Introduction

Buruli ulcer (BU) is a neglected tropical disease caused by subcutaneous infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans, characterised by development of large, painless plaques or open lesions, often associated with oedema. The disease is most common in West Africa but is also found in other tropical and subtropical regions including Australia. Although the lesion can be sterilised by a minimum two-month antimicrobial treatment course with rifampicin and clarithromycin, the wounds can take up to a year to heal and can lead to permanent disfigurement, especially when diagnosed late [1]. The polyketide-derived toxin mycolactone, generated by M. ulcerans, is the critical driver of BU pathogenesis [2, 3]. Continuous production of this virulence factor causes widespread coagulative necrosis and fibrin deposition in patient skin tissue, as it diffuses through tissue away from the infecting bacteria. Mycolactone is also responsible for the restricted immune response seen in BU. As well as showing long-term cytotoxicity to immune cells [2], mycolactone causes a rapid suppression of antigen presentation, co-stimulation and cytokine secretion at low doses [4, 5].

Many clinical features of BU can be attributed to the inhibitory action of mycolactone on the Sec61 translocon, [6, 7] the complex that translocates most membrane, secretory and organellar polypeptides into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [8]. In co-translational translocation, nascent proteins are targeted to the ER surface by a signal peptide sequence at the N-terminus; the interaction between the signal peptide and the pore-forming protein of the translocon, Sec61α, opens a central channel that allows access to the ER lumen and a lateral gate through which transmembrane sequences can enter the membrane [9]. Mycolactone docks to Sec61, preventing signal peptide engagement and locking the translocon in an inactive state with the lateral gate open but the channel blocked [10]. The biogenesis of most secretory proteins and Type I and II membrane proteins is inhibited by mycolactone, while polytopic membrane proteins are largely unaffected [11, 12]. Type III and tail-anchored proteins, which utilise alternative translocation pathways [13], are also resistant to mycolactone [7, 11, 14]. The proteins whose translocation into the ER is blocked are synthesized in the cytosol where they are degraded by the proteosome [7] and selective autophagy [15, 16]. Sec61 blockade induces an integrated stress response by activation of eIF2α kinases [12, 17] and an increase in autophagic flux [15] and without resolution the cells eventually undergo apoptosis [17, 18]. The time from initial exposure to cell death varies between cell types, but for most human cells takes 3-5 days.

We have previously shown that endothelial cells are particularly sensitive to mycolactone. At low nanomolar concentrations, mycolactone depletes the anticoagulant receptor thrombomodulin [19] and junction proteins [20]. It also increases the permeability of monolayers formed from endothelial cells derived from both vascular and lymphatic origin [20]. While thrombomodulin depletion has also been observed in BU patient skin biopsies [19], this seems not to be the cause of the widespread fibrin deposition commonly seen within the skin tissue. Instead, this is linked to aberrant staining for the extrinsic clotting pathway initiator tissue factor [20]. Tissue factor is normally located in the sub-endothelium where it is segregated from both the plasma proteins that drive coagulation and the surrounding dermal tissue [21]. However, in BU patients, tissue factor was observed within the connective tissue distant from vessels and this spatially associated with fibrin deposition and early signs of necrosis [20]. Our working model leading up to the current work was that mycolactone action at Sec61 in endothelial cells leads to vascular dysfunction and promotes the pathogenesis of BU. The current work seeks to explore the molecular mechanisms driving these events.

The integrity of the endothelium greatly depends on adequate production and maintenance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [22], junctional complexes [23] and the glycocalyx, a highly charged coating of proteoglycans, glycolipids, glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) including heparan sulphate (HS), chondroitin sulphate (CS) and hyaluronic acid [24] covering the luminal side of the endothelium [25]. The enzymatic glycosylation of heparan and chondroitin sulphate is initiated in the Golgi apparatus by transferase enzymes. This is also the site of the isomerisation and sulfation reactions needed to achieve the rich diversity of GAGs expressed at the cell surface [26]. The glycocalyx acts as an exclusion zone for blood cells and controls interactions with platelets, blood clotting factors and immune cells as well as modulating fluid exchange and acting as a sensory system for the endothelial monolayer [26]. On the basal side of the endothelium, is the basement membrane (BM), an ECM consisting of collagen type IV and laminins, crosslinked by perlecan, a HS proteoglycan, and/or nidogens [27]. This sheet-like network forms a scaffold that interacts with integrins on the cell surface, controlling structural stability, cell adhesion and angiogenesis as well as preventing leukocyte extravasation [27, 28]. Production of these complex structures, which preserve and regulate the barrier between blood and tissue, relies heavily on Sec61-dependent proteins.

In order to determine the molecular mechanisms driving mycolactone-induced endothelial cell dysfunction we have undertaken a detailed phenotypic and proteomic study of the changes it induces both in vitro and in vivo. Using primary human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC), we found that, as well as increasing monolayer permeability, mycolactone caused rapid changes in endothelial cell morphology and migration, accompanied by loss of glycocalyx, adhesion and ECM proteins. Notably, structurally unrelated Sec61 inhibitors, Ipomoeassin F, and its derivatives induced comparable phenotypes in a similar time frame, highlighting the Sec61 dependency of ECM composition and function. We have dissected the roles of these different components in the response to mycolactone and found that loss of an enzyme critical for GAG biosynthesis phenocopied the changes seen in cell morphology and monolayer permeability. On the other hand, the effects on cell adhesion and migration were dependent on ECM interactions and could be ameliorated by application of exogenous laminin-511. Hence the current work presents a novel pathogenic mechanism in BU, driven by Sec61-dependent effects on endothelial cells.

Results

Sec61 blockade impacts endothelial cell morphology and adhesion

We recently observed that mycolactone induces morphological changes in primary endothelial cells in vitro, leading to a dose-dependent increase in monolayer permeability at 24 hours [20]. To understand the longer-term effects of mycolactone, we performed time-lapse imaging of HDMECs exposed to mycolactone (Video 1) or solvent (DMSO) control (Video 2) every 30 minutes for 48 hours. As in previous observations, the cells began to take on an ‘elongated’ phenotype after 8 hours. The proportion of elongated cells increased with time (Fig 1A) and after 24 hours exposure, approximately half the cells (51.63±2.89%) had this phenotype. The average ratio of cell length to width doubled in 16 hours, and quadrupled after 24 hours exposure (Fig 1C). At 24 hours, a small proportion (9.73±4.01%) had acquired a rounded appearance (Fig 1B) similar to that reported for mycolactone exposure of fibroblasts [16] and epithelial cells [29]. Notably, these cells retained the ability to reattach to the culture vessel (Video 1), in line with their continued viability in this time window [19]. However, after this time their ability to re-adhere declined and the proportion of detached cells steadily increased. Although the number of rounded cells increased between 24 and 48 hours, the elongated phenotype remained predominant at this time point (Fig 1B).

