Browse our Feature Articles

Page 24 of 34
  1. Point of view: Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives

    Sarah E Ali-Khan, Liam W Harris, E Richard Gold
    A survey of researchers at the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital provides insights into the challenges and opportunities involved in adopting an open science policy across an entire patient-oriented academic institution.
  2. Cutting Edge: Towards PubMed 2.0

    Nicolas Fiorini, David J Lipman, Zhiyong Lu
    Staff from the National Center for Biotechnology Information in the US describe recent improvements to the PubMed search engine and outline plans for the future, including a new experimental site called PubMed Labs.
  3. Point of View: What’s in a name?

    Michael D Schaller, Gary McDowell ... Wesley I Sundquist
    Standardizing the titles, terms and conditions under which postdocs are employed will benefit the biomedical research workforce.
  4. Point of View: The future of graduate and postdoctoral training in the biosciences

    Peter Hitchcock, Ambika Mathur ... David Engelke
    What can institutions and funding agencies do to address an array of issues facing the biomedical research community in the United States?
  5. Peer Review: Decisions, decisions

    Peter Rodgers
    Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences.
  6. Peer Review: Rooting out bias

    Bridget M Kuehn
    Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.
  7. Peer Review: Searching for the one

    Helga Groll
    The views of peers are important when applying for a faculty position, but so are research plans and being a good 'fit'.
  8. Peer Review: To fund or not to fund?

    Sarah Shailes
    Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.
  9. Peer Review: Consultative review is worth the wait

    Stuart RF King
    Editors, reviewers and authors share their experiences of consultative peer review at eLife.
  10. Research: The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time

    Pontus Plavén-Sigray, Granville James Matheson ... William Hedley Thompson
    Scientific abstracts have become less readable over the past 130 years, in part because recent texts include more general scientific jargon than older texts.