The Arthropoda-specific Tramtrack group BTB protein domains use previously unknown interface to form hexamers
- Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
BTB (Bric-a-brack, Tramtrack and Broad Complex) is a diverse group of protein-protein interaction domains found within metazoan proteins. Transcription factors contain a dimerizing BTB subtype with a characteristic N-terminal extension. The Tramtrack group (TTK) is a distinct type of BTB domain, which can multimerize. Single-particle cryo-EM microscopy revealed that the TTK-type BTB domains assemble into a hexameric structure consisting of three canonical BTB dimers connected through a previously uncharacterized interface. We demonstrated that the TTK-type BTB domains are found only in Arthropods and have undergone lineage-specific expansion in modern insects. The Drosophila genome encodes 24 transcription factors with TTK-type BTB domains, whereas only four have non‑TTK‑type BTB domains. Yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that the TTK-type BTB domains have an unusually broad potential for heteromeric associations presumably through dimer-dimer interaction interface. Thus, the TTK-type BTB domains are a structurally and functionally distinct group of protein domains specific to Arthropodan transcription factors.
Data availability
The cryo-EM maps (blushed-regularized and normal regularization) and PDB model files have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the PDB entry code 8RC6 and in the EMDB with entry code EMD-19049. SAXS data have been deposited in the Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank (www.sasbdb.org) under accession codes SASDP59 (merged data for LOLA1-120 at 1.0 mg/ml and 3.0 mg/ml), SASDP49 (CG67651-133 at 1.5 mg/ml). Atomic models (both native and exactly corresponding to expression constructs) and reports of SAXS approximation are provided as Supplemental files. Results of bioinformatic analysis are provided as Supplemental tables.
Article and author information
Author details
Konstantin I Balagurov
Konstantin M Boyko
Nikolai N Sluchanko
Funding
Russian Science Foundation (19-74-10099-P)
- Artem N Bonchuk
- Konstantin I Balagurov
- Konstantin M Boyko
- Anna D Burtseva
Russian Science Foundation (19-74-30026-Р)
- Artem N Bonchuk
- Konstantin I Balagurov
- Anastasia M Khrustaleva
- Olga V Arkova
- Karina K Khalisova
- Pavel G Georgiev
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2019-1661)
- Artem N Bonchuk
- Konstantin I Balagurov
- Olga V Arkova
KAUST Baseline Grant (BAS/1/1107-01-01)
- Rozbeh Baradaran
- Andreas Naschberger
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation - project 19-74-10099-P to A.B. (expression and purification of proteins and their mutants), project 19-74-30026-Р to P.G. (analysis of protein-protein interactions) and by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation - grant 075-15-2019-1661 (structural and bioinformatic analysis). Funding for open access charge: Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and Russian Science Foundation. The single-particle cryo-EM work was financially supported by the KAUST Baseline Grant BAS/1/1107-01-01. N.N.S. and K.M.B. acknowledges that SEC-MALS work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
Copyright
© 2024, Bonchuk et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 557
- views
-
- 91
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
The Arthropoda-specific Tramtrack group BTB protein domains use previously unknown interface to form hexamers
eLife 13:e96832.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96832
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.