Figure 1.

Next, we investigated how mycolactone affected HDMEC migration using scratch assays. While control cells were successfully able to close the scratch area within 24 hours, mycolactone-exposed cells displayed a gradual cessation in migration into the cell-free gap (Fig 1D). Thus, while at 16 hours similar numbers of cells had migrated into the scratch regardless of treatment, no further migration could be detected at 24 hours in the presence of mycolactone (Fig 1D). However, it should be noted that mycolactone has previously been reported to cause cell cycle arrest [2], which can be a confounding factor in such migration assays and may explain this finding.

To determine whether Sec61 inhibition by mycolactone was driving these abnormal phenotypes, we exposed endothelial cells to Ipomoeassin F or its more potent derivative, ZIF-80 [30]. These are structurally distinct to mycolactone but inhibit Sec61α in a very similar manner since they compete for the same binding site [31, 32]. Importantly, both compounds phenocopied the ‘elongated’ appearance preceding detachment in HDMEC within 24 hours (Fig 1E & F). Unbiased analysis of time-lapse data using zenCELL owl built-in algorithms allowed continuous estimation of cell coverage and detachment, although it could not be trained to recognise the elongated phenotype. As expected, cell coverage increased with time under control conditions, while the proportion of detached cells remained constant at approximately 5%. However, all three Sec61 inhibitors showed similar effects on both readouts (Fig 1 G & H). Interestingly, both measures remained similar to the control for approximately 24 hours, after which cell coverage declined with a corresponding increase in cell detachment. Taken together, this data strongly supports that these changes are driven by Sec61 inhibition and that endothelial cell homeostasis is dependent on adequate Sec61 function.

To establish the in vivo relevance of these findings, we performed fibrinogen immunostaining in the pre-ulcerative mouse footpad model of M. ulcerans infection (Fig 1I, S1). Fibrinogen is a high molecular weight (∼330 kDa) plasma protein that is normally retained within the lumen of intact vessels and, indeed, in uninfected (vehicle control) mouse feet, fibrinogen was rarely detected, and then only within the vessel lumen (Fig 1I1 and 1I5). In contrast, at 21 days post infection (Grade 1 lesions; metatarsal thickness increase ∼10%), fibrin(ogen) was seen within the blood vessel wall surrounding the endothelium (Fig 1I2, 1I6, 1I7). After 28 days (Grade 2/3 lesions, metatarsal thickness increase 50-100%) widespread fibrin(ogen) staining was seen outside blood vessels within the dermis, in foci consistent with its conversion to insoluble fibrin (Fig 1I8-9). The lack of signal in isotype control-stained tissue (FigS1B) confirms the specificity of staining. This penetration of fibrinogen between the endothelial monolayer lining the vessel, then through the vessel wall and conversion to fibrin by other components of the coagulation cascade within deeper tissue is consistent with the changes in endothelial cell morphology and monolayer integrity described here and previously [20] and demonstrates that the extravascular deposition of fibrin seen in patient biopsy samples is an early feature of infection.

Mycolactone predominantly targets proteins involved in glycosylation and adhesion

While proteomic studies of mycolactone action have been performed previously [6, 12, 14, 16], these have used whole cell lysates, leading to systematic limitations in detection of membrane and secreted proteins, due to their relatively low abundance compared to cytosolic proteins. Therefore, to understand the molecular mechanisms driving the pathogenic phenotypic changes in endothelial cells, we instead used a total membrane proteomics approach to enrich for the Sec61 substrates that are targeted by mycolactone.

We isolated total membrane fractions from HDMECs exposed to DMSO or mycolactone for 24 hours and analysed them by tandem mass tagging (TMT) multiplex LC/MS over biological triplicates (Fig 2A). A total of 6649 proteins were detected, of which 482 were significantly downregulated and 220 upregulated by mycolactone (> 2-Fold change, p < 0.05) (Fig 2B, Supplementary Files 2-5)). Among the total proteins discovered, 36.9% were trafficked via the secretory/endolysosomal pathways that primarily depend on the Sec61 translocon (Fig 2C). This group represented 84.6% of the downregulated but only 23.7% of the upregulated proteins. As predicted, membrane proteins were the most affected in the downregulated group, with little effect on cytoplasmic, cytoskeletal, mitochondrial or nuclear proteins. The downregulated fraction included previously published endothelial targets of mycolactone including coagulation regulators thrombomodulin (TM), von Willebrand Factor (vWF), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (CD31), endothelial protein C receptor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and cell junction components tyrosine protein kinase receptor TIE1, angiopoietin-1 receptor (TEK), cadherin 5 (CDH5), junctional adhesion molecule 3 (JAM-3) and catenin β1 [19, 20] (Fig S2A), validating our dataset.

Figure 2.

As seen in previous proteomic studies and in vitro translocation assays [11, 12, 33, 34], mycolactone preferentially targeted secreted and single pass type I and type II membrane proteins in endothelial cells, with no effect on the EMC-dependent Type III proteins or the GET pathway-dependent tail-anchored proteins (Fig 2D). A small number (51 out of 606 detected) of multi-pass membrane proteins were also >2-fold downregulated by mycolactone (Supplementary File 6). This group was relatively enriched for signal peptide-bearing proteins (42% vs 4% amongst unchanged and upregulated multi-pass proteins) (Fig 2E). The rules governing sensitivity of this subgroup to mycolactone appear to be similar to those reported for single pass type I proteins [12], with higher signal peptide hydrophobicity and a shorter distance between the signal peptide and first transmembrane domain being associated with increased resistance to the effects of mycolactone (Fig S2B and C). Of the remaining mycolactone-sensitive multi-pass proteins, 80% contained at least one long loop (>50aa) between transmembrane domains. Among the upregulated proteins, 88% of the integral membrane proteins were multi-pass membrane proteins, and only one of the predicted single pass proteins contained a signal peptide. Likewise, the four upregulated secreted proteins identified are all secreted by non-conventional pathways.

Overall, the data support the recently described model for the biogenesis of multi-pass proteins whereby the majority of multimembrane spanning proteins utilise an alternative translocon that includes Sec61 and the PAT, GEL and BOS complexes but, crucially, bypasses the lateral gate, instead relying on generation of a lipid-filled cavity on the opposite side of Sec61 [35, 36]. Here, only those multi-pass proteins possessing a signal peptide or long internal loops require insertion into the membrane via the Sec61 channel, and therefore only these are sensitive to mycolactone.

