Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis
  2. Ji Young Park
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi
  4. Stelios Smirnakis  Is a corresponding author
  5. Panayiota Poirazi  Is a corresponding author
  1. FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Greece
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

Pyramidal neurons, a mainstay of cortical regions, receive a plethora of inputs from various areas onto their morphologically distinct apical and basal trees. Both trees differentially contribute to the somatic response, defining distinct anatomical and possibly functional sub-units. To elucidate the contribution of each tree to the encoding of visual stimuli at the somatic level, we modeled the response pattern of a mouse L2/3 V1 pyramidal neuron to orientation tuned synaptic input. Towards this goal, we used a morphologically detailed computational model of a single cell that replicates electrophysiological and two-photon imaging data. Our simulations predict a synergistic effect of apical and basal trees on somatic action potential generation: basal tree activity, in the form of either depolarization or dendritic spiking, is necessary for producing somatic activity, despite the fact that most somatic spikes are heavily driven by apical dendritic spikes. This model provides evidence for synergistic computations taking place in the basal and apical trees of the L2/3 V1 neuron along with mechanistic explanations for tree-specific contributions and emphasizes the potential role of predictive and attentional feedback input in these cells.

Data availability

The code and all data used/generated in the manuscript will be publicly available in a GitHub repository https://github.com/kepetousakis/petousakis_etal_2023.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2022-1671
  2. Ji Young Park

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2466-7259
  4. Stelios Smirnakis

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    smsmirnakis@bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1929-2811
  5. Panayiota Poirazi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    For correspondence
    poirazi@imbb.forth.gr
    Competing interests
    Panayiota Poirazi, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6152-595X

Funding

ERC Starting Grant dEMORY (GA 311435)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-MSCA ITN 2019, SmartNets (GA 860949)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

Fondation Santé a FORTH-Synergy Grant (EVO-NMDA)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-FETOPEN-2018-2019-2020-01NEUREKA (GA 863245)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

NIH NEI (R01 grant EY-024019)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

NINDS (R21 grant NS088457)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (PhD Scholarship (no. 6731))

  • Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

FORTH-Synergy Grant (FlexBe)

  • Athanasia Papoutsi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Petousakis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 985
    views
  • 157
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis
  2. Ji Young Park
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi
  4. Stelios Smirnakis
  5. Panayiota Poirazi
(2023)
Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell
eLife 12:e91627.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91627

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91627

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Monique Marylin Alves de Almeida, Yves De Repentigny ... Rashmi Kothary
    Research Article

    Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations in the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. While traditionally viewed as a motor neuron disorder, there is involvement of various peripheral organs in SMA. Notably, fatty liver has been observed in SMA mouse models and SMA patients. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether intrinsic depletion of SMN protein in the liver contributes to pathology in the peripheral or central nervous systems. To address this, we developed a mouse model with a liver-specific depletion of SMN by utilizing an Alb-Cre transgene together with one Smn2B allele and one Smn1 exon 7 allele flanked by loxP sites. Initially, we evaluated phenotypic changes in these mice at postnatal day 19 (P19), when the severe model of SMA, the Smn2B/- mice, exhibit many symptoms of the disease. The liver-specific SMN depletion does not induce motor neuron death, neuromuscular pathology or muscle atrophy, characteristics typically observed in the Smn2B/- mouse at P19. However, mild liver steatosis was observed, although no changes in liver function were detected. Notably, pancreatic alterations resembled that of Smn2B/-mice, with a decrease in insulin-producing β-cells and an increase in glucagon-producingα-cells, accompanied by a reduction in blood glucose and an increase in plasma glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). These changes were transient, as mice at P60 exhibited recovery of liver and pancreatic function. While the mosaic pattern of the Cre-mediated excision precludes definitive conclusions regarding the contribution of liver-specific SMN depletion to overall tissue pathology, our findings highlight an intricate connection between liver function and pancreatic abnormalities in SMA.

    1. Neuroscience
    Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Katharina Hutterer ... Tina B Lonsdorf
    Research Article

    Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.