Loss of ninein interferes with osteoclast formation and causes premature ossification

Abstract

Ninein is a centrosome protein that has been implicated in microtubule anchorage and centrosome cohesion. Mutations in the human NINEIN gene have been linked to Seckel syndrome and to a rare form of skeletal dysplasia. However, the role of ninein in skeletal development remains unknown. Here, we describe a ninein knockout mouse with advanced endochondral ossification during embryonic development. Although the long bones maintain a regular size, the absence of ninein delays the formation of the bone marrow cavity in the prenatal tibia. Likewise, intramembranous ossification in the skull is more developed, leading to a premature closure of the interfrontal suture. We demonstrate that ninein is strongly expressed in osteoclasts of control mice, and that its absence reduces the fusion of precursor cells into syncytial osteoclasts, whereas the number of osteoblasts remains unaffected. As a consequence, ninein-deficient osteoclasts have a reduced capacity to resorb bone. At the cellular level, the absence of ninein interferes with centrosomal microtubule organization, reduces centrosome cohesion, and provokes the loss of centrosome clustering in multinucleated mature osteoclasts. We propose that centrosomal ninein is important for osteoclast fusion, to enable a functional balance between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts during skeletal development.

Data availability

10.6084/m9.figshare.25650942source data files have been provided for Figure 7-figure supplement 1

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thierry Gilbert

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Camille Gorlt

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Merlin Barbier

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III / CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Benjamin Duployer

    CIRIMAT, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marianna Plozza

    Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ophélie Dufrancais

    Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Laure-Elene Martet

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Elisa Dalbard

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Loelia Segot

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Christophe Tenailleau

    CIRIMAT, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Laurence Haren

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Christel Vérollet

    Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1079-9085
  13. Christiane Bierkamp

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Andreas Merdes

    Centre de Biologie Intégrative, University Toulouse III, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    andreas.merdes@univ-tlse3.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3739-2728

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR16-CE13-0005-01)

  • Christel Vérollet

Universite Toulouse III (financement S&N Bernard)

  • Andreas Merdes

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Genotoul Anexplo facilities of the Center for Integrative Biology, University Toulouse III (institution agreement #D3155511, project agreement APAFIS#2725-2015111213203624 v5).

Copyright

© 2024, Gilbert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 584
    views
  • 112
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thierry Gilbert
  2. Camille Gorlt
  3. Merlin Barbier
  4. Benjamin Duployer
  5. Marianna Plozza
  6. Ophélie Dufrancais
  7. Laure-Elene Martet
  8. Elisa Dalbard
  9. Loelia Segot
  10. Christophe Tenailleau
  11. Laurence Haren
  12. Christel Vérollet
  13. Christiane Bierkamp
  14. Andreas Merdes
(2024)
Loss of ninein interferes with osteoclast formation and causes premature ossification
eLife 13:e93457.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93457

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93457

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Menglei Yang, Hafiz Muhammad Jafar Hussain ... Baolu Shi
    Research Article

    Asthenoteratozoospermia, a prevalent cause of male infertility, lacks a well-defined etiology. DNAH12 is a special dynein featured by the absence of a microtubule-binding domain, however, its functions in spermatogenesis remain largely unknown. Through comprehensive genetic analyses involving whole-exome sequencing and subsequent Sanger sequencing on infertile patients and fertile controls from six distinct families, we unveiled six biallelic mutations in DNAH12 that co-segregate recessively with male infertility in the studied families. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed pronounced axonemal abnormalities, including inner dynein arms (IDAs) impairment and central pair (CP) loss in sperm flagella of the patients. Mouse models (Dnah12-/- and Dnah12mut/mut) were generated and recapitulated the reproductive defects in the patients. Noteworthy, DNAH12 deficiency did not show effects on cilium organization and function. Mechanistically, DNAH12 was confirmed to interact with two other IDA components DNALI1 and DNAH1, while disruption of DNAH12 leads to failed recruitment of DNALI1 and DNAH1 to IDAs and compromised sperm development. Furthermore, DNAH12 also interacts with radial spoke head proteins RSPH1, RSPH9, and DNAJB13 to regulate CP stability. Moreover, the infertility of Dnah12-/- mice could be overcome by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Collectively, DNAH12 plays a crucial role in the proper organization of axoneme in sperm flagella, but not cilia, by recruiting DNAH1 and DNALI1 in both humans and mice. These findings expand our comprehension of dynein component assembly in flagella and cilia and provide a valuable marker for genetic counseling and diagnosis of asthenoteratozoospermia in clinical practice.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.