Our membrane targeted approach identified a higher number of Sec61-dependent proteins in our control cells compared to previous studies [6, 12, 14] thus achieving our goal of wider capture of mycolactone-sensitive proteins. Moreover, when compared to siRNA-based Sec61α knockdown in Hela cells, despite the differences in cell type and methodology, 100 of the downregulated proteins were common to both datasets (Fig 2F) [37]. While possession of a signal peptide or anchor appears to be crucial to mycolactone sensitivity [12], overall, no specific signal peptide sequence features were associated with downregulation. In keeping with this, there was very little overlap between mycolactone downregulated proteins and those lost following knockdown of translocon-associated proteins TRAPβ or knockout of Sec62/Sec63 (Fig S2D and S2E) [37, 38], which assist gating of the translocon by weak signal peptides. Thus, as suggested by analysis of the structure of the inhibited translocon [10], mycolactone acts via direct interaction with the Sec61α signal peptide binding site rather than through interference with accessory proteins.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis of mycolactone-upregulated proteins supported previous observations by ourselves and others of cellular stress responses, with significant enrichment of terms associated with oxidative stress and detoxification (Fig 2G) [12, 17, 39, 40]. The upregulated proteins also included several proteins involved in the autophagy pathway, including SQSTM1/p62, which is involved in the cellular response to mycolactone [15] (Fig S2A). However, in the significantly downregulated fraction a distinct pattern emerged, with GO terms associated with glycosylation, matrix organisation, adhesion and cell migration showing the greatest over-representation compared to the whole genome. Within these GO groups, the vast majority of proteins detected in our proteome were downregulated by mycolactone (Fig 2H). Similar results were obtained when the downregulated proteins were compared to the total detected proteome (Fig S2F), showing this pattern was not an artefact resulting from membrane enrichment.

Mycolactone disproportionately targets Golgi-resident proteins involved in glycosylation and glycosaminoglycan chain synthesis leading to the loss of surface GAGs

The Golgi is the site of higher order protein glycosylation and GAG synthesis and, of the intracellular organelles, is the most affected by mycolactone (Fig 2C and S3A). The Golgi has a particularly high proportion of type II membrane proteins as the membrane anchor and sequences around it can act as a signal for Golgi retention [42] and nearly all of these Golgi-expressed type II membrane proteins were significantly downregulated by mycolactone (Fig 3A). Interestingly, type II Golgi proteins showed a higher degree of down-regulation by mycolactone than ER or plasma membrane localised type II proteins (Fig 3B). This suggests the signals that lead to Golgi localisation may make proteins more sensitive to Sec61 inhibition, although it is equally possible that Golgi proteins are turned over at a higher rate than those at other sites as depletion is generally at the turnover rate [19]. The effect is not due to differences in transmembrane domain hydrophobicity, which shows little variation and has no impact on Type II protein levels in mycolactone-treated cells (Fig S3B).

Figure 3.

Detailed analysis of our dataset revealed that targeting of Golgi-localised proteins by mycolactone leads to significantly decreased abundance of multiple enzymes involved in both higher order N- and O-linked glycosylation (Fig 3C). However, the biggest impact is seen in GAG production, with the majority of the enzymes involved in GAG synthesis lost in mycolactone treated HDMECs (Fig 3D and S3C). All of the 23 proteins in the GAG biosynthetic pathway detected in our analysis are type II membrane proteins and 19 (82%) of these were downregulated by mycolactone (Fig 3D), affecting every step of glycosaminoglycan production (Fig S3C). Three of the mycolactone-targeted proteins were involved in initial steps of keratan sulphate formation, four in common synthesis initiation of chondroitin sulphate (CS), dermatan sulphate (DS) and heparan sulphate (HS), six in chain elongation of CS/DS and HS (two and four, respectively), and six in epimerisation or sulfation processes that enhance the structural diversity of CS/DS or HS (Fig 3D and S3C).

Given the importance of GAGs to endothelial function and the dramatic loss in GAG biosynthetic enzymes induced by mycolactone, we evaluated surface levels of the predominant endothelial GAGs, HS, and CS, using flow cytometry on HDMECs exposed to mycolactone for 24 hours. As a control, chondrointinase ABC was used to remove surface CS, resulting in fluorescence levels 60% lower than untreated cells. Remarkably, CS fluorescence intensity was even lower in cells exposed to mycolactone (Fig 3E). Similarly, using an antibody specific for a neoepitope of HS generated by heparinase III digestion, dHS, disrupted surface HS expression was observed in mycolactone-exposed cells (14.11±7.40% vs. DMSO solvent control 105.30±9.79%, P = 0.0002, Fig 3F). In addition, HS-containing proteoglycans were detected by immunoblot using the anti-dHS antibody. Heparinase III digestion revealed an abundance and diversity of heparan sulphate containing proteins present in untreated or DMSO-exposed HDMECs that decreased progressively with mycolactone exposure (Fig 3G). By immunofluorescence, HS forms a mesh-like network around and between cells in untreated and DMSO solvent controls (Fig 3H). However, in HDMECs exposed to mycolactone, or ZIF-80, the HS-positive network was disrupted within 20 hours (Fig 3H). Collectively, this data confirms that Sec61 inhibition by mycolactone profoundly impairs the ability of endothelial cells to synthesise GAG chains.

Loss of galactosyltransferase II drives changes in endothelial cell morphology and monolayer permeability

We reasoned that mycolactone-dependant depletion of any enzyme involved in the early stages of GAG biosynthesis would, on its own, be sufficient to explain the loss of HS and CS. Therefore, we validated its effect on the GAG linker building enzyme galactosyltransferase II (B3Galt6) by immunofluorescence. Endothelial B3Galt6 colocalised with the Golgi marker Giantin in a perinuclear region in untreated cells and was unchanged in those exposed to the solvent control (0.02% DMSO) (Fig 4A). B3Galt6 expression levels remained normal in HDMECs exposed to mycolactone for 6 hours but a clear reduction was seen after 12 hours (Fig 4A). Notably, ZIF-80 reduced B3Galt6 expression in a similar manner (Fig S4A).

Figure 4.

In order to investigate whether loss of B3Galt6 was sufficient to induce the phenotypic changes we saw after mycolactone exposure, we knocked down B3Galt6 in HUVECs using siRNA. The reduction in B3Galt6 protein expression compared to cells transfected with non-targeting si-control RNA (Fig 4B) was comparable to that caused by mycolactone (∼80%). B3Galt6 siRNA-treated cells demonstrated a similar elongated appearance (Fig 4C) and image analysis confirmed a significant increase in the ratio of cell length to width in HUVECs transfected with si-B3Galt6 RNA (Fig 4D). However, knockdown of B3Galt6 did not recapitulate the cell rounding phenotype (Fig 4E).

