MOF-associated complexes ensure stem cell identity and Xist repression

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki
  2. Friederike Dündar
  3. Matthew Turley
  4. Tasneem Khanam
  5. Tugce Aktas
  6. Fidel Ramírez
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel
  8. Patrick R Wright
  9. Pavankumar Videm
  10. Rolf Backofen
  11. Edith Heard
  12. Thomas Manke
  13. Asifa Akhtar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Germany
  2. Institute Curie, France
  3. University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Institut Curie, France

Abstract

Histone acetyl transferases (HATs) play distinct roles in many cellular processes and are frequently misregulated in cancers. Here, we study the regulatory potential of MYST1-(MOF)-containing MSL and NSL complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and neuronal progenitors. We find that both complexes influence transcription by targeting promoters as well as TSS-distal enhancers. In contrast to flies, the MSL complex is not exclusively enriched on the X chromosome yet it is crucial for mammalian X chromosome regulation as it specifically regulates Tsix, the major repressor of Xist lncRNA. MSL depletion leads to decreased Tsix expression, reduced REX1 recruitment, and consequently, enhanced accumulation of Xist and variable numbers of inactivated X chromosomes during early differentiation. The NSL complex provides additional, Tsix-independent repression of Xist by maintaining pluripotency. MSL and NSL complexes therefore act synergistically by using distinct pathways to ensure a fail-safe mechanism for the repression of X inactivation in ESCs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Friederike Dündar

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Matthew Turley

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tasneem Khanam

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tugce Aktas

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Fidel Ramírez

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel

    Institute Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Patrick R Wright

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Pavankumar Videm

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Rolf Backofen

    University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Edith Heard

    Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Thomas Manke

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Asifa Akhtar

    Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    akhtar@immunbio.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    Asifa Akhtar, Reviewing editor, eLife.

Copyright

© 2014, Chelmicki et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,682
    views
  • 679
    downloads
  • 78
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tomasz Chelmicki
  2. Friederike Dündar
  3. Matthew Turley
  4. Tasneem Khanam
  5. Tugce Aktas
  6. Fidel Ramírez
  7. Anne-Valerie Gendrel
  8. Patrick R Wright
  9. Pavankumar Videm
  10. Rolf Backofen
  11. Edith Heard
  12. Thomas Manke
  13. Asifa Akhtar
(2014)
MOF-associated complexes ensure stem cell identity and Xist repression
eLife 3:e02024.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02024

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.