Full-length proteins exit the ER faster than TMD-only versions regardless of raft affinity.

(A) Exemplary images of GPMVs from cells expressing raft-preferring LAT-TMD (left) or non-raft-preferring allL-TMD (right). The RFP-tagged TMDs are shown in cyan; magenta shows the disordered phase marker Fast DiO (F-DiO). Bottom row shows fluorescence intensity line scans along white lines shown in cyan images, revealing protein partitioning between raft and non-raft phases. (B) The ratio of intensities in raft versus non-raft phase is the raft partition coefficient (Kp,raft). LAT-TMD and full-length LAT are enriched in the raft phase while allL-TMD (and full-length LAT with allL-TMD, LAT-allL) are largely depleted from raft phase. SBP-tagging (for RUSH assay) has no effect on raft affinity. Symbols represent 3 independent experiments with >10 GPMVs/experiment. All blue labeled constructs are not statistically different from one another, and each is p<0. 01 different from all red constructs. (C) Schematic of RUSH assay. (D) Confocal images of co-transfected LAT-EGFP and LAT-TMD-mRFP at various time points after biotin introduction. Full-length LAT exits ER faster. (E) Fraction of ER-positive cells decreases over time, allowing quantitative estimation of ER exit kinetics (t1/2). Symbols represent average +/- st.dev. from >3 independent experiments. Fits represent exponential decays with shading representing 95% confidence intervals. (F) Confocal images of various full-length and TMD-only RUSH constructs (RFP-tagged) at 0 and 60 min after biotin introduction. (G) Quantification of t1/2 for ER exit comparing full-length and TMD-only proteins (blue represents raft-enriched proteins, red = raft-depleted; see Table S1 for Kp,raft quantifications). Bars represent average ± st.dev. from 3 independent experiments; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. All scale bars correspond to 5 µm.

Identification of ER exit motif of LAT.

(A) Schematic of LAT and the truncated versions used here. Inset shows a putative COPII association motif and the evolutionary conservation of residues 144-153 of hLAT. (B) Temporal dependence of the fraction of ER-positive cells for LAT truncations. Deletion of a region comprised of residues 140-185 leads to slow ER exit. (C) Fitted ER exit kinetics for the constructs represented in panel C. Deletion of amino acids 140-185 slows ER exit kinetics by ∼4-fold. (D) Temporal dependence of fraction of ER-positive cells with point mutations of ΦxΦxΦ motif. Mutations of key residues within the motif slow ER exit kinetics. (E) Fitted ER exit kinetics for point mutants in panel D. (F) Insertion of AaPsA motif into LAT-TMD accelerates ER exit kinetics. B&D show a representative experiment with exponential decay fits; points in C,E, and F represent t1/2 values of ER exit from fits of independent repeats with >20 cells/experiment. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, nsp>0.05.

Golgi exit kinetics of LAT are dependent on its association with raft domains.

(A) Representative confocal images of Golgi RUSH experiment show notable Golgi retention of non-raft constructs (LAT-allL and allL-TMD) after 90 min of biotin addition, in contrast to raft-preferring LAT and LAT-TMD. (B) Temporal reduction of protein constructs remaining in Golgi after biotin addition (i.e. release from Golgi RUSH), quantified by immunostaining and colocalization with Golgi marker (Giantin, see Fig S4). Symbols represent average +/- st.dev. from 3 independent experiments with >15 cells/experiment. Fits represent exponential decays; shading represents 95% confidence intervals. (C) Golgi exit rates for raft-associated LAT constructs are ∼2.5-fold faster than non-raft versions for both full-length and TMD-only. Points represent t1/2 values from fits of independent repeats with >20 cells/experiment. *p<0.05, nsp>0.05. (D) Representative confocal images of full-length LAT and LAT-allL during Golgi temperature block. Addition of biotin at 17°C releases ER-RUSH constructs but traps them in Golgi. Removing temperature block by incubation at 37°C leads to fast PM trafficking of LAT but not non-raft LAT-allL. (E) Fraction of proteins in Golgi for the constructs shown in D, calculated as in B. Fits represent exponential decays. (inset) Golgi exit kinetics quantified as in C. All scale bars = 5 µm.

Kinetic model describing secretory traffic of LAT-based constructs.

(A) Schematic of kinetic model. (B) Global fit of model with four free parameters to ER and Golgi RUSH data for four experimental constructs. (C) Global fit of model with five free parameters (different Kp,ERex for LAT and LAT-allL). (D) Representative confocal images of Golgi RUSH experiments show notable Golgi retention for raft-preferring LAT after 2-day pre-treatment with Myr+ZA. Scale bars = 5 µm. (E) Temporal dependence of the fraction of protein constructs remaining in Golgi after biotin addition (to release from Golgi RUSH). Symbols represent average +/- st dev from 3 independent experiments with > 15 cells/exp. (F) Golgi exit rate for the raft-probe LAT-TMD is reduced when raft lipid synthesis is inhibited by Myr-ZA treatment. Points represent t1/2 values of Golgi exit from fits of independent repeats with >20 cells/experiment. **p<0.01, nsp>0.05.

Raft probes segregate from non-raft in Golgi.

(A) Raft vs non-raft probes trapped in Golgi by Golgi-RUSH (i.e. without biotin) and imaged by structured-illumination microscopy (SIM). (B) SIM images of localization of raft vs non-raft probes after 5 minutes of biotin addition to release Golgi RUSH. (C) Quantification of colocalization from SIM images by Pearson’s coefficient in A and B. Symbols represent average +/- st. dev. from 3 independent experiments with >15 cells/experiment. (D) Confocal images of cellular localization of co-transfected probes in cells grown at 20°C to accumulate probes in Golgi. (E) Quantification of colocalization under the conditions represented in D. Significances shown are relative to LAT-to-LAT-TMD. (F) Images of cellular localization of co-transfected Golgi-RUSH probes after treatment with biotin or C6-Cer. (G) Quantification of colocalization under the conditions represented in F. Significances shown are relative to - biotin/-Cer. (H) Quantification of raft affinity (Kp,raft) of TGN46 and ST, representatives of different Golgi sub-compartments. (I) Representative images of raft probes relative to Golgi sub-compartment markers under C6-Cer treatment. (J) Quantification of colocalization of proteins represented in I. Symbols in all quantifications are average +/- st. dev. from 3 independent experiments with >15 cells/experiment. *p<0.05.