Edited by
Peter A Rodgers

Peer Review

A series of articles exploring how journals, funding agencies and universities review papers, grant applications and people.
Collection
Illustration by vividbiology.com
  • Views 1,599

Collection

  1. Peer Review: Decisions, decisions

    Peter Rodgers
    Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences.

  2. Peer Review: Consultative review is worth the wait

    Stuart RF King
    Editors, reviewers and authors share their experiences of consultative peer review at eLife.

  3. Peer Review: Searching for the one

    Helga Groll
    The views of peers are important when applying for a faculty position, but so are research plans and being a good 'fit'.

  4. Peer Review: To fund or not to fund?

    Sarah Shailes
    Funding agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.

  5. Peer Review: Rooting out bias

    Bridget M Kuehn
    Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.

Related

  1. Peer Review: Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing

    Michael B Eisen, Anna Akhmanova ... Mone Zaidi

  2. Meta-Research: Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review

    Daniel G Hamilton, Hannah Fraser ... Fiona Fidler

  3. Meta-Research: Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports

    Ivan Buljan, Daniel Garcia-Costa ... Ana Marušić
    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    Research Culture: Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts

    Gary S McDowell, John D Knutsen ... Rebeccah S Lijek

  5. Peer Review: Final results from a trial at eLife

  6. Early-career Reviewers: Reflections on focused inclusion in reviews at eLife

  7. Research: Gender bias in scholarly peer review

    Markus Helmer, Manuel Schottdorf ... Demian Battaglia

  8. Scientific Publishing: Progress and promise

    Randy Schekman

  9. Scientific Publishing: A new twist on peer review

    Mark Patterson, Randy Schekman

  10. Point of View: Priority of discovery in the life sciences

    Ronald D Vale, Anthony A Hyman

  11. Research: NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

    Ferric C Fang, Anthony Bowen, Arturo Casadevall

  12. Point of View: Making the most of peer review

    Nikolai Slavov

  13. Peer Review: The pleasure of publishing

    Vivek Malhotra, Eve Marder

  14. Scientific Publishing: The eLife approach to peer review

    Randy Schekman, Fiona Watt, Detlef Weigel

Contributors

  1. Peter A Rodgers
    Features Editor, eLife, United Kingdom