Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis
  2. Ji Young Park
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi
  4. Stelios Smirnakis  Is a corresponding author
  5. Panayiota Poirazi  Is a corresponding author
  1. FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Greece
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States

Abstract

Pyramidal neurons, a mainstay of cortical regions, receive a plethora of inputs from various areas onto their morphologically distinct apical and basal trees. Both trees differentially contribute to the somatic response, defining distinct anatomical and possibly functional sub-units. To elucidate the contribution of each tree to the encoding of visual stimuli at the somatic level, we modeled the response pattern of a mouse L2/3 V1 pyramidal neuron to orientation tuned synaptic input. Towards this goal, we used a morphologically detailed computational model of a single cell that replicates electrophysiological and two-photon imaging data. Our simulations predict a synergistic effect of apical and basal trees on somatic action potential generation: basal tree activity, in the form of either depolarization or dendritic spiking, is necessary for producing somatic activity, despite the fact that most somatic spikes are heavily driven by apical dendritic spikes. This model provides evidence for synergistic computations taking place in the basal and apical trees of the L2/3 V1 neuron along with mechanistic explanations for tree-specific contributions and emphasizes the potential role of predictive and attentional feedback input in these cells.

Data availability

The code and all data used/generated in the manuscript will be publicly available in a GitHub repository https://github.com/kepetousakis/petousakis_etal_2023.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2022-1671
  2. Ji Young Park

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Athanasia Papoutsi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2466-7259
  4. Stelios Smirnakis

    Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    smsmirnakis@bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1929-2811
  5. Panayiota Poirazi

    FORTH Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece
    For correspondence
    poirazi@imbb.forth.gr
    Competing interests
    Panayiota Poirazi, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6152-595X

Funding

ERC Starting Grant dEMORY (GA 311435)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-MSCA ITN 2019, SmartNets (GA 860949)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

Fondation Santé a FORTH-Synergy Grant (EVO-NMDA)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

H2020-FETOPEN-2018-2019-2020-01NEUREKA (GA 863245)

  • Panayiota Poirazi

NIH NEI (R01 grant EY-024019)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

NINDS (R21 grant NS088457)

  • Stelios Smirnakis

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (PhD Scholarship (no. 6731))

  • Konstantinos-Evangelos Petousakis

FORTH-Synergy Grant (FlexBe)

  • Athanasia Papoutsi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Petousakis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,012
    views
  • 160
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91627

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sven Ohl, Martin Rolfs
    Research Article

    Detecting causal relations structures our perception of events in the world. Here, we determined for visual interactions whether generalized (i.e. feature-invariant) or specialized (i.e. feature-selective) visual routines underlie the perception of causality. To this end, we applied a visual adaptation protocol to assess the adaptability of specific features in classical launching events of simple geometric shapes. We asked observers to report whether they observed a launch or a pass in ambiguous test events (i.e. the overlap between two discs varied from trial to trial). After prolonged exposure to causal launch events (the adaptor) defined by a particular set of features (i.e. a particular motion direction, motion speed, or feature conjunction), observers were less likely to see causal launches in subsequent ambiguous test events than before adaptation. Crucially, adaptation was contingent on the causal impression in launches as demonstrated by a lack of adaptation in non-causal control events. We assessed whether this negative aftereffect transfers to test events with a new set of feature values that were not presented during adaptation. Processing in specialized (as opposed to generalized) visual routines predicts that the transfer of visual adaptation depends on the feature similarity of the adaptor and the test event. We show that the negative aftereffects do not transfer to unadapted launch directions but do transfer to launch events of different speeds. Finally, we used colored discs to assign distinct feature-based identities to the launching and the launched stimulus. We found that the adaptation transferred across colors if the test event had the same motion direction as the adaptor. In summary, visual adaptation allowed us to carve out a visual feature space underlying the perception of causality and revealed specialized visual routines that are tuned to a launch’s motion direction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gergely F Turi, Sasa Teng ... Yueqing Peng
    Research Article

    Synchronous neuronal activity is organized into neuronal oscillations with various frequency and time domains across different brain areas and brain states. For example, hippocampal theta, gamma, and sharp wave oscillations are critical for memory formation and communication between hippocampal subareas and the cortex. In this study, we investigated the neuronal activity of the dentate gyrus (DG) with optical imaging tools during sleep-wake cycles in mice. We found that the activity of major glutamatergic cell populations in the DG is organized into infraslow oscillations (0.01–0.03 Hz) during NREM sleep. Although the DG is considered a sparsely active network during wakefulness, we found that 50% of granule cells and about 25% of mossy cells exhibit increased activity during NREM sleep, compared to that during wakefulness. Further experiments revealed that the infraslow oscillation in the DG was correlated with rhythmic serotonin release during sleep, which oscillates at the same frequency but in an opposite phase. Genetic manipulation of 5-HT receptors revealed that this neuromodulatory regulation is mediated by Htr1a receptors and the knockdown of these receptors leads to memory impairment. Together, our results provide novel mechanistic insights into how the 5-HT system can influence hippocampal activity patterns during sleep.