MOF-associated complexes ensure stem cell identity and Xist repression

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki
  2. Friederike Dündar
  3. Matthew Turley
  4. Tasneem Khanam
  5. Tugce Aktas
  6. Fidel Ramírez
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel
  8. Patrick R Wright
  9. Pavankumar Videm
  10. Rolf Backofen
  11. Edith Heard
  12. Thomas Manke
  13. Asifa Akhtar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Germany
  2. Institute Curie, France
  3. University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Institut Curie, France

Abstract

Histone acetyl transferases (HATs) play distinct roles in many cellular processes and are frequently misregulated in cancers. Here, we study the regulatory potential of MYST1-(MOF)-containing MSL and NSL complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and neuronal progenitors. We find that both complexes influence transcription by targeting promoters as well as TSS-distal enhancers. In contrast to flies, the MSL complex is not exclusively enriched on the X chromosome yet it is crucial for mammalian X chromosome regulation as it specifically regulates Tsix, the major repressor of Xist lncRNA. MSL depletion leads to decreased Tsix expression, reduced REX1 recruitment, and consequently, enhanced accumulation of Xist and variable numbers of inactivated X chromosomes during early differentiation. The NSL complex provides additional, Tsix-independent repression of Xist by maintaining pluripotency. MSL and NSL complexes therefore act synergistically by using distinct pathways to ensure a fail-safe mechanism for the repression of X inactivation in ESCs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Friederike Dündar

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Matthew Turley

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tasneem Khanam

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tugce Aktas

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Fidel Ramírez

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel

    Institute Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Patrick R Wright

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Pavankumar Videm

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Rolf Backofen

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Edith Heard

    Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Thomas Manke

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Asifa Akhtar

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    akhtar@immunbio.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    Asifa Akhtar, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Copyright

© 2014, Chelmicki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,635
    views
  • 673
    downloads
  • 77
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki
  2. Friederike Dündar
  3. Matthew Turley
  4. Tasneem Khanam
  5. Tugce Aktas
  6. Fidel Ramírez
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel
  8. Patrick R Wright
  9. Pavankumar Videm
  10. Rolf Backofen
  11. Edith Heard
  12. Thomas Manke
  13. Asifa Akhtar
(2014)
MOF-associated complexes ensure stem cell identity and Xist repression
eLife 3:e02024.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Matthew C Pahl, Prabhat Sharma ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of genetic signals associated with autoimmune disease. The majority of these signals are located in non-coding regions and likely impact cis-regulatory elements (cRE). Because cRE function is dynamic across cell types and states, profiling the epigenetic status of cRE across physiological processes is necessary to characterize the molecular mechanisms by which autoimmune variants contribute to disease risk. We localized risk variants from 15 autoimmune GWAS to cRE active during TCR-CD28 co-stimulation of naïve human CD4+ T cells. To characterize how dynamic changes in gene expression correlate with cRE activity, we measured transcript levels, chromatin accessibility, and promoter–cRE contacts across three phases of naive CD4+ T cell activation using RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and HiC. We identified ~1200 protein-coding genes physically connected to accessible disease-associated variants at 423 GWAS signals, at least one-third of which are dynamically regulated by activation. From these maps, we functionally validated a novel stretch of evolutionarily conserved intergenic enhancers whose activity is required for activation-induced IL2 gene expression in human and mouse, and is influenced by autoimmune-associated genetic variation. The set of genes implicated by this approach are enriched for genes controlling CD4+ T cell function and genes involved in human inborn errors of immunity, and we pharmacologically validated eight implicated genes as novel regulators of T cell activation. These studies directly show how autoimmune variants and the genes they regulate influence processes involved in CD4+ T cell proliferation and activation.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Leif Benner, Savannah Muron ... Brian Oliver
    Research Article

    Differentiation of female germline stem cells into a mature oocyte includes the expression of RNAs and proteins that drive early embryonic development in Drosophila. We have little insight into what activates the expression of these maternal factors. One candidate is the zinc-finger protein OVO. OVO is required for female germline viability and has been shown to positively regulate its own expression, as well as a downstream target, ovarian tumor, by binding to the transcriptional start site (TSS). To find additional OVO targets in the female germline and further elucidate OVO’s role in oocyte development, we performed ChIP-seq to determine genome-wide OVO occupancy, as well as RNA-seq comparing hypomorphic and wild type rescue ovo alleles. OVO preferentially binds in close proximity to target TSSs genome-wide, is associated with open chromatin, transcriptionally active histone marks, and OVO-dependent expression. Motif enrichment analysis on OVO ChIP peaks identified a 5’-TAACNGT-3’ OVO DNA binding motif spatially enriched near TSSs. However, the OVO DNA binding motif does not exhibit precise motif spacing relative to the TSS characteristic of RNA polymerase II complex binding core promoter elements. Integrated genomics analysis showed that 525 genes that are bound and increase in expression downstream of OVO are known to be essential maternally expressed genes. These include genes involved in anterior/posterior/germ plasm specification (bcd, exu, swa, osk, nos, aub, pgc, gcl), egg activation (png, plu, gnu, wisp, C(3)g, mtrm), translational regulation (cup, orb, bru1, me31B), and vitelline membrane formation (fs(1)N, fs(1)M3, clos). This suggests that OVO is a master transcriptional regulator of oocyte development and is responsible for the expression of structural components of the egg as well as maternally provided RNAs that are required for early embryonic development.