Shc1 cooperates with Frs2 and Shp2 to recruit Grb2 in FGF-induced lens development

Qian Wang
Hongge Li
Yingyu Mao
Ankur Garg
Eun Sil Park
Yihua Wu
Alyssa Chow
John Peregrin
Xin Zhang author has email address

Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, USA
Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, USA

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103615.1

Open access
Copyright information

Figures and data

FGF Signaling Regulates Lens Development in a Dose-Dependent Manner.
(A) Schematic diagram of murine lens development. The head ectoderm is induced by the underlying optic vesicle to become the lens placode, which subsequently folds inwards to become the lens pit. The closure of the lens vesicle sets the stage for the differentiation of the lens epithelium into the lens fibers. (B) Depletion of all four Fgfr1/2/3/4, driven by Le-Cre and traced with GFP, led to a thinner lens placode, evident from the absence of pERK signals and the failure to upregulate Sox2 like Pax6 (inserts, arrowheads). (C) Fgfr1/2/3/4 mutants displayed disrupted apical constriction (F-actin accumulation, arrows) and lacked lens-specific expression of Foxe3 and Jag1 (arrowheads). Dotted lines outline the lens pit. (D) Despite Fgfr1/2/3/4 mutations, BMP (pSmad1/5/9 staining, arrowheads) and Wnt signaling (Lef1 expression, arrows) remained unaffected. (E) The absence of Fgfr1/2 alone did not impede the apical buildup of F-actin nor the expression of Foxe3, indicating partial retention of lens development processes. (F) Crucial lens markers, Prox1 and αA-crystallin, were absent in Fgfr1/2 mutants, pointing to a significant developmental defect after the lens induction stage. (G) Fgfr1/2 mutants exhibited loss of cell proliferation marker Cyclin D1 (arrows) and widespread apoptosis (TUNEL staining, arrowheads).

Lens development in Fgf receptor mutants.
(A) Depletion of all four Fgfr1/2/3/4 did not disrupt the Fibronectin expression at the basal side of the lens placode (arrows). (B) pmTOR and pS6 staining were lost in Le-Cre;Fgfr1^f/f;Fgfr2^f/LRlens.

Restoration of Lens Development in FGF Signaling Mutants via Kras Activation and Apoptosis Inhibition.
(A) The Le-Cre driver facilitated the excision of the floxed alleles of Fgf1/2 along with the LSL-STOP cassette at the Kras locus, leading to the expression of the constitutively active Kras^G12D allele within the Fgf1/2 mutant background. (B) The activation of Kras signaling in the FGF signaling mutant lenses reinstated pERK activity at E10.5 and pMEK expression at E13.5, indicating restoration of MAPK signaling. (C) The lens-specific expression of Prox1 and αA-crystallin were also recovered, indicating successful lens development rescue. (D) Quantification of the lens size. One way ANOVA, n=3, *P<0.001, **P<0.02. (E) The deletion of pro-apoptotic genes Bak and Bax in Fgf1/2 mutants suppressed apoptosis as shown by TUNEL staining. (F) Inhibiting apoptosis in Fgfr1/2 mutants facilitated lens formation, as indicated by the expression of lens differentiation markers Prox1, Maf, and Jag1. (G) Quantification cell apoptosis. One-way ANOVA, n=3, *P<0.001. (I) Quantification of the lens size. One-way ANOVA, n=3, *P<0.0001, **P<0.05.

The Frs2 binding site on FGFR is only required for lens vesicle differentiation.
(A) Overview of Fgfr mutant alleles. Fgfr1^ΔFrs lacks the Frs2 binding domain (amino acid 407-433), and Fgfr2^LR has point mutations disrupting Frs2 binding (L424A and L426A). (B) In Fgf1/2 compound mutants, loss of pERK, CyclinD1, αA-crystallin and increased cleaved caspase3 were observed with the Fgfr1^ΔFrs allele but not the Fgfr2^LR allele. (C) Quantification of cleaved caspase3 staining. Student’s t-test, n=3, *P<0.001. (D) Heatmap depicts Fgfr expression levels during lens development. (E) Fgfr2^LR mutants in the Fgfr1/2/3 genetic background showed impaired lens vesicle differentiation, with posterior lens epithelial cells failing to elongate and activate lens fiber cell markers Jag1 and Maf. (F) Fgfr1/2/3 triple mutants with Fgfr2^LR lost pERK staining and displayed a shallow lens vesicle at E12.5. (G) Quantification of the lens size. One-way ANOVA n=3, *P<0.001, **P<0.05.

Grb2 is essential for lens vesicle survival, proliferation, and differentiation.
(A) The targeted removal of Grb2 in the lens led to a loss of pERK signaling, reduced CyclinD3 expression, increased apoptosis (TUNEL staining), and disrupted expression of critical lens development genes Maf, Foxe3, Jag1 and γ-crystallin expression at E12.5. (B) Grb2 mutants Grb2 mutants displayed absent CyclinD1, Prox1, and p57 expression at E11.5 and remained an undifferentiated hollow vesicle at E13.5, failing to undergo normal lens fiber elongation. (C) Quantification of the lens size. Student’s t-test, n=3, *P<0.0001.

Shp2 C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation is required for embryonic survival but dispensable for lens development.
(A) Schematic of the core FGF signaling pathway. FGFR activation leads to phosphorylation of the adaptor Frs2 on N- and C-terminal tyrosines, recruiting Grb2 and Shp2 respectively. Shp2 can also bind Grb2 via its own C-terminal phosphotyrosines, and dephosphorylates Grb2 via its catalytic cysteine residue. (B) Generation of the Shp2^YF allele by homologous recombination to introduce loxP-flanked Neo and point mutations (Y542F and Y580F) disrupting the Shp2 C-terminal phosphotyrosine sites. The Neo cassette was subsequently excised by Cre-mediated recombination. (C) Validation of the Shp2^YF allele targeting was confirmed through Southern blot analysis with both 5’ and 3’ probes. (D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrate early lethality of Shp2^YF embryos (E12.5) and perinatal lethality of Sox2Cre;Shp2^f/YFmutants. n=5 for Shp2^YF/YFand n=6 for Sox2Cre;Shp2^f/YF mutants. (E) Shp2^YF/YF embryos displayed reduced body size at E12.5 and thinner labyrinth zones in their placenta E10.5. (F) Sox2Cre-mediated targeting restricts Shp2 deficiency to the embryonic proper, circumventing placental abnormalities. (G) Sox2Cre;Shp2^f/YF mutants appeared grossly normal at E15.5 but failed to survive after birth. (H) While Y542 phosphorylation in Shp2 was lost as expected, Sox2Cre;Shp2^f/YFMEFs exhibited a more pronounced reduction in pERK response to PDGF stimulation compared to FGF stimulation. (I) Sox2Cre;Shp2^f/YFmutant lens displayed normal pERK staining and morphology, but reduced pERK in lacrimal glands at E14.5 and decreased bud numbers at P0. (J) Quantification of the number of lacrimal gland buds. Student’s t-test, n=3, *P<0.02.

Shp2 phosphatase activity is partially required for FGF signaling independently of Grb2 dephosphorylation.
(A) PhosphositePlus database indicates that Grb2 predominantly undergoes phosphorylation at Y209 and less frequently at Y160. (B) The Grb2^YF allele was constructed by homologous recombination to integrate a loxP-flanked Neo cassette and a Y209F point mutation into the Grb2 locus. (C) PCR genotyping confirmed the presence of the Grb2^YF allele. (D) Grb2 mutant lens typical expression patterns of pERK, cell cycle markers p57 and Ki67 and differentiation markers Foxe3, Maf and Jag1. (E) The Shp2^CS allele was generated by inserting the C459S mutation into the Shp2 locus by homologous recombination, followed by Cre-mediated removal of the loxP-flanked Neo cassette. (F) Shp2^CS allele validated by PCR genotyping. (G) Shp2^CS/CS mutants exhibited growth retardation and died at E9.5. (H) Shp2^f/CSMEF cells retained a significant capacity to activate pERK upon FGF stimulation after Cre virus infection. (I) Le-Cre;Shp2^f/f mutants exhibited loss of pERK and Jag1 staining at the lens transition zone (arrowheads), which also shifted posteriorly. Le-Cre;Shp2^f/CS mutant lens, in contrast, maintained staining at the equatorial region. Notably, both mutant types lacked lacrimal gland buds (arrows). (J) Quantification of the lens size. One-way ANOVA n=3, *P<0.0001, **P<0.001. (K) Quantification of the lens perimeter spanning the anterior epithelium versus that of the posterior lens fiber. One-way ANOVA n=3, *P<0.001.

Shc1 complements Frs2 and Shp2 in mediating FGF signaling in lens development.
(A) Fgfr1^f/f;Fgfr2^f/LR infected with Cre virus showed stronger pERK and pShc activation than Fgfr1 ^f/ΔFrs;Fgfr2^f/f MEF cells, despite both losing Frs2, Shp2, Gab1, and Crk phosphorylation. (B) pShc staining was lost in Le-Cre;Fgfr1 ^f/ΔFrs;Fgfr2^f/fmutant lens (arrowhead) but preserved in Le-Cre;Fgfr1^f/f;Fgfr2^f/LR lens. (C) Heatmap showing Shc expression levels during lens development. (D) Shc1-deficient lenses showed a slight decrease in both pERK staining intensity and overall lens size. (E) E12.5 Frs2/Shc1 mutant lenses were smaller than controls, while lenses from Frs2/Shp2 mutants showed a pronounced hollow vesicle structure, a condition that worsened in Frs2/Shp2/Shc1 triple mutants. (F) Quantification of the lens size. One-way ANOVA n=4, *P<0.001, **P<0.05. (G) Model of FGF signaling network. Frs2 recruits Grb2 directly and indirectly through Shp2, while Shc1 provides an alternate Grb2 recruitment route independent of Frs2.

Cell proliferation and apoptosis in Shp2^CSmutants.
Le-Cre;Shp2^f/CS lens exhibits normal expression of proliferation marker Ki67, but there is a significant increase in TUNLE+ cells (arrowheads). Student’s t-test, N.S. (not significant) for %Ki67+ cells and P<0.01 for %TUNEL+ cells in the lens epithelium.

Sign up for email alerts