Pathogenic Huntingtin aggregates alter actin organization and cellular stiffness resulting in stalled clathrin mediated endocytosis

  1. Surya Bansi Singh
  2. Shatruhan Singh Rajput
  3. Aditya Sharma
  4. Sujal Kataria
  5. Priyanka Dutta
  6. Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan
  7. Amitabha Nandi
  8. Shivaprasad Patil
  9. Amitabha Majumdar
  10. Deepa Subramanyam  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Centre for Cell Science, India
  2. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, India
  3. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
  4. UNSW Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington's disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration-associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Surya Bansi Singh

    National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6612-5020
  2. Shatruhan Singh Rajput

    Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aditya Sharma

    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sujal Kataria

    Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Priyanka Dutta

    National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8490-5813
  6. Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan

    EMBL Australia Node in Single Molecule Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2936-7853
  7. Amitabha Nandi

    Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6688-0237
  8. Shivaprasad Patil

    Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amitabha Majumdar

    National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6594-0672
  10. Deepa Subramanyam

    National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India
    For correspondence
    deepa.subramanyam@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1650-5690

Funding

National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS/DIR/2018/24)

  • Amitabha Majumdar
  • Deepa Subramanyam

Government of India (CRG/2022/001891)

  • Shivaprasad Patil

Wellcome Trust-DBT India Alliance (IA/I/13/2/501030)

  • Amitabha Majumdar

Government of India (BT/PR25893/GET/119/174/2017)

  • Amitabha Majumdar

EMBL Australia

  • Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Singh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,227
    views
  • 219
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Surya Bansi Singh
  2. Shatruhan Singh Rajput
  3. Aditya Sharma
  4. Sujal Kataria
  5. Priyanka Dutta
  6. Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan
  7. Amitabha Nandi
  8. Shivaprasad Patil
  9. Amitabha Majumdar
  10. Deepa Subramanyam
(2024)
Pathogenic Huntingtin aggregates alter actin organization and cellular stiffness resulting in stalled clathrin mediated endocytosis
eLife 13:e98363.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98363

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98363

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article Updated

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin 1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration, and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ida Marie Boisen, Nadia Krarup Knudsen ... Martin Blomberg Jensen
    Research Article

    Testicular microcalcifications consist of hydroxyapatite and have been associated with an increased risk of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) but are also found in benign cases such as loss-of-function variants in the phosphate transporter SLC34A2. Here, we show that fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a regulator of phosphate homeostasis, is expressed in testicular germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), embryonal carcinoma (EC), and human embryonic stem cells. FGF23 is not glycosylated in TGCTs and therefore cleaved into a C-terminal fragment which competitively antagonizes full-length FGF23. Here, Fgf23 knockout mice presented with marked calcifications in the epididymis, spermatogenic arrest, and focally germ cells expressing the osteoblast marker Osteocalcin (gene name: Bglap, protein name). Moreover, the frequent testicular microcalcifications in mice with no functional androgen receptor and lack of circulating gonadotropins are associated with lower Slc34a2 and higher Bglap/Slc34a1 (protein name: NPT2a) expression compared with wild-type mice. In accordance, human testicular specimens with microcalcifications also have lower SLC34A2 and a subpopulation of germ cells express phosphate transporter NPT2a, Osteocalcin, and RUNX2 highlighting aberrant local phosphate handling and expression of bone-specific proteins. Mineral disturbance in vitro using calcium or phosphate treatment induced deposition of calcium phosphate in a spermatogonial cell line and this effect was fully rescued by the mineralization inhibitor pyrophosphate. In conclusion, testicular microcalcifications arise secondary to local alterations in mineral homeostasis, which in combination with impaired Sertoli cell function and reduced levels of mineralization inhibitors due to high alkaline phosphatase activity in GCNIS and TGCTs facilitate osteogenic-like differentiation of testicular cells and deposition of hydroxyapatite.