Abstract
The neonatal cochlear epithelium harbors regenerative capacity, attributable to the transient greater epithelial ridge (GER). After injury, GER cells re-enter the cell cycle, migrate into the damaged organ of Corti, and differentiate into sensory or supporting cells in vivo; in culture, they proliferate to form inner ear organoids. The mechanisms underlying this competence remain unclear. Here, we generated organoids from mouse GER cells and performed single-cell transcriptomics at organoid initiation. Analysis revealed extracellular matrix reorganization with prominent involvement of galectins. Functional assays combining inhibition and overexpression demonstrated that galectin-1 and Myc are both necessary and sufficient for organoid growth. Moreover, Myc overexpression conferred organoid-forming capacity in post-neonatal cochlear epithelial cells after hearing onset, thereby extending the time window for regenerative competence. In vivo, organ of Corti ablation induced galectin-1 upregulation and GER proliferation, suppressed by galectin-1 blockade, establishing a model to rekindle proliferative potential in mature cochlear cells.
Introduction
Loss of cochlear hair cells is a major cause of hearing loss in mammals, resulting from aging, ototoxic drugs, genetic predispositions, or noise exposure. In the mature cochlea, non-sensory cells such as organ of Corti supporting cells and adjacent epithelial cells are mitotically quiescent and lack regenerative capacity after hair cell demise. However, ectopic activation of specific transcription factors and signaling pathways can induce regenerative responses in these cells 1–4. This strategy is particularly effective in neonatal mice, where cochlear non-sensory cells can proliferate and generate hair cells both in vitro and in vivo 1,5,6. A particularly plastic progenitor cell population for the organ of Corti is the adjacent greater epithelial ridge (GER) 7–10. The GER is a transient neonatal cell population that disappears during the first postnatal week before the onset of hearing 11. We previously showed that fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-enriched GER cells display robust regenerative capacity in culture. This cell population represented the most potent cochlear progenitors, capable of proliferating and forming otic organoids that develop sensory epithelia containing nascent hair cells and supporting cells 9.
Given this capability of GER cells, we hypothesized that identifying genes and pathways that induce proliferation would provide molecular targets for triggering proliferation in more mature cochlear epithelial cells. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on organoids derived from highly enriched GER cells, using an optimized harvesting method suitable for the limited cell numbers within organoids. We focused on early-phase organoids at the onset of proliferation to identify changes in gene expression in GER-derived cells during the early growth phase of organoid development. We further screened a panel of pharmacological agents linked to enriched pathways to show that inhibition of galectin-1, galectin-3, or Myc suppresses organoid growth.
Using adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated overexpression, we then demonstrated that galectin-1 and Myc enhance organoid growth from GER cells. When overexpressed in cochlear epithelial cells isolated from mice older than two weeks, which lack GER, Myc increased proliferation, providing proof of concept that post-neonatal cochlear cells can be induced to proliferate in the organoid system using genes that are functionally linked to GER cells’ regenerative abilities. In vivo, we detected increased galectin-1 and Myc expression in the GER using an Lgr5-diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR)-based mouse cochlear cell ablation model, in which GER cells enter the cell cycle following the ablation of Lgr5-positive supporting and epithelial cells 12. Inhibition of galectin-1 decreased GER cell proliferation after cell ablation, revealing that galectin signaling is required for damage-induced GER cell proliferation in vivo. Our study provides a transcriptomic atlas of GER cell proliferation in organoids and demonstrates that selected pathways contribute functionally to organoid growth. Moreover, we show that these pathways are actively engaged in the regenerative response following in vivo injury. We propose that GER-derived organoid systems provide a platform for developing strategies to regenerate mature cochlear cells.
Results
Single cell collection from purified GER cell-derived organoids
GER cells robustly give rise to otic organoids that develop epithelial structures harboring nascent hair cells and supporting cells within three weeks 9. To capture dynamic changes in gene expression during organoid growth, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing of GER-derived organoids (GER-organoids). We analyzed organoids that formed after one day, three days, and seven days in vitro, hypothesizing that these time points encompass the initial phase of GER cell proliferation, and thus allow identification of genes involved in this process.
GER cells were purified with FACS from postnatal day (P) 2 mice (Sox2GFP/+; Fgfr3CreERT2/+; Ai14tdTomato/+) by sorting a cell population expressing high levels of GFP and lacking tdTomato fluorescence (Figure 1A) 9,13,14. We have previously developed a method for collecting GER cells by the intensities of two fluorescent reporters expressed in the mouse line with FACS (Gate 1: GFP-high/ tdTomato-negative; Gate 2: GFP-low/ tdTomato-negative; Gate 3: GFP-high/ tdTomato-high; Gate 4: GFP-low/ tdTomato-high). The cells from Gate 1 to Gate 4 were sorted into designated wells of 96-well plates, and single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on these cells (Figure 1B). Each cell’s well position was retained during analysis, allowing assignment to its corresponding FACS gate. Clustering analysis identified the cell subtypes present in each FACS gate. As a result, we confirmed that GER cells are highly enriched in Gate 1 with a purity exceeding 90% 9,13 (Figure 1B). The FACS-purified GER cells from Gate 1 were seeded and cultured for seven days to form organoids.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of GER cell-derived organoids.
(A) Fluorescent reporter gene expression in a P2 organ of Corti vibratome section of an Fgfr3-Cre-ERT2/Ai14-tdTomato/Sox2-GFP transgenic mouse. Scale bar: 20 µm. DCs: Deiters’ cells; OPC: outer pillar cell; IPC: inner pillar cell; IPhC: inner phalangeal cell; IBC: inner border cell; IHC: inner hair cell; OHCs: outer hair cells; GER: greater epithelial ridge. (B) Enrichment strategy of GER cells from Fgfr3-Cre-ERT2/Ai14-tdTomato/Sox2-GFP transgenic mouse. Dissociated P2 cochlear floor cells were sorted from individual FACS gates (Gates 1-4) into defined positions in 96-well plates and subjected to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Well-position metadata were then matched with cell type identities defined by clustering analysis to quantify the proportion of GER cells in each gate. A cell population expressing high GFP and lacking tdTomato fluorescence (Gate 1) contained GER cells with 93% purity 9,13. (C) Single-cell harvesting and sequencing from GER-derived organoids. FACS-enriched GER cells from Gate 1 were cultured for organoid growth in suspension culture for 7 days. Organoids were harvested on culture days 1 (D1), 3 (D3), and 7 (D7). A representative image of D7 organoids is shown (scale bar: 200 µm). Manual harvesting of single cells from dissociated organoids using a glass pipette of 50-60 µm diameter yielded a total library of 966 cells. Of these, scRNA-seq data were obtained from 768 cells, and quality control filtering retained 658 cells for downstream analysis. GER-derived organoids, harvested and transferred to an adherent culture system on day 7, underwent expansion for 14 days, resulting in otic colonies that harbor epithelial structures with nascent hair cells and supporting cells on culture day 21 (D21) 9. For quantification at D7, we used organoids obtained in 7 independent experiments.
At culture day seven, we counted 64 ± 21 (mean ± SD) organoids per well with an average diameter of 72 ± 28 µm (mean ±SD) (Figure 1C). Organoid numbers and sizes were both smaller at earlier timepoints, resulting in insufficient cell concentrations for single-cell library preparation when we used bulk cell suspension methods. FACS-based sorting was also not feasible at these low cell numbers.
To overcome this challenge, dissociated organoid cells on culture days one, three, and seven were manually collected in 96-well plates using 50-60 µm diameter glass micropipettes and processed for single-cell RNA sequencing using the Smart-seq2 platform 15. Out of 966 cell-libraries (208, 278, and 480 cells from day one, three, and seven, respectively), single-cell RNA sequencing data were obtained for 768 cells, with 658 cells passing quality control and used for downstream analysis (Figure 1C).
Identification of candidate genes that mediate otic organoid growth
The 658 cells were subjected to data integration, normalization, and clustering with Seurat 16. We identified seven distinct cell clusters in the dataset (Figure 2A, Table S1). Cells obtained from day one organoids were predominantly localized in cluster 6. Clusters 4 and 5 contained cells from both day one and day three organoids. Cells from day three and day seven organoids co-localized within clusters 1 and 3, while cluster 2 primarily comprised cells obtained from day seven organoids (Figure 2A, B). The expression of the proliferation marker Kiel 67 (Mki67) identified proliferating cells predominantly in clusters 1 and 3 (Figure 2C). Consistent with Mki67 upregulation, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) 17 revealed that genes associated with cell division were upregulated in clusters 1 and 3, which mainly contained cells from days three and seven. Furthermore, Mki67 mRNA expression was not detected in cluster 2, which consisted of day seven cells. These dynamics suggest that organoid cells enter a proliferative state by day three, whereas a subgroup of day seven cells (cluster 2) did not proliferate. IPA identified pathways such as nerve growth factor signaling and Notch signaling in the non-proliferative cells (Table S2). Because proliferation emerged between days one and three, this interval likely reflects the activation of growth-induction signaling pathways. Thus, we focused on clusters 4, 5, and 6 for further analysis, as they represent cell populations present at the onset of proliferation.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of GER-derived organoids reveals proliferating cell clusters.
(A) Seurat data analysis of 658 cells, visualized by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), identified seven distinct clusters. Each dot represents a cell, colored by cluster. (B) UMAP projection, visualized by timepoint, showing the origin of cells from D1, D3, and D7 organoids. (C) Robust expression of mRNA encoding proliferation marker Kiel 67 (Mki67) was detected in the cells represented by clusters 1 and 3. (D) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes between the cells at the onset of proliferation (clusters 4, 5, and 6) and the remaining cells (clusters 1, 2, 3, and 7). Thresholds are indicated with dotted lines and were set to an average log2FC > |1| and adjusted p-value < 1E-5. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used for the comparison.
To identify putative cell growth-promoting effectors, we evaluated differentially expressed genes in these three clusters. The list of upregulated genes relative to the other clusters (clusters 1, 2, 3, and 7) (Figure 2D, Table S3) indicated active production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, which aligned with IPA results showing the activation of signaling related to collagen biosynthesis and ECM-cell surface interactions on day one (cluster 6), followed by cell junction organization from day one to three (cluster 4) (Table S2).
An independent clustering approach based on hierarchical spectral clustering identified 13 clusters (Figure S1A, Table S4). Using similarity weighted non-negative embedding (SWNE) 18, which considers latent factors in two-dimensional projections, the organoid cells were arranged progressively from day one to day three and day seven. Proliferating cells, indicated by the upregulation of Mki67 gene expression, were found in six clusters, primarily consisting of day three cells and a subset of day seven cells (Figure S1B, C). We identified three cell clusters (S11-S13) at the onset of proliferation (Figure S1A-C). Most of the upregulated genes in these clusters (35 out of 39) overlapped with those elevated in clusters 3, 4, and 5 from the Seurat analysis (Figure S1D and Table S5). IPA identified pathways linked to ECM (S11) and cell junction organization (S12 and S13) as active during this phase (Table S6).
Both analyses revealed cell groups corresponding to a pre-proliferative state, active proliferation, and a possible shift toward differentiation. The temporal order of these cell groups aligned with a transition from a pre-proliferative state to active proliferation, as indicated by Mki67-positive cells at days three and seven. The prominence of cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions, as identified by IPA, was consistent with our prior study, which showed that GER-organoid growth depends on GER cell seeding density at the start of the experiment 9. These results defined the transcriptomic profile of GER cells as they initiate proliferation to form growing organoids, which eventually lead to the generation of nascent hair cells and supporting cells. Based on these insights, we hypothesized that a detailed analysis of upregulated genes potentially involved in ECM-modulated growth promotion could provide further mechanistic insight.
Galectins and Myc are essential for otic organoid growth
To validate the functions of differentially expressed genes, we selected several genes upregulated at the onset of proliferation that are potentially relevant for growth promotion. These included galectins, integrins, and their interaction partners, enkephalins, and the transcription factor Myc (Figure 2D, Table S1, and Table S3). Galectins, encoded by Lgals genes, are soluble proteins that bind to β-galactoside sugars on glycosylated proteins. They are present in the extracellular matrix but also serve intracellular functions 19. Specifically, mRNAs encoding galectin-1 (Lgals1) and galectin-3 (Lgals3) were differentially upregulated in clusters 4, 5, and 6 compared to all other clusters (Figure 2D, Table S1, and Table S3). Immunofluorescence staining validated galectin-1 expression along the outer surface cell layers of day three organoids, whereas galectin-3 expression was more dispersed (Figure 3A and B).

Expression of galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc in organoids.
(A, B) Day 3 organoids generated from whole cochlear duct cells. Two representative organoids are shown for each labeling. (A) Immunofluorescence labeling for galectin-1 (grey), Ki67 (green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Immunofluorescence for galectin-3 (grey), Ki67 (green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). Scale bars: 10 µm. (C-E) Single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis comparing the mRNA expression levels of galectin-1 (C), galectin-3 (D), and Myc (E) between organoids and the P2 cochlear floor. (Left) Violin plots. Yellow bars: median lines. (Center) mRNA expression levels projected on the UMAP plots for GER-organoid cells and (right) for cochlear floor cells. DC: Deiters’ cells; GER: greater epithelialridge; IBC: inner border cells; IPhC: inner phalangeal cells; OPC: outer pillar cells; IPC: inner pillar cells; HC: hair cells.
We were curious whether galectins were also expressed in P2 cochlear floor cells and analyzed the corresponding single-cell RNA sequencing data 9 (Figure S2 and Table S7). Overall, Lgals1 mRNA expression was more robust in organoids than in cochlear floor cells (Figure 3C). Within the cochlear floor, Lgals1 was more highly expressed in the GER, inner border cells, inner phalangeal cells, and glial cells, relative to the hair cells and the remaining supporting cell subtypes (Figure 3C). Lgals3 expression was low in the cochlear floor (Figure 3D). Myc mRNA was detectable in some P2 GER and cochlear floor cells (Figure 3E). In organoids, Myc expression was higher and most noticeable in day three organoids, especially in cluster 4 cells, which also displayed the highest levels of Lgals1 and Lgals3 mRNA (Figure 2A and C and Figure 3C-E).
To functionally characterize growth-promoting signals in GER-organoids at the onset of proliferation, we used inhibitors and activators targeting proteins encoded by the genes identified in Seurat clusters 4, 5, and 6 (Figure 2D). We used dissociated cochlear duct cells rather than FACS-purified GER cells because our previous work showed that within the cochlear duct, GER cells are the principal cell population capable of organoid formation in media supplemented with growth factors (epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1)), and the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) inhibitor CHIR99021 9. Moreover, FACS purification of GER cells from Sox2GFP/+; Fgfr3CreERT2/+; Ai14tdTomato/+ transgenic mice yields only enough cells to fill a few wells of a 96-well plate, which is insufficient for multi-condition pharmacological screening in organoids.
We selected the IGF-1 receptor inhibitor picropodophyllin 20 as a positive control to block IGF-1 and IGF-2 signaling. Igf2 was differentially expressed at the onset of proliferation (Figure 2D, Table S1), and IGF-1 is known to play a critical role in inner ear development and maintenance 21–24. Additionally, IGF-1 has been consistently used in otic organoid culture systems 5,25,26. We hypothesized that the picropodophyllin inhibition would block IGF-1 supplemented with the culture media, as well as IGF-2 produced by organoid cells at the onset of proliferation. As predicted, picropodophyllin substantially reduced organoid formation (Figure S3A).
Next, we targeted galectin-1 and galectin-3 with the selective inhibitors OTX008 and GB1107. Organoid numbers were significantly decreased at 40 µM and 5 µM with OTX008 and GB1107, respectively, while the organoid sizes decreased at 10 µM and 20 µM with the respective inhibitors (Figure 4A, B, D, and E). This indicates that although organoid formation is initiated at lower concentrations of OTX008 such as 10-30 µM, cell proliferation within the organoids is slowed, resulting in the smaller-sized organoids.

Inhibition of galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc reduces organoid growth.
(A, D, G) Dose-dependent inhibition of organoid formation by OTX008 (galectin-1 inhibitor) (A), GB1107 (galectin-3 inhibitor) (D), and 10058-F4 (Myc inhibitor) (G). Organoids generated from whole cochlear duct cells of P2 FVB/NJ mice after 7 days in culture in the presence of increasing inhibitor concentrations. Scale bar: 200 µm. (B, E, H) Organoid number (left) and size (right) quantification after 7 days in culture at serial concentrations of inhibitors (OTX008 (B), GB1107 (E), and 10058-F4 (H)). Organoids were centered in the field of view of an inverted microscope in 48-well plates, and quantification was performed using acquired images. For organoid number quantification, medians are shown as solid lines. For organoid size, medians and quartiles are shown as dotted lines. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, **** p <0.0001, ns: not significant. (C, F, I) Live cell quantification of organoids using a colorimetric viable cell mass assay after 7 days in culture. Shown are the means ± SD of N = 3-4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, **** p <0.0001, ns: not significant.
Because organoids vary in morphology from densely cellular to those with an internal acellular cavity, and they are not always spherically shaped, the organoid numbers and sizes do not necessarily reflect the resulting number of cells after proliferation. Therefore, to obtain more accurate and unbiased quantitative data, we performed a colorimetric assay (viable cell mass assay) that provides a relative readout of cell numbers in a well. The viable cell mass assay showed a dose-dependent decrease with both OTX008 and GB1107, with a significant effect observed at 10 µM for each (Figure 4C and F). Inhibition of Myc with 10058-F4 was modest yet clearly detectable in organoid size at 30 µM, while organoid number stayed consistent regardless of the drug concentration (Figure 4G and H). The viable cell mass assay showed a significant decrease at 30 µM (Figure 4I).
To confirm that these selective inhibitors affect GER cell-derived organoids, we also tested them with FACS-enriched GER cells. Organoid number dropped to zero at 20 µM, 10 µM, and 40 µM with OTX008, GB1107, and 10058-F4, respectively (Figure 5A). The viable cell mass assay showed a dose-dependent reduction in organoid growth, with significant inhibition at 5 µM for both OTX008 and GB1107, and at 40 µM with 10058-F4 (Figure 5B). This indicates that galectin and Myc signaling are essential for GER cells to proliferate and form organoids. A limitation of our pharmacological screening strategy is that not all signaling proteins identified by differential gene expression analysis have specific chemical compound modulators. We partially addressed this constraint with compounds that broadly inhibit signaling mediated through integrins. Our analysis identified a substantial number of genes encoding ECM components that directly interact with integrins, such as collagens (Col18a, Col1a, Col2a, Col5a, Col6a, Col9a), tenascin C (Tnc), laminin (Lamc2), urokinase receptor (Plaur), along with proteins that indirectly form complexes with integrins (Figure 2D, Table S2, and Table S3) 27–29. Integrins serve as linkers between the ECM and the cytoskeleton, interact with a wide range of proteins, and transduce signals into cells 28. We utilized three potent inhibitors (RGDS peptide, echistatin, and ATN-161) that target different sets of integrin heterodimer subunits; however, none of them significantly inhibited organoid growth (Figure S3B).

GER cell-derived organoid growth is strongly attenuated with inhibitors targeting galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc.
(A) Organoids generated from FACS-enriched GER cells after seven days in culture. Dose-dependent inhibition of organoid formation was observed with OTX008 (galectin-1 inhibitor), GB1107 (galectin-3 inhibitor), and 10058-F4 (Myc inhibitor). Scale bars: 200 µm. (B) Live cell quantification of organoid cells using a colorimetric viable cell mass assay after seven days in culture in increasing concentrations of OTX008, GB1107, and 10058-F4. Means ± SDs of N = 3-4 independent experiments are shown. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.1, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, **** p <0.0001, ns: not significant.
Based on the observed upregulation of penk, which encodes the preprotein for the endogenous opioid enkephalins (Figure 2D and Table S3), we tested enkephalins as potential activators. In addition, we applied Naltrexone as an opioid receptor antagonist 30. These modulators did not induce significant changes in organoid formation (Figure S3C).
Overall, our results specifically identify galectins 1 and 3 as essential signaling components at the onset of otic organoid proliferation, with Myc acting as either a directly linked or an independent effector of this signaling.
Overexpression of galectin-1 and Myc increases otic organoid growth
Next, to ask whether galectin-1, galectin-3, or Myc are sufficient to drive GER cell proliferation, we performed adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated overexpression of genes in cochlear duct cells isolated from P2 mice. We used dissociated cochlear duct cells for the assay rather than enriched GER cells because AAV infection prevented organoid formation from FACS-enriched GER cells, likely due to limited starting cell numbers, regardless of the encoded genes. We first assessed the ability of AAVs to transduce organoid cells using a control AAV serotype DJ encoding the EGFP reporter gene driven by the CAG promoter (AAV-EGFP, Figure S4A). At 3 days post-infection (3 dpi), organoids transduced with AAV-EGFP exhibited robust EGFP expression, while no EGFP expression was observed in uninfected negative controls (Figure S4B). We quantified the number of AAV-EGFP-transduced cells with detectable fluorescence through FACS analysis and determined that, on average, 84% of organoid cells expressed EGFP (Figure S4C).
For functional studies, we used AAVs encoding Lgals1 (AAV-lgals1), Lgals3 (AAV-lgals3), and Myc (AAV-myc) (Figure S4A). We chose a 9 dpi endpoint because AAV-mediated gene expression takes up to 48 hours, and seven additional days of organoid growth would provide sufficient time to compare growth differences (Figure 6A). To evaluate cell proliferation, we conducted quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Mki67 mRNA at 3, 5, 7, and 9 dpi. Both AAV-lgals1 and AAV-myc transduction resulted in increased mRNA levels of the proliferation marker Mki67, compared to AAV-EGFP control-transduced organoids. AAV-lgals1 induced a gradual increase in Mki67 over time, while AAV-myc transduction triggered a rapid and more pronounced rise in Mki67 mRNA levels at 3 dpi (Figure 6B). Consistent with increased Mki67, Lgals1 mRNA gradually increased in AAV-lgals1-transduced organoids and reached approximately 8-fold higher levels at 9 dpi, compared to AAV-EGFP-transduced organoids. Myc mRNA overexpression was effective at 3 dpi, reaching levels 15-fold higher, subsequently decreasing to approximately 10-fold at 5-9 dpi (Figure 6C). Overexpression of Lgals1 significantly increased organoid growth compared to the control, as quantified by the number of organoids and the viable cell mass assay at 9 dpi. While AAV-myc also increased organoid number, this was not statistically significant in the viable cell mass assay compared to the control (Figure 6D-F). This discrepancy is explained by a reduced proportion of live cells at 9 dpi, determined by FACS analysis (Figure 6G). These results indicated that Myc is a transient inducer of cochlear epithelial cell proliferation in culture, while prolonged overexpression leads to cell death. There was no significant change in the live cell proportion at 9 dpi in galectin-1-overexpressing organoids compared to the control, indicating that the increase in organoid growth results from enhanced cell proliferation (Figure 6G). Unlike galectin-1 and Myc, galectin-3 overexpression did not significantly affect organoid growth compared to the control (Figure 6H-J). Overall, our data showed that galectin-1 and Myc are both essential and sufficient for promoting GER cell proliferation and the growth of otic organoids.

AAV-mediated overexpression of galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc in organoids generated from neonatal cochlear duct cells.
(A) Schematic illustration of the organoid formation assay using dissociated P2 FVB/NJ mouse cochlear duct cells infected with AAVs for each gene of interest (AAV-GOI). Effective gene overexpression was presumed to start within two days post-infection (dpi), and cell proliferation was assessed at 9 dpi. (B) qPCR for Mki67 mRNA in organoids infected with AAV-lgals1 or AAV-myc, compared to organoids infected with AAV-EGFP. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, ***p <0.001, ****p <0.0001, ns: not significant. (C) mRNA expression changes for Lgals1 and Myc were quantified using qPCR in organoids infected with AAV-lgals1 (left) and AAV-myc (right) at 3, 5, 7, and 9 dpi, compared to organoids infected with AAV-EGFP for each respective time point. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, ns: not significant. (D) Cochlear duct cells were infected with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1, or AAV-myc at titers of 4×109 or 8×109 viral genomes per milliliter (vg/mL). AAV-lgals1 and AAV-myc visibly enhanced organoid formation compared to the control (AAV-EGFP) at both viral titers at 9 dpi. Scale bar: 200 µm. (E) Quantification of organoid number (left) and size (right) at 9 dpi following infection with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1, or AAV-myc at 4×109 or 8×109 vg/mL. Organoids were centered in the field of view of an inverted microscope in 48-well plates, and quantification was performed using acquired images. For organoid number quantification, medians are shown as solid lines. For organoid size, medians and quartiles are shown as dotted lines. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, **p <0.01, **** p <0.0001, ns: not significant. (F) Live cell quantification of the organoids using a colorimetric viable cell mass assay. Means ± SDs are shown. N = 8 and N = 4 for the experiments with 4×109 and 8×109 vg/mL viral titers. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, **p <0.01, ns: not significant. (G) FACS quantification of live cells in organoids at 9 dpi following infection with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1, or AAV-myc at 4×109 vg/mL. (Left three panels) Individual live cell populations lacking dead cell stain cells (detected in the allophycocyanin (APC) channel), are gated in dot plots. (Right top two panels) Cells from AAV-EGFP-and AAV-lgals1-infected organoids, as well as cells from AAV-EGFP-and AAV-myc-infected organoids, are overlaid to show the expression of EGFP and mCherry encoded in AAV-EGFP and AAV-myc, respectively. (Right bottom panel) Percentage of live cells in organoids at 9 dpi following infection with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1, or AAV-myc at 4×109 vg/mL. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. ***p <0.001, ns: not significant. (H) Cochlear duct cells were infected with AAV-EGFP or AAV-lgals3 at titers of 4×109 or 8×109 vg/mL. AAV-lgals3-infected organoids exhibited no significant difference in growth compared to the control (AAV-EGFP) at both viral titers at 9 dpi. Scale bar: 200 µm. (I) Quantification of organoid number (left) and size (right) at 9 dpi following infection with AAV-EGFP, or AAV-lgals3 at 4×109 or 8×109 vg/mL. Organoids were centered in the field of view of an inverted microscope in 48-well plates, and quantification was performed using acquired images. For organoid number quantification, medians are shown as solid lines. For organoid size, medians and quartiles are shown as dotted lines. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. ns: not significant. (J) Live cell quantification of organoids using a colorimetric viable cell mass assay. Means ± SDs of N = 3-4 experiments are shown. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed, unpaired t-test. ns: not significant.
Myc, but not galectin-1, promotes organoid growth from third-week cochlear cells
Otic organoid formation is a characteristic of the neonatal cochlea, particularly of GER cells, and is observed only before the onset of hearing in mice, which occurs around P12 31. Since AAV-mediated overexpression of Lgals1 and Myc mRNA enhanced organoid growth at P2, we next investigated whether overexpression of galectin-1 and Myc would stimulate organoid growth from post-neonatal (P14-P17) cochlear cells. To purify cochlear epithelial cells, we utilized the epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM, CD326), which is expressed in the cochlear floor and adjacent epithelia (Figure 7A). At this developmental stage, the GER has already regressed (Figure 7A), and active cell proliferation is absent, resulting in markedly reduced capacity for organoid formation 32. As antibodies to EpCAM have previously been used to enrich cochlear epithelial cells 33, we applied magnetic cell separation (MACS) with an anti-CD326 (EpCAM) antibody to isolate cells from P14-P17 mouse cochleae (Figure 7B).

Overexpression of galectin-1 and Myc in organoids generated from postnatal day 14-17 cochlear epithelial cells.
(A) (a1-3) Immunofluorescence detection of Myosin 7a (Myo7a) and CD326/EpCAM in a P14 FVB/NJ mouse cochlea vibratome section. Hair cells are labeled for Myosin 7a. CD326/EpCAM was detected in cochlear floor epithelial cells and the cells of the stria vascularis. The GER was absent at this more mature age. SV: stria vascularis; TM: tectorial membrane. Scale bar: 50 µm. (b1-4) Magnified images of the areas surrounded by the dotted boxes in a2 (b1,2) and a3 (b3,4). Scale bar: 25 µm. (B) Schematic illustration of the organoid formation assay timeline using dissociated P14-17 FVB/NJ mouse cochlear duct cells infected with AAVs for each gene of interest (AAV-GOI). CD326-positive epithelial cells were enriched by Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS). Organoids were infected with AAV-GOIs. Gene overexpression was presumed to start within two days post-infection, and cell proliferation was assessed at 9 dpi. (C) MACS-enriched CD326-positive cochlear cells were infected with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1, or AAV-myc at a titer of 4×109 vg/mL. AAV-myc infection visibly enhanced organoid formation, while AAV-lgals1-infected organoids exhibited no sifnificant difference in growth compared to the control (AAV-EGFP). Arrowheads: organoids. The cellular debris likely represents the remnants of cochlear cells that did not grow into organoids at 9 dpi. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Quantification of organoid number (left) and size (right) at 9 dpi following infection with AAV-EGFP, AAV-lgals1 or AAV-myc at 4×109 vg/mL. Organoids were centered in the field of view of an inverted microscope in 48-well plates, and quantification was performed using acquired images. For organoid number quantification, medians are shown as solid lines. For organoid size, medians and quartiles are shown as dotted lines. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *** p <0.001, **** p <0.0001, ns: not significant. (E) Live cell quantification of the organoids using a colorimetric viable cell mass assay. Means ± SDs of three experiments are shown. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in one-way ANOVA. *p <0.05, ns: not significant.
The purified cells were then transduced with AAVs for Lgals1 and Myc mRNA overexpression, as well as with a control virus (AAV-EGFP). Cells infected with AAV-lgals1 exhibited low levels of organoid formation that did not differ from the control. In contrast, cells infected with AAV-myc displayed significantly increased organoid formation, as reflected in the number, size, and live-cell mass (Figure 7C-E). These results suggest that galectin-1 alone primarily enhances cell proliferation of neonatal GER cells, whereas Myc can promote proliferation akin to P2 GER cells, resulting in organoid formation from P14-P17 cochlear epithelial cells.
Galectin-1 is upregulated in the GER after cochlear supporting cell ablation
To explore the in vivo relevance of our findings, we employed an Lgr5-DTR mouse model in which the diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor is driven by endogenous Leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) expression 34. Previous studies have demonstrated that intraperitoneal (IP) injection of DT in P1 mice induces Lgr5-driven cell ablation, resulting in the loss of inner phalangeal cells (IPhCs), inner border cells (IBCs), the third row of Deiters’ cells, and inner pillar cells at P4. Simultaneously, cell proliferation is most active at P4, mainly in the apical and middle turns, with robust cycling of cells observed in the lateral GER, followed by the emergence of new IPhCs at P7 8,35.
We investigated gene expression changes in GER cells after DT-mediated organ of Corti cell ablation at P1 by analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing data obtained from P4 Lgr5-DTR mice (damage model: Ki67CreERT2/+; Lgr5DTR/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+) and control mice (control: Ki67CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+) (Figure 8A) 8,34,35. Distinct cell clusters, including medial GER, lateral GER, IPhCs/IBCs, and proliferating cells, were identified based on the expression of specific known marker genes (Figure 8B, C, E, and Table S8). The cells expressing proliferation markers Mki67 or Top2a were almost exclusively detected in the damage model in cluster 8 (Figure 8B, C, E, F, arrows in E). This cluster was inferred to consist of lateral GER cells that entered the cell cycle in response to damage. As expected, we noted lower levels of Lgr5 mRNA in the damage model compared to the control (Figure 8D). Moreover, supporting cell markers that are also expressed in the lateral GER, such as Sox2, Jag1, and Fabp7 9,36, were downregulated in the damage model, while proliferation markers, including Cdk4 and Ccnd1 37, were upregulated (Figure 8H and Table S8) compared to the control. These observations confirmed that Lgr5-driven cell loss, along with active cell proliferation, occurs at P4 in the damaged cochleae. In the control mice, Lgals1 was highly expressed in the medial GER, and its expression was further increased in the damage model (Figure 8G, H, and Table S8). Myc expression was also upregulated in the medial GER in the damage model (Figure 8F, G, and Table S8). Upregulation of Galectin-1 protein was validated in Lgr5-DTR (Lgr5DTR/+) mice at P4 in the GER following DT treatment at P1, compared with controls (Figure 8I). Notably, there was prominent expansion of the galectin-1 expression domain from the medial to lateral GER in the damaged cochleae, accompanied by the loss of fatty acid binding protein 7 (Fabp7)-expressing cells, including IPhCs and IBCs, and the emergence of proliferating cells in lateral GER, marked by Ki67 (Figure 8I).

Galectin-1 upregulation in the GER in the Lgr5-DTR mouse damage model.
(A) Schematic illustration of the Lgr5-DTR mouse damage model. Intraperitoneal injection of diphtheria toxin (DT) in P1 mice induces Lgr5-driven cell ablation. Cell loss and concurrent cell proliferation in the lateral GER occur by P4. New IPhCs emerge by P7. (B) Seurat data analysis with 3,773 cells obtained from P4 Lgr5-DTR damage model mice (Ki67CreERT2/+; Lgr5DTR/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+) and control (Ki67CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+). Eight clusters representing medial GER (MGER), lateral GER (LGER), IPhCs (this cluster also includes IBCs), and proliferating cells (Prolif) are visualized in a UMAP projection. (C) UMAP visualization of the clusters split by damage and control mouse models. Cluster 8 (arrow) is predominantly composed of cells after damage. (D) Violin plot showing the downregulation of Lgr5 expression in the damage model compared to the control. (E) Marker gene expression in GER (Sparcl1 and Gsn), proliferating cells (Mki67 and Top2a), MGER (Calb1 and Epyc), LGER (Igfbp3 and Tsen15), and IPhC (Lfng and Fabp7), projected onto the UMAP plot. A Log2 expression scale is shown for each UMAP. (F) Volcano plot showing differential gene expression in cluster 8 (proliferating cells) compared to the remaining clusters. (G) Lgals1 (left) and Myc (right) expression, projected onto the UMAP plot, and visualized individually for the damage model and control cells. The arrow points to cells with high expression of Lgals1. (H) Differentially expressed genes were analyzed in cells from the damage model compared to the control, individually for MGER (clusters 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) (upper) and LGER (cluster 1) (lower) clusters. The fold change expression of selected genes is shown with lollipop plots for MGER and LGER clusters. (I) Immunohistology of P4 cochleae from control and Lgr5-DTR mice (Lgr5DTR/+) post-DT treatment revealed upregulation of galectin-1 in the medial and lateral GER. Proliferating cells labeled with Ki67 were observed in the lateral GER, accompanied by a loss of Fabp7-expressing cells (IPhC and IBC) along the apex-to-base gradient. Solid yellow arrows indicate the GER, while dotted yellow arrows mark areas with visible galectin-1 expression. IHC: inner hair cell; OHC: outer hair cell; IPhC: inner phalangeal cell; IBC: inner border cell. Scale bars: 20 µm.
In vivo inhibition of galectin-1 suppresses GER cell proliferation
To functionally investigate the role of galectin-1 in vivo during the regenerative proliferation of GER cells, we administered the inhibitor OTX008 (IP, 10 mg/kg) to Lgr5-DTR mice (Lgr5DTR/+) and controls at P2 and P3, following DT treatment at P1 (Figure 9A). Cochleae were harvested at P4, and cell loss was assessed by counting Fabp7-positive IPhCs and IBCs. DT-treated control cochleae exhibited an organized arrangement of Fabp7-positive cells, with no Ki67-labeled cells observed (Figures 9B, and S5A, B).

