Degree of physical overlap, measured as an F1 score, between automatically segmented blood cells and manual sets validates the accuracy of our automated workflow.
(A) Validation regions in 5dpf fish were taken from a section of the dorsal aorta with few blood cells and abundant tissue background (a’), and the heart, which is dense in blood cells and low in other biological background (a’’). This allowed us to test automated segmentation accuracy in widely varied regions. (B) A region used for validation is shown with various degree of overlap between manually and automatically segmented cells. Arrows point to examples of clear false positives (black arrow), clear false negatives (blue arrow) and potential true positives (white arrow). (C) Optimizing similarity of automatically segmented cells to manual validation sets was done quantitatively. F1 scores were generated using increasing Dice-Sorensen coefficients as requirements for what degree of overlap between a manually segmented and automatically segmented cell qualifies as a true positive. Pre-processing the raw micro-CT data using the probability map and post-processing the data by filtering cells using the known biological shape statistics of blood cells increased the performance of the automated segmentation pipeline, both in validation regions of the heart and aorta (blue arrows). (D) The overlap (D’’’) of a single cell, segmented manually (D’) and automatically (D’’), is shown as a 3D render. Qualitative observation of an optimized output shows a large degree of overlap (blue) between the segmented data.