Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data

  1. Dmitry Kobak  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wieland Brendel
  3. Christos Constantinidis
  4. Claudia E Feierstein
  5. Adam Kepecs
  6. Zachary F Mainen
  7. Ranulfo Romo
  8. Xue-Lian Qi
  9. Naoshige Uchida
  10. Christian K Machens
  1. Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Portugal
  2. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, United States
  3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
  4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
  5. Harvard University, United States

Abstract

Neurons in higher cortical areas, such as the prefrontal cortex, are often tuned to a variety of sensory and motor variables, and are therefore said to display mixed selectivity. This complexity of single neuron responses can obscure what information these areas represent and how it is represented. Here we demonstrate the advantages of a new dimensionality reduction technique, demixed principal component analysis (dPCA), that decomposes population activity into a few components. In addition to systematically capturing the majority of the variance of the data, dPCA also exposes the dependence of the neural representation on task parameters such as stimuli, decisions, or rewards. To illustrate our method we reanalyze population data from four datasets comprising different species, different cortical areas and different experimental tasks. In each case, dPCA provides a concise way of visualizing the data that summarizes the task-dependent features of the population response in a single figure.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dmitry Kobak

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    dmitry.kobak@neuro.fchampalimaud.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Wieland Brendel

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Christos Constantinidis

    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Claudia E Feierstein

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Adam Kepecs

    Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Zachary F Mainen

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ranulfo Romo

    Instituto de Fisiología Celular-Neurociencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xue-Lian Qi

    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Naoshige Uchida

    Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Naoshige Uchida, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Christian K Machens

    Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Copyright

© 2016, Kobak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 41,084
    views
  • 6,895
    downloads
  • 486
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dmitry Kobak
  2. Wieland Brendel
  3. Christos Constantinidis
  4. Claudia E Feierstein
  5. Adam Kepecs
  6. Zachary F Mainen
  7. Ranulfo Romo
  8. Xue-Lian Qi
  9. Naoshige Uchida
  10. Christian K Machens
(2016)
Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data
eLife 5:e10989.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10989

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10989

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Gergely F Turi, Sasa Teng ... Yueqing Peng
    Research Article

    Synchronous neuronal activity is organized into neuronal oscillations with various frequency and time domains across different brain areas and brain states. For example, hippocampal theta, gamma, and sharp wave oscillations are critical for memory formation and communication between hippocampal subareas and the cortex. In this study, we investigated the neuronal activity of the dentate gyrus (DG) with optical imaging tools during sleep-wake cycles in mice. We found that the activity of major glutamatergic cell populations in the DG is organized into infraslow oscillations (0.01–0.03 Hz) during NREM sleep. Although the DG is considered a sparsely active network during wakefulness, we found that 50% of granule cells and about 25% of mossy cells exhibit increased activity during NREM sleep, compared to that during wakefulness. Further experiments revealed that the infraslow oscillation in the DG was correlated with rhythmic serotonin release during sleep, which oscillates at the same frequency but in an opposite phase. Genetic manipulation of 5-HT receptors revealed that this neuromodulatory regulation is mediated by Htr1a receptors and the knockdown of these receptors leads to memory impairment. Together, our results provide novel mechanistic insights into how the 5-HT system can influence hippocampal activity patterns during sleep.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ulrike Pech, Jasper Janssens ... Patrik Verstreken
    Research Article

    The classical diagnosis of Parkinsonism is based on motor symptoms that are the consequence of nigrostriatal pathway dysfunction and reduced dopaminergic output. However, a decade prior to the emergence of motor issues, patients frequently experience non-motor symptoms, such as a reduced sense of smell (hyposmia). The cellular and molecular bases for these early defects remain enigmatic. To explore this, we developed a new collection of five fruit fly models of familial Parkinsonism and conducted single-cell RNA sequencing on young brains of these models. Interestingly, cholinergic projection neurons are the most vulnerable cells, and genes associated with presynaptic function are the most deregulated. Additional single nucleus sequencing of three specific brain regions of Parkinson’s disease patients confirms these findings. Indeed, the disturbances lead to early synaptic dysfunction, notably affecting cholinergic olfactory projection neurons crucial for olfactory function in flies. Correcting these defects specifically in olfactory cholinergic interneurons in flies or inducing cholinergic signaling in Parkinson mutant human induced dopaminergic neurons in vitro using nicotine, both rescue age-dependent dopaminergic neuron decline. Hence, our research uncovers that one of the earliest indicators of disease in five different models of familial Parkinsonism is synaptic dysfunction in higher-order cholinergic projection neurons and this contributes to the development of hyposmia. Furthermore, the shared pathways of synaptic failure in these cholinergic neurons ultimately contribute to dopaminergic dysfunction later in life.