A study of the genetic variation that makes mice more susceptible to bowel inflammation after a high-fat diet has identified candidate genes which may drive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans. The findings are published as a Reviewed Preprint in eLife.
Described by the editors as a fundamental study, the work provides a framework for using systems genetics approaches to dissect the complex mechanisms of gut physiology. The authors show how it is possible to use genetically diverse but well-characterised mice to interrogate intestinal inflammation and pinpoint genes influenced by the environment – in this case, a high-fat diet – and identify potential treatment targets for IBD in mice and humans. The editors describe the strength of the analyses as compelling and add that, as a resource, it will be useful for linking genetic variations and diet to gut-related disorders.
It is well established that a high-fat diet can increase the risk of IBD. However, the impact of diet varies between individual people, suggesting an interplay with genetic factors. More than 200 risk genes have been identified for IBD, but there is still no effective treatment, and it is therefore important to understand the gene-by-environment interactions underpinning the inflammation that eventually evolves into IBD.
“Differences in the clinical presentation of IBD among patients, as well as diversity in diet and lifestyle, render human genetic studies challenging,” explains lead author Xiaoxu Li, a Doctoral Research Assistant at the Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland. “Genetically diverse populations of mice allow us to mirror the differences in human populations, while controlling several environmental factors, such as temperature and diet, when exploring the genetic modulators of IBD in the laboratory.”
Li and colleagues used mouse genetic reference populations (GRPs) to map the genetic factors that are important in IBD induced by a high-fat diet. They measured the levels of gene expression in the colons of 52 mice fed with either a chow or a high-fat diet and identified a subset of mice that were more susceptible to high-fat-diet-induced intestinal inflammation. Moreover, they found that levels of a pro-inflammatory cytokine called interleukin-15 were increased in the mice more likely to develop IBD, while levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, Interleukin-10, were decreased. This indicates that changes in the levels of genes associated with IBD reflect the general inflammatory status of mice.
After classifying different mouse strains based on their likelihood of developing IBD-like genetic signatures, the team explored this further using gene co-expression network analysis. This identified two distinct modules (clusters) of genes that are related to known genetic signatures of human IBD.
Next, they looked at the function of these genes and how they are controlled. Both IBD-associated modules largely consisted of immune response-related genes, including those known to be involved in Crohn’s disease, and the team identified the likely regulators of the expression of these genes. But the genetic drivers behind the different susceptibility in the mice were still elusive.
To find the candidate genes that influence gut inflammation specifically following a high-fat diet, they performed QTL analysis to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) – regions of genes that interact with the environment to impact the observable trait data. This revealed a QTL that is related to chronic intestinal inflammation in mice.
To see whether genes under this QTL could play a role in human IBD, the team then cross-checked their findings with risk genes for IBD by conducting an analysis using genome-wide association study data from UK Biobank*. They identified two plausible gene candidates, called EPHA6 and MUC4. In addition, using publicly available genetic variation data for IBD, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, they found evidence to suggest that increased expression of the MUC4 gene in part of the colon may increase the risk of IBD in humans.
A limitation of this analysis is that there were no mechanistic investigations or studies that directly provide a causative link between the candidate genes and IBD. The results are primarily observational and correlative, but they provide a dataset that generates hypotheses that can be studied further.
“Our results point to important potential roles of two gene candidates in gut chronic inflammation that may lead to inflammatory disorders,” says senior author Johan Auwerx, a Professor at the Institute of Bioengineering, EPFL. “Our systems genetics approach using GRP mice where the genetic backgrounds are known and the environment can be controlled enables the prioritisation of candidate genes in a complex disease which, when combined with human genome-wide association studies from UK Biobank, are generalisable to human patients and may have clinical value.”
##
This Reviewed Preprint has been published and will be included in eLife’s upcoming Special Issue on systems genetics. For more information, see https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/08396b6a/special-issue-call-for-papers-in-the-area-of-systems-genetics.
*UK Biobank is a large-scale biomedical database and research resource, containing in-depth genetic and health information from half a million UK participants. More information is available at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk.
Media contacts
Emily Packer
eLife
e.packer@elifesciences.org
+441223855373George Litchfield
eLife
g.litchfield@elifesciences.org
About
eLife transforms research communication to create a future where a diverse, global community of scientists and researchers produces open and trusted results for the benefit of all. Independent, not-for-profit and supported by funders, we improve the way science is practised and shared. In support of our goal, we have launched a new publishing model that ends the accept/reject decision after peer review. Instead, papers invited for review will be published as a Reviewed Preprint that contains public peer reviews and an eLife assessment. We also continue to publish research that was accepted after peer review as part of our traditional process. eLife receives financial support and strategic guidance from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Max Planck Society and Wellcome. Learn more at https://elifesciences.org/about.
To read the latest Computational and Systems Biology research published in eLife, visit https://elifesciences.org/subjects/computational-systems-biology.
