Peer review process
Revised: This Reviewed Preprint has been revised by the authors in response to the previous round of peer review; the eLife assessment and the public reviews have been updated where necessary by the editors and peer reviewers.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorIvan VelascoUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
- Senior EditorSofia AraújoUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
Summary:
in this paper authors show that the degree of pigmentation for RPE cells is not correlated with a level of maturation and function. They suggest that this status could be different in vitro than in vivo but do not provide proper experiments to validate this hypothesis. However, it is the first time that the absence of correlation between pigmentation and function is studied.
Strengths:
The methods are good and experiments very rigorous
Comments on current version:
The authors have modified their title and focus on QC for in vitro process
Reviewer #3 (Public Review):
Summary:
Nakai-Futatsugi et al. present a novel method to analyze the correlation between the degree of pigmentation and the gene expression profile of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE (iPSC-RPE) cells at the single cell level. This was achieved with the use of ALPS (Automated Live imaging and cell Picking system), an invention developed by the same authors. Briefly, it allows one to choose and photograph a specific cell from a culture dish and proceed to single cell digital RNA-seq. The authors identify clusters of cells that present differential gene expression, but this showed no association with the degree of pigmentation of the cells. Further data analysis allowed the authors to correlate the degree of pigmentation to some degree with the expression of complement and lysosome-related genes.
Strengths:
An important amount of data related to gene expression and heterogeneity of the iPSC-RPE population has been generated in this work.
Weaknesses:
However, the justification of the analysis, and the physiological relevance of the hypothesis and the findings could be strengthened.
Importantly, I fail to grasp from the introduction what is the previous evidence that leads to the hypothesis. Why would color intensity be related to the quality of cell transplantation? In fact, cell transplantation is not evaluated at all in this work. The authors mention "quality metrics for clinical use", but this concept is not further explained. Neither is the concept of "sufficient degree of pigmentation" explained.
On the other hand, the positive correlation of cluster formation with complement and lysosome-related genes is not discussed.
As a consequence it is very difficult to evaluate the impact of these findings on the field.