1-oct chemotaxis in microfluidic arenas.

(A) Microfluidics arenas were configured with two zones of equal area, one containing a 1-oct solution and the other containing buffer alone (1-oct zone contains 0.01% xylene cyanol dye for visualization here; assays are run without dye). (B, C) Typical distribution of worms when first exposed to 1-oct (B), and after 15 min of 2.2 mM 1-oct exposure (C). (D) Time-course of 1-oct chemotaxis. (E) Calculation of chemotaxis index, averaging worm counts every 2 minutes from 10-20 minutes after introduction of 1-oct solution.

Network recording of 1-oct (2.2 mM) response.

(A) Representative image of a NeuroPAL worm immobilized in a microfluidics device visualized using the mTagBFP2, CyOFP, and mNeptune2.5 reporters for neuronal identification (22). (B, C) Pan-neuronal nGCaMP6s signal for the region indicated by the box in (A) during 1-oct stimulation, showing 1-oct offset (B) and onset (C). Specific time points in the recording for (B) and (C) are indicated by the black triangles in (D). Selected sensory neurons and interneurons are indicated by dashed white circles. (D) Heat map of activity profiles for 56 identifiable neurons. Raw (i.e. non-normalized) fluorescence values shown. Stimulation time-course shown on top row (white is buffer, orange is 1-oct). Green and orange vertical bars at left indicate first-layer and locomotory command neurons (+RIM), respectively.

Neuronal activity correlations.

(A-C) Neuronal activity patterns from worm shown in Fig – 2. (A) Stochastic activity state transitions of locomotory command and associated interneurons, with AIY and AVB showing opposite activity patterns to AVA, AVD, AVE, RIM, AIB, and AIZ. (B) Sensory neuron activity patterns. (C) Selected neuron pairs highlighting the opposite activity patterns of AWC and ASH (top), and the correlated activity patterns of AWC with AIA (middle) and SAA (bottom). (D, E) Activity correlations for 12 selected neurons based on data from 5 worms. (D) Graph representation of activity correlations before stimulus (minutes 0-6, left) and during stimulus (minutes 6-12, right). Neurons pairs with the strongest positive correlations are closest to one another and connected by the darkest purple lines; neurons with the strongest negative correlations are furthest apart and connected by the darkest green lines. (E) Relationships from (D) presented as a correlation matrix using the same color code.

1-oct valence reverses as a function of concentration.

(A-C) ASH ON responses (A, C) are concentration dependent, while AWC ON and OFF responses (B, C) are not, over a 10-fold concentration range from 0.22 to 2.2 mM. Representative traces from a single ASH or AWC neuron are shown (A, B, respectively), averages shown in (C) *** P<0.001, ns non-significant, paired ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparison test). (D) For wild type (black points/line), chemotaxis index for 1-oct switches from negative (repulsive) at the highest concentration (2.2 mM) to positive (attractive) at the lowest concentrations (0.22 and 0.66 mM), and insensitivity at intermediate concentrations (1.21 and 1.54 mM). In tax-4 mutants, 1-oct responses are repulsive at all tested concentrations (red points/line), n = 3-5. (E) Results are consistent with a model in which repulsive and attractive afferent pathways (driven by ASH and AWC, respectively) are co-active, and balance to determine overall chemotactic response.

Locomotory reversals and speed modulation stimulated by 1-oct.

(A) Example of a single worm track traced by the automated tracking software. (B) Worms execute reversals probabilistically at the 1-oct-buffer interface dependent on TAX-4 and OSM-9 signaling cascades. (C, D) Reversal probabilities at 1-oct-buffer interface for wild-type, tax-4, and osm-9 (see panel B for summary and explanation of terms). (C) movement from buffer zone to 1-oct zone (‘entries’); (D) movement from 1-oct zone to buffer zone (‘exits’). (E) Modulation of locomotory activity. Distance traveled in 2 minutes prior to, during, and after flooding the entire chip with 1-oct solution. (F) Simulation of chemotaxis outcome based on reversal probabilities (from C, D) and locomotory activity modulation (from E). Points shown are averages of 10 simulation trials with SEM error bars. ***, **** in C, D indicate P<0.001, 0.0001 Fisher’s Exact Test. *, ** in E indicate P<0.05, 0.01, ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

Entrainment of neuronal activity by 1-oct stimulation.

