Browse Inside eLife

The working example represents a major milestone in the development of Libero Publisher, a community-supported tool to help modernise academic publishing.

We reflect on eLife’s achievements in continuing to improve peer review, transforming technology for academic publishing, and supporting communities for open science.

New approach to peer review results in slightly longer decision times and more appeals against decisions, but several other features of the review process, such as the ease of finding reviewers, remain unchanged.

Seven researchers have been selected for eLife travel awards in the second round of funding for this year.

Four Reviewing Editors bring their expertise to eLife’s leadership team.

A pilot fund seeks to recognise and support the work of researchers from underrepresented communities.

Details related to the data held and processed as part of applications to the Ben Barres Spotlight Awards.

A number of organisations have adopted practices that open up funding opportunities to a more diverse set of researchers.

Learn about some of the initiatives that are working to help researchers improve their mental health.

A consultative peer-review process is just one of the reasons researchers choose to publish with eLife.