Adolescent length growth spurts in bonobos and other primates: Mind the scale

  1. Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, 1160 Austria
  2. Behavioral Ecology and Ecophysiology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2160 Belgium
  3. Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2018 Belgium
  4. SALTO Agro- and Biotechnology, Odisee University College, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
  5. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103 Germany
  6. Comparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 49090 Germany
  7. Endocrinology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, 37077 Germany

Peer review process

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.

Read more about eLife’s peer review process.

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    George Perry
    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States of America
  • Senior Editor
    George Perry
    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States of America

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript provides analyses on a very complete dataset on weight and length growth, as well as several physiological markers related to growth, in bonobos. Moreover, there is a good overview of the presence of adolescent growth spurts in non-human primates, by reviewing published data, in comparison to their own dataset. They discuss the need to consider scaling laws when interpreting and comparing growth curves of different species and variables.

The manuscript is very well written, the sample is large, and the methods are well explained. It seems they have analyzed a very complete dataset. Also, the discussion and the references supporting the findings are complete.

The main weakness of this manuscript is that they do not provide a direct comparison with previous analyzed datasets in other species, using their own method (in part maybe because there is not available data, but just published figures).

On the other side, conclusions are well supported by the results, and the previous published datasets are discussed in the manuscript, although not in detail.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This work sheds new light on the growth trajectory of Bonobo and contributes heavily to the discussion of the exclusivity of certain aspects of growth in modern humans. These results are also interesting as long as they are based on the study of the largest sample ever considered in the study of the growth of this species by including morphometric measurements as well as endocrinological factors.

The authors approach the study of the presence of growth spurs (GS) in Bonobo on the basis that GS are exclusive to the growth in modern humans. This idea is fairly widespread, however studies on non-human primates have shown an acceleration of growth during adolescence in several species, these works are recalled, presented and discussed by the authors. The originality of this work lies in highlighting the importance of scaling in studies of growth trajectories. The absence of GS in Bonobo but also in other primate species may result from not considering the conjunction of weight and height in the analysis of growth, because the pronounced changes in the speed of the height are in relation to the speed of changes in weight and this is modified according to the size/age. The authors apply scaling corrections to their results and the GS become evident (or more obvious) in Bonobo. Thus, the exclusivity of GS in growth in modern humans may in fact result only by the application of analytical approach not very appropriate in non-human primates.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation