Effects of Snail-induced EMT on sphingomyelin profile
(A) Comparison of sphingomyelin (SM) content relative to phospholipid content.
(B) Comparison of cholesterol (Chol)/SM ratio between EpH4 and EpH4-Snail cells.
(C) Fatty acid composition of SM determined using LC-MS. All peaks corresponding to d18:1-even fatty acid-SMs were included in the analysis and each peak value is expressed as a percentage. n.d., peak not detected.
(D) Pie charts of SM chain length profile from c. SMs were classified into long-chain fatty acid (LCFA, orange) (≤20) and very long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA, purple) (>20) SMs.
(E) Chain length specificity of Elovls and CerSs responsible for fatty acid profile of sphingolipids reported (Levy & Futerman, 2010; Sassa & Kihara, 2014). Elovls catalyze a rate-limiting step of fatty acid elongation cycle, and CerSs catalyze N-acylation of sphingoid bases to produce ceramides.
(F) Comparison of transcription levels of ELOVLs and CERSs. Notable decreases in expressions of ELOVL7 and CERS3 in EpH4-Snail cells are indicated by asterisks.
(G) Immunoblot analyses of whole cell lysates of mouse epithelial (MTD-1A, CSG) and fibroblast (L-929, NIH3T3) cells.
(H) Comparison of Chol/SM ratio of EpH4, EpH4-Snail and normal fibroblasts.
(I) Comparison of Chol/SM ratio between TE-15 and TE-8.
(J) Scatter plot of Chol content against SM content used in B, H and I. Dashed lines indicate Chol/SM = 1.0 (blue) and 1.5 (red). The region of Chol/SM > 1.5 is shown with red background.
(K) Possible mechanism of LD enlargement induction through decrease in SM. In EpH4, a certain amount of Chol is sequestered through interaction with SM. In EpH4-Snail, SM-unbound form of Chol is increased, detected by cellular cholesterol sensors, internalized and stored in LDs. In A, B, C, H and I, data are means of three independent experiments ± SDs (Student’s t-test (A,B,C,I) or Dunnett’s test (H): n.s., p ≥ 0.05; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).