Coordination of cell cycle and morphogenesis during organ formation

Abstract

Organ formation requires precise regulation of cell cycle and morphogenetic events. Using the Drosophila embryonic salivary gland (SG) as a model, we uncover the role of the SP1/KLF transcription factor Huckebein (Hkb) in coordinating cell cycle regulation and morphogenesis. The hkb mutant SG exhibits defects in invagination positioning and organ size due to abnormal death of SG cells. Normal SG development involves distal-to-proximal progression of endoreplication (endocycle), whereas hkb mutant SG cells undergo abnormal cell division, leading to cell death. Hkb represses the expression of key cell cycle and pro-apoptotic genes in the SG. Knockdown of cyclin E or cyclin-dependent kinase 1, or overexpression of fizzy-related rescues most of the morphogenetic defects observed in the hkb mutant SG. These results indicate that Hkb plays a critical role in controlling endoreplication by regulating the transcription of key cell cycle effectors to ensure proper organ formation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.Supplementary file 3 contains all the full list of Hkb target genes, GO clusters, and the list of genes in each cluster.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeffrey Matthew

    Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5686-6370
  2. Vishakha Vishwakarma

    Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Thao Phuong Le

    Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ryan A Agsunod

    Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. SeYeon Chung

    Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
    For correspondence
    seyeonchung@lsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5493-6424

Funding

National Science Foundation (MCB 2141387)

  • SeYeon Chung

Louisiana Board of Regents (LEQSF(2019-22)-RD-A-04)

  • SeYeon Chung

Louisiana State University

  • SeYeon Chung

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Claude Desplan, New York University, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 21, 2023 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 7, 2024
  3. Accepted: January 21, 2024
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 26, 2024 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 15, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2024, Matthew et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 737
    views
  • 151
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jeffrey Matthew
  2. Vishakha Vishwakarma
  3. Thao Phuong Le
  4. Ryan A Agsunod
  5. SeYeon Chung
(2024)
Coordination of cell cycle and morphogenesis during organ formation
eLife 13:e95830.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95830

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.95830

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    F Javier DeHaro-Arbona, Charalambos Roussos ... Sarah Bray
    Research Article

    Developmental programming involves the accurate conversion of signalling levels and dynamics to transcriptional outputs. The transcriptional relay in the Notch pathway relies on nuclear complexes containing the co-activator Mastermind (Mam). By tracking these complexes in real time, we reveal that they promote the formation of a dynamic transcription hub in Notch ON nuclei which concentrates key factors including the Mediator CDK module. The composition of the hub is labile and persists after Notch withdrawal conferring a memory that enables rapid reformation. Surprisingly, only a third of Notch ON hubs progress to a state with nascent transcription, which correlates with polymerase II and core Mediator recruitment. This probability is increased by a second signal. The discovery that target-gene transcription is probabilistic has far-reaching implications because it implies that stochastic differences in Notch pathway output can arise downstream of receptor activation.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Rieko Asai, Vivek N Prakash ... Takashi Mikawa
    Research Article

    Large-scale cell flow characterizes gastrulation in animal development. In amniote gastrulation, particularly in avian gastrula, a bilateral vortex-like counter-rotating cell flow, called ‘polonaise movements’, appears along the midline. Here, through experimental manipulations, we addressed relationships between the polonaise movements and morphogenesis of the primitive streak, the earliest midline structure in amniotes. Suppression of the Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling pathway maintains the polonaise movements along a deformed primitive streak. Mitotic arrest leads to diminished extension and development of the primitive streak and maintains the early phase of the polonaise movements. Ectopically induced Vg1, an axis-inducing morphogen, generates the polonaise movements, aligned to the induced midline, but disturbs the stereotypical cell flow pattern at the authentic midline. Despite the altered cell flow, induction and extension of the primitive streak are preserved along both authentic and induced midlines. Finally, we show that ectopic axis-inducing morphogen, Vg1, is capable of initiating the polonaise movements without concomitant PS extension under mitotic arrest conditions. These results are consistent with a model wherein primitive streak morphogenesis is required for the maintenance of the polonaise movements, but the polonaise movements are not necessarily responsible for primitive streak morphogenesis. Our data describe a previously undefined relationship between the large-scale cell flow and midline morphogenesis in gastrulation.