1. Neuroscience

Male cuticular pheromones stimulate removal of the mating plug and promote re-mating through pC1 neurons in Drosophila females

  1. Minsik Yun
  2. Do-Hyoung Kim
  3. Tal Soo Ha
  4. Kang-Min Lee
  5. Eungyu Park
  6. Markus Knaden
  7. Bill S Hansson
  8. Young-Joon Kim  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Republic of Korea
  2. Department of Biomedical Science, College of Natural Science, Daegu University, Republic of Korea
  3. Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Germany
  4. Next Generation Insect Chemical Ecology, Max Planck Centre, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Germany
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Minsik Yun
  2. Do-Hyoung Kim
  3. Tal Soo Ha
  4. Kang-Min Lee
  5. Eungyu Park
  6. Markus Knaden
  7. Bill S Hansson
  8. Young-Joon Kim
(2024)
Male cuticular pheromones stimulate removal of the mating plug and promote re-mating through pC1 neurons in Drosophila females
eLife 13:RP96013.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife assessment

This important work unravels how female Drosophila can assess their social context via chemosensory cues and modulate the sperm storage process after copulation accordingly. A compelling set of rigorous experiments uncovers specific pheromones that influence the excitability of the female brain receptivity circuit and their propensity to discard inseminate from a mating. This insight into neuronal mechanisms of sexual behavior plasticity is of general interest to scientists working in the fields of animal behavior, neuroscience, evolution, and sexual selection, as well as insect chemosensation and reproduction.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013.3.sa0

Abstract

In birds and insects, the female uptakes sperm for a specific duration post-copulation known as the ejaculate holding period (EHP) before expelling unused sperm and the mating plug through sperm ejection. In this study, we found that Drosophila melanogaster females shortens the EHP when incubated with males or mated females shortly after the first mating. This phenomenon, which we termed male-induced EHP shortening (MIES), requires Or47b+ olfactory and ppk23+ gustatory neurons, activated by 2-methyltetracosane and 7-tricosene, respectively. These odorants raise cAMP levels in pC1 neurons, responsible for processing male courtship cues and regulating female mating receptivity. Elevated cAMP levels in pC1 neurons reduce EHP and reinstate their responsiveness to male courtship cues, promoting re-mating with faster sperm ejection. This study established MIES as a genetically tractable model of sexual plasticity with a conserved neural mechanism.

Introduction

Sexual plasticity, the ability to modify sexual state or reproductive behavior in response to changing social conditions, is observed in both vertebrates and invertebrates (Bruce, 1959; Koene and Ter Maat, 2007; Roberts et al., 2012; Steiger et al., 2008; Yagound et al., 2012). In rodents, exposure to unfamiliar males often leads to the sudden termination of pregnancy, known as the Bruce effect. It is induced by male urinary peptides, such as MHC I peptides, activating the vomeronasal organ (Becker and Hurst, 2008; Leinders-Zufall et al., 2004; Zipple et al., 2019). This effect enhances reproductive fitness of both sexes, by eliminating the offspring of competing males and enabling females to select better mates even after conception. Many species also adapt their reproductive behavior in response to the social-sexual context change (SSCC), involving encounters with new sexual partners or competitors. Understanding the neural circuit mechanisms behind female responses to SSCC emerges as a central focus of neuroscience (Gaspar et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2021).

Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly, displays various social behaviors like aggregation, aggression, and sexual behavior (Bartelt et al., 1985; Billeter et al., 2006; Billeter and Levine, 2015). Similar to rodents, they primarily use the olfactory system to communicate socially through pheromones (Kohl et al., 2015; Sengupta and Smith, 2014). Some of these pheromones act as aphrodisiacs, while others regulate aggression or foster aggregation. For instance, 11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA) attracts females but repels males and promotes aggregation (Billeter and Levine, 2015; Kurtovic et al., 2007; Mane et al., 1983). 7-Tricosene (7-T), a cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) present in males, is an aphrodisiac to females and affects social interactions between males (Grillet et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2011). On the other hand, 7,11-heptacosadiene (7,11-HD), a related female-specific pheromone, functions as an aphrodisiac to males, triggering courtship behavior and involving species recognition (Antony et al., 1985; Toda et al., 2012).

The fruit fly’s chemosensory organs, located in various parts of the body, detect these pheromones (Ali et al., 2022; Joseph and Carlson, 2015). Olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in the sensilla of the antennae and maxillary palp are responsible for the detection of long-range volatile pheromones like cVA, while short-range pheromones like 7-T are sensed by neurons on the forelegs and labellum (Joseph and Carlson, 2015; Kohl et al., 2015; Sengupta and Smith, 2014).

The olfactory receptor Or47b, expressed in ORNs located in the at4 trichoid sensilla on the third antennal segment, is involved in several sociosexual interactions, including male mating success, mate preference, and female aggression toward mating pairs (Gaspar et al., 2022; Kohlmeier et al., 2021; Lone et al., 2015; Lone and Sharma, 2012; Zhuang et al., 2016). In males, Or47b senses fatty acid methyl esters and fatty acids that affect mating competition and copulation (Dweck et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016). While the role of Or47b in female aggression is well established (Gaspar et al., 2022), its involvement in female sexual behavior is uncertain. In both sexes, Or47b ORNs project to VA1v glomeruli, where VA1v projection neurons receive their signal and project to the mushroom body calyx and lateral horn. Male Or47b neurons connect to neurons such as aSP5, aSP8, and aSP9, which express a male-specific transcription factor FruM (Yu et al., 2010).

CHC pheromones, which function as short-range pheromones, are detected primarily by neurons on the forelegs and the labellum that express gustatory receptors, ionotropic receptors, or the ppk/DEG-ENaC family of sodium channels (Joseph and Carlson, 2015; Kohl et al., 2015; Sengupta and Smith, 2014). CHCs like 7-T and 7,11-HD are sensed by ppk23-expressing M and F cells in the tarsi (Liu et al., 2020). 7-T and cVA are sensed by M cells expressing ppk23, whereas 7,11-HD and 7,11-nonacosadiene are sensed by F cells expressing ppk23, ppk25, and ppk29. In males, 7-T or 7,11-HD affects the neuronal activity of the FruM-expressing P1 neurons (Inagaki et al., 2014; Kohatsu et al., 2011; Sato and Yamamoto, 2020). However, how these CHCs signal in the female brain remains unknown.

Sperm ejection is a process by which females can remove the male ejaculate or the mating plug after copulation. This phenomenon has been observed in several animal species including feral fowl (Pizzari and Birkhead, 2000), black-legged kittiwake (Wagner et al., 2004), and dunnock (Davies, 1983). In the fruit fly, it typically occurs approximately 90 min after mating (Lee et al., 2015). This specific interval, referred to as ejaculate holding period (EHP), is thought to affect sperm usage and fecundity (Lee et al., 2015; Manier et al., 2010). The neurosecretory neurons in the brain pars intercerebralis (PI) that produce diuretic hormone 44 (Dh44), an insect orthologue of the corticotropin-releasing factor, regulate EHP (Lee et al., 2015). There is evidence that Drosophila females sense the social-sexual context through sperm ejected by other females. For instance, females were likely to lay more eggs when placed on a food patch containing male ejaculate deposited by other females (Duménil et al., 2016). However, it remains unknown whether the SSCC influences sperm ejection and EHP.

Female pC1 neurons, which express a specific transcription factor DsxF, integrate olfactory and auditory cues associated with male courtship (Lee et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2014). The pC1 neurons, their male counterparts (i.e. P1 neurons), and the ventrolateral subdivision of ventromedial hypothalamus (VMHvl) neurons in mice share conserved circuit configurations and demonstrate functional similarity in coordinating social and sexual behaviors (Anderson, 2016; Jiang and Pan, 2022). There are 14 Dsx-positive pC1 neurons in each hemisphere of the brain, responsive to the male sex-pheromone cVA and courtship songs (Kim et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2014). Connectome analyses identified 10 pC1 neurons that fall into five subtypes, with pC1a, b, and c subtypes associated with mating behavior and pC1d and e subtypes associated with aggression (Chiu et al., 2023; Deutsch et al., 2020; Han et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2024; Schretter et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Although direct evidence connecting pC1 neurons to sperm ejection is limited, they are promising candidates for regulating sperm ejection or EHP, because sperm ejection allows females to eliminate the mating plug and male ejaculate, thereby restoring sexual attractiveness (Laturney and Billeter, 2016).

In this study, we demonstrated that two male pheromones, 2-methyltetracosane (2MC) and 7-T, significantly reduced the EHP through Or47b neurons and ppk23 neurons, respectively. These pheromone pathways converge on pC1 neurons, where they increase cAMP levels. The elevated cAMP in pC1 neurons resulted in a reduction of the EHP to a degree that was comparable to the effects of the male pheromones. It also enhanced the excitability of pC1 neurons, making them more responsive to both olfactory and auditory male courtship cues and promoting further mating following the earlier removal of the mating plug. These findings establish a novel behavioral paradigm that sheds light on the intricate molecular and neuronal pathways underlying female sexual plasticity.

Results

MIES is dependent on olfaction

To investigate the impact of changes in the social-sexual context on the EHP, we compared the EHP of post-mating females isolated from any male presence to those exposed to naive wild-type Canton-S (CS) males immediately after copulation (Figure 1A). Notably, the EHP of females incubated with naive males was approximately 30 min shorter than that of females left in isolation after mating (Figure 1A and B). We refer to this phenomenon as male-induced EHP shortening (MIES). In contrast, little difference in EHP was observed between females incubated with virgin females and those isolated after mating (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
The presence of males reduces the ejaculate holding period (EHP) in females through olfactory or gustatory sensation.

(A) Schematic of the experimental procedure employed to measure male-induced EHP shortening (MIES). Immediately after the end of copulation, the female is incubated with a wild-type Canton-S (CS) male that has not been previously exposed to the female. Typically, w1118 females that are kept alone after mating exhibit an EHP of approximately 90 min, whereas females that are incubated with a naïve CS male exhibit an EHP of approximately 60 min. In this study, we refer to this phenomenon as MIES. (B–F) Normalized EHP or ΔEHP of the females of the indicated genotypes, incubated under the indicated conditions after mating. The ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females kept alone after mating (the leftmost column) from the EHP of individual females in comparison. Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; ****p<0.0001). Gray circles indicate the EHP or ΔEHP of individual females, and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. Numbers below the horizontal bar represent the mean of the EHP differences between the indicated treatments. Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

Male fruit flies employ various sensory signals to attract females during courtship (Billeter et al., 2006). To assess the role of the visual signal in MIES, we examined MIES under dim red light conditions and observed that limited illumination had a marginal impact on MIES (Figure 1D). Next, we examined MIES in post-mating females incubated with decapitated CS males. These males could serve as a source of olfactory or gustatory signals, but not for auditory or visual signals. Again, no reduction in MIES was observed (Figure 1E). This strongly suggests that olfactory or gustatory cues are the key signals responsible for MIES. This is further supported by the observation that females deficient in the odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco1) did not exhibit MIES (Figure 1F). Thus, it is highly likely that male odorant(s), especially those detected by olfactory receptors (Or), induce MIES.

MIES is dependent on the Or47b receptor and Or47b-expressing ORNs

In the fruit fly antenna, the trichoid sensilla and their associated ORNs are known to detect sex pheromones (van der Goes van Naters and Carlson, 2007). To investigate the contribution of ORNs located in the trichoid sensilla to MIES, we silenced 11 different ORN groups found in the trichoid and intermediate sensilla (Couto et al., 2005; Lin and Potter, 2015) by expressing either the active or inactive form of tetanus toxin light chain (TNT) (Sweeney et al., 1995). Our results showed that silencing ORNs expressing Or13a, Or19a, Or23a, Or47b, Or65c, Or67d, or Or88a significantly affected MIES (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

We then focused on the analysis of Or47b-positive ORNs (Figure 2A), which, in contrast to the others, exhibited almost complete abolition of MIES when silenced. Activation of these neurons with the thermogenetic activator dTRPA1 (Hamada et al., 2008) resulted in a significant EHP shortening, even in the absence of male exposure (Figure 2B). Subsequently, we examined whether restoring Orco expression in Or47b ORNs in Orco-deficient females would restore MIES. Our results confirmed that this is indeed the case (Figure 2C). To establish the necessity of the Or47b receptor gene for MIES, we examined Or47b-deficient females (Or47b2/Or47b3) and observed a complete absence of MIES, whereas heterozygous controls exhibited normal MIES (Figure 2D). Furthermore, the reintroduction of Or47b expression in Or47b ORNs of Or47b-deficient females almost completely restored MIES (Figure 2E). Based on these observations, we concluded that MIES depends on the Or47b receptor gene and Or47b-expressing ORNs.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
The function of Or47b and Or47b-positive olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) is essential for male-induced EHP shortening (MIES).

(A, C–E) ΔEHP of females of the indicated genotypes, incubated with or without naive males after mating. The female genotypes are as follows from left to right: (A) control (Or47b>TNTinactive), Or47b ORN silencing (Or47b>TNTactive); (C) Orco mutant (Orco1/Orco1), Orco rescue in Or47b ORNs of Orco mutant (Orco1/Orco1; Or47b>Orco); (D) control 1 (Or47b2/+), control 2 (Or47b3/+), Or47b mutant (Or47b2/Or47b3); (E) Or47b mutant (Or47b2/Or47b2), Or47b rescue (Or47b>Or47b; Or47b2/Or47b2). (B) Thermogenetic activation of Or47b-positive ORNs shortens EHP in females kept alone after mating. The female genotypes are as follows from left to right: control 1 (Or47b-Gal4/+), control 2 (UAS-dTRPA1/+), Or47b>dTRPA1 (Or47b-Gal4/UAS-dTRPA1). Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001). The ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females kept alone after mating (‘-’ in A, C–E) or incubated at 21°C control conditions (B) from the EHP of individual females in comparison. Gray circles indicate the ΔEHP of individual females, and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. The gray circles with dashed borders indicate ΔEHP values that exceed the axis limits (>90 or <-90 min). Numbers below the horizontal bar represent the mean of the EHP differences between the indicated treatments. EHP, ejaculate holding period. Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

2MC induces MIES via Or47b and Or47b ORNs

Previous studies have shown that methyl laurate and palmitoleic acid can activate Or47b ORNs only in the presence of a functional Or47b gene (Dweck et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016). However, in our investigation, none of these odorants induced significant EHP shortening, even when applied at concentrations as high as 1440 ng (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). This prompted us to search for a new pheromone capable of activating Or47b ORNs and thereby shortening the EHP.

Oenocytes produce a significant portion of the CHCs or pheromones. We asked whether the male pheromone responsible for MIES is produced by oenocytes (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A). Indeed, incubation with females engineered to produce male oenocytes significantly shorten EHP, strongly suggesting that male oenocytes serve as a source for the MIES pheromone. Unexpectedly, however, incubation with males possessing feminized oenocytes also resulted in significant EHP shortening (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A). This raises the possibility that oenocytes may not be the sole source of the MIES. The genus Drosophila exhibits distinct CHC profiles, with certain CHC components shared among closely related species (Billeter et al., 2009). We found that incubation with males of other closely related species, such as Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, and Drosophila erecta, also induced EHP shortening, whereas incubation with Drosophila yakuba males did not (Figure 3—figure supplement 2B).

The EHP was therefore measured in females incubated in a small mating chamber containing a piece of filter paper perfumed with male CHCs, including 2-methylhexacosane, 2-methyldocosane, 5-methyltricosane, 7-methyltricosane, 10Z-heneicosene, 9Z-heneicosene, and 2MC at various concentrations (not shown). Among these, 2MC at 750 ng was the only one that significantly reduced EHP (Figure 3A; Figure 3—figure supplement 3). 2MC was mainly found in males, but not in virgin females (Dweck et al., 2015). Notably, it is present in D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. erecta, but not in D. yakuba (Dweck et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2022).

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
2-Methyltetracosane (2MC) can induce ejaculate holding period (EHP) shortening through Or47b.

(A–D) ΔEHP of females of the indicated genotypes, incubated in solvent vehicle or 2MC. Mated females were incubated with a piece of filter paper perfumed with either vehicle (-) or 750 ng 2MC (+). The female genotypes are as follows: (A) w1118, (B) Orco mutant (Orco1/Orco1), (C) Or47b mutant (Or47b2/Or47b2), (D) Gal4 control (Or47b-Gal4/+; Orco1/Orco1), UAS control (UAS-Orco/+; Orco1/Orco1), Orco rescue in Or47b olfactory receptor neurons (ORN) (Orco1/Orco1; Or47b-Gal4/UAS-Orco). (A–C) Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; *p<0.05). (D) One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison (n.s. p>0.05; *p<0.05). Gray circles indicate the ΔEHP of individual females and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. The ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females incubated with vehicle-perfumed paper (the leftmost column in A–C) or the mean of the Gal4 control and UAS control female incubated with vehicle-perfumed paper (the two leftmost columns in D) from the EHP of individual females in comparison. Gray circles with dashed borders indicate ΔEHP values that exceed the axis limits (>90 or <-90 min). Numbers below the horizontal bar represent the mean of the EHP differences between the indicated treatments. Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

Moreover, the 2MC-induced EHP shortening was not observed in Orco- or Or47b-deficient females (Figure 3B and C), but was restored when Orco expression was reinstated in Or47b ORNs in Orco-deficient mutants (Figure 3D). Our behavioral observations strongly suggest that 2MC acts as an odorant ligand for Or47b and shortens the EHP through this receptor.

7-T shortens EHP through ppk23 neurons

In contrast to incubation with virgin females, incubation with mated females resulted in a significant shortening of EHP (Figure 4A). Mated females carry male pheromones, including 7-T and cVA, which are transferred during copulation (Laturney and Billeter, 2016). This raised the possibility that these male pheromones might also induce EHP shortening. Indeed, our experiments revealed that incubation with a piece of filter paper perfumed with 150 ng of 7-T significantly shortened the EHP. Conversely, incubation with cVA and 7-pentacosene, a related CHC, did not produce the same effect (Figure 4B and C; Figure 4—figure supplement 1A, B). The concentrations of 7-T capable of inducing EHP shortening appear to be physiologically relevant. 7-T has been found at levels of 432 ng in males (Scott and Richmond, 1988), 25 ng in virgin females, and 150 ng in mated females (Laturney and Billeter, 2016). Although the receptors for 7-T remain unknown, ppk23-expressing tarsal neurons have been shown to sense these compounds and regulate sexual behavior in males and females (Thistle et al., 2012; Toda et al., 2012; Vijayan et al., 2014). Subsequently, we silenced ppk23 neurons, and as a result, MIES was almost completely abolished, underscoring the pivotal role of 7-T in MIES (Figure 4D). However, DEG/ENac channel genes expressed in ppk23 neurons, including ppk23 and ppk29, were found to be dispensable for MIES (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C–E). This aligns with the previous observations that neither ppk23 deficiency nor ppk28 deficiency recapitulates the sexual behavioral defects caused by silencing ppk23 neurons (Lu et al., 2012).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
7-Tricosene (7-T) present in mated females and males reduces ejaculate holding period (EHP) via ppk23 neurons.

(A–D) ΔEHP of females of the indicated genotypes, incubated with mated females (A), a piece of filter paper perfumed with 150 ng 7-T (B), 200 ng 11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA) (C), or naive males (D) after mating. The female genotypes are as follows: (A–C) w1118, (D) control (ppk23-Gal4/UAS-TNTinactive), ppk23 silencing (ppk23-Gal4/UAS-TNTactive). (A) Unpaired t-test. (B–D) Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; *p<0.05). The ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females kept alone (‘-’ in A, D) or incubated with vehicle-perfumed paper (the leftmost column in B, C) from the EHP of individual females in comparison. Gray circles indicate the ΔEHP of individual females, and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. The gray circles with dashed borders indicate ΔEHP values that exceed the axis limits (>90 or <-90 min). Numbers below the horizontal bar represent the mean of the EHP differences between the indicated treatments. Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

The pC1b and c neurons regulate EHP and MIES

The neuropeptide Dh44 determines the timing of sperm ejection or EHP (Lee et al., 2015). The same study found that Dh44 receptor neurons involved in EHP regulation also express doublesex (dsx), which encodes sexually dimorphic transcription factors. A recent study has revealed that pC1 neurons, a specific subgroup of dsx-expressing central neurons in the female brain, do indeed express Dh44 receptors (Kim et al., 2024). With these findings, we set out to investigate the role of pC1 neurons in the regulation of EHP and MIES. The pC1 neurons comprise five distinct subtypes. Of these, the pC1a, b, and c subtypes have been implicated in mating receptivity (Deutsch et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2024), while the remaining pC1d and e subtypes have been implicated in female aggression (Chiu et al., 2023; Deutsch et al., 2020). To investigate the role of these subtypes in EHP, we employed GtACR1, an anion channel activated by blue light in the presence of all trans-retinal (ATR), to silence specific pC1 subtypes immediately after mating. Our experiments revealed that silencing of the pC1 subset comprising the pC1a, b, and c subtypes with GtACR1 led to an increase in EHP (Figure 5A), whereas silencing of the pC1d and e subtypes had a limited effect on EHP (Figure 5B). We further analyzed the roles of pC1b, c neurons along with pC1a neurons separately. We generated a subtype-specific split-Gal4 for pC1a and found that, as expected, silencing pC1a with this split-Gal4 almost completely suppressed mating receptivity (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). However, silencing pC1a alone did not result in increased EHP, suggesting a marginal role of the pC1a subtype in EHP regulation (Figure 5C). In contrast, concomitant silencing of both pC1b and pC1c neurons significantly increased EHP by 56±6.9 min (Figure 5D). At present, we lack the genetic tools to further distinguish the roles of pC1b and pC1c subtypes separately.

Figure 5 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
A subset of pC1 neurons, comprising pC1b and pC1c subtypes, regulates ejaculate holding period (EHP) and exhibits CRE-luciferase reporter activity in response to 2-methyltetracosane (2MC) and 7-tricosene (7-T).

(A–D) The optogenetic silencing of a pC1 neuron subset comprising pC1b and pC1c neurons (pC1b, c) increases EHP. Females of the indicated genotypes were cultured on food with or without all trans-retinal (ATR) after eclosion. The ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females cultured in control ATR - food (the leftmost column) from the EHP of individual females in comparison. The female genotypes are as follows: (A) pC1a,b,c>GtACR1 (pC1-S-Gal4/UAS-GtACR1), (B) pC1d,e>GtACR1 (pC1-A-Gal4/UAS-GtACR1), (C) pC1a>GtACR1 (pC1a-split-Gal4/UAS-GtACR1), and (D) pC1b,c>GtACR1 (Dh44-pC1-Gal4/UAS-GtACR1). Gray circles indicate the ΔEHP of individual females, and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. The gray circles with dashed borders indicate ΔEHP values that exceed the axis limits (>120 min). Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; *p<0.05; ****p<0.0001). Numbers below the horizontal bar represent the mean of the EHP differences between the indicated treatments. (E, F) Relative CRE-luciferase reporter activity of pC1 neurons in females of the indicated genotypes, incubated with a piece of filter paper perfumed with solvent vehicle control or the indicated pheromones immediately after mating. The CRE-luciferase reporter activity of pC1 neurons of Or47b-deficient females (Or47b2/2 or Or47b3/3) was observed to increase in response to 7-T but not to 2MC. To calculate the relative luciferase activity, the average luminescence unit values of the female incubated with the vehicle are set to 100%. Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001). Gray circles indicate the relative luciferase activity (%) of individual females, and the mean ± SEM of data is presented. Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

2MC and 7-T increase cAMP levels in pC1b and c neurons

Our recent research has shown that pC1 neurons exhibit elevated cAMP levels during sexual maturation, and that this increase in cAMP is closely related to heightened excitability of pC1 neurons (Kim et al., 2024). The same study also showed that a mating signal (i.e. sex peptide in the male seminal fluid) reduces cAMP levels in pC1 neurons. Thus, we hypothesized that male odorants responsible for inducing MIES, such as 2MC or 7-T, would elevate cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons in newly mated females. This, in turn, would lead to increased excitability of pC1 neurons and, as a consequence, a reduction in the EHP. To monitor cAMP levels in these neurons, we prepared females that express a CRE-luciferase reporter selectively in pC1b, c neurons. Indeed, when exposed to 2MC or 7-T, pC1b, c neurons exhibited a significant increase in CRE-luciferase activity, indicating that these neurons produce higher levels of cAMP in response to these odorants (Figure 5E). Notably, CRE-luciferase activity appeared to peak at specific odorant concentrations that induced significant shortening of the EHP (Figure 5—figure supplement 2).

In contrast, when we examined other pC1 subsets, such as pC1a, and pC1d and e, we detected no evidence of increased CRE-luciferase reporter activity upon exposure to 2MC or 7-T treatment (Figure 5E). Notably, CRE-luciferase reporter activity in the pC1a neurons appears to be dependent on the mating status, as it reaches levels similar to those of pC1b, c neurons in virgin females (Figure 5—figure supplement 3). This observation aligns well with connectome data suggesting that SAG neurons, which are responsible for relaying SP-dependent mating signals, synapse primarily with the pC1a subtype and to a much lesser extent with other pC1 subtypes (Wang et al., 2020).

To further test the role of Or47b in 2MC detection, we generated Or47b-deficient females with pC1 neurons expressing the CRE-luciferase reporter. Females with one copy of the wild-type Or47b allele, which served as the control group, showed robust CRE-luciferase reporter activity in response to either 2MC or 7-T. In contrast, Or47b-deficient females showed robust CRE-luciferase activity in response to to 7-T, but little activity in response to 2MC. This observation suggests that the odorant receptor Or47b plays an essential role in the selective detection of 2MC (Figure 5F).

Elevated cAMP in pC1 neurons shortens the EHP, while increasing re-mating

Having shown that MIES-inducing male odorants, 2MC or 7-T, increase cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons from mated females, we next asked whether this induced elevation of cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons would shorten EHP, leading to MIES. We employed the photoactivatable adenylate cyclase (PhotoAC), which increases cellular cAMP levels upon exposure to light. Indeed, the induced elevation of cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons significantly shortened EHP, whereas the same treatment applied to pC1a or pC1d and pC1e had no such effect (Figure 6A). This further underscores the pivotal role of pC1b, c neurons in EHP regulation.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Elevated cAMP levels in pC1 neurons reduce ejaculate holding period (EHP) and increase the responsiveness of pC1 neurons to male courtship cues, thereby promoting subsequent re-mating.

(A) The optogenetic production of cAMP in the pC1b, c neurons shortens EHP, whereas the same treatment in pC1a or pC1d, e neurons does not. ΔEHP is calculated by subtracting the mean of the reference EHP of females incubated in the control illumination (Dim light), which does not activate a photoactivatable adenylate cyclase (PhotoAC), from the EHP of individual females. Mann-Whitney test (n.s. p>0.05, ****p<0.0001). (B) The optogenetic production of cAMP transiently increases the excitability of pC1 neurons. Left, schematic of the experimental procedure. Right, peak ΔF/F in the LPC projections of pC1 neurons from freshly mated females in response to the pheromone 11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA), before and after photoactivation of PhotoAC expressed in pC1 neurons. The calcium response was measured at specific time points after photoactivation: after 1 min (blue dots and box) or 10 min (purple dots and box) after activation. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA test with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (*p<0.05; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001). (C) Left, schematic of the experimental procedure. Right, re-mating rate of females during optogenetic cAMP production in pC1b, c neurons, scored as the percentage of females that copulate with a naive Canton-S (CS) male within 6 hr after the first mating. The female genotypes are as follows: Control (+/UAS-PhotoAC), pC1b,c>UAS-PhotoAC (Dh44-pC1-Gal4/UAS-PhotoAC). Chi-square test (*p<0.05). Genotype and sample size are shown in Table 1.

Next, we asked whether the expression of Dh44R1 and Dh44R2, GPCRs that increase cellular cAMP in response to their ligand Dh44, in pC1b, c neurons is necessary for MIES. However, double knockdown of Dh44R1 and Dh44R2 in pC1 neurons seemed to have a limited impact on MIES (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). This suggests that Dh44R signaling in pC1 neurons is not essential for the regulation of EHP or MIES, raising the possibility that other GPCRs may be involved in the upregulation of cAMP levels in pC1 neurons in response to 2MC or 7-T.

Lastly, we investigated how increased cAMP levels affect the physiological activity of pC1 neurons. pC1 neurons from virgin females exhibit robust Ca2+ transients in response to male courtship cues, such as the male pheromone cVA and the courtship pulse song (Zhou et al., 2014). In contrast, those from mated females display significantly diminished Ca2+ transients (Kim et al., 2024). When examined shortly after mating, a decrease in pC1 responsiveness to cVA was observed. However, immediately after PhotoAC activation in pC1 neurons, pC1 neurons from freshly mated females became more excitable and exhibited stronger Ca2+ transients in response to cVA (Figure 6B). It is important to note that this PhotoAC-induced increase in pC1 excitability is transient and rapidly declines within 10 min (Figure 6B). Nevertheless, these findings suggest that the increased cAMP levels in pC1 neurons would not only promote MIES but also facilitate re-mating in post-mating females, which typically engage in re-mating at a low frequency. To test this hypothesis, we examined the re-mating frequency of freshly mated females paired with naive males while inducing a cAMP increase in pC1 neurons. As expected, PhotoAC activation in pC1b, c neurons substantially increased the re-mating rate compared to the control group (Figure 6C). Therefore, we concluded that male odorants that stimulate cAMP elevation in pC1 neurons expedite the removal of the mating plug, consequently leading to increased instances of re-mating (Figure 7).

Figure 7
Download asset Open asset
The presence of male odorants, which reflect changes in the social-sexual context, stimulates newly mated females to remove the male ejaculate and engage in subsequent re-mating.

Following the initial mating, a female that encounters a new courting male removes the male ejaculate after a shorter ejaculate holding period (EHP) than those that do not encounter new male partners. This phenomenon, referred to as male-induced EHP shortening (MIES) in this study, is followed by a second mating with the new partner. The production of MIES depends on the functions of the Or47b+ olfactory and ppk23+ gustatory neurons, which are activated by 2-methyltetracosane (2MC) and 7-T, respectively. These odorants increase cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons, enhancing their responsiveness to male courtship cues and increasing mating receptivity. Consequently, 2MC and 7-T promote a second mating with a faster removal of the male ejaculate or mating plug.

Discussion

Males employ a diverse range of strategies to enhance their reproductive fitness. One such strategy involves the formation of a ‘mating plug’, a mechanism that prevents females from engaging in further mating, thereby increasing fertilization success rates (Dixson, 1998; Parker, 1970; Schneider et al., 2016). As a means of intra-sexual competition, rival males often promote the removal or precocious expulsion of the mating plug. The evolution of this strategy is driven by intersexual interactions with polyandrous females, who often remove the mating plug to engage in additional mating with males of superior traits or higher social status than their previous partners (Dean et al., 2011; Pizzari and Birkhead, 2000). In the dunnock Prunella modularis, a small European passerine bird, the male often engages in cloacal pecking of mated females, inducing the expulsion of the previous mate’s sperm and mating plug, thereby increasing their chances of successful mating (Davies, 1983). In this study, we discovered that in D. melanogaster, freshly mated females exhibit an earlier removal of the mating plugs or a shorter EHP when kept with actively courting males. This behavior is primarily induced by the stimulation of females via male sex pheromones. In addition, our study has revealed that the neural circuit that processes male courtship cues and controls mating decisions plays an important role in regulating this behavior. This fly circuit has recently been proposed to be homologous to VMHvl in the mouse brain (Anderson, 2016; Jiang and Pan, 2022). By delving into the molecular and neuronal mechanisms underlying MIES, our study provides valuable insights into the broader aspect of behaviors induced by changes in the social-sexual context.

Our findings highlight the involvement of the Or47b receptor and Or47b ORNs in MIES. These OR and ORNs have been implicated in a range of social and sexual behaviors in both male and female fruit flies (Dweck et al., 2015; Gaspar et al., 2022; Kohlmeier et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2016; Lone et al., 2015; Lone and Sharma, 2012; Zhuang et al., 2016). Methyl laurate and trans-palmitoleic acid are odorant ligands for Or47b that account for many of these functions, particularly in males (Dweck et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016). In this study, we provide compelling evidence that 2MC induces cAMP elevation in pC1 neurons and EHP shortening via both the Or47b receptor and Or47b ORNs, suggesting that 2MC functions as an odorant ligand for Or47b. Notably, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of CHCs from 4-day-old wild-type D. melanogaster revealed the presence of 2MC exclusively in males (Dweck et al., 2015). Surprisingly, however, unlike 2MC, neither methyl laurate nor trans-palmitoleic acid affected EHP. The reason for this paradoxical result remains unclear. A plausible interpretation is that the EHP shortening induced by 2MC may require not only Or47b but also other as yet unidentified ORs. With the establishment of a behavioral and cellular assessment of 2MC activity, the search for additional odorant receptors responsive to 2MC is now feasible. Another important avenue for further research is whether 2MC can also elicit behaviors previously associated with methyl laurate or trans-palmitoleic acid, such as promoting male copulation and courtship (Dweck et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016).

We observed that both 2MC and 7-T exhibit both cellular and behavioral activity within a specific concentration range (Figure 3—figure supplement 3, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Figure 5—figure supplement 2). This observation is of particular interest, given the multitude of environmental and biological factors that influence the levels of 2MC and 7-T, potentially affecting the capacity of males to induce MIES. For instance, exposure to low temperatures during development has been linked to increased production of both 2MC and 7-T (Bontonou et al., 2013). Similarly, mutation of the desiccation stress gene CG9186, which encodes a protein associated with lipid droplets, has been found to impact 2MC levels (Werthebach et al., 2019). Furthermore, 2MC levels rise with age in males (Everaerts et al., 2010). Thus, we propose that levels of 2MC, and possibly 7-T, may serve as indicators of male age and resilience to environmental stress in a complex manner.

In mated females, treatment with 2MC or 7-T increases cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons but not in pC1a neurons. In contrast, pC1a neurons in virgin females are fully responsive to both male pheromones, showing increases in cAMP levels that are similar to those of pC1b,c neurons (Figure 5—figure supplement 3). The absence of cAMP levels in pC1a neurons in mated females likely results from the mating signal (i.e. sex peptide) silencing pC1a neurons. Connectome and electrophysiology data support this interpretation, as SAG neurons, which relay sex peptide signals, have the strongest synaptic connection with the pC1a among five pC1 subtypes (Wang et al., 2020). However, the activity of SAG neurons may also influence pC1c neurons, as they also have substantial synaptic connections with pC1c neurons, as seen in the hemibrain connectome dataset (Scheffer et al., 2020). Future studies are needed to understand the role of SAG neurons in the regulation of EHP.

We found that increased cAMP levels cause pC1b, c neurons in mated females, which are typically unresponsive to male courtship cues like cVA and pulse song, to become responsive and exhibit strong Ca2+ transients. Since pC1b, c neurons play a role in generating sexual drive and increasing female receptivity to male courtship, the 2MC- or 7-T-induced increases in cAMP are likely to control the removal of the mating plug and the engagement of mated females in further mating (Figure 7). This hypothesis aligns well with the previous report that mating reduces the sensitivity of Or47b ORNs, which we found to be responsive to 2MC, leading to an increased preference for pheromone-rich males after mating (Kohlmeier et al., 2021). Moreover, the finding that 2MC and 7-T induce cAMP levels in pC1b, c neurons in virgin females suggests that virgin females may also use 2MC and 7-T as odorant cues to assess male quality during their first mating. Indeed, females seem to evaluate male quality by the amount of 7-T, as increased 7-T promotes mating receptivity and shortens mating latency (Grillet et al., 2006).

Physiological factors like the nutritional status of females prior to mating and the nutritional status of their mates have been shown to influence EHP (Kim et al., 2023), and therefore potentially MIES. Hence, it is highly probable that MIES is regulated by additional central neurons such as Dh44-PI neurons that regulate these processes (Lee et al., 2015). However, it remains unclear whether and how Dh44-PI neurons and pC1 neurons interact to modulate EHP and MIES. The observation that double knockdown of Dh44R1 and Dh44R2 has only a marginal effect on MIES suggests that Dh44-PI neurons may also function independently of pC1 neurons, raising the possibility that multiple independent central circuits may contribute to the production of MIES.

Our initial screening of ORNs responsible for MIES revealed the involvement of Or47b ORNs, as well as several other ORNs. In addition to 2MC, which acts through Or47b-expressing ORNs, our findings indicate that 7-T and ppk23 neurons, which are capable of detecting 7-T, also play a role in MIES induction. In D. melanogaster and other related species, food odors typically serve as volatile long-range signals that attract both males and females (Lin et al., 2015; Verschut et al., 2023), suggesting that specific food odors may also influence EHP (Duménil et al., 2016). The involvement of multiple ORNs in the regulation of EHP predicts that pC1 neurons may process multiple odorants, not limited to those associated with mating behavior, including food odors. Future studies will explore the full spectrum of odorants processed by pC1 neurons in the regulation of EHP.

In conclusion, we have identified a circuit that, via the detection of a novel male pheromone, potentially signals male quality and governs the female’s decision to remove the mating plug of her last mate and mate again.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Canton SBDSCRRID:BDSC_64349
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)w1118VDRCVDRC #60000
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)R71G01 (pC1-Gal4)BDSCRRID:BDSC_39599
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Orco1BDSCRRID:BDSC_23129
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or13a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9946
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or19a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9948
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or23a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9955
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or43a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9974
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or47b-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9983
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or47b-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9984
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or65a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9993
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or65b-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_23901
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or65c-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_23903
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or67d-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_9998
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or83c-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_23131
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or88a-Gal4BDSCRRID:BDSC_23137
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-Or47bBDSCRRID:BDSC_76045
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or47b2/2BDSCRRID:BDSC_51306
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Or47b3/3BDSCRRID:BDSC_51307
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-TNT activeBDSCRRID:BDSC_28837
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-TNT inactiveBDSCRRID:BDSC_28839
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-dTRPA1BDSCRRID:BDSC_26263
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-CsChrimsonBDSCRRID:BDSC_55135
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-GCaMP6mBDSCRRID:BDSC_42748
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)R52G04-ADBDSCRRID:BDSC_71085
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)SAG-Gal4 (VT50405)VDRCRRID:Flybase_FBst0489354,
VDRC #200652
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-Dh44R1-RNAiVDRCRRID:Flybase_FBst0482273,
VDRC #110708
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-Dh44R2-RNAiVDRCRRID:Flybase_FBst0465025,
VDRC #43314
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-Dicer2VDRCVDRC #60007
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)PromE(800)-Gal4Billeter et al., 2009N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-FLP, CRE-F-lucTanenhaus et al., 2012N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)LexAop-FLPBussell et al., 2014N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-CsChrimsonKlapoetke et al., 2014N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-GtACR1Mohammad et al., 2017N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-PhotoAC (PACα)Schröder-Lang et al., 2007N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)ppk23-Gal4Thistle et al., 2012N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)ppk23-Thistle et al., 2012N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)ppk28-Thistle et al., 2012N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)ppk29-Thistle et al., 2012N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)pC1-ADeutsch et al., 2020N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)pC1-SDeutsch et al., 2020N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Dh44-pC1-Gal4Kim et al., 2024N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Orco-Gal4Yu et al., 2018N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-EGFP-OrcoYu et al., 2018N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)dsx-DBDWang et al., 2020N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)pC1a-split-Gal4This studyN/A
Strain, strain background (Drosophila simulans)Drosophila simulansEHIME-Fly, KYORIN-FlyN/A
Strain, strain background (Drosophila sechellia)Drosophila sechelliaEHIME-Fly, KYORIN-FlyN/A
Strain, strain background (Drosophila erecta)Drosophila erectaEHIME-Fly, KYORIN-FlyN/A
Strain, strain background (Drosophila yakuba)Drosophila yakubaEHIME-Fly, KYORIN-FlyN/A
AntibodyMouse monoclonal
anti-Bruchpilot		DSHBCat# Nc82; RRID:AB_23148661:50
AntibodyRabbit Polyclonal
Anti-Green
Fluorescent Protein (GFP)		Thermo Fisher
Scientific
(Invitrogen)		Cat# A-11122, RRID:AB_2215691:1000
AntibodyAlexa 488-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit		Thermo Fisher
Scientific
(Invitrogen)		Cat# A-11008, RRID:AB_1431651:1000
AntibodyAlexa 568-conjugated
goat anti-mouse		Thermo Fisher Scientific (Invitrogen)Cat# A-11004, RRID:AB_25340721:1000
Chemical compoundPhoto-curable
UV glue		ThreeBondA16A01
Chemical compoundAll trans-retinalSigma-AldrichCat# R2500
Chemical compoundVectashieldVector LaboratoriesCat# H-1000
Chemical compoundMethyl laurateSigma-AldrichCat# W271500
Chemical compound7(Z)-TricoseneCayman ChemicalCat# 9000313
Chemical compoundtrans-palmitoleic acidCayman ChemicalCat# 9001798
Chemical compound11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA)Cayman ChemicalCat# 10010101
Chemical compound7(Z)-PentacoseneCayman ChemicalCat# 9000530
Chemical compoundBeetle Luciferin,
Potassium Salt		PromegaCat# E1601
Chemical compoundTriton X-100,
laboratory grade		Sigma-AldrichCat# X100
Chemical compound2-MethyltetracosaneKIPN/A>98%, purity
Software and algorithmsFijihttps://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloadsRRID:SCR_002285
Software and algorithmsGraphPad Prism9https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/RRID:SCR_002798
Software and algorithmsMetamorph softwarehttps://www.moleculardevices.com/products/cellular-imaging-systems/acquisition-and-analysis-software/metamorph-microscopyRRID:SCR_002368
Software and algorithmsNeuronbridgehttps://neuronbridge.janelia.org/N/A
Software and algorithmsComputational
Morphometry
Toolkit (CMTK)		https://github.com/jefferis/fiji-cmtk-gui;
Jefferis, 2015		RRID:SCR_002234
Version number: v0.1.1
Software and algorithmsColorMIP_Mask
_Search plugin		https://github.com/JaneliaSciComp/ColorMIP_Mask_Search;
Otsuna et al., 2020		Version number: v1.0.1
OtherDigital camcorderSONYHDR-CX405Behavior recording device
OtherSmart phoneXiaomiRedmi Note 10Behavior recording device
OtherMulti-channel
LED lights		NeoPixelCat# WS2812Light activation device;
red light, 620–625 nm,
390–420 mcd; green light,
522–525 nm, 660–720 mcd;
blue light, 465–467 nm,
180–200 mcd
OtherElectron-multiplying
CCD camera		Andor
Technology		LucaEM R 604MCalcium imaging
assay device
OtherStimulus
Controller		SyntechType CS-55Pheromone
delivery device
OtherMicroplate
luminometer		Berthold TechnologiesCentro XS3 LB 960Luciferase assay
device

Fly care

Request a detailed protocol

Flies were cultured on a standard medium composed of dextrose, corn meal, and yeast, at room temperature on a 12 hr:12 hr light:dark cycle (Kim et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2015). Behavioral assays were performed at 25°C, except for the thermogenetic activation experiment with dTRPA1. Virgin males and females were collected immediately after eclosion. Males were aged individually for 4–6 days, while females were aged in groups of 15–20. For EHP and mating assays, females were aged for 3–4 days. Assays were performed at Zeitgeber time 3:00–11:00 and were repeated on at least 3 separate days.

Fly stocks

Request a detailed protocol

The following stocks are from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC), the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC): Canton S (CS) (RRID:BDSC_64349), w1118 (VDRC #60000), R71G01 (pC1-Gal4) (RRID:BDSC_39599), Orco1 (RRID:BDSC_23129), Or13a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9946), Or19a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9948), Or23a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9955), Or43a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9974), Or47b-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9983), Or47b-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9984), Or65a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9993), Or65b-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_23901), Or65c-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_23903), Or67d-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_9998), Or83c-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_23131), Or88a-Gal4 (RRID:BDSC_23137), UAS-Or47b (RRID:BDSC_76045), Or47b2/2 (RRID:BDSC_51306), Or47b3/3 (RRID:BDSC_51307), UAS-TNT active (RRID:BDSC_28837), UAS-TNT inactive (RRID:BDSC_28839), UAS-dTRPA1 (RRID:BDSC_26263), UAS-CsChrimson (RRID:BDSC_55135), UAS-GCaMP6m (RRID:BDSC_42748), R52G04-AD (RRID:BDSC_71085), SAG-Gal4 (VT50405) (RRID:Flybase_FBst0489354, VDRC #200652), UAS-Dh44R1-RNAi (RRID:Flybase_FBst0482273, VDRC #110708), UAS-Dh44R2-RNAi (RRID:Flybase_FBst0465025, VDRC #43314), UAS-Dicer2 (VDRC #60007). The following stocks were previously reported: PromE(800)-Gal4 (Billeter et al., 2009), UAS-FLP, CRE-F-luc (Tanenhaus et al., 2012), LexAop-FLP (Bussell et al., 2014), UAS-CsChrimson (Klapoetke et al., 2014), UAS-GtACR1 (Mohammad et al., 2017), UAS-PhotoAC (PACα) (Schröder-Lang et al., 2007), pC1-A (Deutsch et al., 2020), pC1-S (Deutsch et al., 2020), Dh44-pC1-Gal4 (Kim et al., 2024), ppk23-Gal4, ppk23-, ppk28-, ppk29- (Thistle et al., 2012), and Orco-Gal4, UAS-EGFP-Orco (Yu et al., 2018). pC1a-split-Gal4 is generated by combining R52G04-AD (RRID:BDSC_71085) and dsx-DBD (Wang et al., 2020). Drosophila species other than D. melanogaster are obtained from the EHIME-Fly Drosophila Stock Center and the KYORIN-Fly Drosophila Species Stock Center. To enhance knock-down efficiency, RNAi experiments were performed using flies carrying UAS-Dicer2 (VDRC #60007). Table 1 lists the genotypes and number of animals used in all experiments.

