state results in state-specific homeostatic rebound. Finally, by accounting for the molecular effects of mechanical stimulation during deprivation experiments, we show that serotonin levels track sleep pressure in the fly's central brain. Our results illustrate the critical need to control for sleep-independent effects of deprivation when examining the molecular correlates of sleep pressure and call for a critical reassessment of work that has not accounted for such non-specific effects.

Data availability

All Raw Data is available at Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Budhaditya Chowdhury

    Advanced Science Research Center, City University of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lakshman Abhilash

    The Advanced Science Research Center, City University of New York, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Antonio Ortega

    VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sha Liu

    VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Orie T Shafer

    Advanced Science Research Center, City University of New York, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    oshafer@gc.cuny.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7177-743X

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS131939)

  • Orie T Shafer

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS077933)

  • Orie T Shafer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Chowdhury et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,727
    views
  • 277
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Budhaditya Chowdhury
  2. Lakshman Abhilash
  3. Antonio Ortega
  4. Sha Liu
  5. Orie T Shafer
(2023)
Homeostatic Control of Deep Sleep and Molecular Correlates of Sleep Pressure in Drosophila
eLife 12:e91355.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91355

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91355

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Anna Cattani, Don B Arnold ... Nancy Kopell
    Research Article

    The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a key site where fear learning takes place through synaptic plasticity. Rodent research shows prominent low theta (~3–6 Hz), high theta (~6–12 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz) rhythms in the BLA local field potential recordings. However, it is not understood what role these rhythms play in supporting the plasticity. Here, we create a biophysically detailed model of the BLA circuit to show that several classes of interneurons (PV, SOM, and VIP) in the BLA can be critically involved in producing the rhythms; these rhythms promote the formation of a dedicated fear circuit shaped through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Each class of interneurons is necessary for the plasticity. We find that the low theta rhythm is a biomarker of successful fear conditioning. The model makes use of interneurons commonly found in the cortex and, hence, may apply to a wide variety of associative learning situations.

    1. Neuroscience
    Elena Massai, Marco Bonizzato ... Marina Martinez
    Research Article

    Control of voluntary limb movement is predominantly attributed to the contralateral motor cortex. However, increasing evidence suggests the involvement of ipsilateral cortical networks in this process, especially in motor tasks requiring bilateral coordination, such as locomotion. In this study, we combined a unilateral thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) with a cortical neuroprosthetic approach to investigate the functional role of the ipsilateral motor cortex in rat movement through spared contralesional pathways. Our findings reveal that in all SCI rats, stimulation of the ipsilesional motor cortex promoted a bilateral synergy. This synergy involved the elevation of the contralateral foot along with ipsilateral hindlimb extension. Additionally, in two out of seven animals, stimulation of a sub-region of the hindlimb motor cortex modulated ipsilateral hindlimb flexion. Importantly, ipsilateral cortical stimulation delivered after SCI immediately alleviated multiple locomotor and postural deficits, and this effect persisted after ablation of the homologous motor cortex. These results provide strong evidence of a causal link between cortical activation and precise ipsilateral control of hindlimb movement. This study has significant implications for the development of future neuroprosthetic technology and our understanding of motor control in the context of SCI.