Identifying Genetic Variations in emm89 Streptococcus pyogenes Linked to Severe Invasive Infections

  1. Department of Microbiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan
  2. Bioinformatics Research Unit, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan
  3. Bioinformatics Center, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  4. Center for Infectious Diseases Education and Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  5. NGS Core Facility, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  6. Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives (OTRI), Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
  7. Department of Oral Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
  8. Pathogenic Microbe Laboratory, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  9. Department of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan
  10. Department of Bacteriology, Osaka Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan
  11. Department of Public Health Sciences, Yamaguchi Prefectural Institute Public Health and Environment, Yamaguchi, Japan
  12. Department of Infectious Diseases, Kobe Institute for Health, Hyogo, Japan
  13. Department of Microbiology, Fukushima Prefectural Institute for Public Health, Fukushima, Japan
  14. Division of Microbiology, Kyoto City Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto, Japan
  15. Sapporo Public Health Office, Hokkaido, Japan
  16. Niigata City Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Niigata
  17. Microbiological Testing and Research Division, Yokohama City Institute of Public Health, Kanagawa, Japan
  18. Department of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan

Peer review process

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.

Read more about eLife’s peer review process.

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    Dominique Soldati-Favre
    University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Senior Editor
    Dominique Soldati-Favre
    University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Summary:

In this study, the authors sequenced emm89 serotype genomes of clinical isolates from patients in Japan, where the number of invasive Group A Streptococcus (GAS), especially those of the emm89 serotype, has drastically increased over the past 10-15 years. The sequences from this cohort were compared against a large collection of publicly available global isolates, yielding a total of almost 1000 genomes in the analysis. Because the researchers focused on the emm89 serotype, they could construct a common core genome, with subsequent ability to analyze genomic differences in accessory genes and intergenic regions that contributed to the invasive phenotype using multiple types of GWAS analysis (SNP, k-mer). Their analysis demonstrates some mutations responsible for invasiveness are specific to the Japanese strains, and that multiple independent virulence factors can contribute to invasiveness. None of the invasive phenotypes were correlated with new gene acquisition. Together, the data support that synergy between bacterial survival and upregulation of virulence factors contributes to the development of severe infection.

Strengths:

• The authors verify their analysis by confirming that covS is one of the more frequently mutated genes in invasive strains of GAS, as has been shown in other publications.

• A mutation in one of the SNPs attributed to invasiveness (SNP fhuB) was introduced into an invasive strain. The authors demonstrate that this mutant strain survives less well in human blood. Therefore, the authors have experimental data to support their claims that their analysis uncovered a new mutation/SNP that contributed to invasiveness.

Weaknesses:

• It would be helpful for the authors to highlight why their technique (large scale analysis of one emm type) can yield more information than a typical GWAS analysis of invasive vs. non-invasive strains. Are SNPs easier to identify using a large-scale core genome? Is it more likely evolutionarily to find mutations in non-coding regions as opposed to the core genome and accessory genes, and this is what this technique allows? Did the analysis yield unexpected genes or new genes that had not been previously identified in other GWAS analyses? These points may need to be made more apparent in the results and deserve some thought in the discussion section.

• The Alpha-fold data does not demonstrate why the mutations the authors identified could contribute to the invasive phenotype. It would be helpful to show an overlay of the predicted structures containing the different SNPs to demonstrate the potential structural differences that can occur due to the SNP. This would make the data more convincing that the SNP has a potential impact on the function of the protein. Similarly, the authors discuss modification of the hydrophobicity of the side chain in the ferrichrome transporter (lines 317-318) due to a SNP, but this is not immediately obvious in the figure (Fig. 5).

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors aim to identify genetic determinants associated with the invasion profile of Streptococcus pyogenes strains of the emm89 type, which has been increasingly linked to invasive infections. The study leverages both in-house sequenced genomes and publicly available genomic data. Several GWAS approaches are applied to these datasets, leading to the identification of potential genetic targets. For these targets, the authors conduct additional analyses, including three-dimensional structural modeling of the encoded proteins, as well as the development of mutant strains. The functional impact of these mutations is further explored through transcriptomic comparisons between the mutants and wild-type strains

Strengths:

The strengths of this manuscript include the large amount of data analyzed and the various methodologies applied. The identification of CovS, a gene known to influence the invasion profile, as a significant variation further validates the methodology employed in this study. Then, the gene fhuD is an intriguing target, identified through both bioinformatics and wet lab approaches.

Weaknesses:

I do not identify any additional weaknesses in the manuscript, beyond those already acknowledged by the authors themselves.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation