Abstract
Eukaryotic cells control cytosolic inorganic phosphate to balance its role as essential macronutrient with its negative bioenergetic impacts. Phosphate homeostasis depends on a conserved signaling pathway including inositol pyrophosphates (PP-IPs) and SPX receptor domains. Since cells synthesize various PP-IPs and SPX domains bind them promiscuously, it is unclear whether a specific PP-IP regulates SPX domains in vivo, or whether multiple PP-IPs act as a pool. In contrast to previous models, which postulated that phosphate starvation is signaled by increased 1-IP7 production, we now show that the levels of all detectable PP-IPs of yeast, 1-IP7, 5-IP7 and 1,5-IP8, strongly decline upon phosphate starvation. Among these, specifically the decline of 1,5-IP8 triggers the transcriptional phosphate starvation response, the PHO pathway. 1,5-IP8 inactivates the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Pho81 through its SPX domain. This stimulates the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85/Pho80 to phosphorylate the transcription factor Pho4 and repress the PHO pathway. Combining our results with observations from other systems we propose a unified model where 1,5-IP8 signals cytosolic phosphate abundance to SPX proteins in fungi, plants, and mammals. Its absence triggers starvation responses.
Significance statement
Cytosolic Pi is of prime importance for cellular bioenergetics because Pi influences free energy of nucleotide hydrolysis and the metabolite fluxes through glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. Eukaryotic cells signal Pi via SPX domains binding critical ligands, inositol pyrophosphates (IP7, IP8), which control Pi homeostasis through a network of target proteins that import, export, store or detoxify Pi. Studies with different systems failed to yield a coherent model on this regulation.
We performed the first time-resolved profiling of the full isomer spectrum of inositol pyrophosphates and dissected the isomer that is relevant to intracellular Pi signaling. Our results support a unified model of Pi signaling across all eukaryotic kingdoms, which is in accord with the fundamental importance of Pi management for metabolism.
Introduction
Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is an essential nutrient for all living systems. While required in large amounts for synthesis of nucleic acids, phospholipids and phosphorylated carbohydrates and proteins, an overaccumulation of Pi decreases the free energy provided by Pi-liberating reactions, such as nucleotide hydrolysis, which might stall metabolism (1). In fungi, plants and animals, control of Pi homeostasis involves myo-inositol pyrophosphates (PP-IPs) and a family of evolutionarily conserved SPX domains (2).
SPX domains interact with or form part of a large variety of proteins that affect Pi homeostasis by transporting Pi across membranes, converting it into polyphosphates (polyP), metabolizing it, or regulating Pi-dependent transcription (3). Direct regulation of an SPX-containing protein by synthetic inositol pyrophosphates was shown for the polyP polymerase VTC, the Pi transporters Pho91 and the PHR transcription factors in plants (4–10). A firm link suggesting the SPX domain as the receptor for inositol pyrophosphate regulation was provided by point mutants in the SPX domain that rendered VTC either independent of activation by inositol pyrophosphates, or non-responsive to inositol pyrophosphates (6). Structural analysis revealed that many of these mutations localized to a highly charged region that can bind inositol poly- and pyrophosphates with high affinity. However, this binding site discriminates poorly between different inositol polyphosphates at the level of binding (6). By contrast, strong differences are observed in the agonist properties, leading to the suggestion that binding affinity is a poor predictor of inositol pyrophosphate specificity and activity (1, 4).
PP-IPs that can be found in a wide variety of organisms are 5-IP7, 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8. They are all linked to phosphate homeostasis by the fact that genetic ablation of the enzymes making them, such as IP6Ks, PPIP5Ks and IPTKs, alter the phosphate starvation response. Considerable discrepancies exist in the assignment of these PP-IPs to different aspects of Pi homeostasis. In mammalian cells, IP8 activates the only SPX-protein expressed in this system, the Pi exporter XPR1 (11, 12). In plants, IP7 and IP8 decrease upon Pi starvation and mutants lacking either of the enzymes necessary for their synthesis induce the phosphate starvation response, leaving it open whether IP7, IP8, or both, control the Pi starvation program (10, 13, 14). Pioneering studies on the regulation of the Pi starvation program of S. cerevisiae, the PHO pathway, concluded that this transcriptional response is triggered in by an increase in 1-IP7 (15, 16), whereas subsequent studies in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans proposed 5-IP7 as the necessary signaling compound (17). Studies using the S. cerevisiae polyphosphate polymerase VTC as a model suggested that this enzyme, which is necessary for polyP accumulation under Pi-replete conditions, is stimulated by 5-IP7 in vivo (4, 18, 19), whereas studies in S. pombe proposed IP8 as the stimulator (20). S. pombe has similar enzymes for IP8 synthesis and hydrolysis as S. cerevisiae (21–25) In contrast to S. cerevisiae, genetic ablation of 1-IP7 and IP8 production in S. pombe leads to hyper-repression of the transcriptional phosphate starvation response (23, 26, 27) and interferes with the induction of the transcriptional phosphate starvation response. However, the transcriptional phosphate starvation response in S. pombe organism occurs through a different set of protein mediators. For example, it lacks homologs of Pho81 and uses Csk1 instead of Pho80/Pho85 for phosphate-dependent transcriptional regulation (28–31). Furthermore, PHO pathway promotors in S. pombe overlap with and are strongly regulated by lncRNA transcription units (32–34). It is hence difficult to compare the downstream events in this system to the PHO pathway of S. cerevisiae.
The discrepancies mentioned above could either reflect a true divergence in the signaling properties of different PP-IPs in different organisms, in which case a common and evolutionarily conserved signaling mechanism may not exist. Alternatively, the diverging interpretations could reflect limitations in the analytics of PP-IPs and in the in vivo assays for the fundamental processes of Pi homeostasis. The analysis of PP-IPs is indeed very challenging in numerous ways. Their cellular concentrations are very low, the molecules are highly charged, and they exist in multiple isomers that differ only in the positioning of the pyrophosphate groups. PP-IP analysis has traditionally been performed by ion exchange HPLC of extracts from cells radiolabeled through 3H-inositol (35). This approach requires constraining and slow labeling schemes, is costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, HPLC-based approaches in most cases did not resolve isomers of IP7 or IP8. These factors severely limited the number of samples and conditions that could be processed and the resolution of the experiments.
The recent use of capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) has dramatically improved the situation, permitting resolution of many regio-isomers of IP7 and IP8 without radiolabeling, and at superior sensitivity and throughput. We harnessed the potential of this method to dissect the role of the three known PP-IPs that accumulate in S. cerevisiae. We analyzed their impact on the PHO pathway, which is a paradigm for a Pi-controlled transcriptional response and the regulation of phosphate homeostasis (1, 36, 37). Beyond this physiological function, however, the PHO pathway also gained widespread recognition as a model for promotor activation, transcription initiation, chromatin remodeling and nucleosome positioning (38). In the PHO pathway, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKI) Pho81 translates intracellular Pi availability into the activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) complex Pho80-Pho85 (15, 39–41). At high Pi, Pho80-Pho85 phosphorylates and inactivates the key transcription factor of the PHO pathway, Pho4, which then accumulates in the cytosol (42–44). During Pi starvation, Pho81 inhibits the Pho80-Pho85 kinase, leading to dephosphorylation and activation of Pho4 and the ensuing expression of Pi-responsive genes (PHO genes).
