Representation of genetic distances between modern and archaic haplotypes.
(A) Heatmap displaying the divergence between Tibetan and Han Chinese NOS2 haplotypes with respect to the Denisovan sequence. Haplotypes are reported in rows, while derived (i.e., black square) and ancestral (i.e., white square) alleles are displayed in columns. Haplotypes are ranked from top to bottom according to their number of pairwise differences with respect to the Denisovan sequence. A total of 14 haplotypes belonging to individuals with Tibetan ancestry are plotted in the upper part of the heatmap (i.e., the first quartile of haplotype distribution). These haplotypes account for 33% of the haplotypes inferred for Tibetans and are characterized by 32 or less pairwise differences with respect to the Denisovan sequence. (B-D) Barplots showing the number and cumulative proportions of NOS2, EPAS1 and EGLN1 Tibetan and Han Chinese haplotypes in each haplotype class defined according to the number of pairwise differences between modern and archaic sequences. In all plots are reported on the x-axis the haplotype classes, while on the first and on the second y-axes are indicated the number of haplotypes belonging to each haplotype class (i.e., blue/red bars) and the cumulative proportion of haplotypes (i.e., blue/red lines), respectively. (B) NOS2 presents a pattern qualitatively comparable to the one displayed for the EPAS1 gene, with 46% of haplotype classes presenting a greater value for the cumulative proportion of TIB haplotypes (i.e., blue line) rather than CHB ones (i.e., red line). (C) The EPAS1 plot represents the trend expected for genes involved in AI events mediated by hard selective sweeps, in which TIB haplotypes (i.e., blue bars) are over-represented in all those haplotype classes presenting the smaller number of pairwise differences with Denisovan. In line with this, values obtained for the cumulative proportion of Tibetan haplotypes are higher with respect to those calculated for CHB haplotypes in all the haplotype classes considered. (D) The entire set of haplotype classes at EGLN1 showed higher values for the cumulative proportion of CHB haplotypes with respect to the same proportion calculated for Tibetan haplotypes, with an over-representation of Han Chinese samples in the haplotype classes presenting few numbers of differences with Denisovan, as it may be expected for genes not involved in AI events.