Table 1
Table of D. melanogaster genotypes or Drosophila species used to generate the figures and figure supplements in this paper.
FigureD. melanogaster genotypes or Drosophila species ofN numbers
Tested femalesMating partnerIncubation partnerFrom left to right
Figure 1
Figure 1Bw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S59, 69
Figure 1Cw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S18, 15
Figure 1Dw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S12, 12
Figure 1Ew[1118]Canton-SCanton-S20, 18, 23
Figure 1Fw[1118]; TI{w[+mW.hs]=TI}Orco[1]Canton-SCanton-S55, 47
Figure 2
Figure 2Aw[1118];Or47b-Gal4/UAS-TNTinactive(P{UAS-TeTxLC.(-)Q}A2)Canton-SCanton-S14, 14
w[1118];Or47b-Gal4/UAS-TNTactive (P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2)Canton-SCanton-S16, 18
Figure 2Bw[1118];Or47b-Gal4/+Canton-SCanton-S28, 31
w[1118];;UAS-dTRPA1/+Canton-SCanton-S21, 16
w[1118];Or47b/+;UAS-dTRPA1/+Canton-SCanton-S11, 15
Figure 2Cw[1118]; TI{w[+mW.hs]=TI}Orco [1]Canton-SCanton-S12, 12
w[1118]; Or47b-Gal4>UAS-EGFP-Orco; Orco[1]/Orco[1]Canton-SCanton-S13, 14
Figure 2Dw[1118]; Or47b[2]/+Canton-SCanton-S12, 15
w[1118]; Or47b[3]/+Canton-SCanton-S13, 14
w[1118]; Or47b[2]/Or47b[3]Canton-SCanton-S13, 12
Figure 2Ew[1118]; Or47b[2]/Or47b[2]Canton-SCanton-S14, 15
w[1118]; Or47b-Gal4>P{w[+mC]=UAS-Or47b.MYC}2; Or47b[2]/Or47b[2]Canton-SCanton-S11, 11
Figure 3
Figure 3Aw[1118]Canton-S13, 16
Figure 3Bw[1118]; TI{w[+mW.hs]=TI}Orco[1]Canton-S11, 12
Figure 3Cw[1118]; TI{w[+mW.hs]=TI}Or47b[2]Canton-S14, 17
Figure 3Dw[1118];Or47b-Gal4/+;Orco[1]/Orco[1]Canton-S22, 22
w[1118];UAS-Orco/+; Orco[1]/Orco[1]Canton-S15, 14
w[1118];Or47b-Gal4/UAS-Orco;Orco[1]/Orco[1]Canton-S18, 19
Figure 4
Figure 4Aw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S18, 22
Figure 4Bw[1118]Canton-S23, 31
Figure 4Cw[1118]Canton-S16, 17
Figure 4Dw[1118];ppk23-Gal4/UAS-TNTinactive(P{UAS-TeTxLC.(-)Q}A2)Canton-SCanton-S18, 13
w[1118];ppk23-Gal4/UAS-TNTactive (P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2)Canton-SCanton-S17, 17
Figure 5
Figure 5Aw[1118];pC1(R71G01)-AD/+;Dsx-DBD/UAS-GtACR1Canton-S22, 21
Figure 5Bw[1118];VT25602-AD/+;UAS-GtACR1/VT2064-DBDCanton-S18, 18
Figure 5Cw[1118];R52G04-AD/+;UAS-GtACR1/Dsx-DBDCanton-S15, 14
Figure 5Dw[1118];;Dh44-pC1 (Dsx-DBD, Dh44A-AD)-GAL4/UAS-GtACR1Canton-S17, 20
Figure 5Ew[1118];UAS-FLP/+; GMR71G01-Gal4, CRE-F-Luc/+Canton-S12, 12, 12
w[1118];R52G04-AD/+;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/Dsx-DBDCanton-S12, 12, 12
w[1118];;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/Dh44-pC1 (Dsx-DBD, Dh44A-AD)-GAL4Canton-S16, 16, 16
w[1118];VT25602-AD/+;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/VT2064-DBDCanton-S12, 12, 12
Figure 5Fw[1118]; Or47b[2]/+; pC1-FLP, CRE-F-LucCanton-S8, 8, 8
w[1118]; Or47b[2]/Or47b[2]; pC1-FLP, CRE-F-LucCanton-S8, 8, 8
w[1118]; Or47b[3]/+; pC1-FLP, CRE-F-LucCanton-S8, 8, 8
w[1118]; Or47b[3]/Or47b[3]; pC1-FLP, CRE-F-LucCanton-S8, 8, 8
Figure 6Aw[1118]; R52G04-AD/+;UAS-PhotoAC/Dsx-DBDCanton-S18, 22
w[1118];;UAS-PhotoAC/Dh44-pC1 (Dsx-DBD, Dh44A-AD)-GAL4Canton-S22, 28
w[1118]; VT25602-AD/+;UAS-PhotoAC/VT2064-DBDCanton-S21, 20
Figure 6Bw[1118];UAS-GCaMP6m/+; pC1(GMR71G01)-GAL4/UAS-PhotoACCanton-S9, 9, 9
Figure 6Cw[1118];;+/UAS-PhotoACCanton-S
(1st, 2nd)		60
w[1118];;Dh44-pC1 (Dsx-DBD, Dh44A-AD)-GAL4/UAS-PhotoACCanton-S
(1st, 2nd)		18
Figure 2—figure supplement 1w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S27, 27
w[1118];Or13a-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S9, 12
w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2;+/Or19a-Gal4Canton-SCanton-S8, 6
w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2;+/Or23a-Gal4Canton-SCanton-S11, 11
w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2;+/Or43a-Gal4Canton-SCanton-S18, 16
w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2;+/Or47b-Gal4Canton-SCanton-S12, 11
w[1118];Or65a-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S13, 16
w[1118];Or65b-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S18, 14
w[1118];+/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2;+/Or65c-Gal4Canton-SCanton-S20, 18
w[1118];Or67d-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S15, 19
w[1118];Or83c-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S20, 17
w[1118];Or88a-Gal4/P{w[+mC]=UAS-TeTxLC.tnt}E2Canton-SCanton-S21, 19
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Figure 3—figure supplement 1Aw[1118]Canton-S26, 14, 18, 13
Figure 3—figure supplement 1Bw[1118]Canton-S22, 14, 12, 12
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Figure 3—figure supplement 2Aw[1118]Canton-S33
w[1118]Canton-S+;PromE(800)-Gal4/UAS-Tra36
w[1118]Canton-S+;PromE(800)-Gal4/UAS-Tra-RNAi17
Figure 3—figure supplement 2Bw[1118]Canton-S20
w[1118]Canton-SD. melanogaster23
w[1118]Canton-SD. simulans21
w[1118]Canton-SD. sechellia20
w[1118]Canton-SD. erecta19
w[1118]Canton-SD. yakuba21
Figure 3—figure supplement 3w[1118]Canton-S18, 18, 14, 17, 15, 13
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Figure 4—figure supplement 1Aw[1118]Canton-S17, 17, 18, 18, 17, 18
Figure 4—figure supplement 1Bw[1118]Canton-S15, 15, 15, 16, 14, 15
Figure 4—figure supplement 1Cw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S21, 18
w[1118]/ppk23-Canton-SCanton-S17, 21
ppk23-Canton-SCanton-S13, 15
Figure 4—figure supplement 1Dw[1118]Canton-SCanton-S18, 14
w[1118]/ppk28-Canton-SCanton-S23, 25
ppk28-Canton-SCanton-S22, 17
Figure 4—figure supplement 1Ew[1118]Canton-SCanton-S17, 14
w[1118];ppk29-/+Canton-SCanton-S19, 20
ppk29-Canton-SCanton-S16, 17
Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–Cw[1118];R52G04-AD/UAS-myrGFP;Dsx-DBD/UAS-myrGFP
Figure 5—figure supplement 1Dw[1118];R52G04-AD/+;Dsx-DBD/UAS-GtACR1Canton-S82, 60
Figure 5—figure supplement 2Aw[1118];UAS-FLP/+; GMR71G01-Gal4, CRE-F-Luc/+8, 8, 8, 12, 8, 4
Figure 5—figure supplement 2Bw[1118];UAS-FLP/+; GMR71G01-Gal4, CRE-F-Luc/+8, 8, 8, 12, 8, 4
Figure 5—figure supplement 3w[1118];UAS-FLP/+; GMR71G01-Gal4, CRE-F-Luc/+12, 12, 12
w[1118]; R52G04-AD/+;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/Dsx-DBD12, 12, 12
w[1118];;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/Dh44-pC1 (Dsx-DBD, Dh44A-AD)-GAL412, 12, 12
w[1118]; VT25602-AD/+;UAS-FLP, CRE-F-Luc/VT2064-DBD10, 10, 10
Figure 6—figure supplement 1w[1118]/UAS-Dcr2;;GMR71G01-Gal4/+Canton-SCanton-S27, 26
w[1118];UAS-Dh44R1-RNAi/+; UAS-Dh44R2-RNAi/+Canton-SCanton-S18, 17
w[1118]/UAS-Dicer2;UAS-Dh44R1-RNAi1/+; GMR71G01-GAL4/UAS-Dh44R2-RNAi2Canton-SCanton-S35, 30

Chemical information

Request a detailed protocol

ATR (Cat# R2500), methyl laurate (Cat# W271500), and Triton X-100 (Cat# X100) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The following chemicals were obtained from the Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA): 7(Z)-Tricosene (CAS No. 52078-42-9, Cat# 9000313), 7(Z)-Pentacosene (CAS No. 63623-49-4, Cat# 9000530), trans-palmitoleic acid (CAS No. 10030-73-6, Cat# 9001798), cVA dissolved in EtOH (CAS No. 6186-98-7, Cat# 10010101). 2MC (>98% purity) was custom-synthesized by KIP (Daejeon, Korea). Ethanol is used as a vehicle for 7-T, cVA, trans-palmitoleic acid, and methyl laurate, while hexane is used as a vehicle for 2MC.

Behavior assays

Request a detailed protocol

For mating behavior assays, we followed the procedures described previously (Yapici et al., 2008). Individual virgin females and naive CS males were paired in 10 mm diameter chambers and were recorded using a digital camcorder (SONY, HDR-CX405 or Xiaomi, Redmi Note 10) for either 30 min or 1 hr for the mating assay and 6 hr for the re-mating assay. In the re-mating assay, females that completed their initial mating within 30 min were subsequently paired with naive CS males.

To measure EHP, defined as the time elapsed between the end of copulation and sperm ejection, we used the following procedure: Virgin females were individually mated with CS males in 10 mm diameter chambers. Following copulation, females were transferred to new chambers, either with or without a CS male or pheromone presentation, and their behavior was recorded using a digital camcorder (SONY, HDR-CX405). Typically, females that completed copulation within 30 min were used for analysis. The sperm ejection scene, in which the female expels a white sac containing sperm and the mating plug through the vulva, was directly observed by eye in the recorded video footage. For pheromone presentation, females were individually housed in 10 mm diameter chambers containing a piece of Whatman filter paper (2 mm × 2 mm) treated with 0.5 μl of the pheromone solution and air-dried for 1 min. For thermogenetic activation experiments, females were incubated at the indicated temperatures immediately after the end of copulation. For light activation experiments, a custom-made light activation setup was used with a ring of 104 multi-channel LED lights (NeoPixel, Cat# WS2812; red light, 620–625 nm, 390–420 mcd; green light, 522–525 nm, 660–720 mcd; blue light, 465–467 nm, 180–200 mcd). Females were individually placed in 10 mm diameter chambers, and the chamber was illuminated with light at an intensity of 1100 lux across the chamber during the assay, as measured by an HS1010 light meter. Flies used in these experiments were prepared by culturing them immediately after eclosion in food containing vehicle (EtOH) or 1 mM ATR. They were kept in complete darkness for 3–4 days until the assay was conducted. To prevent the accumulation of residual pheromones, all behavioral chambers were cleaned with 70% water/ethanol or acetone before and after the experiment.

Calcium imaging

Request a detailed protocol

We followed the procedures described previously (Kim et al., 2024; Kohatsu and Yamamoto, 2015). Following copulation, freshly mated female flies were temporarily immobilized using ice anesthesia, and their heads were attached to a custom-made thin metal plate with a 1 mm diameter hole using photo-curable UV glue (ThreeBond, A16A01). An opening in the fly’s head was created using a syringe needle under saline (108 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 8.2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM trehalose, 10 mM sucrose, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.5). Imaging was performed with a Zeiss Axio Examiner A1 microscope equipped with an electron-multiplying CCD camera (Andor Technology, LucaEM R 604M) and an LED light source (CoolLED, Precis Excite). Metamorph software (Molecular Devices, RRID:SCR_002368) was used for image analysis. The Syntech Stimulus Controller (Type CS-55) was used to deliver the male pheromone using an airflow. 2 μl of pheromone solution was applied to a piece of Whatman filter paper (2 mm × 1 mm), which was then inserted into a glass Pasteur pipette after solvent evaporation.

