Parallel processing of quickly and slowly mobilized reserve vesicles in hippocampal synapses

  1. Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, UK
  2. Institute for Neurosciences CSIC-UMH, San Juan de Alicante, Spain

Peer review process

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, public reviews, and a provisional response from the authors.

Read more about eLife’s peer review process.

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    Nils Brose
    Max Planck Institute of Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
  • Senior Editor
    Lu Chen
    Stanford University, Stanford, United States of America

Joint Public Review:

This study is concerned with the general question as to how pools of synaptic vesicles are organized in presynaptic terminals to support different types of transmitter release, such as fast synchronous and asynchronous release. To address this issue, the authors employed the classical method of loading synaptic vesicle membranes with FM-styryl dyes and assessing dye destaining during repetitive synapse stimulation by live imaging as a readout of the mobilization of vesicles for fusion. Among other findings, the authors provide evidence indicating that there are multiple reserve vesicle pools, that quickly and slowly mobilized reserves do not mix, and that vesicle fusion does not follow a mono-exponential time course, leading to the notion that two separate reserve pools of vesicles - slowly vs. rapidly mobilizing - feed two distinct releasable pools - reluctantly vs. rapidly releasing. These findings are valuable to the field of synapse biology, where the organization of synaptic vesicle pools that support synaptic transmission in different temporal and stimulation regimes has been a focus of intense experimentation and discussion for more than two decades.

On the other hand, the present study has limitations, so that the authors' key conclusions remain incompletely supported by the data, and alternative interpretations of the data remain possible. The approach of using bulk FM-styryl dye destaining as a readout of precise vesicle arrangements and pools in a population of functionally very diverse synapses bears problems. In essence, the approach is 'blind' to many additional processes and confounding factors that operate in the background, from other forms of release to inter-synaptic vesicle exchange. Further, averaging signals over many - functionally very diverse - synapses makes it difficult to distinguish the dynamics of separate vesicle pools within single synapses from a scenario where different kinetics of release originate from different types of synapses with different release probabilities.

Author Response:

We are grateful to the editors for getting our study reviewed, and are pleased that the reviewers found value in our findings. We plan to submit a revision that we believe can resolve much of the remaining doubt about the major conclusions.

Our current understanding is that much of the uncertainty stems from extensive diversity among synapses. The FM-dye de-staining technique does have single synapse resolution, so it should be possible to develop new kinds of analysis that can make each of our points at the level of individual synapses. For a preview, see Figure 2D (explained in lines 126-141), and Figure 2-Figure supplement 5 of the current version.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation