CMUS depression male mice have a decreased firing activity and down-regulated TRPC6 expression in the VTA DA neurons.
A. Experimental procedure timeline. B. i: Sucrose preference test for CMUS mice. Two-sample T test, t = 5.810, P = 0.0001, compared with control mice. ii: Tail suspension test for CMUS mice, Two-sample T test, t = 4.689, P = 0.0005, compared with control mice. C. Loose cell-attached current clamp recordings of the spontaneous firing of the VTA DA neurons from the CMUS (n = 28, N = 5, DAT positive) and the control (n = 18, N = 5, DAT positive) mice. The inset on the top of i and ii shows a map of a coronal midbrain slice indicating the location of neurons that were recorded and subsequently identified as DA neurons which were DAT positive with single cell-PCR (i: Con, grey dots; ii: CMUS, red dots). Examples of firing traces in the bottom of i as well as in the bottom left of ii and summarized data in the bottom right of ii were shown. Mann-Whitney U test, U = 118, P = 0.0020. D. Representative Western blot assay (i) and summarized data (ii) showing the expression of TRPC6 and GAPDH in the VTA of the control (Con, N = 6) and the CMUS (N = 6) mice. Two-sample T test, t = 4.848, P = 0.0007. E. i and ii: Example traces (up) and time-course (bottom) of firing frequency of mPFC-projecting VTA DA neurons, effect of 2-APB. (i) Con, (ii) CMUS. iii. Summarized effect of 2-APB in the control (n = 12 cells, N = 5, DAT positive) and CMUS (n = 15 cells, N=5, DAT positive) mice. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, Con vs. CMUS: F (1, 25) = 3.411, Con-ACSF vs. CMUS-ACSF, P = 0.0001; Con-2-APB vs. CMUS-2-APB, P = 0.0164. ACSF vs. 2-APB: F (1, 25) = 92.43, Con-ACSF vs. Con-2-APB, P = 0.0001; CMUS-ACSF vs. CMUS-2-APB, P = 0.2259. iv. The inhibition rate (%) on firing rate by 2-APB in the control group (n = 12, N=5) and the CMUS group (n = 15, N = 5). Mann-Whitney U test, U = 1, P = 0.0001. The inset on the top of iii and iv shows a map of a coronal midbrain slice indicating the location of mPFC-projecting neurons that were recorded and subsequently identified as DA neurons which were DAT positive with single cell-PCR (iii: Con, grey dots; iv: CMUS, red dots). F. i and ii: Example traces (up) and time-course (bottom) of firing frequency of mPFC-projecting VTA DA neurons, effects of LA.(i) Con, (ii) CMUS. iii. Summarized effect of LA on the control (n = 17 cells, N = 8, DAT positive) and CMUS (n = 19 cells, N = 8, DAT positive) mice. Kruslal-Wallis-H test with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, H = 53.08, Con-ACSF vs. Con-LA: P = 0.0001, Con-ACSF vs. CMUS-ACSF: P = 0.0023, CON-LA vs. CMUS-LA: P = 0.0187, CMUS-ACSF vs. CMUS-LA: P > 0.9999. iv. The inhibition rate (%) on firing rate by LA in the control group (n = 17, N = 8) and the CMUS group (n = 19, N = 8). Mann-Whitney U test, U = 0, P = 0.0001. The inset on the top of iii and iv shows a map of a coronal midbrain slice indicating the location of mPFC-projecting neurons that were recorded and subsequently identified as DA neurons which were DAT positive with single cell-PCR (iii: Con, grey dots; iv: CMUS, red dots). n.s. P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. n is number of neurons recorded and N is the number of mice used.