Luciferase assay

Request a detailed protocol

We followed the procedures described previously (Kim et al., 2024; Tanenhaus et al., 2012). For the assay, 3-day-old virgin females or freshly mated females were used. A group of three fly heads, kept at –80°C, was homogenized using cold homogenization buffer (15 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA). Luciferase activity was measured using beetle luciferin potassium salt (Promega, Cat# E1603) and a microplate luminometer (Berthold Technologies, Centro XS3 LB 960), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For pheromone presentation, flies were placed in 10 mm diameter chambers containing a piece of Whatman filter paper (4 mm × 6 mm) treated with 1 μl of the pheromone solution and air-dried for 1 min.

Immunohistochemistry

Request a detailed protocol

3- to 5-day-old virgin female flies were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After fixation, the brains were thoroughly washed in PBST (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) and then blocked with 5% normal goat serum in PBST. After blocking, brains were incubated with primary antibody in PBST for 48 hr at 4°C, washed with PBST, and then incubated with secondary antibody in PBST for 24 hr at 4°C. The samples were washed three times with PBST and once with PBS before mounting in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Cat# H-1000). Antibodies used were rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11122, RRID:AB_221569), mouse anti-nc82 (1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Cat# Nc82; RRID:AB_2314866), Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11008, RRID:AB_143165), Alexa 568-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A-11004, RRID:AB_2534072). Brain images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM 700/Axiovert 200M (Zeiss) and processed with Fiji (https://imagej.net/software/fiji/downloads, RRID:SCR_002285).

Color depth MIP-based anatomical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

A stack of confocal images of pC1a-split-Gal4>UAS-myr-EGFP adult female brains stained with anti-GFP and anti-nc82 was used. Images were registered to the JRC2018 unisex brain template (Bogovic et al., 2020) using the Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK, https://github.com/jefferis/fiji-cmtk-gui RRID:SCR_002234, v0.1.1). Color depth MIP masks of pC1a-split-Gal4 neurons and pC1a (ID, 5813046951) in Hemibrain (Scheffer et al., 2020; Figure 5—figure supplement 1C) were generated using the ColorMIP_Mask_Search plugin for Fiji (Otsuna et al., 2018; https://github.com/JaneliaSciComp/ColorMIP_Mask_Search) and NeuronBridge (Clements et al., 2022; https://neuronbridge.janelia.org/). Similarity score and rank were calculated using NeuronBridge.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad, RRID:SCR_002798), with specific details of each statistical method provided in the figure legends.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  5. Book
    1. Becker SD
    2. Hurst JL
    (2008) Pregnancy block from a female perspective in
    In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD, editors. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 11. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 141–150.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73945-8_13
  67. Book
    1. Sengupta S
    2. Smith DP
    (2014)
    How Drosophila detect volatile pheromones: signaling, circuits behavior
    In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editors. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication, Frontiers in Neuroscience. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. pp. 229–254.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Minsik Yun

    School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0011-0942

  2. Do-Hyoung Kim

    School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Tal Soo Ha

    Department of Biomedical Science, College of Natural Science, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0015-6075

  4. Kang-Min Lee

    School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Eungyu Park

    School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Markus Knaden

    1. Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    2. Next Generation Insect Chemical Ecology, Max Planck Centre, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Contribution
    Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6710-1071

  7. Bill S Hansson

    1. Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    2. Next Generation Insect Chemical Ecology, Max Planck Centre, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Contribution
    Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4811-1223

  8. Young-Joon Kim

    School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    kimyj@gist.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7990-754X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022M3H9A1085169)

  • Young-Joon Kim

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022R1A2C3008091)

  • Young-Joon Kim

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022M3E5E8081194)

  • Young-Joon Kim

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019R1A4A1029724)

  • Young-Joon Kim

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A6A3A11027866)

  • Do-Hyoung Kim

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1I1A1A01060304)

  • Do-Hyoung Kim

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST Research Institute (GRI) GIST-MIT research collaboration grant)

  • Young-Joon Kim

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (AI-based GIST Research Scientist Project)

  • Do-Hyoung Kim

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank S Kang, J-H Yoon, and B Lee for excellent technical assistance and the GIST Advanced Institute of Instrumental Analysis (GAIA) for the confocal microscopy analysis. Fly stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC), the Kyoto Stock Center, the EHIME-Fly Drosophila Species Stock Center, the KYORIN-Fly Drosophila Species Stock Center, and the Korea Drosophila Resource Center (NRF-2022M3H9A1085169). This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea grants NRF-2022R1A2C3008091 (Y-JK), NRF-2022M3E5E8081194 (Y-JK), NRF-2019R1A4A1029724 (Y-JK), NRF-2017R1A6A3A11027866 (D-HK), NRF-2021R1I1A1A01060304 (D-HK), GIST Research Institute (GRI) GIST-MIT research collaboration grant funded by GIST in 2023 (Y-JK), 2022, 2023 AI-based GIST Research Scientist Project (D-HK).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted:
  2. Sent for peer review:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2024, Yun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 877
    views
  • 88
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Minsik Yun
  2. Do-Hyoung Kim
  3. Tal Soo Ha
  4. Kang-Min Lee
  5. Eungyu Park
  6. Markus Knaden
  7. Bill S Hansson
  8. Young-Joon Kim
(2024)
Male cuticular pheromones stimulate removal of the mating plug and promote re-mating through pC1 neurons in Drosophila females
eLife 13:RP96013.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96013

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    A human forebrain organoid model reveals the essential function of GTF2IRD1-TTR-ERK axis for the neurodevelopmental deficits of Williams syndrome

    Xingsen Zhao, Qihang Sun ... Xuekun Li
    Research Article

    Williams syndrome (WS; OMIM#194050) is a rare disorder, which is caused by the microdeletion of one copy of 25–27 genes, and WS patients display diverse neuronal deficits. Although remarkable progresses have been achieved, the mechanisms for these distinct deficits are still largely unknown. Here, we have shown that neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in WS forebrain organoids display abnormal proliferation and differentiation capabilities, and synapse formation. Genes with altered expression are related to neuronal development and neurogenesis. Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis revealed 13 clusters in healthy control and WS organoids. WS organoids show an aberrant generation of excitatory neurons. Mechanistically, the expression of transthyretin (TTR) are remarkably decreased in WS forebrain organoids. We have found that GTF2IRD1 encoded by one WS associated gene GTF2IRD1 binds to TTR promoter regions and regulates the expression of TTR. In addition, exogenous TTR can activate ERK signaling and rescue neurogenic deficits of WS forebrain organoids. Gtf2ird1-deficient mice display similar neurodevelopmental deficits as observed in WS organoids. Collectively, our study reveals critical function of GTF2IRD1 in regulating neurodevelopment of WS forebrain organoids and mice through regulating TTR-ERK pathway.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Key epigenetic and signaling factors in the formation and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier

    Jayanarayanan Sadanandan, Sithara Thomas ... Peeyush Kumar T
    Research Article

    The blood-brain barrier (BBB) controls the movement of molecules into and out of the central nervous system (CNS). Since a functional BBB forms by mouse embryonic day E15.5, we reasoned that gene cohorts expressed in CNS endothelial cells (EC) at E13.5 contribute to BBB formation. In contrast, adult gene signatures reflect BBB maintenance mechanisms. Supporting this hypothesis, transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct cohorts of EC genes involved in BBB formation and maintenance. Here, we demonstrate that epigenetic regulator’s histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) control EC gene expression for BBB development and prevent Wnt/β-catenin (Wnt) target genes from being expressed in adult CNS ECs. Low Wnt activity during development modifies BBB genes epigenetically for the formation of functional BBB. As a Class-I HDAC inhibitor induces adult CNS ECs to regain Wnt activity and BBB genetic signatures that support BBB formation, our results inform strategies to promote BBB repair.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Estradiol elicits distinct firing patterns in arcuate nucleus kisspeptin neurons of females through altering ion channel conductances

    Jian Qiu, Margaritis Voliotis ... Martin J Kelly
    Research Article

    Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.