The activation of Pho80-Pho85 through Pho81 has been explored in detail, leading to a series of highly influential studies that have gained wide acceptance in the field. These studies ascribed a critical function to 1-IP7 in activating the CDK inhibitor PHO81, allowing it to inhibit Pho80-Pho85 (15). They reported an increase of IP7 concentration upon Pi starvation and concluded that this increase was necessary and sufficient to inactivate Pho80/Pho85 kinase through Pho81 and trigger the PHO pathway. The 1-IP7 binding site on Pho81 was mapped to a short stretch of 80 aa, the “minimum domain” (15, 16, 40, 45). This domain is in the central region and distinct from the N-terminal SPX domain of Pho81. Since overexpression of the minimum domain rescued Pi-dependent regulation of the PHO pathway to some degree, the key regulatory function was ascribed to this minimum domain and the SPX domain was considered as of minor importance. By contrast, earlier studies based on unbiased mutagenesis, which subsequently received much less attention, had identified mutations in other regions of PHO81 with significant impact on PHO pathway activation (40, 46–49). The situation is complicated by further studies, which found global IP7 levels to decrease rather than increase upon Pi starvation (6, 11, 18). The analytics used could not distinguish 1-IP7 and 5-IP7, however, leaving open the possibility that an increase in 1-IP7 might be masked by a decrease in the much larger pool of 5-IP7.
We capitalized on recent advances in the non-radioactive analysis of inositol pyrophosphates through CE-MS, offering superior resolution, sensitivity, and throughput (50, 51), to revisit the regulation of the PHO pathway by PP-IPs and Pho81. To this end, we combined comprehensive analyses of PHO pathway activation and PP-IP profiles in mutants of all key enzymes involved in PP-IP metabolism of yeast.
Results
So far, analysis of the role of PP-IPs in Pi homeostasis and Pi starvation responses relied mainly on the use of mutants which ablate one of the pathways of PP-IP synthesis (Fig. 1). Yet, as shown in plants, several PP-IPs can change in a similar manner upon Pi depletion or replenishment, and ablation of enzymes diphosphorylating either the 1-or 5-positions on the inositol ring induces similar Pi starvation responses (10, 13) This renders it difficult to distinguish a role for an individual PP-IP from the alternative hypothesis that all PP-IPs collectively contribute to signaling. To dissect this issue in yeast, we performed time course analyses of mutants in PP-IP phosphatases and kinases, in which we correlate the levels of all PP-IPs with the induction of the phosphate starvation response in yeast. The rationale was to seek for upper or lower thresholds of PP-IP concentrations during PHO pathway induction and using those to sieve out the PP-IP responsible for signaling Pi starvation.
Cytosolic concentrations and kinetics of 5-IP7, 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8
In yeast, the myo-inositol hexakisphosphate kinases Vip1 and Kcs1 generate 1-IP7 and 5-IP7, respectively, and they are both required for synthesis of 1,5-IP8 (Fig. 1) (52–56). Inositol pyrophosphatases, such as Ddp1 and Siw14 dephosphorylate these compounds at the 1-and 5 position, respectively (Fig. 1A) (18, 57, 58).
We analyzed the kinetics and the role of these inositol pyrophosphates in PHO pathway activation. To this end, yeasts were cultured in synthetic liquid (SC) media to early logarithmic phase and then transferred to Pi-free SC medium. The cells were extracted with perchloric acid and inositol phosphates were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (50). Three PP-IPs were detectable: 1-IP7, 5-IP7 and 1,5-IP8. We note that the CE-MS approach does not differentiate pyrophosphorylation of the inositol ring at the 1- and 3-positions. Thus, our assignments of the relevant species as 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 are based on previous characterization of the reaction products and specificities of IP6Ks and PPIPKs (52–56, 59).
Quantitation of PP-IPs by CE-MS was facilitated by spiking the samples with synthetic, 13C-labeled inositol pyrophosphate standards (60, 61). The recovery rate of inositol pyrophosphates during the extraction was determined by adding known quantities of synthetic standards to the cells already before the extractions. This demonstrated that 89 % of 1-IP7, 90 % of 5-IP7 and 75 % of 1,5-IP8 were recovered in the extract. To estimate the cellular concentrations of these compounds the volume of the cells was determined by fluorescence microscopy after staining of the cell wall with trypan blue (Fig. S1). This yielded an average cell volume of 42 fL. Detailed morphometric studies of yeast showed that the nucleus occupies around 8% of this volume and that all other organelles collectively account for approx. 18%
(62). Taking this into account we can estimate the concentrations in the cytosolic space (including the nucleus, which is permeable to small molecules) of cells growing logarithmically on SC medium as 0.3 µM for 1-IP7, 0.7 µM for 5-IP7, 0.5 µM for 1,5-IP8 (Fig. 2A). IP6 is present at 3 µM.
Next, we determined the impact of Kcs1, Vip1, Siw14 and Ddp1 on the inositol pyrophosphate levels in the cells (Fig. 2A). 5-IP7 has not been detected in the kcs1Δ mutant and 1-IP7 has been strongly reduced in the vip1Δ strain. IP8 was undetectable in kcs1Δ and decreased by 75% in vip1Δ. kcs1Δ mutants also showed a 2 to 3-fold decrease in 1-IP7, suggesting that the synthesis of 1-IP7 depends on 5-IP7. This might be explained by assuming that a significant source of 1-IP7 is synthesis of 1,5-IP8 through successive action of Kcs1 and Vip1, followed by dephosphorylation to 1-IP7. A systematic analysis of this interdependency will require pulse-labeling approaches, which are not yet available for inositol pyrophosphates. Therefore, this aspect was not pursued further in the framework of this study. An unexpected finding was the up to 20-fold overaccumulation of 5-IP7 in the vip1Δ mutant. By contrast, ddp1Δ cells showed normal levels of 5-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 but a 10-fold increase in 1-IP7. siw14Δ cells showed a 5-fold increase in 5-IP7, but similar levels of 1,5-IP8 and 1-IP7 as wildtype.
We performed kinetic experiments to analyze how PP-IP levels change under Pi withdrawal. 5-IP7 was the predominant inositol pyrophosphate species in wildtype cells growing on Pi-replete media (Fig. 2B). Within 30 min of Pi starvation, the concentration of all three inositol pyrophosphate species rapidly decreased by 75% for 1,5-IP8, by 47% for 1-IP7, and by 40% for 5-IP7. This decline continued, so that 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 became undetectable and only 3% of 5-IP7 remained after 4 h, corresponding to a concentration below 50 nM. The high excess of 5-IP7 in vip1Δ cells also declined as soon as the cells were transferred to Pi starvation medium (Fig. 2C). After two hours of starvation, it was still two-fold above the concentration measured in Pi-replete wildtype cells. Even after 3.5-4 h, Pi-starved vip1Δ cells had just reached the 5-IP7 concentration of Pi-replete wildtype cells.
Taken together, Pi starvation leads to a virtually complete depletion of all three inositol pyrophosphate species, with 1,5-IP8 reacting faster than 1-IP7 and 5-IP7. Furthermore, inositol pyrophosphatase mutants provide the possibility to generate relatively selective increases in 5-IP7 and 1-IP7. We used this information to dissect the impact of 5-IP7, 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 on control of the PHO pathway.
1,5-IP8 signals cytosolic Pi levels to the PHO pathway
To this end, we correlated the measured inositol pyrophosphate concentrations to the induction of the PHO pathway. We assayed a key event of PHO pathway activation, partitioning of the fluorescently tagged transcription factor Pho4yEGFP between the cytosol and the nucleus. Pho4 shuttles between nucleus and cytosol and its phosphorylation through Pho85/Pho80 favors Pho4 accumulation in the cytosol. The relocation of Pho4 can hence serve as an in vivo indicator of PHO pathway activation (63–65). It provides a readout for Pho85/Pho80 activity. PHO4 was tagged at its genomic locus, making Pho4yEGFP the sole source of this transcription factor. Pho4 relocation was assayed through automated image segmentation and analysis. The artificial intelligence-based segmentation algorithm recognized more than 90% of the cells in a bright-field image and delimited their nuclei based on a red-fluorescent nuclear mCherry marker (Fig. S2). This segmentation allows quantitative measurements of Pho4 distribution between the cytosol and nucleus in large numbers of cells. In addition, we assayed PHO pathway activation through fluorescent yEGFP reporters expressed from the PHO5 (prPho5-yEGFP) and PHO84 (prPho84-yEGFP) promotors. These are classical assays of PHO pathway activation, but their output is further downstream and hence comprises additional regulation, e.g. at the level of chromatin or RNA, or the direct activation of Pho4 through metabolites such as AICAR (66–70). Upon Pi withdrawal, both promotors are induced by the PHO pathway but the PHO84 promotor reacts in a more sensitive manner and is induced more rapidly than the PHO5 promotor (63). In wildtype cells grown under Pi-replete conditions, Pho4yEGFP was cytosolic and the PHO5 and PHO84 promotors were inactive, indicating that the PHO pathway was repressed (Fig. 3). Within 30 min of starvation in Pi-free medium, Pho4yEGFP relocated into the nucleus and PHO84 and PHO5 were strongly induced. By contrast, kcs1Δ cells showed Pho4yEGFP constitutively in the nucleus already under Pi-replete conditions, and PHO5 and PHO84 were activated. These cells have strongly reduced 1,5-IP8 and 5-IP7, and 50% less 1-IP7 than the wildtype, Thus, a decline of PP-IPs not only coincides with the induction of the Pi starvation program, but the genetic ablation of these compounds is sufficient for a forced triggering of this response in Pi-replete conditions. Therefore, we explored the hypothesis that inositol pyrophosphates repress the PHO pathway, and that their loss upon Pi starvation creates the signal that activates the starvation response.
In this case, we must explain the behavior of the vip1Δ mutation, which strongly reduces 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 and maintains the PHO pathway repressed in Pi-replete medium. Upon withdrawal of Pi, vip1Δ cells did not show nuclear relocation of Pho4 after 30 min and, even after 4h of starvation, PHO5 was not expressed. PHO84 remained partially repressed in comparison with the wildtype. These results are at first sight consistent with the proposal that 1-IP7 activates the PHO pathway (15, 16). Several further observations draw this hypothesis into question, however. First, all three inositol pyrophosphate species strongly decline upon Pi starvation instead of showing the increase postulated by Lee et al. Second, vip1Δ cells show a more than 15-fold overaccumulation of 5-IP7. Genetic ablation of this pool by deleting KCS1 is epistatic to the vip1Δ mutation. A kcs1Δ vip1Δ double mutant constitutively activates the PHO pathway already in presence of Pi, despite its strong reduction of 1-IP7 and the complete absence of 1,5-IP8. Third, ddp1Δ cells, which show a 10-fold quite selective increase in 1-IP7 under Pi-replete conditions, did not induce the PHO84 and PHO5 promotors, nor did they show Pho4 accumulation in the nucleus in Pi-replete medium. Thus, even a strong increase in 1-IP7 is not sufficient to activate the PHO pathway, while reductions of inositol pyrophosphates do this.
The data described above argues against a diminution of 1-IP7 as a critical factor for induction of the PHO pathway because vip1Δ cells, which have virtually no 1-IP7, do not constitutively activate the PHO pathway. By contrast, vip1Δ kcs1Δ double mutants, which have similarly low levels of 1-IP7 but also strong reductions of 1,5-IP8 and 5-IP7, show constitutive PHO pathway activity (Fig. 3). We hence tested the hypothesis that a decline of 5-IP7 might trigger the PHO pathway. To define the critical concentration at which this happens in vip1Δ cells, we assayed the induction of the PHO pathway over time (Fig. 4). While Pho4yEGFP was cytosolic in wild-type cells under high Pi supply, a large fraction of it rapidly relocated into the nucleus within the first 15 min of Pi starvation (Fig. 4 A,B). In vip1Δ, Pho4yEGFP relocation followed a sigmoidal curve. The nuclear/cytosolic ratio strongly increased after 1 h, reaching a plateau after 3 h. Thus, relocation was stimulated when the 20-fold exaggerated 5-IP7 levels of the vip1Δ cells had declined below 5 µM (Fig. 2C), which is 6 to 7 times above the maximal concentration observed in Pi-replete wildtype cells. Since 5-IP7 is the only PP-IP that exists in vip1Δ cells in significant amounts, this observation places the critical concentration of 5-IP7 that can repress the PHO pathway at 5 µM. In Pi-replete wildtype cells, 5-IP7 never reaches 5 µM (Fig. 2) and, therefore, 5-IP7 is unlikely to be a physiological repressor of the PHO pathway in wildtype cells. The 5-IP7-dependent PHO pathway repression in vip1Δ cells must then be considered as a non-physiological reaction resulting from the strong overaccumulation of 5-IP7 in these cells.
This interpretation is also consistent with the phenotype of siw14Δ cells. Although these cells accumulate 5-IP7, they accumulate it 4-fold less than vip1Δ, remaining below the 5 µM threshold where we should expect non-physiological repression of the PHO pathway. However, siw14Δ cells contain the same concentration of 1,5-IP8 as the wildtype (Fig. 2A), degrade it upon Pi starvation as the wildtype, and relocalize Pho4yEGFP with similar kinetics as the wildtype (Fig. S4). Taken together with the evidence presented above, 1,5-IP8 thus ends up being the only PP-IP that correlates with the activation of the PHO pathway in all mutants and conditions. This points to 1,5-IP8 as the controller of the PHO pathway.
The PHO pathway is controlled by the SPX domain of Pho81
Our results strongly argue against an increase of 1-IP7 as the key factor for inactivating the CDK Pho80-Pho85 through the CDK inhibitor Pho81. This prompted us to also re-evaluate the regulation of Pho81 because previous studies had proposed a small peptide from the central region of Pho81, called the minimum domain (amino acids 645-724), as a receptor for 1-IP7 that triggers the PHO pathway (15, 16). This model rests mainly on results with the isolated minimum domain used in vitro or, in highly overexpressed form, in vivo. This expression of the minimum domain outside its normal molecular context may be problematic because earlier work had suggested that the N-and C-terminal portions of Pho81 could provide competing inhibitory and stimulatory functions for Pho81 (40).
We targeted the N-terminal SPX domain of Pho81 through various mutations, leaving the rest of Pho81 and its minimum domain intact (Fig. 5). First, we asked whether Pho81 lacking the N-terminal 200 amino acids, corresponding to a deletion of its SPX domain, could still activate the PHO pathway. This Pho81ΔSPX is likely to be folded because a yEGFP-tagged version of Pho81ΔSPX localized to the nucleus (Fig. 5C, D), and this nuclear localization requires Pho81 to interact with Pho80-Pho85 (45). We tested the effect of Pho81ΔSPX on relocation of Pho4yEGFP (Fig. 5 A, B). Whereas wild-type cells efficiently relocated Pho4yEGFP to the nucleus upon Pi starvation, pho81ΔSPX cells partially maintained Pho4yEGFP in the cytosol. Thus, while the SPX domain is not essential for nuclear targeting of Pho81, it is required for efficient nuclear relocation of Pho4 and the induction of the PHO pathway under Pi starvation.