In vivo administration of the galectin-1 inhibitor OTX008 prevents GER cell proliferation.
(A) A schematic illustrating the DT and OTX008 treatment schedule in Lgr5-DTR (Lgr5DTR/+) and control mice. (B) Immunohistology of P4 cochleae obtained from control and Lgr5-DTR mice treated with DT at P1, representing intact and damage controls, respectively, and from control and Lgr5-DTR mice treated with OTX008 (10 mg/kg per injection) at P2 and P3. Stacked images of the apical turns of the cochleae are presented at three levels: IPhC apical membrane, IPhC nuclei, and GER (scale bars: 20 µm). In the IPhC nucleus-level images, magnified views of the IBC/IPhC nuclei are shown for the areas outlined by squares (scale bars: 10 µm). Fabp7-positive debris lacking nuclei, along with pyknotic cells, were observed in Lgr5-DTR cochleae treated with DT (damage control) or DT+OTX008. Asterisks indicate IPhCs and IBCs. Solid yellow arrows indicate the GER. (C) Quantification of Fabp7-positive and Ki67-positive cells in the apical, middle, and basal turns of the cochleae, corresponding to Figures 7B and S5A, B. **** p<0.0001, *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05, ns: not significant. (D) P4 cochleae obtained from control and Lgr5-DTR mice treated with DT at P1, followed by OTX008 (10 mg/kg per injection) only at P2. Stacked images of the apical turns of the cochleae are presented at three levels, as described in (B). Scale bars: 20 µm and 10 µm (magnified images). Fabp7-positive debris lacking nuclei, along with pyknotic cells, were observed in Lgr5-DTR cochleae treated with DT+OTX008 (P2). Asterisks indicate IPhCs and IBCs. Solid yellow arrows indicate GER. (E) Quantification of Fabp7-positive and Ki67-positive cells in the apical, middle, and basal turns of the cochleae, corresponding to Figures 7D and S6A, B. **** p<0.0001, *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05, ns: not significant.
In contrast, in DT-treated Lgr5-DTR cochleae, we observed a decrease of Fabp7-positive cells in the IPhC and IBC region together with a concomitant increase in Ki67-positive cells in the lateral GER along the apex-to-base gradient (Figures 9B, C, and S5A, B). Neither cell loss nor cell proliferation was noted in DT-treated control mice injected with OTX008, confirming that OTX008 itself does not affect quiescent cochlear cells (Figures 9B, C, and S5A, B). Lgr5-DTR mice treated with DT and OTX008 exhibited a significant decrease in Fabp7-positive cells in the apical and middle turns of the cochleae compared to controls. The inhibition of galectin-1 signaling resulted in a substantial and significant reduction of Ki67-positive cells, supporting the notion that galectin-1 is essential for GER cell proliferation (Figures 9B, C, and S5A, B).
It should be noted that OTX008 administration partially mitigated the Fabp7-positive cell loss compared to DT-treated Lgr5-DTR damage control, with the effect being more pronounced towards the basal turn. Because inhibition of galectin-1 was protective, this suggests that galectin-1 has pleiotropic effects and may contribute to cell loss after injury. Because it remained unclear whether the decrease in proliferating cells in the GER resulted from incomplete ablation or was a primary effect of galectin-1 inhibition by OTX008, we further investigated this by administering OTX008 (IP, 10 mg/kg) only at P2 in Lgr5-DTR mice after DT treatment at P1. Although the number of Fabp7-positive cells decreased to an equivalent level as the damage control, a significant reduction in Ki67-positive cells was observed in the GER, confirming galectin-1’s role in supporting cell proliferation (Figures 9D, E, and S6A, B). These findings demonstrate that galectin-1 plays a role in damage-induced cell proliferation in the GER, contributing to the replenishment of lost cells. Importantly, they also suggest that the cell proliferation mechanism in GER-derived organoids parallels the in vivo mechanism of GER proliferation.
Discussion
Certain tissues retain relatively high proliferative and regenerative capacity in neonatal stages in mammals, whereas this capacity is limited or absent in adults. These tissues include the heart, Achilles tendon, brain, spinal cord, and the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc, where extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal remodeling provide a microenvironment that supports regeneration 38,39. Cochlear epithelium is one such tissue: the GER (Kölliker’s organ), located adjacent to the modiolar edge of the organ of Corti is replaced by inner sulcus cells during the second and third weeks of postnatal cochlear maturation.
Several lines of evidence suggest that GER cells possess otic progenitor characteristics. First, ectopic expression of Atoh1 in neonatal cochlear explants robustly and specifically induces hair cell marker expression in the GER, both in vitro 40 and in vivo 1,41. Second, Sox2, an early marker of inner ear prosensory regions, is robustly expressed in the GER 42 (Figure 1A). Third, unlike other neonatal cochlear floor cells, which are mitotically quiescent, the GER dynamically replaces cells until the middle of the second postnatal week in mice, as revealed by thymidine analog labeling 43. Fourth, gene expression profiling suggests that conditionally immortalized cochlear cells likely originated from GER cells 44. Fifth, when supporting cells surrounding inner hair cells were specifically ablated in neonatal mice, the neighboring GER cells replaced the lost cells 7,35. This replacement can also involve S-phase reentry and is accompanied by changes in gene expression following damage in the neighboring organ of Corti (Figure 8) 8. Finally, purified GER cells can give rise to proliferating otic progenitors that generate otic organoids (Figure 1C) 9,45. Together, these findings raise the possibility that regenerative mechanisms present in the neonatal GER may be reactivated in adult tissues to rekindle regenerative capacity.
To characterize the proliferative mechanisms of GER cells as a framework for future reprogramming of adult cochlear cells for hair cell regeneration, the first step of this study was to systematically define the gene expression profile of organoids at various stages of organoid formation. Our single-cell RNA-sequencing data obtained from GER-derived organoids revealed that Lgals1 mRNA is highly enriched, while Lgals3 and Myc mRNA are distinctly expressed during organoid formation at the onset of cell proliferation (Figure 3C-E).
Galectins are a family of proteins that bind to the β-galactoside-containing side chains of glycosylated proteins. They participate in diverse biological processes by mediating cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and can initiate intracellular signaling 19. Galectins 1 and 3 have been implicated in cancer progression 46,47, which has motivated the recent application of the small-molecule inhibitors used in our screen (OTX008 and GB1107) as promising drug candidates for cancer and fibrosis treatments 48. In the inner ear, the role of galectin-1 is largely unexplored, aside from its reported expression in the inner and outer sulcus of the mature mouse cochlea 2. Myc, a multifunctional transcription factor and oncoprotein, along with Notch, has recently been shown to enable cell cycle entry in various mature cochlear floor cell types, including hair cells and supporting cells 4.
Galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc inhibition dose-dependently suppressed organoid growth and formation (Figures 4 and Figure 5). The overexpression of galectin-1 and Myc, but not galectin-3, augmented organoid formation and cell growth (Figure 6). These observations led us to conclude that galectin-1 and Myc are necessary and sufficient drivers of organoid cell proliferation, although galectin-3 remains essential for organoid formation. Cochlear epithelial cells lose the ability to enter the cell cycle and form organoids following the onset of hearing in mice, around postnatal day 12 32. Our finding that purified P14-17 cochlear epithelial cells can form organoids in response to Myc overexpression, but not galectin-1 (Figure 7C-E), demonstrates that selected genes from our organoid data can induce proliferation in adult supporting cells. Prior studies showed that Myc can induce proliferation of adult cochlear supporting cells and hair cell regeneration in vivo 4. The identification of Myc in our GER-derived organoid single-cell RNA sequencing dataset, together with the increased cell proliferation in organoids grown from P14-P17 cochlear epithelium cells, provides proof of concept that GER-derived mechanisms can be leveraged to discover factors that promote cochlear hair cell regeneration in adult tissue. Because our organoid dataset is generated exclusively from GER cells, it provides a high-yield set of candidate genes that could drive a “GER-like” conversion of adult supporting cells for further exploration.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that changes in gene expression during organoid growth mirror the GER cell response to a proliferative stimulus in vivo (Figure 8). Specifically, galectin-1 was associated with this process, as indicated by its upregulation in the GER during cell proliferation in an Lgr5-DTR cell ablation model. Inhibition of galectin-1 resulted in a reduction in the number of cycling cells within the GER (Figure 9), confirming its crucial role in GER cell proliferation: we propose that galectin-1-mediated cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions are likely key initiators of GER proliferation, as predicted by our organoid model, where direct cell-cell contact plays a critical role in driving this process 9. Together, the alignment between our organoid and in vivo findings provides strong support for our strategy of utilizing organoid-based transcriptomic data to identify candidate genes required for cochlear epithelial cell regeneration in vivo.
In conclusion, this study identified galectin-1, galectin-3, and Myc as essential regulators of inner ear organoid growth, through generating organoids from purified GER cells, integrating single-cell RNA sequencing and functionally testing signaling pathways identified in proliferating organoid cells. Both galectin-1 and Myc effectively enhanced organoid growth. We then demonstrated the in vivo relevance of our organoid model and established it as a platform for identifying key effectors that enable the regeneration of cochlear epithelial cells.