We next investigated the potential contribution of B3Galt6 loss to the previously observed mycolactone-induced increase in HDMEC and human dermal lymphatic endothelial cell monolayer permeability [20]. Exposure of mock-transfected HUVEC monolayers to 10 ng/mL mycolactone for 24 hours increased permeability to 23.13±7.38%, an effect comparable to 100 ng/mL IL-1β (21.30±3.48%) (Fig 4E). B3Galt6 knockdown in HUVECs also led to a rise in monolayer permeability (10.08±4.37% and 15.47±1.27% of the values seen in empty wells, P = 0.2371 and 0.0367, for two different oligonucleotides, Fig 4F). Interestingly, B3Galt6 knockdown did not reduce the rate of HUVEC migration in scratch assays (Fig 4G); in fact the cells exhibited a slightly increased healing rate compared to controls.

Mycolactone rapidly depletes endothelial surface proteoglycans

Since loss of GAGs did not explain all the phenotypes observed, we considered the so-called core proteins to which GAGs synthesised in the Golgi are covalently linked to form the proteoglycans. These can be secretory, plasma membrane or GPI-anchored proteins, all of which require the Sec61 translocon for their biogenesis. Our proteome revealed that seven HS, CS, and/or DS-carrying proteoglycans were significantly down-regulated after 24 hours mycolactone exposure (Fig 5A).

Figure 5.

Using flow cytometry, we validated the changes in abundance of three cell surface proteoglycans; perlecan (HSPG2; secreted, HS/CS), glypican-1 (GPC1; GPI-anchored, HS/CS) and biglycan (BGN; secreted, CS/DS). Syndecan-2, a membrane-bound protein for which only one unique peptide was found in the proteome, could not be detected by flow cytometry. The most profound effects were seen for perlecan and glypican-1 (detection at 10.8±4.8% and 28.8±9.0% of untreated control, Fig 5B), while biglycan was partly reduced (43.7±6.8% of untreated control). As the turnover rate of HS proteoglycans is rapid (t_1/2= 3-4 hours in granulosa and 6.9 hours in macrophages [43, 44]), we explored the rate of perlecan and glypican-1 loss at early time points in HUVECs. A ∼50% reduction in perlecan was evident after only 2 hours mycolactone treatment, reaching significance at 6 hours. Depletion of glypican-1 was slower, evident at 6 hours and reaching significance at 24 hours (Fig S5A).

Immunofluorescence staining of HDMECs showed abundant perlecan staining in control cells, particularly around intercellular junctions, but the staining rapidly decreased in response to mycolactone, with reduced expression detectable after 8 hours (Fig 5C). HDMECs exposed to ZIF-80 for 8 hours displayed similarly limited perlecan-positive junctional staining (Fig 5C). The parallel loss of GAGs and the proteoglycans that bear them means that the glycocalyx is severely disrupted by mycolactone.

Mycolactone depletes endothelial basement membrane components and their ligands

Taken together, our results so far show that mycolactone profoundly depletes the endothelial glycocalyx, due to the loss of both GAG and proteoglycan biosynthesis following Sec61 inhibition. However, while loss of GAG production affected permeability, it had less impact on adhesion and migration. We therefore next focused on the downregulated proteins in our dataset with GO classifications linked to these processes. Numerous adhesion molecules and basement membrane components were downregulated by mycolactone, including nidogen 1 (NID1), laminins and collagens (Fig 6A). Although the abundance of major BM component collagen IV was not significantly influenced by mycolactone, perhaps indicating a slow turnover rate, several ER-localised and/or secreted enzymes involved in collagen biosynthesis (Table S3), were reduced as previously reported in murine fibroblasts [16]. Laminins are the other key constituent glycoproteins of the BM and important binding partners for endothelial cell integrins. Our proteomic data suggested multiple laminins are affected by mycolactone. Laminin α4 and α5 are both common to all types of vessel wall, but α4 has a slightly higher turnover rate [45]. By immunofluorescence staining, laminin α4 was seen in perinuclear regions within cells and in the network bridging intercellular junctions between endothelial cells in untreated and DMSO control HDMEC (Fig 6B). After 16 hours of exposure to mycolactone, the perinuclear staining was absent and the laminin-positive network between cells had become disconnected (Fig 6B). The same striking decrease was also seen in HDMECs exposed to ZIF-80 (Fig 6B).

Figure 6.

The effect of mycolactone on the abundance of the laminin binding integrin β subunits β1 and β4 and laminin α5 in HDMEC were determined by flow cytometry (Fig 6D). After 24 hours, they were reduced to 45.0±6.2%, 27.3±7.7% and 15.6±5.4% respectively of control levels (Fig 6C). In addition, the loss of expression of the basement membrane component fibronectin and cell surface integrin α5 were validated using immunoblot analysis; fibronectin levels decreased very rapidly showing >75% depletion after 4 hours exposure to mycolactone (p<0.01) (Fig S6A) whilst the level of integrin α5 decreased more slowly, reaching ∼50% of control levels at 24h (p<0.01; Fig S6B).

To determine whether the basement membrane was disrupted in vivo, we stained the tissue sections from M. ulcerans-infected mice with the alcian blue-periodic acid Schiff (AB-PAS) method. In mouse feet receiving the vehicle control (Fig 6D1), the dermis contained neutral glycans (purple staining) and the vasculature displayed an intact vessel basement membrane (Fig 6D4, insert). At early stages of infection (Grade 1; Fig 6D2), immune cell infiltration could be seen in these regions in proximity to mycobacterial clusters (Fig S1A) and the surrounding dermal tissue had become more acidic (blue staining) (Fig 6D5). At later stages of infection, when the metatarsal area was more swollen (Fig 6D3) and the dermis showed marked oedema and the fibrous architecture was disrupted (Fig 6D6-7), there was an overall reduction in the intensity of staining around the vasculature and the vessel basement membranes were irregular (Fig 6D6, insert).

Exogenous laminin-α5 ameliorates mycolactone-driven cell detachment and impaired migration

Since laminins are secreted proteins, which are then deposited to form cell-associated extracellular matrix, we wondered whether exogenous provision of these molecules might protect mycolactone-exposed cells. We therefore coated tissue culture plates with laminin-111, -411 or -511, complexes that contain laminin β1γ1 in combination with laminins α1, α4 or α5 respectively. As expected [46], primary HDMECs efficiently re-attached to laminin-511-coated culture vessels, with very little reattachment to uncoated vessels (P = 0.0020, Fig S7A). Re-attachment laminin-411 or the non-endothelial specific laminin-111 was also observed albeit to a lesser extent (P = 0.1226 and 0.3365 compared to the uncoated wells, respectively). We then quantified the re-attachment of endothelial cells that had been pre-exposed to mycolactone for 24 hours compared to controls (Fig 7A). Remarkably, mycolactone-exposed cells re-adhered to specifically to laminin-511-(but not 411- or 111-) coated vessels with the same efficiency as controls (Fig 7A).

Figure 7.

We then investigated whether exogenous laminin-511 could ameliorate the cell rounding, attachment or migration phenotypes observed in response to mycolactone using time-lapse imaging of HDMECs. On uncoated wells, mycolactone caused the expected phenotypic changes (Fig 8B-C), and remarkably, exogenous laminin α5 significantly reduced mycolactone-driven cell rounding, even after 48 hours (7.7±1.5% vs. 17.6±2.4%, P = 0.0194, Fig 8B). Similarly, while the relative number of attached cells did not increase steadily with time as for the DMSO control (Fig 8C), laminin-511 coating prevented the decrease in attached cells seen between 36 and 48 hours in uncoated wells (P = 0.0156). These effects were absent in laminin-411 and -111-coated wells (Fig S7B-C). Laminin coating did not impact HDMEC survival in the presence or absence of mycolactone at 48 hours (Fig S7D), although as mentioned before, cell death due to mycolactone is minimal prior to 72 hours [19].

For migration, we performed a scratch assay on HUVECs in wells coated or not with laminins prior to mycolactone exposure. Monitoring cell migration using time-lapse imaging revealed that control HUVECs took less than 16 hours to close a 600-800 µm gap (Video 3). By contrast, the leading edge of wounded HUVEC monolayers exposed to mycolactone gradually stopped migrating into the cell-free region after ∼7 hours; at this point the cells began to migrate randomly before undergoing the previously described morphological changes (Video 4). However, strikingly, in HUVEC monolayers plated onto laminin-511, cells continued to migrate into the gap in the presence of mycolactone, with a leading edge still evident after 16 hours (Video 5). Cell counts per unit scratch area at 8 and 16 hours showed that cells plated onto laminin-511 were able to migrate back at a rate comparable to that seen in monolayers exposed to DMSO in uncoated wells (Fig 7D, P = 0.286). We did not see these same effects on laminin-411 and -111-coated wells (Video 6 and 7) where migration rates remained significantly lower than the control (P = 0.0054 and 0.0003, respectively, Fig S7E).

This ability of laminin α5 to reverse or diminish the impact of mycolactone on endothelial cell adhesion, morphology and migration highlights the contribution of the loss of basement membrane proteins to the phenotypic changes induced by mycolactone and presents an unanticipated potential for use in wound care in Buruli ulcer skin lesions, although such therapies are currently in their infancy [47].

Discussion

Until recently, the pathogenesis of BU was thought to rely on two factors; immunosuppression due to the action of mycolactone on innate and adaptive immunity, and direct cytotoxic action of mycolactone on the cells present within the subcutis leading to cell death and necrosis. Our findings provide further evidence supporting a third and vital pathway to tissue necrosis; the induction of endothelial dysfunction that drives an indirect mechanism leading to tissue necrosis via the breakdown of vessel integrity and fibrin-driven ischemia within tissue.

The current work reaffirms the critical role that Sec61 inhibition plays in the virulence mechanism of mycolactone. In this post-transcriptional, co-translational mechanism responsible for changes in protein abundance, proteins are made in the wrong cellular compartment (the cytoplasm) and degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system or removed by autophagy [7, 15]. During the current studies we tried, without success, to express examples of our library of SEC61A1 mutants that confer resistance to mycolactone [10, 17] in primary endothelial cells. This suggests that the endothelium is particularly sensitive to functional perturbation of the Sec61 translocon and perhaps explains why these cells are so exquisitely sensitive to the compound. As an alternative approach, we tested two analogues of the structurally unrelated Sec61 inhibitor Ipomoeassin F that was first isolated as a natural product of the “Morning Glory” flower [31]. Across multiple readouts, this induced comparable phenotypes to mycolactone, in the same time frame, including changes in morphology, loss of GAGs, matrisome proteins required for their synthesis, proteoglycan core proteins and basement membrane proteins. Hence, we are confident that the primary target of mycolactone in endothelial cells is Sec61, as it has already been shown in immune cells [6, 7, 14], fibroblasts [15] and epithelial cells [17]. Since epithelial cells showed similar effects on migration to those we report here, these effects probably depend on its action on the Sec61 translocon rather than other previously proposed mechanisms such as WASP activation [29].

Although the Sec61 translocon is thought to be required for the biosynthesis of approximately 30% of the proteome, mycolactone only inhibits production of specific subsets of proteins that traffic through the ER. As their depletion rate depends on protein turnover, inhibitory effects cannot be predicted a priori. Therefore, we performed quantitative proteomic analysis of total membrane fractions of primary endothelial cells to identify as many of the targets of mycolactone as possible, since “whole cell” approaches can bias against membrane proteins, particularly insoluble ones. Indeed, this approach was successful, more than doubling the number of detected proteins classified as membrane, secretory, ER/ERGIC, Golgi or endolysosomal compared to previous studies [12]. Significant depletion of our previously discovered targets by candidate gene approaches (including loss of CDH5, TIE-1, TEK, JAM-C, CD31, vWF, TFPI and TM [19, 20], and induction of SQSTM1/p62 [15]) validates this data set. The pattern of protein topologies affected by mycolactone reflected that seen in in vitro translocation assays and whole cell proteome analysis [6, 11, 12, 16, 34], further supporting mycolactone selectivity towards secreted, Type I and Type II single pass membrane proteins, with few multi-pass proteins and no Type III or tail-anchored membrane proteins showing any reduction in expression.

GO analysis confirmed induction of cytoplasmic/oxidative stress responses [17, 39, 48] amongst >220 up-regulated processes in mycolactone-exposed endothelial cells. However, in this work we focussed on the >480 down-regulated proteins, which represented a striking inadequacy in components of glycoprotein biosynthesis and metabolism and ECM organization, many of which we have validated individually. Taking together the cellular compartment analysis and our understanding of mycolactone’s cellular target, we were able to correctly hypothesise that the effects on endothelial cell function were exacerbated by loss of Golgi-localised Type II transmembrane enzymes involved in GAG (CS, DS and HS) production. Up to now, the impact of mycolactone on Golgi function has been underappreciated, but the wider ranging effect on protein glycosylation may explain why mycolactone has such a strong effect on glycosylated protein production irrespective of topology [7]. It also suggests that the effects of mycolactone may be even more far-reaching than expected, as even molecules resistant to the Sec61 blockade at the protein level may be functionally affected due to the loss of glycosylation.

