Peer review process
Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, public reviews, and a provisional response from the authors.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorRosalyn AdamBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States of America
- Senior EditorMartin PollakHarvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
Summary:
The authors try to use a gene therapy approach to cure urofacial symptoms in an HSPE2 mutant mouse model.
Strengths:
The authors have convincingly shown the expression of AAV9/HSPE2 in pelvic ganglion and liver tissues. They have also shown the defects in urethra relaxation and bladder muscle contraction in response to EFS in mutant mice, which were reversed in treated mice.
Weaknesses:
Some important and interesting data are missing. For example, whether the gene therapy can extend the life span of these mutants? The overall in vivo voiding function is missing. AAV9/HSPE2 expression in the bladder wall is not shown.
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
In this study, Lopes and colleagues provide convincing evidence to support the potential for gene therapy to restore expression of heparanase-2 (Hpse2) in mice mutant for this gene, as occurs in urofacial syndrome. Beyond symptomatic relief for the consequences of outlet obstruction that results from Hpse2 mutation, no treatments exist. Building on prior studies describing the nature of urinary tract dysfunction in Hpse2 mutant mice, the authors applied a gene therapy approach to determine whether gene replacement could be achieved, and if so, whether restoration of HPSE2 expression could mitigate the urinary tract dysfunction and present a potential cure. Using an AAV9 viral vector encoding HPSE2, the authors performed gene replacement in neonatal wild-type or Hpse2 mutant mice and determined gene and protein expression as well as the impact on bladder outflow tract and bladder body physiology in juvenile mice. In addition to dose-dependent transduction of liver and pelvic ganglia (that innervate the bladder) with HPSE2, and demonstration of increased HPSE2 protein in Hpse2 mutant mice, the authors showed restoration of nerve-evoked outflow tract relaxation and bladder body contraction, both of which were deficient in mutant mice. They also showed that the viral vector-based approach was not deleterious to weight gain or to liver morphology. Based on these findings the authors concluded that AAV9-based HPSE2 replacement is feasible and safe, mitigates the physiological deficits in outflow tract and bladder tissue from Hpse2 mutant mice, and provides a foundation for gene replacement approaches for other genes implicated in lower urinary tract disorders.
Strengths include a rigorous experimental design, solid data in support of the conclusions, and a discussion of the limitations of the approach.
Weaknesses include a lack of discussion of the basis for differences in carbachol sensitivity in Hpse2 mutant mice, limited discussion of bladder tissue morphology in Hpse2 mutant mice, some questions over the variability of the functional data, and a need for clarification on the presentation of statistical significance of functional data
Reviewer #3 (Public Review):
Summary:
This is a really interesting study, looking at the efficacy of AAV-mediated delivery of wt HSPE2 gene into mouse mutants with the goal of rescuing lower urinary tract defects.
Strengths: Nice analysis of muscle physiology ex vivo, interesting approach.
Weaknesses: lack of rigor (see below). This is an awesome opportunity to learn much more about the disease, its affects on neurons, muscle, etc.
* Single-cell analysis of mutants versus control bladder, urethra including sphincter. This would be great also for the community.
* Detailed tables showing data from each mouse examined.
* Survival curves.
* Use of measurements that are done in vivo (spot assay for example). This sounds relatively simple.
* Assessment of viral integration in tissues besides the liver (could be done by QPCR).
* Discuss subtypes of neurons that are present and targeted in the context of mutants and controls.