Sequential replacement of PSD95 subunits in postsynaptic supercomplexes is slowest in the cortex

  1. Katie Morris
  2. Edita Bulovaite
  3. Takeshi Kaizuka
  4. Sebastian Schnorrenberg
  5. Candace T Adams
  6. Noboru Komiyama
  7. Lorena Mendive-Tapia
  8. Seth GN Grant  Is a corresponding author
  9. Mathew H Horrocks  Is a corresponding author
  1. EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. Genes to Cognition Program, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. EMBL Imaging Centre, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  4. IRR Chemistry Hub, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  5. Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (SIDB), Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. The Patrick Wild Centre for Research into Autism, Fragile X Syndrome & Intellectual Disabilities, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  7. Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
4 figures, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Stoichiometry and spatial arrangement of PSD95 within individual supercomplexes.

(a) Brain containing either endogenously tagged PSD95-eGFP or PSD95-mEoS2 was extracted from the genetically modified mouse, and the forebrain was homogenized to solubilize PSD95-containing …

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Stoichiometry of eGFP determined using photobleaching step count analysis.

(a) Stoichiometries of eGFP determined using the same approach as that for eGFP-tagged PSD95. (b) Example intensity trace with fitting.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Multimers of PSD95 in wild-type supercomplexes.

Homogenate extracted from wild-type mice was processed using the same procedure as that for PSD95-eGFP mice. It was subsequently diluted 1:1000 and 100 µl of this solution was incubated on a …

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
PSD95 turnover within supercomplexes in mouse brain homogenate.

(a) PSD95-HaloTag homozygous mice were injected with SiR-Halo ligand and culled 6 hr (day-0) or 7 days (day-7) post injection. The forebrains were homogenized and post hoc stained with AF488-Halo …

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Absolute number graphs for Figure 2c.

Number of labeled supercomplexes at day-0 and day-7 containing only SiR-labeled ‘old’ protein (SIR), AF488-labeled ‘new’ protein (AF488), or both ‘mixed’. In total, 13,710 supercomplexes were …

Protein turnover in synaptic and total forebrain PSD95 supercomplexes.

(a) SiR-Halo ligand was injected into the tail vein of three 3-month-old PSD95-HaloTag knock-in mice. Seven days later, the forebrain was extracted and synaptosomes isolated. AF488-HaloTag ligand …

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Differences in PSD95 turnover between mouse brain regions.

(a) Mouse brains were dissected into five broad regions. (b) The percentage of total PSD95 imaged contained in SiR-labeled (i), AF488-labeled (ii), and mixed (iii) supercomplexes. Error bars show …

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Characterization of PSD95 turnover in 3-week-old mice.

(a) Key showing the five dissected brain regions (i). Percentage of total PSD95 proteins in old-only (ii), new-only (iii), and mixed (iv) supercomplexes (mean ± SD, n = 3). (b) Mouse brain region …

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Comparison between the density-based PSD95 puncta half-life and old, new, and mixed proteins in supercomplexes.

The percentage of complexes that contain (a) old-only, (b) new-only, or (c) mixed old and new PSD95 (mean ± SD for % PSD95, and ± 95% CI for half-life, n = 3). There is no statistically significant …

Tables

Table 1
MINFLUX iterations.
1st2nd3rd4th5th
L size [nm]3003001507540
TCP – patternHexagonHexagonHexagonHexagonHexagon
Minimum number of collected photons100150100100150
Laser power factor1x1x2x4x6x
TCP dwell time [ms]11111
CFRx0.5x0.8x
Background threshold [kHz]1515151515
Table 2
Post hoc t-tests to locate the source of significance between the means of the mixed supercomplexes in the five brain regions analyzed.

Only p-values less than 0.05 are shown. There are high levels of significance between the means of the isocortex and all other regions.

IsocortexHippocampusOlfactory bulbCerebellumSubcortex
Isocortex6.4 × 10−43.8 × 10−61.5 × 10−53.1 × 10−3
Hippocampus3.8 × 10−31.0 × 10−2N.S.
Olfactory bulbN.S.9.3 × 10−3
CerebellumN.S.
Subcortex

Additional files

Download links