Since GAG biosynthesis is a sequential process, and the endothelial glycocalyx is essential to maintain monolayer permeability [49], we reasoned that loss of one of the GAG linker-building enzymes common to CS, DS and HS could be sufficient to explain the mycolactone-induced phenotype. This was supported by siRNA-mediated knockdown of B3Galt6, which transfers galactose to substrates such as galactose-beta-1,4-xylose, i.e. the third step in this process. B3Galt6 knockdown phenocopied the elongated appearance seen in primary endothelial cells exposed to mycolactone. The intermediate phenotype seen in some experiments suggests that depletion of junctional molecules by mycolactone [20], also plays an important contributory role. In the context of BU, it is interesting to note that children born with ‘linkeropathies’, who have a reduced ability to synthesise GAG linker regions [50, 51], display phenotypes such as skin fragility and delayed wound healing [52] that are similar to antibiotic-treated M. ulcerans infections. As well as increasing permeability, the loss of the glycocalyx could exacerbate the inhibition of leukocyte homing caused by mycolactone [4]. Notably other viral and bacterial pathogens promote colonisation by degrading the endothelial glycocalyx [53–55], however here the mechanism is via inducing the production of heparanase and other proteinases.

Importantly, it is not only the GAGs of the apical glycocalyx that are depleted by mycolactone. Many proteoglycan core proteins are also lost. The secretory protein perlecan is notable for being a component of the glycocalyx as well as the BM and was profoundly and rapidly lost from the surface of primary endothelial cells following mycolactone exposure. Other BM components, particularly laminins and their cellular receptors, were also found to be depleted. Excitingly, providing an exogenous coating of laminin α5-containing laminin-511 complex to tissue culture wells protected endothelial cells from mycolactone-driven changes, improving adhesion, and reversing the migration defect. We have not been able to ascribe this to the retention of a specific adhesion molecule, and instead postulate that rescue could be via residual expression of a wide variety of laminin α5 receptors. This is supported by previous work showing that laminin α5 is more promiscuous that laminin α4 [46].

Adequate adhesion to the BM is critical for endothelial cell proliferation, migration, morphogenesis and survival [22]. Furthermore, loss of perlecan and laminin α4, or reduced binding to fibronectin, disturbs the structural integrity and maturation of microvessels [56–58], Finally, laminin α5 not only guides tissue patterning [59] and development [60] but also maintains vascular homeostasis by stabilising endothelial cell tight junctions [28]. Therefore, it is perhaps not surprising that we found the BM to be disturbed in M. ulcerans infected footpads. Moreover, this was seen in more advanced infections where fibrin deposition was also present within tissue, due to disturbance of the boundary between damaged vessels and dermal connective tissue. It is possible that these effects are exacerbated by IL-1β in vivo; this Sec61-independent pro-inflammatory cytokine has been shown to be induced in macrophages by mycolactone and M. ulcerans [61, 62] and is known to have profound effects on endothelial cell function, including the downregulation of anticoagulant and junctional proteins, induction of vascular permeability and upregulation of BM degrading proteinases [63]. There is considerable overlap in the endothelial cell responses to IL-1β and mycolactone, although the former’s effects are mediated predominately at the transcriptional level. An additive effect of mycolactone has been shown for some of these phenotypes in vitro [19, 20] although the in vivo situation is likely more complex [62]

In summary, this study identifies loss/disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx and BM as a critical molecular process in the pathogenesis of Buruli ulcer. Since these changes occur prior to mycolactone-driven apoptosis [17–19], they provide further support for our working model whereby mycolactone builds a hyper-coagulative environment alongside disruption of the endothelial monolayer and BM integrity. We propose that this leads to leakage of high molecular weight plasma proteins into the connective tissue where they activate the coagulation cascade leading to fibrin deposition and tissue ischemia. The detection of extravascular fibrinogen at early stages of infection prior to widespread tissue damage and necrosis provides further evidence that endothelial dysfunction could be a driver of disease progression. Rethinking of BU as a vascular disease may ultimately lead to improved therapies that support better wound healing, alongside antibiotic treatment. However, it should be remembered that tissue repair requires a controlled progression through a series of different stages [64]; following injury, under normal circumstances, platelet accumulation in a fibrin and fibronectin rich matrix is followed by an inflammation phase [65]. Therefore, ameliorating the coagulative features with anticoagulants alongside the standard antimycobacterial drugs may be of most value in the initial stages of treatment, while bioactive dressings containing laminin-derived peptides might be more useful to promote healing at later stages. In this context, laminin-derived bioactive peptides have recently been proposed as a treatment for defective tissue repair [47] and indeed, accelerate re-epithelialisation in wounds of diabetic animals [66, 67], suggesting this novel approach may be an effective complement to current therapies and could alleviate the long wound healing times experienced by BU patients.

Materials and methods

Mycolactone and other translocation inhibitors

For all experiments, we used synthetic mycolactone A/B [68], which was generously donated by Prof. Yoshito Kishi (Harvard University). Ipomoeassin F and ZIF-80 (Compound 2 in ref 30) were synthesised by Wei Shi. All compounds were diluted from stock solutions in DMSO and were used at the minimal inhibitory concentration, which was 10 ng/ml (∼13 nM) mycolactone [15], 400nM Ipomoessin F [69] and 20nM ZIF-80 [30]. To control for potential impact of the DMSO solvent on cell function, DMSO diluted equivalently was used; typically this was 0.02%.

Cell culture and treatment

Juvenile, single donor human microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (Promocell) were cultured in hVEGF containing Endothelial cell growth medium 2 (Promocell) at 37°C and 5% CO₂. Cells were routinely seeded at a concentration of 1 x 10⁴/cm² in 25cm² or 75cm² flasks for no more than 15 population doublings. Where used, laminin-511, -411 or -111 (BioLamina, Sweden) were coated on the surface of uncoated 96-well tissue culture plates at 5 µg/mL in PBS at 4°C overnight, then washed with medium prior to further experiment.

Time-lapse imaging of live cells

For time-lapse monitoring, endothelial cells were imaged every 30 minutes using a zenCELL Owl incubator microscope (innoME GmbH, supplied by LabLogic UK) for 48 hours. Time-lapse videos were generated with zencell-owl software (version 3.3, innoME GmbH), and analysed using their built-in algorithms of relative cell coverage, proportion of detached cells, and total cell numbers. In some cases, images of cells from certain time points were further analysed in Image J (v1.52n) to cell count of rounded cells per field, and/or the proportion and length/width ratio of elongated cells

Scratch assay

Endothelial cells were grown to confluency in 24 well plates then single lines were scratched into the monolayer using a p20 pipette tip. Healing of HDMECs was monitored by imaging at various time points up to 24 hours. Each assay was carried out in triplicate wells. Wounded HUVECs were monitored every 15 minutes by zenCELL Owl microscope (innoME GmbH) for up to 30 hours.

Mycobacterium ulcerans mouse footpad infection model

Mycobacterium ulcerans strain Mu_1082 was cultivated on Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Merck) supplemented with 0.2% glycerol (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 10% OADC (ThermoFisher Scientific). Several days before inoculation, bacteria were scraped from the plate and resuspended in 10ml 7H9 medium (Becton Dickinson) containing 0.5% glycerol, 10% OADC and 0.2% Tween-80 (Merck) and incubated shaking with 3µm glass beads for 3 days at 31°C. To prepare the inoculum, cultures were allowed to stand for 10min (to allow clumps to settle) then 1ml culture was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 2min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet resuspended in Dulbecco’s PBS (Fisher Scientific). After measuring the OD600, 3.33 x 10⁷ bacteria were pelleted and resuspended in 10ml PBS, to give an inoculum of ∼10⁵ cfu/footpad in a volume of 30µl.

All in vivo procedures were approved by the local ethics committee and UK Home office and met relevant animal welfare and biosafety regulatory standards. In this publication we present new histological analysis of archived material from eight to nine-week-old C57BL/6J female mice (Charles River, UK), which had been inoculated intradermally with 30 μl of the bacterial suspension or vehicle control (PBS) to the left hind footpad. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at a temperature of 20–24 °C and humidity of 45 to 65% in individually HEPA filtered cages. The mice had free access to water and a standard balanced diet, standard bedding and enrichments including a tunnel and nesting material. Infected mice were housed separately from uninfected mice, and blinding was not possible as the infection is clearly visible. Infection grade was assessed daily according to the method of Converse [70], where Grade 1 showed swelling of the metatarsal area (<50% increase compared to normal), Grade 2 showed greater swelling (50-150%) and Grade 3 had swelling further up the leg, visualised at the hock. Mice were killed by a schedule 1 method (cervical dislocation). The whole foot was then removed and fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin for at least 24 hours.

Histological analysis of murine foot samples

Fixed murine feet were decalcified using the EDTA-based Osteosoft solution (Merck) and then embedded in paraffin for histological analysis.by Ziehl-Neelsen stain, Alcian blue-periodic acid Schiff stain, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for fibrin(ogen). For IHC staining, 5-μm tissue sections on polylysine-coated slides were deparaffinised, endogenous peroxidase quenched, epitope unmasked with heated IHC citrate buffer (pH 6.0) (Merck) and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin. The tissue sections were incubated with anti-fibrinogen antibody (A0080, DAKO) or matched isotype control overnight at 4°C. Staining was then performed with biotinylated horse anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories) and VECTASTAIN Elite ABC kit and ImmPACT NovaRED peroxidase substrate and further counterstained with Harris Haematoxylin (ThermoFisher Scientific). Whole slide images were captured using the NanoZoomer slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics) and analysed using ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) and ndp2.view software (Hamamatsu). Some photographs were taken with Micropix microscope camera (acquisition software Cytocam) attached to a Yenway CX40 laboratory microscope (Micropix).

Membrane protein preparation

HDMEC (1 x 10⁷ cells) were seeded onto 15cm dishes (Corning) and grown to 90% confluency then exposed to solvent carrier DMSO or 10ng/ml mycolactone for 24 hours. Cells were washed four times in PBS and once in lysis buffer (10mM Tris pH 7.5, 250mM Sucrose, protease inhibitor cocktail). Cells were incubated for 20min on ice in 10ml lysis buffer then lysed in by 20 strokes dounce homogenisation. Lysates were centrifuged at 1,000xg for 10min at 4°C then the post-nuclear supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000xg for 1 hour at 4°C. Pellets were resuspended in 110 µl lysis buffer. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay and 50 µg aliquots were subjected to acetone precipitation. Triplicate samples were prepared from 3 independent assays.

Proteomics

Acetone precipitated proteins were reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin before 9-plex isobaric TMT labelling according to the manufacturer’s protocol (https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html? url= https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0016969_2162457_TMT10plex_UG.pdf). Labelled peptides were separated by high pH reverse phase liquid chromatography, collecting 20 fractions which were then lyophilised, desalted and analysed by LC-MS/MS. TMT labelled samples were analysed by the SPS-MP3 method using an Orbitrap Lumos mass spectrometer. Spectra were searched using the Mascot search engine version (Matrix Science) and analysed using the Proteome Discovery platform. (Version 2.2ThermoFisher Scientific). NA values and low confidence proteins were removed, and data was normalised using each channel median. Differential expression analysis was carried out using Limma. Adjusted p values were calculated by the Benjamini-Hochberg method. UniProt and the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org) were used to determine protein location and characteristics. Over-representation of GO groups was assesses using Webgestalt (www.webgestalt.org) (ref). Signal peptide ΔG values were obtained via the ΔG Prediction Server V1.0 (https://dgpred.cbr.su.se). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [71] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD037489.

siRNA transfection

Transfections of siRNA (assay ID#112321, #112322 for B3GALT6 or Silencer negative control No.1 siRNA AM4611) diluted to give a final concentration of 50 nM in Opti-MEM (Gibco) were performed on HUVECs at 30-40% confluency using Escort IV transfection reagent (L3287, Merck). After 48 hours, transfectants were subjected to the respective in vitro assays.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry was carried out according to standard methods as described in [19] using an Attune NxT flow cytometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Cells were detached with non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Merck) or briefly (for Itgb4 staining only) trypsinised with 0.04% trypsin/ 0.03% EDTA (PromoCell). For surface GAG detection, cells were treated with 1mU of heparinase III (EC4.2.2.8 from Flavobacterium heparinum) to expose neo-epitope of heparan sulphate or with chondroitinase ABC (EC 4.2.2.4 from Proteus vulgaris) (AMS Biotechnology) for 1h at 37°C prior to the staining procedures. Antibodies were Δ-HS (F69-3G10, AMS Biotechnology), CS (CS56, Merck), perlecan (7B5, ThermoFisher Scientific), glypican-1 (AF4519), integrin β4/ CD104 (clone 439-9B, eBioscience), integrin β1/ CD29 (P4C10, NBP2-36561), syndecan-2 (MAB2965), biglycan (AF2667), laminin α5 (NBP2-42391) from Biotechne. Isotype control mouse IgG1 (P3.6.2.8.1; 14-4714-81 from Invitrogen), mouse IgG2b (MG2B00), goat IgG (AB-108-C from R&D), rat IgG2b (14-4031-81), mouse IgM (PFR-03) and fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse IgG PE (12-4010-82), donkey anti-goat IgG FITC (A16000) and anti-rat IgG FITC (31629) were from ThermoFisher Scientific. The main population was gated by forward and side scatter plot of untreated cells using FlowJo (v9); among this, single cell population of 10⁴ cells per condition was subjected to analysis. Mean fluorescence intensity was determined and presented as % relative to untreated control.

Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting was carried out according to standard methods as described in [19]. Endothelial cells were lysed either in RIPA buffer (where protein content-equalised post-nuclear fractions were used) or directly in ‘gel sample buffer’ (with sonication to degrade genomic DNA). Immunoblotting of commercial pre-cast gels (BioRad) used either Immobilon PVDF membranes (Merck) or nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare). Antibodies used in this study were: Δ-HS (F69-3G10, AMS Biotechnology); anti-fibronectin (AB1945, Merck); anti-integrin α5 (sc-166665); anti-rabbit-HRP (GE Healthcare, NA934V), anti-mouse-HRP (GE Healthcare, NA931V). To visualise HS neoepitope, protein lysate was digested with 1 mU of heparinase III (EC4.2.2.8 from Flavobacterium heparinum) prior to SDS-PAGE.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescent imaging was carried out according to standard methods as described in [15]. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. For visualising intracellular markers, cells were permeabilised wit 0.25% Nonidet P-40 alternative in NETGEL buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 0.05% Nonidet P-40 alternative, 0.25% gelatin and 0.02% sodium azide). Antibodies used in this study were: B3Galt6 (H00126792-B01P, Biotechne), Giantin (ab80864, abcam), Laminin α4 (AF7340, Biotechne), Δ-HS (F69-3G10, AMS Biotechnology), perlecan (7B5, ThermoFisher Scientific), TRITC-conjugated phalloidin (FAK100, Merck), Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit (A11012), Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse (A21202) and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-sheep (A11015) from Invitrogen/ThermoFisher Scientific. For B3Galt6 intensity in Golgi apparatus, the region of interest per cell was defined by giantin-positive staining using ImageJ selection tools. The integrated density of B3Galt6 fluorescence of selected regions and background reading were then measured and the difference between the two numbers were corrected total cell fluorescence.

Vascular permeability assay

Endothelial cells were seeded on hanging cell culture inserts containing 1 µm pores with a polyethylene terephthalate membrane (Falcon). Treatment as above or with 100 ng/mL IL-1β (Gibco) were applied to both the insert and receiver wells. After indicated time, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated dextran (70 kDa, Millipore) was applied to each insert for 20 minutes. The fluorescence intensity of the solution in the receiver wells was then assessed by a fluorescent plate reader (FLUOstar Omega, BMG Labtech) with excitation/ emission wavelength at 485/ 530 nm. Fluorescence intensity was normalised to untreated control wells with an intact monolayer of endothelial cells and expressed as a % of subtracted value obtained from wells where no cells were seeded to the insert.

Adhesion assay

HDMECs were harvested, incubated with anti-integrin β1 (clone P4C10, NBP2-36561, Biotechne) or isotype control mouse IgG1 (P3.6.2.8.1; 14-4714-81 from Invitrogen) for 5 minutes, then 1.5 x 10⁴ cells were added to the wells of a 96 well plate that had been coated or not with different laminins as described above. After 1 hour, each well was washed three times with serum free medium and attached cells were imaged with a digital microscope camera (Micropix) attached to an AE31E inverted microscope (Motic). The cell count per image was determined using ImageJ.

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to Prof Yoshito Kishi (Harvard University, USA) for the gift of synthetic mycolactone A/B. We dedicate this paper to the memory of this tremendous scientist who did some much to advance research into the pathogenesis of Buruli ulcer. We thank Prof Richard Phillips (Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine) who provided the M. ulcerans strain used in this work. We thank Katherine Walker and Ella May of the University of Surrey’s Veterinary Pathology Centre for their assistance with tissue processing and staining of murine samples. This work is supported by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award in Science to Prof Rachel Simmonds (WT202843/Z/16/Z). Chemical synthesis of Ipomoeassin F and ZIF-80 was supported by an AREA grant GM116032 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to Prof Wei Q Shi.

Additional Files

Supplementary File 1

Supplementary figures (found at the end of this PDF).

Supplementary File 2

HDMEC membrane fraction raw peptide data.

Supplementary File 3

Normalised differential expression analysis for membrane fractions of HDMEC incubated for 24 hours with DMSO vs Mycolactone

Supplementary File 4

HDMEC membrane fraction proteins significantly downregulated by mycolactone.

Supplementary File 5

HDMEC membrane fraction proteins significantly upregulated by mycolactone.

Video 1. HDMECs were exposed to 10 ng/mL mycolactone. Live cell imaging was performed with using the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 30 minutes for 48 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 2. HDMECs were exposed to 0.02% DMSO. Live cell imaging was performed with using the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 30 minutes for 48 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 3. A scratch was introduced to HUVEC monolayer exposed to 0.02% DMSO and live cell imaging was performed with the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 15 min for 23 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 4. A scratch was introduced to HUVEC monolayer exposed to 10 ng/mL mycolactone and live cell imaging was performed with the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 15 min for 23 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 5. HUVECs were seeded on to laminin-511 coated well. The following day, a scratch was introduced to the monolayer and the cells were exposed to 10 ng/mL mycolactone. Live cell imaging was then performed with the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 15 min for 23 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 6. HUVECs were seeded on to laminin-411 coated well. The following day, a scratch was introduced to the monolayer and the cells were exposed to 10 ng/mL mycolactone. Live cell imaging was then performed with the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 15 min for 23 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Video 7. HUVECs were seeded on to laminin-111 coated well. The following day, a scratch was introduced to the monolayer and the cells were exposed to 10 ng/mL mycolactone. Live cell imaging was then performed with the zenCELL Owl incubator microscope every 15 min for 23 hours. Time-lapse videos (representative of 3 independent experiments) were generated with zencell-owl software. Time stamp and scale bar as indicated.

Supplementary Figures

Figure S1.

Figure S2.

Figure S3.

Figure S4.

Figure S5.

Figure S6.

Figure S7.