Materials and methods
Experimental Model and Study Participant Details
All animal care and procedures complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. Animal procedures were approved by Stanford University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted per the NIH criteria described in ‘The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’.
Cell Isolation
Neonatal cochlea
Temporal bones were removed from P2-4 mice, cochlear ducts were dissected, and the spiral ligament and stria vascularis were removed from each specimen. The tissues were rinsed twice with potassium-and magnesium-free PBS and incubated in a drop of 50 µL PBS mixed with 50 µL 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 10 min in a suspension culture dish (Greiner Bio-One). After adding 50 µL DMEM/F12 and 50 µL of a DMEM/F12-based mixture of soybean trypsin inhibitor (20 mg/mL) (Gibco) and DNAseI (2 mg/mL) (Stemcell Technologies), the cochlear duct tissue was mechanically dissociated with a pipette and passed through a 70 µm strainer to remove aggregates. The cells were subsequently passed through a 35 µm strainer for flow cytometric analysis and sorting.
P14-P17 cochlea
The cochleae were separated from the vestibular compartments, and the apex bone was removed from each specimen. Ten cochleae were collected into HBSS on ice, transferred to 700 μL thermolysin (0.5 mg/ml in DMEM), and gently vortexed at low speed, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 10 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 300 x g for 1 min, and the supernatant was removed. 700 μL Accutase was added, and the sample was gently mixed by vortexing at low speed, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 2 h. The sample was centrifuged at 300 x g for 1 min and the supernatant was removed. After washing once with PBS, 500 μL PBS was added, and the cells were mechanically dissociated by triturating with a low-retention 1000 μL pipette tip. Following centrifugation at 300 x g for 5 min and the removal of the supernatant, the cells were resuspended in MACS buffer (1:20 mixture of MACS BSA Stock Solution, Miltenyi Biotec / autoMACS Rinsing Solution, Miltenyi Biotec), and filtered with a 30 μm MACS SmartStrainer (Miltenyi Biotec) to remove bony fragments and aggregates. The cells were then subjected to magnetic cell separation.
Flow Cytometry
Sorting
Dissociated cochlear duct cells were collected in a round-bottom tube and washed twice with phenol red-free DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco). For each wash, the cells were pelleted at 300 x g for 5 min and gently resuspended in medium. Sorting was performed on a BD ARIA II SORP flow cytometer using previously established procedures 9,13. Briefly, debris and doublets were excluded based on scatter and singlet parameters, respectively, and dead cells were eliminated using the CYTOX Red cell viability marker (Invitrogen). A double-positive cell population for GFP and tdTomato reporter fluorescence was sorted from Fgfr3-tdTomato/Sox2-GFP mouse cochlear cells to collect GER cells for further culture (Figure 1B, Figure 5).
Analysis
Organoids were washed twice with potassium and magnesium-free PBS and incubated in a drop of 50 µL PBS mixed with 50 µL 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 10 min in a suspension culture dish (Greiner-bio-one). After adding 25 µL soybean trypsin inhibitor (40 mg/mL) (Gibco) and 75 µL DMEM/F12, the organoids were mechanically dissociated with a pipette. For the analysis described in Figure S4C, the cells were passed through a 35 µm strainer to remove aggregates and processed using flow cytometry with the parameters described above to quantitatively assess the GFP-positive cell population. For the analysis described in Figure 6G, dissociated organoid cells were incubated with Far Red Dead Cell Stain (Invitrogen) for 30 min at room temperature under light-protection, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. After each incubation step, cells were washed once with PBS and centrifuged at 300 x g for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed. Cells were then passed through a 35 µm strainer and subjected to debris and doublet discrimination by flow cytometry. The fluorescence of Far Red Dead Cell Stain was used to determine the proportion of dead and live cells.
Organoid Culture
Cell seeding densities were kept consistent across experiments; Dissociated cochlear duct cells were seeded at 1.1 x 104 cells per cm2 surface area (Figure 4A, D, and G; Figure 6, Figure 7C; Figure S3; Figure S4B). FACS-enriched GER cells were seeded at 2,000 cells per well in 96-well plates (Figure 1C; Figure 5).
To grow GER-organoids for single-cell RNA sequencing (Figure 1B), enriched GER cells were sorted into a 96-well suspension culture dish at 2000 cells/well filled with 200 µL/well maintenance medium. The maintenance medium consisted of DMEM/F-12 (Gibco) with 1x N-2 Supplement (Gibco), 1x B-27 Supplement (Gibco), and 100 µg/mL ampicillin.
Growth factors (20 ng/mL EGF, 10 ng/mL FGF2, and 50 ng/mL IGF1) and small molecules (3µM CHIR99021, 500 µM valproic acid, 100 µg/mL 2-phospho-L-ascorbic acid, and 2 µM TGFß receptor inhibitor 616452) were added 5,13. The cells were incubated for up to 7 days to allow organoid formation at 37°C and 5% CO2. Half of the medium was changed every other day. To grow organoids for the evaluation of proliferation (Figure 4A, D, and G, Figures S3A-C, Figure S4B, Figure 6, and Figure 7B, C) and immunohistochemistry (Figure 3A and B), dissociated cochlear duct cells were seeded in suspension culture dishes at 1.1 x 104 cells per cm2 surface area in maintenance medium containing growth factors (20 ng/mL EGF, 10 ng/mL FGF2, and 50 ng/mL IGF1) and 3µM CHIR99021. The cells were cultured for 3 days (immunohistochemistry) or 7 days (evaluation of proliferation) at 37°C and 5% CO2. The same media composition was used for FACS-enriched GER cells (Figure 5). Here, the cells were seeded into a 96-well suspension culture dish at 2000 cells/ well filled with 200 µL medium and cultured for 7 days at 37°C and 5% CO2 to evaluate proliferation. Organoid number and size were quantified using images captured under an inverted microscope by measuring organoids collected at the center of the field of view in individual wells of 48-well plates (Figure 4B, E, and H, Figure 6E and I, Figure 7D).
Single-Cell Collection from GER-Derived Organoids (Figure 1C)
Organoids, harvested at culture days 1, 3, and 7, were individually collected with a small amount of medium with a low retention pipette into a well of a suspension culture dish (Greiner-bio-one) using an inverted microscope. The organoids were sequentially rinsed by transferring them into a 100 µL drop and then into a 50 µL drop of potassium and magnesium-free PBS. 50 µL of 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) was added, and the samples were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 10-20 min. Subsequently, 25 µL of soybean trypsin inhibitor (40 mg/mL) (Gibco) and 75 µL of DMEM/F12 were added. The organoids were mechanically dissociated with a 200 µL low-retention pipette tip. The dissociated cells were transferred into a 1.5 mL low-adhesion tube and washed twice with DMEM/F12. Each wash was performed by centrifuging at 300 x g for 10 min and removing the supernatant. The dissociated cells were then transferred into a 500 µL drop of DMEM/F12 prepared in a cell-repellent culture dish (Greiner-bio-one, #628979) to prevent cell adhesion to plastic and minimize cell damage.
A micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument) was used to generate a 50-60 µm diameter glass micropipette from a glass capillary (World Precision Instruments). The micropipette was attached to the micropipette holder (Sutter Instrument) and connected with a clear plastic tube. Using an inverted microscope for visualization, single cells were aspirated into the glass capillary along with less than 0.5 µL of the medium. Each aspirated cell was individually released into a well of 96-well plates pre-filled with 4 µL lysis buffer (2U/μL RNase inhibitor, 0.2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 2.5μM modified Oligo-dT primer (5’-AAG CAG TGG TAT CAA CGC AGA GTA CTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TVN - 3’). After collecting the cells, 96-well plates were immediately placed into a box filled with dried ice and then stored at-80°C.
Single-Cell RNA-seq Library Preparation and Sequencing for GER-derived Organoid Cells
Library preparation and sequencing were conducted at the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility. Reverse transcription was performed with SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Clontech), followed by cDNA synthesis as described in the Smart-seq2 protocol 15. Synthesized cDNA was purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), quantified, and assessed for size distribution using the HS NGS Fragment Kit (1-6000bp) (Agilent) on a fragment analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies). The samples were concentration-normalized and tagmented using the Nextra XT (Illumina) sample preparation system, which adds cell-specific barcodes to the fragments. After PCR amplification and purification with AMPure XP beads, the cDNA library was quality-assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500 using a high-output flow cell configuration with paired-end sequencing of 150 bp.
Sequencing Data Processing for GER-derived Organoid Cells
The sequenced reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome release GRCm38/mm10 and the GENCODE annotation vM17 using custom scripts on the Sherlock Supercomputer Cluster (Stanford). The STAR aligner was used to map the raw sequencing reads, followed by RSEM for transcript quantification. Count matrices were loaded into R and processed with Seurat package version 5.0.1 16. A total of 768 cells were sequenced from two batches of sequencing plates (384 cells x2 batches). Both datasets yielded 52,640 features each after removal of spike-in control RNAs (ERCCs). Features expressed in fewer than four cells were removed, leaving 18,952 and 17,426 genes, respectively, in these datasets. Cell-level quality control was performed by filtering out cells with fewer than 200 unique genes (nFeature_RNA >200) and cells with over 10% mitochondrial counts (percent.mt <10). The data was normalized with the scTransform function followed by integration in Seurat. The integrated dataset contained 658 cells and 18,587 features, which were clustered into 7 groups and visualized in a UMAP (Figure 2A). The CellTrails package (version 1.16.0) 49 was used to analyze the same datasets for quality control and normalization. The resulting dataset, comprising 646 cells and 23,473 features, yielded 13 clusters and was visualized using SWNE plots 18 (Figure S1). Transcription factors were identified using the AnimalTFDB 4.0 database 50 (Table S1, S3, S4, and S5).
Single-Cell Collection, Single-Cell RNA-seq Library Preparation and Sequencing, and Data Processing for Lgr5-DTR and Control Cochlear Cells (Figure 8A-H)
Cochlear sensory epithelia from P4 Ki67CreERT2/+; Lgr5DTR/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ (damage) and Ki67CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ (control) mice were dissected and dissociated as previously described 51. Briefly, whole cochleae were dissected into ice-cold HBSS before incubation in 0.5 mg/mL Thermolysin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 45 minutes. Tissues were then transferred to 300 µL Accutase and incubated for an additional 20 minutes at 37°C. After incubation, 300 µL of DMEM/F12 with 5% fetal bovine serum was added, and the tissue was dissociated into a single-cell suspension by 60x trituration at a 500 µL volume using a 1000 µL pipette tip. Remaining aggregates were removed by filtering the cells through a 40 µm mini strainer (pluriSelect) and cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 60 µL DMEM/F12 with 5% FBS and assessed for concentration and viability before capture using the 10x Genomics Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagents v3.1 kit (10x Genomics) at the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility. Resulting single-cell libraries were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) using a 150bp paired-end read configuration.
Reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome mm39 with appended genome for the TdTomato-WPRE sequence using 10x Genomics Cell Ranger v6.0.0 with default parameters 52. Filtered digital gene expression matrices were used for downstream data analysis using Seurat v5.1.0 53. Briefly, cell profiles were filtered based on the capture of sufficient unique counts and features, as well as a maximum of 10% mitochondrial gene content, and cell doublets were removed using DoubletFinder. Cell profiles from damage and control conditions were integrated using Harmony 54 and cells of interest were isolated based on the expression of known epithelial, IPhC and GER markers. Data are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, accession number GSE291228).
Immunohistochemistry
Organoid (Figure 3A and B)
Organoids were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and washed three times for 10 min with PBS. The organoids were then permeabilized in 0.1% (w/v) TritonX-100 in PBS for 30 min, and blocked with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated donkey serum, 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (w/v) TritonX-100, and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The organoids were then transferred from the plastic dish to a glass-bottom dish (Lab-Tek Chamber Slide, Thermo Fisher Scientific), which prevents permanent adhesion of the organoids to the dish’s bottom. The organoids were incubated with the primary antibodies in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. The organoids were then washed three times for 15 min with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies and DAPI at room temperature for 1 h in a buffer containing 0.1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (w/v) TritonX-100, and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3 in PBS. After washing three times for 10 min in PBS, the organoids were transferred to a glass slide with a spacer (Secure-Seal Spacer, Invitrogen), sealed with ProLong Diamond Antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen), and a coverslip.
P14-P17 cochlea (Figure 7A)
The inner ear was dissected from P14-17 FVB/NJ mice and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h. After three 15 min washes with PBS, the tissue was incubated in 0.5% EDTA, pH 8.0 overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation for decalcification. Tissues were then embedded in 4% Low Melt Agarose (Bio-Rad) at 65°C in dH2O. The tissue blocks were cooled until the agarose solidified, and 100 μm sections were cut using a vibratome (VT100S, Leica). Permeabilization, blocking, immunostaining, and mounting were performed as described above.
Whole cochlear duct (Figures 8I, Figure 9, Figure S5, Figure S6)
The temporal bones were dissected from P4 mice and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation. After washing with PBS three times for 15 min, cochlear ducts were dissected and attached to 10 mm coverslips with Cell-Tak (Corning). Permeabilization, blocking, and immunostaining were performed as described above. Each tissue-mounted coverslip was placed onto a glass slide, and sealed with ProLong Diamond Antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen) and another coverslip.
Confocal Microscopy
Cochlear sections and organoids were imaged with an LSM880 confocal laser scanning microscope (ZEISS) and processed with ZEN (ZEISS) and Fiji software.
Viable Cell Mass Assay
The CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay System (Promega) was used to compare cell mass increases in organoid cultures. 20 μL of CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution reagent was added per 100 μL of culture medium and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a plate reader (Infinite M1000, Tecan). At least three independent experiments were conducted (Figure 4C, F, and I, Figure 5B, Figure 6F and J, Figure 7E).
Magnetic Cell Separation
The dissociated and filtered cells were washed with 1 mL MACS buffer (1:20 mixture of MACS BSA Stock Solution, Miltenyi Biotec/ autoMACS Rinsing Solution, Miltenyi Biotec), and filtered with a 30μm MACS SmartStrainer (Miltenyi Biotec), followed by centrifuging at 300 x g for 10 min and the removal of supernatant. The cells were resuspended in 90 μL MACS buffer and incubated with 10 μL CD326 (EpCAM) MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec) at 4 °C for 15 min. The cells were washed with 2 mL MACS buffer, centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min, and resuspended in 500 μL MACS buffer. The cells were applied to an MS Separation column (Miltenyi Biotec), pre-equilibrated with 3 mL MACS buffer, and placed into the MACS Separator (Miltenyi Biotec). The column was washed 3 times with 3 mL MACS buffer each. The column was taken out from the separator, and the enriched CD326-positive cells in the column were flushed with 3 mL MACS buffer into a 15 mL conical tube. After centrifugation at 300 x g for 3 min, the supernatant was removed. The cells were washed with 1 mL DMEM/F12 and centrifuged at 300 x g for 3 min. The cells were resuspended in the maintenance medium for culture (Figure 7B and C).
qPCR
The medium was removed from the organoids grown in 12-well suspension culture dishes, and the organoids were dissolved in 100 μL TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) per well. An additional 100 μL of 100% ethanol was added to each well, then mixed with the sample solution. The samples were loaded onto Direct-zol RNA Miniprep (Zumo Research) columns, and RNA extraction was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). All cDNA synthesized from 10 ng RNA was used in a single qPCR amplification session using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (2X) (Thermo Scientific) and the CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) (Figure 6B and C).
AAV-Vector Generation and Virus Production
The plasmid pAAV-CAG-EBFP2-P2A-EGFP (Addgene) was used as the backbone of AAV vector constructs. The control EGFP-and lgals1-encoding plasmids were produced using restriction digestion and ligation by replacing the EBFP2-P2A-EGFP sequence individually with PCR-amplified EGFP or lgals1 sequences. Similarly, lgals3-and myc-encoding plasmids were produced by replacing the EBFP sequence with lgals3 or myc. EGFP was further replaced with the mCherry sequence in the myc-encoding plasmid (Figure S4A). Lgals1, lgals3, and myc cDNA were generated from total RNA, extracted with the Direct-zol RNA Miniprep kit (Zumo Research) from organoids grown from whole cochlear duct cells of FVB/NJ mice. Reverse transcription utilized the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen), and was followed by PCR with specific primers for lgals1, lgals3, and myc. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis, followed by DNA purification, restriction digestion, and subcloning. The resulting plasmids were sequenced to confirm correct cDNA inserts (GENEWIZ). Plasmids were purified from XL10-Gold E. coli (Agilent Technologies) with EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kits (Qiagen) for viral production. Viral production involved transfecting HEK293 cells with the individual plasmids, a helper plasmid, and the Rep/Cap plasmid encoding serotype DJ protein. Viral production and purification were conducted by Stanford University’s Gene Vector and Virus Core facility.
In vivo mouse models
For single-cell RNA sequencing (Figure 8A-H), Ki67CreERT2/+; Lgr5DTR/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ (damage) and Ki67CreERT2/+; Rosa26RtdTomato/+ (control) mice were used. Diphtheria toxin (DT) dissolved in saline (4 ng/g) was administered intraperitoneally (IP) at P1. For Cre recombination, tamoxifen dissolved in corn oil (0.25 mg/g) was administered at P3, the time point of peak proliferation post-damage 35. Cochlear sensory epithelia were dissected at P4. For OTX008 treatment (Figures 8I, Figure 9, Figure S5, Figure S6), Lgr5DTR/+ (damage) and control mice were used. After DT administration at P1, OTX008 (MedChemExpress) dissolved in 10% ethanol and 90% saline was administered intraperitoneally at P2 and P3 (10 mg /kg each time), or only at P2 (10 mg /kg), and cochlear sensory epithelia were dissected at P4.
Quantification and Statistical Analysis
Statistical details for individual experiments are provided in the figure legends. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.2.0 and GraphPad Prism version 10.2.2.
Data availability
All sequencing datasets generated in this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession numbers GSE326100 and GSE291228. The data are also accessible at gEAR, a gene Expression Analysis Resource (https://umgear.org/) 55. Further information and requests for reagents may be directed to the Lead Contact, Stefan Heller (hellers@stanford.edu). Single-cell RNA sequencing data were analyzed using R (v4.5.0) with publicly available R packages, following existing vignettes and code. No custom code was generated in this study. Details of the R packages and software used are provided in the Materials and methods.
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Sim and M.C. Yee for their invaluable support with single-cell sequencing, and the current and previous members of the Heller laboratory for their helpful discussions and manuscript review. We are grateful to the FACS Core of the Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and the Gene Vector and Virus Core of Stanford University. We thank Stanford Functional Genomics Facility, which is supported by NIH grants S10OD018220 and 1S10OD021763, as well as the OHNS microscopy core facility, for their assistance with imaging. M.K. was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health R21DC020271, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, and the Soda Toyoji Memorial Foundation. We also acknowledge the generous support of the Hearing Restoration Project Consortium of the Hearing Health Foundation, the Stanford Initiative to Cure Hearing Loss, and the National Institutes of Health grants R21DC019910 (S.H), R01DC021110 and R01DC016919 (A.G.C.), K08DC019683 and R21DC022058 (T.A.J).
Additional information
Author contributions
Conceptualization, MK and SH; methodology, MK, TAJ; formal analysis, MK; investigation, MK, PKL, SBB, TAJ, MSM, JMA, AGC, SH; visualization, MK, MSM; funding acquisition, MK, TAJ, SH, AGC; project administration, MK, SH; supervision, MK, SH; writing – original draft, MK, PKL, SH; writing – review & editing, MK, SH, TAJ, AGC, JMA.
Funding
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21DC020271)
Marie Kubota
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21DC019910)
Stefan Heller
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC021110)
Alan Cheng
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC016919)
Alan Cheng
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (K08DC019683)
Taha A Jan
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21DC022058)
Taha A Jan
Additional files
Table S1. Marker genes for clusters 1-7 in GER-derived organoids.
Table S2. Ingenuity pathway analysis results – top 10 pathways.
Table S3. Differentially expressed genes at the onset of proliferation.
Table S4. Marker genes for CellTrails clusters in GER-derived organoids.
Table S5. Differentially expressed genes at the onset of proliferation for CellTrails analysis.
Table S6. Ingenuity pathway analysis results for CellTrails analysis – top 10 pathways.
Table S7. Differentially expressed genes in organ of Corti cells.
Table S8. Differentially expressed genes in in vivo damage model (Lgr5-DTR) and control.
References
- 1Cellular reprogramming with ATOH1, GFI1, and POU4F3 implicate epigenetic changes and cell-cell signaling as obstacles to hair cell regeneration in mature mammalseLife 11https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79712PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2Expression of Atoh1, Gfi1, and Pou4f3 in the mature cochlea reprograms nonsensory cells into hair cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121:e2304680121https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304680121PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3Reprogramming by drug-like molecules leads to regeneration of cochlear hair cell-like cells in adult miceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120:e2215253120https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215253120PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4Renewed proliferation in adult mouse cochlea and regeneration of hair cellsNature communications 10https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13157-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5Clonal Expansion of Lgr5-Positive Cells from Mammalian Cochlea and High-Purity Generation of Sensory Hair CellsCell reports 18:1917–1929https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.066PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6Eya1-Six1 interaction is sufficient to induce hair cell fate in the cochlea by activating Atoh1 expression in cooperation with Sox2Dev Cell 22:377–390https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.006PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7Spontaneous regeneration of cochlear supporting cells after neonatal ablation ensures hearing in the adult mouseProc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:16919–16924https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408064111PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8Lineage-tracing and translatomic analysis of damage-inducible mitotic cochlear progenitors identifies candidate genes regulating regenerationPLoS Biol 19:e3001445https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001445PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9Greater epithelial ridge cells are the principal organoid-forming progenitors of the mouse cochleaCell reports 34https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108646PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10Pseudo-Temporal Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Trans-Differentiation Potential of Greater Epithelial Ridge Cells Into Hair Cells During Postnatal Development of Cochlea in RatsFront Mol Neurosci 15https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.832813PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11Development of the cochleaDevelopment 147https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.162263PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12Dual mechanisms of supporting cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochleaiScience 29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115113PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13Murine cochlear cell sorting and cell-type-specific organoid cultureSTAR Protoc 2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100645PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14Quantitative High-Resolution Cellular Map of the Organ of CortiCell reports 11:1385–1399https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.062PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2Nat Protoc 9:171–181https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.006PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysisNat Biotechnol 42:293–304https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01767-yPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway AnalysisBioinformatics 30:523–530https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18Visualizing and Interpreting Single-Cell Gene Expression Datasets with Similarity Weighted Nonnegative EmbeddingCell Syst 7:656–666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.10.015PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19Essentials of Glycobiology
- Varki A
- et al.
- 20Picropodophyllin induces downregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor: potential mechanistic involvement of Mdm2 and beta-arrestin1Oncogene 27:1629–1638https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210797PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21Application of insulin-like growth factor-1 in the treatment of inner ear disordersFront Pharmacol 5https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00208PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22Insulin-like growth factor-I regulates cell proliferation in the developing inner ear, activating glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and Fos expressionEndocrinology 136:3494–3503https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.136.8.7628386PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23Early development of the vertebrate inner earAnat Rec 295:1775–1790https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22575PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Signaling in Mammalian HearingGenes 12https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101553PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25Pluripotent stem cells from the adult mouse inner earNature medicine 9:1293–1299https://doi.org/10.1038/nm925PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26Stem/progenitor cells derived from the cochlear sensory epithelium give rise to spheres with distinct morphologies and featuresJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO 10:173–190https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-009-0161-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27Integrin ligands at a glanceJ Cell Sci 119:3901–3903https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03098PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapySignal Transduct Target Ther 8https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01259-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29Regulation of integrin function by the urokinase receptorScience 273:1551–1555https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5281.1551PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30The role of enkephalinergic systems in substance use disordersFront Syst Neurosci 16https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.932546PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31Early postnatal development of spontaneous and acoustically evoked discharge activity of principal cells of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: an in vivo study in miceJ Neurosci 29:9510–9520https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1377-09.2009PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32Differential distribution of stem cells in the auditory and vestibular organs of the inner earJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO 8:18–31https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-006-0058-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33Molecular characterization and prospective isolation of human fetal cochlear hair cell progenitorsNat Commun 9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06334-7PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensableNature 478:255–259https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10408PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35Dual mechanisms of supporting cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochleaiScience 29:115113https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115113PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36Characterization of the development of the mouse cochlear epithelium at the single cell levelNature communications 11https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16113-yPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37Common markers of proliferationNature reviews. Cancer 6:99–106https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1802PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissuesDevelopment 149https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.199819PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39The local microenvironment limits the regenerative potential of the mouse neonatal heartSci Adv 4:eaao5553https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao5553PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner earsNature neuroscience 3:580–586https://doi.org/10.1038/75753PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41Functional auditory hair cells produced in the mammalian cochlea by in utero gene transferNature 455:537–541https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07265PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42Sox2 signaling in prosensory domain specification and subsequent hair cell differentiation in the developing cochleaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:18396–18401https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808175105PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43Mitosis and apoptosis in postnatal auditory system of the C3H/He strainBrain Res 901:296–302https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02300-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44Transcript profiling of functionally related groups of genes during conditional differentiation of a mammalian cochlear hair cell lineGenome Res 12:1091–1099https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.225602PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45Isolation, growth and differentiation of hair cell progenitors from the newborn rat cochlear greater epithelial ridgeJ Neurosci Methods 164:271–279https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.009PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46The Role of Galectin-1 in Cancer Progression, and Synthetic Multivalent Systems for the Study of Galectin-1Int J Mol Sci 17https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091566PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47Galectin-3 and cancer stemnessGlycobiology 28:172–181https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwy001PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48Targeting galectin-driven regulatory circuits in cancer and fibrosisNat Rev Drug Discov 22:295–316https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00636-2PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49Transcriptional Dynamics of Hair-Bundle Morphogenesis Revealed with CellTrailsCell reports 23:2901–2914https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.002PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50AnimalTFDB 4.0: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database updated with variation and expression annotationsNucleic Acids Res 51:D39–D45https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac907PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51Single-cell transcriptomic atlas reveals increased regeneration in diseased human inner ear balance organsNat Commun 15https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48491-yPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cellsNat Commun 8https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell dataCell 184:3573–3587https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with HarmonyNat Methods 16:1289–1296https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55gEAR: Gene Expression Analysis Resource portal for community-driven, multi-omic data explorationNat Methods 18:843–844https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01200-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
Article and author information
Author information
Version history
- Sent for peer review:
- Preprint posted:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
Cite all versions
You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.111365. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.
Copyright
© 2026, Kubota et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
- views
- 0
- downloads
- 0
- citations
- 0
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.