(A, B) Validation of the entrainment index measurement using ASH (A) and AWC (B), showing very strong positive and very strong negative entrainment by 1-oct application, as expected. Gray dots indicate each randomized sum, while red and blue dots indicate the stimulus-specific sums of ASH and AWC, respectively (see Methods). (C-F) Superimposed ASH and AVA activity patterns after stimulation by 0.22, 0.66, and 2.2 mM 1-oct in wild type (C, D) and tax-4 (E, F). Single worm traces (C, E) and averaged traces are shown (D, F, n ranges from 6-21 worms). (G) AIB trace (averaged); showing unprocessed (upper panel, purple trace) and AIB after subtracting AVA activity (lower panel, green trace). (H) Entrainment indices for all recordings in C through G, with gray dots indicating randomized EIs and the bold dots represent the stimulus-specific EIs for AVA (black), unprocessed AIB (purple), and AVA-subtracted AIB (green). P values in A, B and H represent the probability that a randomized EI would be as great or greater than the stimulus-selected sum, with a significance cut-off of P<0.05.

Balanced repulsion and attraction support context-dependent modulation of sensory responses.

(A, B) Combinatorial coding-based mechanism for modulating sensory responses. (A) At lower 1-oct concentrations, the attractive afferent pathway is relatively strong, resulting in attraction. (B) Addition of IAA reduces AWC activity, weakening the attractive pathway relative to the repulsive pathway, and reversing the 1-oct valence. (C) Addition of 0.92 mM IAA reverses the valence of 1-oct (0.66 mM) from attractive to repulsive. (D) IAA biases reversal behavior (at the 1-oct/buffer interface) toward repulsion. Reversals upon entering 1-oct zone are increased (left side/red), and reversals upon exiting the 1-oct zone are decreased (right side /green). (E-F) Effect of IAA on locomotory activity. (E) 1-oct (0.66 mM) in the absence of IAA does not cause increased speed. (F) 1-oct (0.66 mM) in the presence of IAA causes markedly increased speed. (G) Single (upper) and averaged (lower) recordings of ASH and AVA before and after addition of IAA and 1-oct (0.66mM) as shown, demonstrating increased AVA entrainment to stimulus (compare to Fig-6D/middle). Blue bar indicates addition of IAA (in both control buffer and 1-oct solutions). (H) AVA entrainment index confirms that the presence of IAA causes AVA to become significantly entrained with the stimulus. ** in C indicates P<0.01, t-test; *** and **** in D indicate P<0.001, 0.0001 respectively, Fisher’s Exact Test; *, *** in F indicate P<0.05 and 0.001, respectively, ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Combinatorial coding of 1-oct as an attractant and a repellant, simultaneously, facilitates sensory motor coupling and context-dependent modulation in C. elegans.

(A) 1-oct simultaneously activates sensory neurons in the periphery that mediate both repulsion (ASH and other) and attraction (AWC and others), such that repulsive and attractive afferent pathways become active concurrently. These inputs are then integrated centrally to control at least three key locomotory parameters (exit reversals, entry reversals, and locomotory speed), and the activity state of the reverse command neurons. (B) An analogy based on refraction on light through two prisms highlights the potential versatility of olfactory combinatorial coding in C. elegans. An individual odorant activates many chemosensory neurons to produce multiple distinct afferent inputs propagating through the downstream circuitry simultaneously, analogous to the first prism separating white light into its component colors (top panel, left). The motor integration circuity formulates a locomotory response by integrating the active afferent pathways, analogous to the second prism recombining the incoming light (top panel, right). Because chemosensory neurons have different odorant affinities, the specific outputs of the sensory array and motor integration circuit may be concentration dependent. In this study, ASH (coded in red) is a low affinity sensor, while AWC (coded in blue) is a high affinity sensor. Reducing the 1-oct concentration biases the output of the sensory array toward AWC (middle panel, left), and the motor integration circuitry uses this information to produce an attractive locomotory response (middle panel, right). This coding strategy produces a simple framework for modulation. The behavioral outcome may be influenced by simply shifting the balance of the afferent pathways, much like an optical filter placed in a light path can selectively eliminate specific wavelengths (lower panel) to change the color of the transmitted light. In this study, IAA was added to the diluted 1-oct solution, inhibiting AWC, such that the afferent pathways were re-balanced toward the ASH end of the spectrum, and repulsion was restored. This ‘filtering’ effect could, in principle, take place peripherally or centrally, and could subserve modulation due to the presence of other odorant molecules, monoamine/neuropeptide modulators serving as interoceptive signals, and effectors of experience-dependent plasticity.