Several lysines located on α-helix 4 of SPX domains form part of an inositol pyrophosphate binding patch (6). Substituting them by alanine severely reduces the affinity of the domains for inositol pyrophosphates and can thus mimic the inositol pyrophosphate-free state. We determined the corresponding lysines in Pho81 (Fig. S3), created a point mutation in the genomic PHO81 locus that substitutes one of them, K154, by alanine, and investigated the impact on the PHO pathway. Pho81K154A-yEGFP should be correctly folded because it concentrates in the nuclei of the cells, which requires its interaction with Pho80-Pho85. pho81K154A cells constitutively activated the PHO pathway because Pho4yEGFP accumulated in their nucleus already under Pi-replete conditions (Fig. 5A, B). This constitutive activation was also observed in a pho81K154A vip1Δ double mutant, confirming that 1-IP7 synthesis by Vip1 is not necessary for PHO pathway induction. Since, as shown above, vip1Δ cells over-accumulate 5-IP7 20-fold and thereby repress the PHO pathway, this result underlines the efficiency of the K154A substitution in preventing PP-IP binding to the Pho81 SPX domain. Induction of the PHO pathway through SPX mutations is further illustrated by Pho81 expression, which itself is under the control of the PHO pathway (Fig. 5E, F). Western blots of protein extracts from cells grown under Pi-replete conditions showed increased levels of Pho81 in pho81K154A cells, like those observed in other strains with constitutively active PHO pathway, such as kcs1Δ and vip1Δ/kcs1Δ. They were significantly higher than in cells that do not constitutively activate the PHO pathway, such as wildtype or vip1Δ. In sum, these results suggest that the PHO pathway is regulated through binding of PP-IPs to the SPX domain of Pho81.
Inositol pyrophosphate binding to the SPX domain labilizes the Pho81-Pho80 interaction
The effect of inositol pyrophosphates on PHO pathway activation could be further investigated exploiting Pho80 substitutions (pho80R121K and pho80E154V) that labilize the interaction between Pho80 and Pho81 and render it Pi-sensitive (45). We introduced these labilizing Pho80 substitutions into our inositol pyrophosphate mutants, which in addition expressed a fluorescent Pho81yEGFP. Under Pi-replete conditions, wild-type cells expressing the pho80R121K or pho80E154V alleles as the sole source of Pho80 showed Pho81yEGFP in the cytosol (Fig. 6). They accumulated the protein in the nucleus only upon Pi starvation. This accumulation was more pronounced in pho80R121K than in pho80E154V, suggesting that pho80E154V affects the interaction with Pho81 more severely than pho80R121K. Pho81K154A-yEGFP, with a substitution inactivating its PP-IP binding site, accumulated in the nucleus of pho80R121K and pho80E154V cells already under Pi replete conditions, i.e., it behaved constitutively as under Pi starvation. vip1Δ mutants behaved like the wildtype, accumulating Pho81yEGFP in the nucleus of pho80R121K and pho80E154V cells upon Pi starvation. These observations favor a model in which binding of inositol pyrophosphates to the SPX domain of Pho81 decreases the affinity between Pho81 and Pho80 and thereby relieves the inhibition of the Pho80/85 complex by Pho81. The SPX domain itself may contribute to the interaction with Pho80 because Pho81ΔSPX-yEGFP, which lacks this SPX domain, could not even accumulate in nuclei upon Pi starvation (Fig. 6). An interesting side-observation is that Pi-starved cells showed Pho81yEGFP not only in the nucleus but also in small speckles which line the plasma membrane (Fig. 6). In pho80E154V cells, they were already visible under Pi-replete conditions, suggesting that binding to nuclear Pho80 competes with the recruitment of Pho81 into peripheral speckles. The nature of these speckles is unknown and was not pursued further in this study.
Discussion
The transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae to varying Pi supply is an important model system for studying gene regulation, promotor structure, and the impact of chromatin structure (38, 71). However, identification of the inositol pyrophosphates relaying phosphate availability to this PHO pathway has been challenging. This is mainly due to limitations in analytics. The recent development of a CE-MS method has provided a potent tool, allowing PP-IP analysis without radiolabeling and under any physiological condition. The improved separation, higher throughput and lower cost of this approach led us to re-investigate the role of PP-IPs in PHO pathway regulation. The results inspire a revised model differing from the traditional model in three aspects: We propose that Pi scarcity is signaled by a decrease in PP-IPs rather than by an increase; a critical function is ascribed to the loss of 1,5-IP8 instead of 1-IP7; and we postulate that the N-terminal SPX domain of Pho81 rather than the central minimum domain is the primary receptor mediating PP-IP-control over the PHO pathway.
Our observations reveal an effect that misled the interpretation of several preceding studies. This concerns our own work on the activation of the polyphosphate polymerase VTC. Our in vitro activity assays had shown a clear order of potency of PP-IPs in stimulating VTC, with 1,5-IP8 showing an apparent EC50 30-fold below that of 5-IP7 and 50-fold below that of 1-IP7 (4). In this work, we nevertheless dismissed 1,5-IP8 as a physiological stimulator of the VTC SPX domains based on the argument that a vip1Δ mutant, which lacks the enzyme for 1,5-IP8 synthesis, shows quite normal polyP accumulation in vivo. We proposed 5-IP7 for this role because a kcs1Δ mutant, which lacks the IP6K making this compound, also lacks polyP. The PP-IP analyses that we present now call for a re-interpretation of this model. The presence of polyP in a vip1Δ mutant can well be explained by the 20-fold over-accumulation of 5-IP7 in this mutant, which can compensate for the lower EC50 and permit stimulation of VTC through 5-IP7. In wildtype cells, however, where 5-IP7 is only twice as abundant as 1,5-IP8 (Fig. 2), 1,5-IP8 should be the relevant activator of VTC for polyP synthesis when Pi is abundant. Then, the situation is also compatible with results from S. pombe, where ablation of the Vip1 homolog Asp1 impairs polyP synthesis (20).
The transcriptional phosphate starvation response in S. pombe depends also on PP-IPs. However, the downstream executers differ from those present in S. cerevisiae. Fission yeast contains no homologs of Pho81, and the responsible transcription factor is not controlled through a Pho80/Pho85-like kinase (28–30). Nevertheless, important basic properties of the IP6K/PPIP5K system are conserved. Like in baker’s yeast, deletion of the Vip1 homolog Asp1 leads to a strong increase in IP7 (23). Characterization of the purified enzyme showed that Pi stimulates net production of IP8 by inhibiting the phosphatase domain of Asp1 (27). Thus, we must expect a decreased production of IP8 upon Pi starvation in vivo also in S. pombe. As for Vip1 in baker’s yeast, genetic ablation of Asp1 does not interfere with the induction of the phosphate-regulated gene PHO1 by Pi starvation, suggesting that 1-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 are not essential for this transcriptional response (28). In Pi-replete media, however, ablation of Asp1 hyper-represses PHO1, and putative overproduction of 1-IP7 and/or 1,5-IP8 by inactivation of the Asp1 phosphatase domain induces this gene (28, 72). It appears likely that this discrepancy also originates from a similar disequlibration of IP7 species as in Saccharomyces because ablation of Asp1 increases the IP7 pool 4-to 5-fold (23). This can be judged better once the changes of the different IP7 isomers will have been dissected under different Pi regimes in these mutants.
The PHO pathway in Cryptococcus neoformans, a pathogenic yeast, shares many protein components with that of S. cerevisiae and might hence be expected to function in a similar manner (73). Yet a recent study on this organism proposed 5-IP7 as the critical inducer of the PHO pathway (17). This model relies on the observation that kcs1Δ mutants, which lack 5-IP7, cannot induce the PHO pathway in this yeast. This is the opposite behavior compared to S. cerevisiae. It was hence concluded that, despite an experimentally observed moderate decline in 5-IP7 upon short Pi starvation, the remaining pool of 5-IP7 was required for PHO pathway activity. Substitution of basic residues in the PP-IP-binding pocket of C. neoformans Pho81 interfered with PHO pathway activation, lending further support to the conclusion. However, the same study also showed that Pho81 was lacking completely from kcs1Δ mutants. When the Pho81 PP-IP binding site was compromised by amino acid substitutions the Pho81 protein level was significantly reduced, and the protein almost vanished upon Pi starvation. This offers an alternative explanation of the effects because absence of the critical inhibitor Pho81 activates Pho85/80 kinase and represses the PHO pathway independently of Pi availability (39, 40). Destabilization of the Pho81 will then mask effects of PP-IPs. Thus, it remains possible that the PHO pathway in C. neoformans is controlled as in S. cerevisiae, i.e. that Pi starvation is signaled by a decline of 1,5-IP8. We analyzed the inositol pyrophosphates of C. neoformans by CE-MS. Upon shifting the cells from Pi-replete to Pi-starvation medium, all inositol pyrophosphates disappeared within 2 hours (Fig. S5). As in S. cerevisiae, 1,5-IP8 showed a faster and more profound response, becoming undetectable already after 20 min of Pi-starvation. Therefore, we consider it as likely that the loss of 1,5-IP8 signals Pi starvation also in C. neoformans.
Our results revise the widely accepted model of increased 1-IP7 as the trigger of the PHO pathway and the minimum domain of Pho81 as its receptor (15, 16). This model rests upon the increase of 1-IP7 upon Pi starvation, a reported constitutive activation of the PHO pathway in a ddp1Δ mutant, and upon the lack of rapid PHO pathway induction in a vip1Δ mutant. A later study from this group revealed that vip1Δ cells finally induced the PHO pathway after prolonged Pi starvation (74), but this did not lead to a revision of the model. Our results rationalize the strong delay of vip1Δ in PHO pathway induction by the overaccumulation of 5-IP7 in this mutant, which leads to aberrant PHO pathway silencing through this compound. Under Pi starvation, it takes several hours longer to degrade this exaggerated pool, which provides a satisfying explanation for the delayed PHO pathway induction in vip1Δ cells. Even though earlier studies of O’Shea and colleagues, due to the limited resolution of the radio-HPLC approach, could not differentiate between 1-and 5-IP7, these studies reported an increase in the IP7 pool upon Pi starvation (15). Other studies using a similar radio-HPLC approach suggested a decline of the IP7 pool upon long Pi withdrawal, but they analyzed only a single timepoint and could not exclude an earlier increase in 1-IP7 as a trigger for the PHO pathway (6, 17, 18). In our CE-MS analyses, we consistently observed strong, continuous declines of 1,5-IP8, 5-IP7 and 1-IP7 and, upon several hours of Pi starvation, their almost complete disappearance. Furthermore, we could not confirm the reported constitutive activation of the PHO pathway in a ddp1Δ mutant (15), although this mutant did show the expected increased 1-IP7 concentration. These observations argue against a role of 1-IP7, 5-IP7 or 1,5-IP8 as activators for Pho81 and the PHO pathway.
The link between 1-IP7 and Pho81 activation relied mainly on the use of the 80 amino acid minimum domain from the central region (15, 16, 45). This domain was used in in vitro experiments, where 1-IP7 stimulated binding of the minimum domain to Pho80, thereby inhibiting Pho85/Pho80. Given that 1-IP7 disappears under Pi starvation it appears unlikely that this in vitro effect is physiologically relevant. Furthermore, the apparent dissociation constant for the complex of 1-IP7 with the minimum domain and Pho80/Pho85 was determined to be 20 µM (16). The minimum domain is thus unlikely to respond to 1-IP7 in the cells because its Kd is almost 50-fold above the cellular concentrations of 1-IP7 in Pi-replete medium (0.5 µM; Fig. 2), and at least 3 orders of magnitude above the concentration remaining on Pi starvation media (< 20 nM). Another discrepancy is that the in vitro inhibition of Pho80/Pho85 by the minimum domain was reported to be specific for 1-IP7 whereas 5-IP7 had no effect (16). This contrasts with the in vivo situation, where we find that even massive overaccumulation of 1-IP7 by ablation of Ddp1 cannot trigger the PHO pathway, but where suppression of 5-IP7 and 1,5-IP8 production by ablation of Kcs1 does activate it constitutively (Fig. 3)(19).
An argument supporting a role of the minimum domain in mediating Pi-responsiveness was provided by in vivo experiments in a pho81Δ mutant, where Pi-dependent activation of the PHO pathway could be partially rescued through over-expression of the minimum domain (40, 45). PHO pathway activation was assayed through PHO5 expression. This is relevant because the PHO5 promotor is not only controlled through Pho85/Pho80-mediated phosphorylation of Pho4, but also through changes in nucleosome occupancy, which substantially influence activity and activation threshold of the PHO5 promotor (67, 69). It is thus conceivable that constitutive overexpression of the minimum domain reduces Pho85/Pho80 activity moderately, but sufficiently to allow regulation of PHO5 through nucleosome positioning, which changes in a Pi-dependent manner (67).
Even though the minimum domain is unlikely to function as a receptor for PP-IPs this does not draw into question that the minimum domain is critical for Pho81 function. This is suggested by substitutions and deletions in this domain, introduced into full-length Pho81, which constitutively repress the PHO pathway (40, 45). We hence explored the effects of the minimum domain by molecular modeling. Using Alphafold Multimer we generated models of Pho80 in complex with the minimum domain (Fig. 7). The structure predictions place the minimum domain in a groove of Pho80. This groove contains both E154 and R121, the two residues that were identified by a random mutagenesis approach as critical for the interaction between Pho80 and Pho81 (45). Modeling a Pho81/Pho85/Pho80 complex yielded a similar result. Also here, the minimum domain is modeled as a long unstructured loop associated with the groove containing E154 and R121. In this model, the minimum domain provides the contact between Pho80 and Pho81. This readily explains why substitutions in the Pho81 minimum domain (residues 690-701) as well as in Pho80 residues E154 or R121 destabilize the association of Pho81 with Pho85/Pho80 (75). The effects of substituting these residues lend credibility to this aspect of the structure prediction.
If the minimum domain itself may not serve as PP-IP receptor of Pho81 but is important for regulating Pho80/Pho85 activity, how does Pho81 receive information about cytosolic Pi levels? Our in vivo analyses of Pho81 regulation were performed with the full-length protein. In this context, the SPX domain exerts strong control over Pho81 activity, because a single substitution of one of the lysines in the PP-IP-binding patch, designed to mimic the PP-IP-free state (6), sufficed to induce Pho4 translocation and PHO pathway activation. This critical role of the SPX domain for controlling Pho81 is consistent with the results from two random mutagenesis approaches (40, 48), which had received little attention in the previous model of PHO pathway regulation (15, 16). These random mutagenesis approaches generated multiple pho81c alleles, which constitutively activate the PHO pathway (G4D, G147R, 158-SGSG-159, E79K). All these alleles affect the SPX domain at residues in the immediate vicinity of the PP-IP binding site (Fig. S3). Three of the alleles (G4D, G147R, 158-SGSG-159) replace small glycine residues by bulky residues or insert additional amino acids, respectively, at sites where they should sterically interfere with binding of inositol pyrophosphates (Fig. 8). We hence expect them to mimic the PP-IP-free state. In sum, multiple lines of evidence support the view that the SPX domain exerts dominant, 1,5-IP8 mediated control over Pho81 activity in response to Pi availability.
Taking all these aspects together, we propose the following working model (Fig. 9): Pi sufficiency in the cytosol is signaled through the accumulation of 1,5-IP8. Its binding to the SPX domain of Pho81 inactivates this CDK inhibitor and labilizes its interaction with Pho85/Pho80. The now un-inhibited kinase phosphorylates Pho4, triggers its relocation into the cytosol and represses the PHO pathway. Pi limitation is signaled by a decline in 1,5-IP8, resulting in the ligand-free form of the SPX domain and the activation of Pho81. Activation of Pho81 allows its minimum domain to bind a groove in the cyclin Pho80, which stabilizes the complex and inhibits Pho85 kinase. An obvious question arising from this model is how the availability of the minimum domain for Pho80 binding could be controlled. An attractive speculation is that this control could be exerted through an interaction with the SPX domain. This aspect will be explored in future work.
In low Pi, 1,5-IP8 and other pyrophosphates decline. Liberation of the SPX domain from this ligand allows Pho81 to insert its minimum domain into a critical cleft of Pho80, binding Pho80-85 more tightly and inhibiting it. This allows dephosphorylation of Pho4, its concentration in the nucleus and activation of the PHO pathway. This inhibition is reinforced by increased expression of PHO81, which itself is a PHO pathway-controlled gene.
This revision of PHO pathway regulation permits to develop a coherent picture on intracellular phosphate signaling across the eukaryotic kingdoms. Phosphate abundance being indicated by the accumulation of 1,5-IP8 is compatible with the situation in mammalian cells, where 1,5-IP8 triggers Pi export through the putative phosphate transporter XPR1 (11, 76), and with the situation in plants where IP8 are only abundant on high-Pi substrate and suppresses the phosphate starvation response (10). Thus, we propose that phosphate scarcity in eukaryotes is generally signaled through a loss of 1,5-IP8.
Materials and Methods
S. cerevisiae culture
Cells have been grown in liquid Synthetic Complete (SC) medium of the following composition: 3.25 g YNB without amino acids (Difco 291920); 1 g Synthetic Complete Mixture (Kaiser) Drop-Out: Complete (Formedium DSCK1000); 50 ml 20% glucose; 450 ml demineralized water. Phosphate starvation experiments were performed in SC-Pi medium: 3.25g YNB without amino acids and phosphate, supplemented with KCl (Formedium CYN6703); 1 g Synthetic Complete Mixture (Kaiser) Drop-Out: Complete (Formedium DSCK1000); 50ml 20% glucose; 450 ml water. These synthetic media were sterile filtered and tested for absence of free Pi by the malachite green assay. Cultures were shaken in capped Erlenmeyer flasks at 150 rpm at 30°C unless stated otherwise.
Yeast strains and their genetic manipulation
The S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed and described in the Electronic Supporting Information. DNA transformations were carried out with overnight cultures at 30°C in YPD medium (Yeast Extract-Peptone-Dextrose) using the following protocol: Cultures (not exceeding 107 cells/mL) were centrifuged at 1800 x g for 2 min. 25 μL of pellet was resuspended in 25 μL of LiAc-TE 0.1 M (Lithium acetate 0.1M, Tris 10 mM, EDTA 1 mM). The cell suspension was supplemented with 240 μL of PEG 50%, 36 μL of LiAC 1 M, 5 μL of boiled ssDNA, and the DNA (200 ng of plasmid and/or 0.5-2 mg of PCR product). After 30 min at 30°C, a heat shock was carried out at 42°C for 20 min. Cells were then centrifuged at 1800 x g for 2 min, resuspended in 150 μL of water, and grown on selective plates for 2 to 4 days. Fluorescent protein tags have been obtained using a standard method (77), except for Hta2 tagging, which was performed by CRISPR-Cas9. All introduced single mutations, knockouts, and fluorescent protein tags were confirmed by PCR and sequencing.
Plasmid constructions
The plasmids used to carry out CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing were obtained by cloning hybridized oligonucleotides coding for the sgRNA between the XbaI and AatII restriction sites of the parent plasmid (pSP473, pSP475 or pSP476). The plasmids used to overexpress Vip1 (pVC97 and pVC114) were obtained by cloning the vip1 open reading frame between the BamHI and SalI restriction sites of the parent plasmid (respectively pRS415-GDP and pRS413-GPD) (78). The plasmid used to monitor prPho5-GFP expression (pVC115) was obtained by replacing the pgk1 promoter with the −1 to −1500 region of the pho5 promoter and by replacing the gene for G418 resistance to the coding region of the leu2 gene within the pCEV-G1 backbone (Addgene).
Fluorescence microscopy
Cells were grown logarithmically in SC medium for 12-15 h until they reached a density of 107 cells/mL. For Pi starvation experiments, overnight-grown cells were washed twice, resuspended in SC-Pi medium at a density of ca. 5×106 cells/mL, and incubated at 30°C. Fluorescence images were recorded on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2/Yokogawa CSU-X1 Spinning Disk microscope equipped with two Prime BSI sCMOS cameras (Teledyne Photometrics), a LightHUB Ultra® Laser Light (Omicron Laserage), and an Apo TIRF 100×/1.49 Oil lens (Nikon). Time-lapse experiments were performed on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope equipped with a Prime BSI sCMOS camera (Teledyne Photometrics), a Spectra X Light Engine (Lumencor), a Plan Apo λ 100×/1.45 Oil lens (Nikon). Microscopy chambers were made using sticky-Slides VI 0.4 (Ibidi) glued onto concanavalin a-coated cover slips (Knittel glass, 24 x 60 x 0.13 – 0.17 mm). The cell suspension (200 μL, 107 cells/mL) was added to the chamber. After 30 seconds of sedimentation, a flow of SC medium was applied using the microfluidic flow controller AF1 Mk2 (Elveflow) coupled to a MUX distributor (Elveflow). After 2 min, the flow was switched to SC-Pi medium, and imaging was started. After further 2 min, the flow was stopped, and the time lapse was continued by recording one image every 5 min. The temperature was kept at 30°C using the stage-top incubator Uno-Controller (Okolab).
Western Blots
5 mL of cells grown overnight in SC medium (until ca. 107 cells/mL) was centrifuged (1800 x g, 2 min). Cells were resuspended in 1 mL of lithium acetate (2 M) and centrifuged as before. Cells were resuspended in 1 mL of sodium hydroxide (0.4 M) and kept on ice for 5 min. After centrifugation (1800 x g, 2 min), cells were resuspended in 100 μL of SDS-PAGE Sample Buffer and boiled for 5 min. After centrifugation under the same conditions, the supernatant was collected, and the protein content was measured using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Witec). Supernatant concentrations were adjusted, and the samples were loaded on SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
Inositol pyrophosphate quantification
Cells were logarithmically grown in SC medium overnight to reach a density of 107 cells/mL. 1 mL of cell culture was mixed with 100 µL of 11 M perchloric acid (Roth HN51.3). After snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen, the samples were thawed and cell debris was removed by centrifugation (15’000 x g, 3 min, 4°C). Titanium dioxide beads (Titansphere TiO beads 5 mm, GL Sciences 5020-75000) were pretreated by washing them once with water, once with 1 M PA and finally resuspending them in 200 µl 1 M PA. The cell supernatant was mixed with 1.5 mg of beads and incubated with shaking or on a rotating wheel for 15 min at 4°C. The beads were collected by centrifugation (15’000 x g, 1 min, 4°C) and washed twice with 1 M perchloric acid. Inositol phosphates were eluted by 300 mL of 3% ammonium hydroxide and the eluate was evaporated using a speed-vac concentrator at 42°C and 2000 rpm overnight. The pellet was resuspended using 20 ml of water. CE-ESI-MS analysis was performed on an Agilent 7100 CE coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (QqQ MS) Agilent 6495c, equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream (AJS) electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Stable CE-ESI-MS coupling was enabled by a commercial sheath liquid coaxial interface, with an isocratic LC pump constantly delivering the sheath-liquid.
Spectrofluorimetry
Cells were grown overnight to a density of 5×106 cells/mL in SC medium. They were then resuspended in SC-Pi medium after two washing steps. For each timepoint, the concentration of the cell suspension was measured and adjusted to 107 cells/mL before fluorescence measurement. The fluorescence of yEGFP (λex: 400 nm; λem: 500-600 nm; λcutoff: 495 nm) and mCherry (λex: 580 nm; λem: 600-700 nm; λcutoff: 590 nm) were measured on a SpectraMax Gemini EM microplate fluorimeter at 30°C.
Analysis of IPP in C. neoformans
C. neoformans grubii wildtype cells were grown in liquid synthetic complete (SC) medium to logarithmic phase. They were sedimented (3000 x g, 1 min, 4°C), washed twice with phosphate-free medium, aliquoted, and used to inoculate four 25 ml cultures in SD medium lacking phosphate. The inoculum was adjusted (starting OD600 at 0.9, 0.6, 0.4, 0.3 etc, respectively) such that after further incubation for 0 to 240 min all samples had similar OD600 at the time of harvesting. The sample for the 0 min timepoint was taken from the culture in SC medium. The starvation time was counted beginning with the first wash. At the indicated time points, the OD600 of the culture was measured. A 4 ml sample was collected, supplemented with 400 µl of 11 M perchloric acid (PA), frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at - 80°C. The samples were thawed and IPPs were extracted using 6 mg TiO2 beads due to the higher number of cells. All further steps were as described above for S. cerevisiae samples.
Acknowledgements
We thank Julianne Djordjevic and John York for strains and discussion and Dorothea Fiedler for 13C-labelled PP-IP standards. This study was supported by grants from SNSF (CRSII5_170925) and ERC (788442) to AM, from HFSP (LT000588/2019) to GK, and from the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germanýs Excellence Strategy (CIBSS – EXC-2189 – Project ID 390939984) to HJJ.
Supplementary Information
Strains
The S. cerevisiae strains used in this study were all obtained by genetic manipulations from the BY4741 background described in Table S1. This strain corresponds to the wild-type of this study. For the sake of clarity, the BY4741 background was therefore not indicated in the genotype of each mutant strain.
Plasmids
Oligonucleotides
CE-ESI-MS parameters
All experiments were performed with a bare fused silica capillary with a length of 100 cm and 50 μm internal diameter. 35 mM ammonium acetate titrated by ammonia solution to pH 9.7 was used as background electrolyte (BGE). The sheath liquid was composed of a water-isopropanol (1:1) mixture, with a flow rate of 10 µL/min. 15 µL Inositol pyrophosphate extracts was spiked with 0.75 µL isotopic internal standards mixture (2 µM [13C6]1IP8, 10 µM [13C6]5-IP7, 10 µM [13C6]1-IP7 and 40 µM [13C6]IP6). Samples were introduced by applying 100 mbar pressure for 10 s (20 nL). A separation voltage of +30 kV was applied over the capillary, generating a constant CE current at around 19 µA.
The MS source parameters setting were as follows: nebulizer pressure was 8 psi, sheath gas temperature was 175 °C and with a flow at 8 L/min, gas temperature was 150 °C and, with a flow of 11 L/min, the capillary voltage was −2000 V with nozzle voltage 2000V. Negative high pressure RF and low pressure RF (Ion Funnel parameters) was 70V and 40V, respectively. Parameters for MRM transitions are in Table S4.
Supplementary Figures
References
- 1.Phosphate Homeostasis - A Vital Metabolic Equilibrium Maintained Through the INPHORS Signaling PathwayFront Microbiol 11
- 2.Eukaryotic Phosphate Homeostasis: The Inositol Pyrophosphate PerspectiveTrends Biochem Sci 42:219–231
- 3.The emerging importance of the SPX domain-containing proteins in phosphate homeostasisNew Phytol 193:842–851
- 4.Inositol Pyrophosphate Specificity of the SPX-Dependent Polyphosphate Polymerase VTCACS Chem. Biol 12:648–653
- 5.5-Diphosphoinositol Pentakisphosphate (5-IP7) Regulates Phosphate Release from Acidocalcisomes and Yeast VacuolesJ. Biol. Chem., jbc.RA118.005884
- 6.Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domainsScience 352:986–990
- 7.Inositol pyrophosphates promote the interaction of SPX domains with the coiled-coil motif of PHR transcription factors to regulate plant phosphate homeostasisNature communications 12:1–13
- 8.Rice SPX-Major Facility Superfamily3, a Vacuolar Phosphate Efflux Transporter, Is Involved in Maintaining Phosphate Homeostasis in RicePlant Physiol 169:2822–2831
- 9.Identification of plant vacuolar transporters mediating phosphate storageNature communications 7
- 10.Inositol Pyrophosphate InsP8 Acts as an Intracellular Phosphate Signal in ArabidopsisMol Plant 12:1463–1473
- 11.Control of XPR1-dependent cellular phosphate efflux by InsP8 is an exemplar for functionally-exclusive inositol pyrophosphate signalingProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 14
- 12.The inositol hexakisphosphate kinases IP6K1 and - 2 regulate human cellular phosphate homeostasis, including XPR1-mediated phosphate exportJ. Biol. Chem., jbc.RA119.007848
- 13.ITPK1 is an InsP6/ADP phosphotransferase that controls phosphate signaling in ArabidopsisMol Plant https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.07.011
- 14.VIH2 Regulates the Synthesis of Inositol Pyrophosphate InsP8 and Jasmonate-Dependent Defenses in ArabidopsisPlant Cell 27:1082–1097
- 15.Regulation of a Cyclin-CDK-CDK Inhibitor Complex by Inositol PyrophosphatesScience 316:109–112
- 16.Molecular basis of cyclin-CDK-CKI regulation by reversible binding of an inositol pyrophosphateNat Chem Biol 4:25–32
- 17.IP7-SPX Domain Interaction Controls Fungal Virulence by Stabilizing Phosphate Signaling MachineryMBio 11
- 18.Identification of an evolutionary conserved family of inorganic polyphosphate endopolyphosphatasesJ Biol Chem https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111.266320
- 19.Plc1p, Arg82p, and Kcs1p, enzymes involved in inositol pyrophosphate synthesis, are essential for phosphate regulation and polyphosphate accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJ Biol Chem 280:25127–25133
- 20.The PPIP5K Family Member Asp1 Controls Inorganic Polyphosphate Metabolism in S. pombeJ Fungi (Basel) 7
- 21.Asp1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe binds a [2Fe-2S](2+) cluster which inhibits inositol pyrophosphate 1-phosphatase activityBiochemistry 54:6462–6474
- 22.A two-way switch for inositol pyrophosphate signaling: Evolutionary history and biological significance of a unique, bifunctional kinase/phosphataseAdv Biol Regul 100674
- 23.Asp1 Bifunctional Activity Modulates Spindle Function via Controlling Cellular Inositol Pyrophosphate Levels in Schizosaccharomyces pombeMol Cell Biol 38
- 24.The inositol pyrophosphate kinase Asp1 modulates chromosome segregation fidelity and spindle function in S. pombeMol Cell Biol, MCB.00330-16
- 25.The Vip1 inositol polyphosphate kinase family regulates polarized growth and modulates the microtubule cytoskeleton in fungiPLoS Genet 10
- 26.Inositol pyrophosphates impact phosphate homeostasis via modulation of RNA 3’ processing and transcription terminationNucleic Acids Res 47:8452–8469
- 27.Activities and Structure-Function Analysis of Fission Yeast Inositol Pyrophosphate (IPP) Kinase-Pyrophosphatase Asp1 and Its Impact on Regulation of pho1 Gene ExpressionMbio :e01034–22
- 28.Dissection of the PHO pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using epistasis and the alternate repressor adenineCurr Genet 61:175–183
- 29.Systematic screen of Schizosaccharomyces pombe deletion collection uncovers parallel evolution of the phosphate signal transduction pathway in yeastsEukaryotic Cell 10:198–206
- 30.Genome-wide characterization of the phosphate starvation response in Schizosaccharomyces pombeBMC Genomics 13
- 31.Genetic screen for suppression of transcriptional interference identifies a gain-of-function mutation in Pol2 termination factor Seb1Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 118
- 32.RNA polymerase II CTD interactome with 3ʹ processing and termination factors in fission yeast and its impact on phosphate homeostasisProc National Acad Sci 115:E10652–E10661
- 33.RNA polymerase II CTD phospho-sites Ser5 and Ser7 govern phosphate homeostasis in fission yeastRna New York N Y 21:1770–80
- 34.Individual letters of the RNA polymerase II CTD code govern distinct gene expression programs in fission yeastProc National Acad Sci 111:4185–4190
- 35.Importance of Radioactive Labelling to Elucidate Inositol Polyphosphate SignallingTop Curr Chem (Cham) 375
- 36.pH homeostasis in yeast; the phosphate perspectiveCurr Genet 274:30052–7
- 37.Nutrient sensing and signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFEMS Microbiol Rev 38:254–299
- 38.The yeast PHO5 promoter: from single locus to systems biology of a paradigm for gene regulation through chromatinNucleic Acids Res 42:10888–10902
- 39.Phosphate-regulated inactivation of the kinase PHO80-PHO85 by the CDK inhibitor PHO81Science 266:122–126
- 40.Functional domains of Pho81p, an inhibitor of Pho85p protein kinase, in the transduction pathway of Pi signals in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMol Cell Biol 15:997–1004
- 41.Function of the PHO regulatory genes for repressible acid phosphatase synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMol. Gen. Genet 217:40–46
- 42.Phosphorylation regulates association of the transcription factor Pho4 with its import receptor Pse1/Kap121Genes Dev 12:2673–2683
- 43.The receptor Msn5 exports the phosphorylated transcription factor Pho4 out of the nucleusNature 396:482–486
- 44.Roles of phosphorylation sites in regulating activity of the transcription factor Pho4Science 284:977–980
- 45.Functional analysis of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Pho81 identifies a novel inhibitory domainMol Cell Biol 21:6695–6705
- 46.Truncated forms of a novel yeast protein suppress the lethality of a G protein alpha subunit deficiency by interacting with the beta subunitJ Biol Chem 270:25435–25444
- 47.Characterization of a dominant, constitutive mutation, PHOO, for the repressible acid phosphatase synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJ Bacteriol 120:608–17
- 48.Molecular analysis of the PHO81 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNucleic Acids Res 21:1975–1982
- 49.Negative transcriptional regulation of PH081 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeGene 168:23–29
- 50.Analysis of inositol phosphate metabolism by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometryNature communications 11:6035–12
- 51.Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry identifies new isomers of inositol pyrophosphates in mammalian tissuesChem Sci 14:658–667
- 52.A conserved family of enzymes that phosphorylate inositol hexakisphosphateScience 316:106–109
- 53.Synthesis of diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate by a newly identified family of higher inositol polyphosphate kinasesCurr Biol 9:1323–1326
- 54.Structural and catalytic analyses of the InsP6 kinase activities of higher plant ITPKsFaseb J 36
- 55.Structural basis for an inositol pyrophosphate kinase surmounting phosphate crowdingNat Chem Biol 8:111–116
- 56.New structural insights reveal an expanded reaction cycle for inositol pyrophosphate hydrolysis by human DIPP1FASEB J 35
- 57.Structural and biochemical characterization of Siw14: A protein-tyrosine phosphatase fold that metabolizes inositol pyrophosphatesJ. Biol. Chem 293:6905–6914
- 58.The InsP7 phosphatase Siw14 regulates inositol pyrophosphate levels to control localization of the general stress response transcription factor Msn2J. Biol. Chem., jbc.RA119.012148
- 59.Vip1 is a kinase and pyrophosphatase switch that regulates inositol diphosphate signalingProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 117:9356–9364
- 60.Harnessing 13C-labeled myo-inositol to interrogate inositol phosphate messengers by NMRChem Sci 10:5267–5274
- 61.Scalable Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Inositol PyrophosphatesBiochemistry 58:3927–3932
- 62.Quantitative analysis of yeast internal architecture using soft X-ray tomographyYeast 28:227–236
- 63.An intracellular phosphate buffer filters transient fluctuations in extracellular phosphate levelsProc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9565–9570
- 64.Positive feedback regulates switching of phosphate transporters in S. cerevisiaeMol Cell 27:1005–1013
- 65.Regulation of PHO4 nuclear localization by the PHO80-PHO85 cyclin-CDK complexScience 271:209–212
- 66.Nutrient-regulated antisense and intragenic RNAs modulate a signal transduction pathway in yeastPLoS Biol 6:2817–2830
- 67.Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elementsEmbo J 5:2689–2696
- 68.Redundancy of chromatin remodeling pathways for the induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter in vivoJournal of Biological Chemistry 282:27610–27621
- 69.Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic rangeNature 453:246–250
- 70.Metabolic intermediates selectively stimulate transcription factor interaction and modulate phosphate and purine pathwaysGenes Dev 23:1399–1407
- 71.Effective dynamics of nucleosome configurations at the yeast PHO5 promoterElife 10
- 72.A genetic screen for suppressors of hyper-repression of the fission yeast PHO regulon by Pol2 CTD mutation T4A implicates inositol 1-pyrophosphates as agonists of precocious lncRNA transcription terminationNucleic Acids Res 48
- 73.Identification of genes involved in the phosphate metabolism in Cryptococcus neoformansFungal Genet Biol 80:19–30
- 74.A systematic genetic screen for genes involved in sensing inorganic phosphate availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiaePLoS ONE 12
- 75.Structure of the Pho85-Pho80 CDK-cyclin complex of the phosphate-responsive signal transduction pathwayMol Cell 28:614–623
- 76.Inorganic phosphate export by the retrovirus receptor XPR1 in metazoansCell Rep 3:1866–1873
- 77.Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast 21:661–670
- 78.Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgroundsGene 156:119–122
Article and author information
Author information
Version history
- Sent for peer review:
- Preprint posted:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
- Reviewed Preprint version 2:
- Version of Record published:
Copyright
© 2023, Chabert et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
- views
- 1,967
- downloads
- 213
- citations
- 25
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.